{"id":118974,"date":"2018-09-24T12:00:38","date_gmt":"2018-09-24T11:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=118974"},"modified":"2018-09-20T15:58:35","modified_gmt":"2018-09-20T14:58:35","slug":"human-rights-humanitarian-law-genocide-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2018\/09\/human-rights-humanitarian-law-genocide-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Human Rights &#038; Humanitarian Law: Genocide"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><strong>On Genocide &#8211; <\/strong><strong>November 1967<\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_49345\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/sartre1.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-49345\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-49345\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/sartre1-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/sartre1-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/sartre1.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-49345\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Jean Paul Sartre<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n<p>Jean Paul Sartre&#8217;s Statement at the Second\u00a0 Session of the Bertrand Russell International War Crimes Tribunal on Vietnam held in Denmark in November 1967 remains, almost 40 years later, an inspiring appeal to the conscience of humanity &#8211; inspiring not only because of\u00a0 the force of its reason but also because it reveals Sartre&#8217;s passionate commitment to justice.\u00a0 <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tamilnation.co\/saty\/index.htm#the%20moment%20I%20feel\" >Jean Paul Sartre was no arm chair intellectual.<\/a> During the Second World War, he was a key figure among\u00a0the French intellectuals who resisted the Nazi occupation and spent one year as a prisoner of war in German camps. Sartre was an existentialist. He recognized &#8216;personal subjective experience as the foundation upon which abstract knowledge is built.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Sartre&#8217;s\u00a0testimony before the Vietnam War Crimes Tribunal, compelled many\u00a0 to re examine their own stand on genocide &#8211; &#8220;because, little by little, this genocidal blackmail is\u00a0spreading to all humanity, adding to the blackmail of atomic war. This\u00a0crime is perpetrated under our eyes every day, making accomplices out\u00a0of those who do not denounce it.&#8221; The <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tamilnation.co\/indictment\/index.htm\" >continuing genocide of the Tamil people<\/a> by the Sri Lanka armed forces is a modern day example which serves to illustrate the truth of Sartre&#8217;s assessment:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Against partisans backed by the entire population, colonial\u00a0armies are helpless. They have only one way of escaping from the\u00a0harassment which demoralizes them &#8230;.\u00a0This is to eliminate the civilian population. As it is the unity of a\u00a0whole people that is containing the conventional army, the only\u00a0anti-guerrilla strategy which will be effective is the destruction of\u00a0that people, in other words, the civilians, women and children&#8230;&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/vietnam-war-napalm-usa.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-96073\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/vietnam-war-napalm-usa.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"370\" height=\"278\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/vietnam-war-napalm-usa.jpg 370w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/vietnam-war-napalm-usa-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 370px) 100vw, 370px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>See Also<\/em> &#8211; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=4KIvAXPEcaE&amp;mode=related&amp;search=\" >Vietnam: American Holocaust &#8211; Bombing Vietnam at Youtube<\/a><\/p>\n<p>**************************************<\/p>\n<p>The word \u2018genocide\u2019 has not been in existence for very long: it was\u00a0the jurist Lemkin who coined it between the two world wars. The thing\u00a0itself is as old as humanity and there has never been a society whose\u00a0structure has preserved it from committing this crime.<\/p>\n<p><strong>All genocide is\u00a0a product of history and it always carries the signs of the society\u00a0from which it springs.<\/strong> The case which we have to judge concerns the\u00a0largest contemporary capitalist power. It is as such that we must\u00a0attempt to consider it; in other words, inasmuch as it expresses the\u00a0economic structure, the political aims and the contradictions of that\u00a0power.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/rajivcrime-genocide.gif\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-96074\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/rajivcrime-genocide.