{"id":107171,"date":"2018-03-12T12:00:42","date_gmt":"2018-03-12T12:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=107171"},"modified":"2018-03-11T11:22:18","modified_gmt":"2018-03-11T11:22:18","slug":"the-jury-has-been-out-on-vaccines-harm-to-the-brain-immune-system-limbic-system-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2018\/03\/the-jury-has-been-out-on-vaccines-harm-to-the-brain-immune-system-limbic-system-life\/","title":{"rendered":"The Jury Has Been Out on Vaccines: Harm to the Brain, Immune System, Limbic System, Life"},"content":{"rendered":"

Two Rabbits, Twenty-Eight Days of Testing, and a 91-Year Old Salt Called Aluminum Hydroxide Captured in New Documentary<\/em><\/p>\n

H-o-p-e Spells H<\/em>elp O<\/em>ur P<\/em>eople E<\/em>xist<\/strong><\/p>\n

Fact One: Aluminum is present in U.S. childhood vaccines that prevent hepatitis A, hepatitis B, diphtheria-tetanuspertussis (DTaP, Tdap), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), human papillomavirus (HPV) and pneumococcus infection<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

For someone always skeptical of big money-big business tied to anything in the realm of medicine or science in general, I have lifted myself way beyond hope when it comes to any amount of efficacy in medicine or all the other nodes tied to our modern industrial-postindustrial world.<\/p>\n

The vaccination debate is a misnomer in itself, since the debate is really an attack on anyone who dares question the science and chemistry and genetic engineering of the vaccine industry, an industry that plows through so many of our rights as citizens, individuals and patients. We have states and school systems ordering people of all ages to submit to the needle.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>A new film airing in May, Injecting Aluminum<\/em><\/a>, looks at a specific aspect of the vaccine \u201cdebate\u201d through what easily is the one giant Gordian knot metaphor of the entire vaccine injury and death history \u2013 the adjuvant aluminum hydroxide developed in the 1920s as the \u201cbest\u201d optimizer of the immune response when injecting the disease.<\/p>\n

The subtitle of 90-minute film by director Marie-Ange Poyet, How Toxic are Vaccines?<\/em>, really takes the air out of the sails of the pro-vaccine-and-never-question-the-vaccinologist zealots. In fact, it\u2019s the Gordian knot we can cut away: disentangling an impossible knot but cutting that damned thing, or finding a loophole through creative and robust outside the box thinking:<\/p>\n

Turn him to any cause of policy,
\nThe Gordian Knot of it he will unloose,
\nFamiliar as his garter
\n<\/em>\u2014\u2009Shakespeare, Henry V, Act 1 Scene 1. 45\u201347<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The director says things about the power of film, or the limits of documentaries, that I too voice:<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think movies can change things,\u201d Marie-Ange Poyet says: \u201cThey bring new information, they contribute to change, but they don\u2019t carry themselves the ability to deeply shake the system in which we are.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

She states that if the film can educate the public and rally around the \u201creal drama\u201d of those lives affected by aluminum salts in vaccines, then Marie-Ange would be satisfied.<\/p>\n

The commitment of citizens is the only way things will change. I hope this citizen-driven film can be a step in that direction.<\/p>\n

Storytelling Straight in the Eye<\/strong><\/p>\n

Viewing the interviews in this documentary for 90 minutes, I came to the realization that the story of the wounded and chronically ill \u2014 because of their bodies\u2019 reaction to the aluminum \u2014 is the taproot of this film\u2019s blossoming.<\/p>\n

We have some heavy players in medicine and some compelling victims of the vaccines, as well as intrepid journalists. More than 16 powerful voices from a myriad of perspectives give shape to the film. And this is a film of a special order \u2013 the voices are captured in straightforward narrative style. No asides or typical documentary bells and whistles. No graphics, no tours of the drug manufacturers\u2019 research facilities, no laboratory microscopic images, no up close and personal looks at rehabilitation.<\/p>\n

