{"id":100487,"date":"2017-10-23T12:00:03","date_gmt":"2017-10-23T11:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=100487"},"modified":"2017-10-17T14:53:27","modified_gmt":"2017-10-17T13:53:27","slug":"chinas-pivot-to-world-markets-washingtons-pivot-to-world-wars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2017\/10\/chinas-pivot-to-world-markets-washingtons-pivot-to-world-wars\/","title":{"rendered":"China\u2019s Pivot to World Markets, Washington\u2019s Pivot to World Wars\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

And the Debacle of the Latin American Left<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

15 Oct 2017 – China and the United States are moving in polar opposite directions: Beijing is rapidly becoming the center of overseas investments in high tech industries, including robotics, nuclear energy and advanced machinery with collaboration from centers of technological excellence, like Germany.<\/em><\/p>\n

In contrast, Washington is pursuing a predatory military pivot to the least productive regions with collaboration from its most barbaric allies, like Saudi Arabia.<\/em><\/p>\n

China is advancing to global economic superiority by borrowing and innovating the most advance methods of production, while the US degrades and debases its past immense productive achievements to promote wars of destruction.<\/em><\/p>\n

China\u2019s growing prominence is the result of a cumulative process that advanced in a systematic way, combining step-by-step growth of productivity and innovation with sudden jumps up the ladder of cutting edge technology.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

China\u2019s Stages of Growth and Success<\/strong><\/p>\n

China has moved from a country, highly dependent on foreign investment in consumer industries for exports, to an economy, based on joint public-private investments in higher value exports.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s early growth was based on cheap labor, low taxes and few regulations on multi-national capital.\u00a0 Foreign capital and local billionaires stimulated growth, based on high rates of profit.\u00a0 As the economy grew, China\u2019s economy shifted toward increasing its indigenous technological expertise and demanding greater \u2018local content\u2019 for manufactured goods.<\/p>\n

By the beginning of the new millennium China was developing high-end industries, based on local patents and engineering skills, channeling a high percentage of investments into civilian infrastructure, transportation and education.<\/p>\n

Massive apprenticeship programs created a skilled labor force that raised productive capacity.\u00a0 Massive enrollment in science, math, computer science and engineering universities provided a large influx of high-end innovators, many of whom had gained expertise in the advanced technology of overseas competitors.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s strategy has been based on the practice of borrowing, learning, upgrading and competing with the most advanced economics of Europe and the US.<\/p>\n

By the end of the last decade of the 20th<\/sup>\u00a0century, China was in a position to move overseas. The accumulation process provided China with the financial resources to capture dynamic overseas enterprises.<\/p>\n

China was no longer confined to investing in overseas minerals and agriculture in Third World countries.\u00a0 China is looking to conquer high-end technological sectors in advanced economics.<\/p>\n

By the second decade of the 21st<\/sup>\u00a0century Chinese investors moved into Germany, Europe\u2019s most advanced industrial giant.\u00a0 During the first 6 months of 2016 Chinese investors acquired 37 German companies, compared with 39 in all of 2015.\u00a0 China\u2019s total investments in Germany for 2016 may double to over $22 billion dollars.<\/p>\n

In 2016, China successfully bought out\u00a0KOKA<\/u><\/em>, Germany\u2019s most innovative engineering company.\u00a0 China\u2019s strategy is to gain superiority in the digital future of industry.<\/p>\n

China is rapidly moving to automate its industries, with\u00a0plans to double the robot density of the US by the year 2020<\/u>.<\/p>\n

Chinese and Austrian scientists successfully launched the first quantum-enabled satellite communication system which is reportedly \u2018hack proof\u2019, ensuring China\u2019s communications security.<\/p>\n

While China\u2019s global investments proceed to dominate world markets, the US, England and Australia have been trying to impose investment barriers. By relying on phony \u2018security threats\u2019, Britain\u2019s Prime Minister Theresa May blocked a multi-billion dollar Chinese investment-heavy nuclear plant (Hinckley Point C). The pretext was the spurious claim that China would use its stake to \u201cengage in energy blackmail, threatening to turn off the power in the event of international crises<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

The US Committee on Foreign Investment has blocked several multi-billion dollar Chinese investments in high tech industries.<\/p>\n

In August 2016 Australia blocked an $8 billion-dollar purchase of a controlling stake in its biggest electricity distribution network on specious claims of \u2018national security\u2019.<\/p>\n

The Anglo-American and German empires are on the defensive.\u00a0 They increasingly cannot compete economically with China, even in defending their own innovative industries.<\/p>\n