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"240\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In particular, we must try to understand whether there is an\u00a0intention of genocide in the war that the American government is\u00a0fighting against Vietnam. Article 2 of the Convention of 1948 defines\u00a0genocide on the basis of intention. The Convention was tacitly\u00a0referring to very recent history. Hitler had declared a deliberate\u00a0plan to exterminate the Jews; he did not conceal the fact that he was\u00a0using genocide as a political tactic. The Jew had to be put to death,\u00a0wherever he came from, not because he had taken up arms or had joined\u00a0a resistance movement, but just because he was a Jew.<\/p>\n<p>The American\u00a0government, on the other hand, has made no such clear declarations. It\u00a0even averred that it was going to the rescue of its allies, the South\u00a0Vietnamese, who had been attacked by the Communists from the North. Is\u00a0it possible for us, in objectively studying the facts, to unveil their\u00a0hidden intention? And can we, after this examination, say that the\u00a0armed forces of the USA are killing\u00a0Vietnamese in Vietnam for the simple reason that they are Vietnamese?<\/p>\n<p>This can only be established after a look at history: the\u00a0structures of war change at the same time as those of society. From\u00a01860 to this day, military motives and objectives have undergone a\u00a0profound change and the end\u00a0result of this metamorphosis is precisely the war of \u2018example\u2019 that\u00a0the USA is waging in Vietnam.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>1856: Treaties for the preservation of the property of neutrals;<\/li>\n<li>1864: At Geneva, an attempt to protect the wounded;<\/li>\n<li>1899, 1907: At The Hague, two Conferences attempting to control conflicts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>It is no coincidence if jurists and governments have multiplied\u00a0agreements to \u2018humanize war\u2019 on the eve of two of the most horrifying\u00a0massacres that man has ever known. Vladimir Dedijer has shown very\u00a0well in his book &#8216;On Military Conventions&#8217; that capitalist societies\u00a0were all simultaneously creating this monster, total war, which\u00a0expresses their real nature.<\/p>\n<p>This is because:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Competition between the industrialized nations fighting over\u00a0new markets engenders a permanent hostility which is expressed, both\u00a0in theory and in practice, by what is called \u2018bourgeois nationalism\u2019.<\/li>\n<li>The development of industry, which is the source of these\u00a0antagonisms, enables them to be resolved at the expense of one\u00a0competitor, in the production of more and more massively lethal arms.\u00a0The result of this\u00a0evolution is that it becomes less and less possible to distinguish the\u00a0rear from the front line, between the civilian population and the\u00a0soldiers.<\/li>\n<li>More military objectives appear, near to the cities. The\u00a0factories, even if they are not working for the armies, do comprise\u00a0the economic potential of a country. Therefore, the destruction of\u00a0this potential becomes the aim of the war and the means by which it\u00a0may be won.<\/li>\n<li>For this reason, everybody is mobilized: the peasant fights at\u00a0the front, the labourer is a soldier in the second line, the wives of\u00a0the peasants replace the men in the fields. In the total effort of one\u00a0country against\u00a0another, the worker tends to become a fighter because, in the end, it\u00a0is the strongest economic power that has the greatest chance of winning.<\/li>\n<li>Finally, the democratic evolution of the bourgeois countries\u00a0interests the masses in politics. The masses do not control the\u00a0decisions of the state, but gradually gain a self-awareness. When a\u00a0war comes, they no longer feel\u00a0detached. Thus, reappraised and often deformed by propaganda, war\u00a0becomes an ethical decision of the whole community. <strong>In every nation\u00a0engaged in war manipulation makes all, or nearly all, the\u00a0citizens the enemies of the other nation. In this way war becomes total.\u00a0 <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>These same technologically advanced societies do not cease to\u00a0enlarge upon the field of competition in multiplying the means of\u00a0communication. The well-known \u2018One World\u2019 of the Americans already\u00a0existed at the end of the nineteenth century when the wheat from\u00a0Argentina managed to ruin the farmers in Britain. War is total not\u00a0only because all the members of one community are at war against the\u00a0members of another, but because its risk embraces the whole world.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Therefore the war of bourgeois nations &#8211; of which the conflict of\u00a01914 is the first example, but which had been menacing Europe since\u00a01900 &#8211; is not the invention of one man or one government, but the\u00a0simple necessity since the beginning of the century for a totalitarian\u00a0effort against those who wish to carry on their politics by other\u00a0means or methods.