Just interviews are captured, as if this is an inquest on the very substance that is at the center of this disease the French medical and research community discovered in the 1990s \u2013 Macrophagic Myofascitis, or MMF. It\u2019s a very simple and to the point look at one element that is toxic to the human body, and an element tied to MS and Alzheimer\u2019s and here now, MMF, which has destroyed young people\u2019s ability to lead regular lives.<\/p>\n

Anti-Aluminum isn\u2019t Anti-Vaccine \u2013 Precaution Over Profits<\/strong><\/p>\n

Some of the heavy-hitters are MDs like Romain Gherardi and Jerome Authier, professor Christopher Exley, member of the European Parlimante Michele Rivasi, Le Monde journalist Stephane Foucart, and President of E3M (Entraide aux Malades of Myofascite to Macrophages) Didier Lambert.<\/p>\n

The NGO E3M and victims of MMF support scientific research to buttress their campaign to have aluminum removed from vaccines. Lambert is currently on disability, which is a state of survival 80 percent of the members of the association E3M share.<\/p>\n

He\u2019s outspoken and on a mission of protecting his country and others by advocating taking aluminum out of vaccines, \u201cwithout calling into question the very principle of vaccination.\u201d<\/p>\n

The simple aim is to reverse the felonious push to keep aluminums in vaccines by going back to the gold standard of the Precautionary Principle, a simple oath and operating system science and scientists (and all sectors of civilization) ought to abide by, but to also embrace before any chemical, product, service or process is pushed onto us, the prevailing majority of citizens harmed by this current lack of ethical oversight and concern. Where money and profits and vast accumulation of power rides roughshod over our civilization, there rarely is a deep look at the unintended consequences or negative feedback loops!<\/p>\n

It\u2019s easy to undergird the documentary with a proviso tied to the ideas of \u201cfirst do no harm,\u201d or, \u201cbetter safe than sorry,\u201d or, \u201can ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.\u201d In the past 100 years, at least, Western Civilization has been moved by demonic ideas of profit tied to these aphorisms: \u201cNothing ventured, nothing gained\u201d and, \u201cLet the devil take the hindmost.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Dr. Chris Exley<\/p><\/div>\n

Some of the film\u2019s \u201cstars\u201d are folk like Dr. Exley, bioinorganic chemistry professor at University of Stirling, who has been for more than three decades researching \u201chow the third most abundant element of the Earth\u2019s crust, aluminum, is non-essential and largely inimical to life.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ironically, he investigates the most abundant element on Earth\u2019s crust, silicon, and how it is almost devoid of biological function: \u201cOne possible function of silicon is to keep (aluminium) aluminum out of biota.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here, the Precautionary Principle with the help of Peter Montague<\/a> :<\/p>\n

The release and use of toxic substances, the exploitation of resources, and physical alterations of the environment have had substantial unintended consequences affecting human health and the environment. Some of these concerns are high rates of learning deficiencies, asthma, cancer, birth defects and species extinctions, along with global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion and worldwide contamination with toxic substances and nuclear materials.<\/em><\/p>\n

We believe existing environmental regulations and other decisions, particularly those based on risk assessment, have failed to protect adequately human health and the environment the larger system of which humans are but a part.<\/em><\/p>\n

We believe there is compelling evidence that damage to humans and the worldwide environment is of such magnitude and seriousness that new principles for conducting human activities are necessary.<\/em><\/p>\n

While we realize that human activities may involve hazards, people must proceed more carefully than has been the case in recent history. Corporations, government entities, organizations, communities, scientists and other individuals must adopt a precautionary approach to all human endeavors.<\/em><\/p>\n

Therefore, it is necessary to implement the Precautionary Principle: When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. In this context the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof.<\/em><\/p>\n

The process of applying the Precautionary Principle must be open, informed and democratic and must include potentially affected parties. It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Mountains of Studies Indicting Aluminum Adjuvants<\/strong><\/p>\n