In large part this is the result of their failed policies.\u00a0 Western economic elite have increasingly relied on short-term speculation in finance, real estate and insurance, while neglecting their industrial base.<\/p>\n

Led by the US, their reliance on military conquests (militaristic empire-building) absorb public resources, while China has directed its domestic resources toward innovative and advanced technology.<\/p>\n

To counter China\u2019s economic advance, the Obama regime has implemented a policy of building\u00a0economic walls<\/u>\u00a0at home,\u00a0trade restrictions<\/u>\u00a0abroad and military confrontation in the South China Seas \u2013 China\u2019s strategic trade routes.<\/p>\n

US officials have ratcheted up their restrictions on Chinese investments in high tech US enterprises including a $3.8 billion investment in Western Digital and Philips attempt to sell its lighting business.\u00a0 The US blocked \u2018Chen China\u2019s planned $44 billion takeover of Swiss chemical group \u2018Syngenta\u2019.<\/p>\n

US officials are doing everything possible to stop innovative billion dollar deals that include China as a strategic partner.<\/p>\n

Accompanying its\u00a0domestic wall<\/u>, the US has been mobilizing an overseas\u00a0blockade<\/u>\u00a0of China via its Trans-Pacific-Partnership, which proposes to exclude Beijing from participating in the \u2018free trade zone\u2019 with a dozen North America, Latin American and Asian members.\u00a0 Nevertheless, not a single member-nation of the TPP has cut back its trade with China.\u00a0 On the contrary, they are increasing ties with China \u2013 an eloquent comment on Obama\u2019s skill at \u2018pivoting\u2019.<\/p>\n

While the \u2018domestic economic wall\u2019 has had some negative impacts on particular Chinese investors, Washington has failed to dent China\u2019s exports to US markets.\u00a0 Washington\u2019s failure to block China\u2019s trade has been even more damaging to Washington\u2019s effort to encircle China in Asia and Latin America, Oceana and Asia.<\/p>\n

Australia, New Zealand, Peru, Chile, Taiwan, Cambodia and South Korea depend on Chinese markets far more than on the US to survive and grow.<\/p>\n

While Germany, faced with China\u2019s dynamic growth, has chosen to \u2018partner\u2019 and share, up-scale productive investments, Washington has opted to form\u00a0military alliances<\/u>\u00a0to confront China.<\/p>\n

The US bellicose military alliance with Japan has not intimidated China.\u00a0 Rather it has\u00a0downgraded<\/u>\u00a0their domestic economies and economic influence in Asia.<\/p>\n

Moreover, Washington\u2019s \u201cmilitary pivot\u201d has deepened and expanded China\u2019s strategic links to Russia\u2019s energy sources and military technology.<\/p>\n

While the US\u00a0spends<\/u>\u00a0hundreds of billions in military alliances with the backward Baltic client-regimes and the parasitical Middle Eastern states, (Saudi Arabia, Israel), China\u00a0accumulates<\/u>\u00a0strategic expertise from its economic ties with Germany, resources from Russia and market shares among Washington\u2019s \u2018partners\u2019 in Asia and Latin America.<\/p>\n

There is no question that China, following the technological and productive path of Germany, will win out over the US\u2019s economic isolationist and global militarist strategy.<\/p>\n

If the US has failed to learn from the successful economic strategy of China, the same failure can explain the demise of the progressive regimes in Latin America.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s Success and the Latin American Retreat<\/strong><\/p>\n

After more than a decade of growth and stability, Latin America\u2019s progressive regimes have retreated and declined.\u00a0 Why has China continued on the path of stability and growth while their Latin American partners retreated and suffered defeats?<\/p>\n

Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia and Ecuador, for over a decade, served as Latin America\u2019s center-left success story.\u00a0 Their economies grew, social spending increased, poverty and unemployment were reduced and worker incomes expanded.<\/p>\n

Subsequently their economies went into crisis, social discontent grew and the center-left regimes fell.<\/p>\n

In contrast to China, the Latin American center-left regimes\u00a0did not diversify<\/u>\u00a0their economies:\u00a0 they remained heavily dependent on the commodity boom for growth and stability.<\/p>\n

The Latin American elites borrowed and depended on foreign investment, and financial capital, while China engaged in public investments in industry, infrastructure, technology and education.<\/p>\n