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_64441\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/bertrandrussell.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-64441\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-64441\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/bertrandrussell-300x180.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"180\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/bertrandrussell-300x180.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/bertrandrussell.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-64441\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Bertrand Russell<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In other words, the option is clear; no war or total\u00a0war. It was total war that our fathers fought. And the governments &#8211;\u00a0who could see it coming but did not have the intelligence or the\u00a0courage to avoid it &#8211; tried vainly to humanize it.<\/p>\n<p>However, in the First World War, intentions of genocide only\u00a0appeared sporadically. The primary aim &#8211; as in the two centuries\u00a0previously &#8211; was to destroy the military strength of a country, even\u00a0if the more profound aim\u00a0was to ruin its economy.<\/p>\n<p>But, although it was sometimes difficult to \u00a0distinguish the civilians from the soldiers, it was rare, except\u00a0during a few terroristic raids, for the population itself to be a\u00a0target. Further, the two sides were developed nations, which implied\u00a0from the outset a certain balance inasmuch as each side had a\u00a0sufficient deterrent against the threat of extermination: the\u00a0possibility for retaliation. This explains how, even in the midst of\u00a0the massacre, a certain caution was observed.<\/p>\n<p>However, since 1830 and throughout the last century, there have\u00a0been many genocides outside Europe, some of which were the expression\u00a0of authoritarian political structures, while the others &#8211; those which\u00a0we need to know about to understand the growth of US imperialism and\u00a0the nature of the war in Vietnam &#8211; found their origin in capitalistic\u00a0democracies.<\/p>\n<p>To export goods and capital, the big powers, and in\u00a0particular Great Britain and France, built themselves colonial\u00a0empires. The name by which the French called their conquests &#8211;\u00a0\u2018overseas possessions\u2019 &#8211; clearly indicates that they could only have\u00a0acquired them by wars of aggression, seeking out the foe in his own\u00a0country, in Africa, in Asia and in the underdeveloped lands.<\/p>\n<p>Far from\u00a0being \u2018total wars\u2019, which would indicate a certain initial\u00a0reciprocity, such complete superiority of arms only required an\u00a0Expeditionary Force. This easily conquered any regular armies that\u00a0existed, but because such barefaced aggression provoked the hatred of\u00a0the civilian populations, which is the reserve of manpower or\u00a0soldiers, the\u00a0colonial troops imposed themselves by the terror of constant\u00a0massacres.<\/p>\n<p>These massacres had all the characteristics of genocide:\u00a0they involved destruction of \u2018one part of the group\u2019 (ethnic,\u00a0national, religious) to terrorize the rest and break down the\u00a0indigenous social structure. When the French had made a bloodbath of\u00a0Algeria during the last century, they imposed on this tribal society &#8211;\u00a0where every community possessed its own indivisible lands &#8211; the Code\u00a0Civile, which consists of bourgeois jurisdiction with regard to the\u00a0division of inherited property. Thus, they systematically destroyed\u00a0the economic structure of the country. The land soon passed from the\u00a0peasant tribes into the hands of merchants who had come from France.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, colonialization is\u00a0not just a simple conquest &#8211; as was the case in 1870 when Germany\u00a0annexed Alsace-Lorraine &#8211; it is necessarily a cultural genocide. One\u00a0cannot colonize without systematically destroying the particular\u00a0character of the natives,\u00a0at the same time denying them the right of integration with the mother\u00a0country and of benefiting from its advantages.<\/p>\n<p>Colonialism is, in\u00a0effect, a system: the colony sells raw materials and foodstuffs at a\u00a0favourable price to the colonial power which then sells industrial\u00a0goods back to them at world market prices. This peculiar method of\u00a0exchange can only be established when the native labour is made to\u00a0work for starvation wages. It naturally follows that the colonized\u00a0lose their national personality, their culture, their customs,\u00a0sometimes even their language, and live in misery like shadows\u00a0constantly reminded of their own sub-humanity.