Compelling for me about the film is the detail both the citizens patients of MMF and the established biology, chemistry, immunology, medical experts lay out for the viewer. Exely is both trustworthy and compassionate, quirky and interesting. He is interviewed in his office with towers of research papers and journal articles behind him like many Leaning Towers of Pisa.<\/p>\n

His scientific bent is on deep research, unclouded by some profit margin derived by selling the aluminum to labs and the manufacturing facilities and pharmaceuticals making billions on these vaccines.<\/p>\n

He cites the common known fact that adjuvants in vaccines do not require clinical approve. The vaccine preparation does go through trials, so when the aluminum is put in vaccine, it\u2019s the vaccine that gets approved, not the aluminum or another adjuvant.<\/p>\n

The articulate scientist knows the field of aluminum research. For instance, he states that he can\u2019t say the cause of Alzheimer\u2019s is aluminum, but aluminum does make Alzheimer\u2019s worse, and aluminum does make Alzheimer\u2019s occur at an earlier age. He goes on:<\/p>\n

You have this fantasy of, I think it\u2019s the World Health Organization, giving a safe limit for aluminum, and they say, as long as it\u2019s low, one milligram per kilogram body weight per day, you\u2019re safe. I asked them, how do you know that, when I don\u2019t know it? I\u2019ve been working on aluminum for 30 odd years, trying to understand it, you know this. I asked them for the details, how did you work this out, and who did it?<\/em><\/p>\n

They have people that I call the aluminum ambassadors\u2026Usually, good scientists all around the world, who are paid by the aluminum industry to say that aluminum is not a problem, but these are not individuals who work on aluminum. Most of them have absolutely no background in aluminum whatsoever. They are individuals, who for example, work on Alzheimer\u2019s disease, and then they, whenever someone with the Alzheimer\u2019s society, a major charity, asks for advice, they ask this well-known person in Alzheimer\u2019s disease, what\u2019s the role of aluminum? No, there\u2019s nothing to worry about. They don\u2019t ask me.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s the Calcium Phosphate, Stupid, That\u2019s What We Need!\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Fact Two: A small proportion of vaccinated people present with delayed onset of diffuse myalgia, chronic fatigue and cognitive dysfunction, and exhibit very long-term persistence of aluminum-loaded macrophages at site of previous intra-muscular (I.M.) immunization, forming a granulomatous lesion called Macrophagic Myofasciitis (MMF). Clinical symptoms associated with MMF are paradigmatic of the recently delineated \u201cautoimmune\/ inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants\u201d. Autoimmune\/inflammatory Syndromes Adjuvants (ASIA).<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here we have aluminum hydroxide dating back to 1927. The same compound used in vaccines in 2018. Yet, in 1974, the Insitut Pasteur developed calcium-phosphate adjuvant, and the president of the French vaccination committee admitted that the calcium phosphate adjuvant was no less effective than aluminum salts. That adjuvant could be brought back. It takes a political decision. \u201cThen our vaccines would be safe,\u201d says Didier Lambert.<\/p>\n

Aluminum salts are identified as neurotoxic by many health authorities and organizations. Count Alzheimer\u2019s, Parkinson\u2019s, Crown\u2019s, Sarcoidosis, development of allergies, cases of chronic fatigue, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, autism and many more as the unintended side effects of aluminum, according to Professor Exley and many more.<\/p>\n

The evidence in the documentary mounts minute by minute, and the interviews are clear but not charged with emotions or with a music track overlay.<\/p>\n

Professor J\u00e9r\u00f4me Authier, a neurologist and coordinator of the Centre of Reference for Neuromuscular Diseases at H. Mondor Hospital, states the aluminum stays at the injection site for months, and migrates to the liver, spleen and brain. He sees unique conditions\/factors that slow down or speed up the migration:<\/p>\n