Latin American progressives joined with foreign capitalist and local speculators in non-productive real estate speculation and consumption, while China invested in innovative industries at home and abroad.\u00a0 While China consolidated political rulership, the Latin American progressives \u201callied\u201d with strategic domestic and overseas multi-national adversaries to \u2018share power\u2019, which were, in fact, eagerly prepared to oust their \u201cleft\u201d allies.<\/p>\n

When the Latin commodity based economy collapsed, so did the political links with their elite partners.\u00a0 In contrast, China\u2019s industries benefited from the lower global commodity prices, while Latin America\u2019s left suffered.\u00a0 Faced with widespread corruption, China launched a major campaign purging over 200,000 officials.\u00a0 In Latin America, the Left ignored corrupt officials, allowing the opposition to exploit the scandals to oust center-left officials.<\/p>\n

While Latin America\u00a0imported<\/u>\u00a0machinery and parts from the West; China bought the entire Western companies producing the machines and their technology \u2013 and then implemented Chinese technological improvements.<\/p>\n

China successfully outgrew the crisis, defeated its adversaries and proceeded to expand local consumption and stabilized rulership.<\/p>\n

Latin America\u2019s center-left suffered political defeats in Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay, lost elections in Venezuela and Bolivia and retreated in Uruguay.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

China\u2019s political economic model has outperformed the imperialist West and leftist Latin America.\u00a0\u00a0 While the US has\u00a0spent<\/u>\u00a0billions in the Middle East for wars on behalf of Israel, China has\u00a0invested<\/u>\u00a0similar amounts in Germany for advanced technology, robotics and digital innovations.<\/p>\n

While President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton\u2019s \u201cpivot to Asia<\/em>\u201d has been largely a wasteful military strategy to encircle and intimidate China, Beijing\u2019s \u201cpivot to markets<\/em>\u201d has successfully\u00a0enhanced<\/u>\u00a0its economic competitiveness.\u00a0 As a result, over the past decade, China\u2019s growth rate is three times that of the US; and in the next decade China will double the US in \u2018robotizing\u2019 its productive economy.<\/p>\n

The US \u2018pivot to Asia\u2019<\/em>, with its heavy dependence on military threats and intimidation has cost billions of dollars in lost markets and investments.\u00a0 China\u2019s \u2018pivot to advanced technology<\/em>\u2019\u00a0demonstrates<\/u>\u00a0that the future lies in Asia not the West. China\u2019s experience offers lessons for\u00a0future<\/u>\u00a0Latin American leftist governments.<\/p>\n

First and foremost, China emphasizes the necessity of balanced economic growth, over and above short-term benefits resulting from commodity booms and consumerist strategies.<\/p>\n

Secondly, China demonstrates the importance of professional and worker technical education for technological innovation, over and above\u00a0 business school and non-productive \u2018speculative\u2019 education so heavily emphasized in the US.<\/p>\n

Thirdly, China balances its social spending with investment in core productive activity; competitiveness and social services are combined.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s enhanced growth and social stability, its commitment to learning and surpassing advanced economies has important limitations, especially in the areas of social equality and popular power.\u00a0 Here China can learn from the experience of Latin America\u2019s Left.\u00a0 The social gains under Venezuela\u2019s President Chavez are worthy of study and emulation; the popular movements in Bolivia, Ecuador and Argentina, which ousted neo-liberals from power, could enhance efforts in China to overcome the business- state nexus of pillage and capital flight.<\/p>\n

China, despite its socio-political and economic limitations, has successfully\u00a0resisted<\/u>\u00a0US military pressures and even \u2018turned the tables\u2019 by advancing on the West.<\/p>\n

In the final analysis, China\u2019s model of growth and stability certainly offers an approach that is far superior to the recent debacle of the Latin American Left and the political chaos resulting from Washington\u2019s quest for global military supremacy.<\/p>\n

________________________________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>James Petras is a Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at Binghamton University, New York. He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals. He has a long history of commitment to social justice, working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, <\/em>La Jornada<\/em>, and previously, for the Spanish daily, <\/em>El Mundo<\/em>. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.<\/em><\/p>\n

The original source of this article is<\/em> Global Research.<\/p>\n

Copyright \u00a9 Prof. James Petras<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 globalresearch.ca<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

15 Oct 2017 – China and the United States are moving in polar opposite directions: Beijing is rapidly becoming the center of overseas investments in high tech industries, including robotics, nuclear energy and advanced machinery with collaboration from centers of technological excellence, like Germany. In contrast, Washington is pursuing a predatory military pivot to the least productive regions with collaboration from its most barbaric allies, like Saudi Arabia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-focus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100487"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100487\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}