{"id":110618,"date":"2018-05-07T12:00:51","date_gmt":"2018-05-07T11:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=110618"},"modified":"2018-05-06T14:45:08","modified_gmt":"2018-05-06T13:45:08","slug":"having-bought-into-a-wreck-what-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2018\/05\/having-bought-into-a-wreck-what-now\/","title":{"rendered":"Having Bought into a Wreck &#8212; What Now?"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><em>Cognitive Challenges of Embodying Reality Otherwise<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>7 May 2018 &#8211; <\/em>Whether in collusion with others or not, I seem to have bought shares in a total wreck of some kind. It could be a house or some means of transportation &#8212; possibly a truck, or a boat, or a train, or a plane. Some call it global civilization. Like the Cubans after their revolution, I am faced with the challenge of a rapidly decaying &#8220;automobile&#8221; for which I cannot get spare parts. This is despite the reported rate of development of technology elsewhere (beyond my reach and comprehension), and the promises with which it is associated. How am I to then to engage with the wreck, which could indeed collapse further at any moment? There is some irony that, as an &#8220;auto-mobile&#8221;, getting it to work is curiously reminiscent of what is otherwise framed as the challenge of &#8220;sustainability&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>One approach for me is simply to note the facts of this situation &#8212; to bear witness. To whom? Various parts do not work as they might be expected to work &#8212; whether frozen, ill-fitting, or poorly connected. The pipework seems mysteriously to be leaking. There are unpredictable sparks form the electrical system &#8212; suggesting that something is working to a degree, but perhaps dangerously so. One aspect of this situation is that I am variously keen on some of these parts and their preservation. I want them to work. They carry significance for me and I identify with them &#8212; and especially with the &#8220;automobile&#8221; as a whole, if only it would work. In a sense I am locked-into parts as they once worked, or might have worked, and have little time for proposals regarding alternatives &#8212; especially alternative modes of transportation. However it is a serious mess. I have taken the &#8220;automobile&#8221; apart on various occasions. I have multiple parts scattered around my garage and yard &#8212; some acquired by various means from elsewhere. I have forgotten where some might have fitted. Basically I am confronted with chaos and do not know what to do.<\/p>\n<p>A second approach is for me to recognize certain patterns in the situation. I can reframe it in aesthetic terms. I can see how other &#8220;stuff&#8221; from elsewhere might be used to substitute for some parts of the &#8220;automobile&#8221; that do not work &#8212; or at least compensate for my inadequacy. I can indeed become more flexible and inventive in this process of looking for equivalents to get the &#8220;automobile&#8221; to work, or to appear to do so to my satisfaction. I can also begin to see that some of the constraints on fixing the &#8220;automobile&#8221; are due to constraints blocking my own imaginative creativity. The brokenness of the &#8220;automobile&#8221; is a kind of mirror of my own incompetence and failure to get to grips with the situation. More challenging is the sense in which I am effectively conning myself in my approach to the &#8220;automobile&#8221; . Clearly I have some responsibility &#8212; if not a fundamental one &#8212; for having tricked myself in buying into the wreck in the first place (whether or not I only have shares in the &#8220;automobile&#8221; with others who were similarly tricked into its acquisition). Then what?<\/p>\n<p>A third approach is for me to articulate my understanding of my situation in relation to the &#8220;automobile&#8221; . I can be sophisticated. I can philosophize about it and about the nature of its existence, and mine in relation to it. I can analyze it in sociological terms, in systemic terms, or in terms of the possibilities of some more fruitful approach &#8212; about which I can variously speculate imaginatively. I can express my condition in nostalgic song, music, humour, drama, or turn it into a game. I can organize a party around the &#8220;automobile&#8221; , using it as a focus for fun &#8212; even turn it into a monument for regular ritual celebration. What am I trying to achieve? What do I want to &#8220;leave behind&#8221;? With whom (or what) should I be engaging far more intimately to engender that? What of my situation is meaningfully replicable? What would fixing the &#8220;automobile&#8221; do for me? Do I really want to possess and own a &#8220;automobile&#8221; ? Why? Is there some strange kind of illusion implied by this engagement with the potential of the &#8220;automobile&#8221; as a means of my transpiration. To where?<\/p>\n<p>A fourth approach is of course to step back from these other approaches and to see myself and the &#8220;automobile&#8221; as part of a far larger scheme of things. What shift in perspective does this imply? Is it more realistic or less so &#8212; given the passage of time and the probable reality of events elsewhere, of which I am only partially aware, if at all? Should I be taking account of subtler dimensions of which I have only the faintest intimations &#8212; whether the supernatural or those wrapped up in the immediate reality of the moment, according to fundamental physics? Is there a case for being far more radical in my understanding of my situation (and that of the &#8220;automobile&#8221;) &#8212; did I but know how? More radically inventive perhaps &#8212; to the degree of completely reinventing myself and the world around me. And my &#8220;automobile&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.laetusinpraesens.org\/musings\/upwreck.php\" >To continue reading Go to Original \u2013 laetusinpraesens.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cognitive Challenges of Embodying Reality Otherwise<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":108619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-transcend-members"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110618\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/108619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}