<\/p>\n<p>Yet their value as virtually free labour protects them to a\u00a0certain extent from genocide. The Nuremberg Tribunal was fresh in the\u00a0memory when the French, to make an example, massacred 45,000 Algerians\u00a0at S\u00e9tif. This was such a common occurrence that no one then thought\u00a0of judging the French government as the Nazis had been judged.<\/p>\n<p>But\u00a0this deliberate destruction of \u2018one part of the national group\u2019 could\u00a0not be continued without proving to the disadvantage of the settlers.\u00a0To have done so would have ruined them. It is\u00a0because they were unable to liquidate the Algerian population, and\u00a0because they did not integrate the country, that the French lost the\u00a0war in Algeria.<\/p>\n<p>These comments enable us to understand how the nature of colonial\u00a0wars was transformed after the Second World War. It is at about this\u00a0period, in fact, that the people in the colonies, enlightened by such\u00a0conflict and its\u00a0impact on the \u2018empires\u2019, and encouraged by Mao Tse-tung\u2019s victory,\u00a0determined to regain their national independence.<\/p>\n<p>The characteristics of the struggle were clear from the\u00a0beginning: the settlers were superior in arms, the colonized in\u00a0numbers. Even in Algeria &#8211; a colony of settlers rather than of outside\u00a0exploitation &#8211; the ratio of\u00a0settlers to natives was 1:9.<\/p>\n<p>During the two world wars, many native\u00a0peoples had learned the military arts and become well-seasoned\u00a0soldiers. However, the scarcity and quality of weapons &#8211; at least at\u00a0the beginning &#8211; limited the number of fighting units. These conditions\u00a0dictated the nature of the fighting: terrorism, ambush, harassing the\u00a0enemy, and the extreme mobility of the combat groups which had to\u00a0strike unexpectedly and disappear immediately. This was not possible\u00a0without the participation of the entire population.<\/p>\n<p>Hence the\u00a0well-known association of the forces of liberation with the masses:\u00a0the former organizing agrarian reform, political bodies and education;\u00a0the latter supporting, feeding and hiding the liberation army\u2019s\u00a0soldiers, and giving them their young to replace their losses.<\/p>\n<p>It is not by mere chance that the \u2018popular\u2019 war, with its\u00a0principles, its strategy, its tactics and its theoreticians, begins at\u00a0the same time as the industrial powers brought total war to its\u00a0ultimate stage with the harnessing of nuclear fission. Nor is it by\u00a0chance that it resulted in the ruin of colonialism. The contradiction\u00a0that gave victory to the FLN in Algeria was typical of the time; in\u00a0fact, popular war eradicates classical war (as does the hydrogen bomb).<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Against partisans backed by the entire population, colonial\u00a0armies are helpless. They have only one way of escaping from the\u00a0harassment which demoralizes them and tends towards a Dien Bien Phu.\u00a0This is to eliminate the civilian population. As it is the unity of a\u00a0whole people that is containing the conventional army, the only\u00a0anti-guerrilla strategy which will be effective is the destruction of\u00a0that people, in other words, the civilians, women and children.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Torture and genocide were the colonialists\u2019 answers to the uprising of\u00a0the natives.<\/em><em> And that answer, as we know, is useless if it is not\u00a0definitive and total. A determined population, unified by its fierce\u00a0and politicized partisan army, will not let itself be intimidated, as\u00a0it was in the heyday of colonialism, by a massacre \u2018as a lesson\u2019. On\u00a0the contrary, this will only increase its hatred. It is no longer a\u00a0matter of arousing fear but of physically liquidating a people. <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And as\u00a0this is not possible without at the same time eliminating the colonial\u00a0economy and the colonial system; the settlers panic, the colonial\u00a0powers grow tired of sinking manpower and money into a conflict with\u00a0no solution, the masses at home end up opposing the continuation of\u00a0barbaric wars and the colonies become independent states.<\/p>\n<p>There do exist, however, cases where the genocidal solution to\u00a0popular wars is not held back by innate contradictions. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tamilnation.co\/indictment\/genocide95\/index.htm\" >Total genocide\u00a0then reveals itself as the foundation of anti-guerrilla strategy.<\/a> And,\u00a0under certain\u00a0circumstances, it would even present itself as the ultimate objective,\u00a0either immediately or gradually. This is exactly what has happened in\u00a0the war in Vietnam.<\/p>\n<p>This is a new aspect of the imperialist process,\u00a0one usually called neocolonialism because it is defined as aggression\u00a0against an old colonial country, which has already attained its\u00a0independence, to subject it once again to colonial rule.<\/p>\n<p>At first, the\u00a0neo-colonialists make sure &#8211; either by the financing of a putsch or by\u00a0another underhand stroke &#8211; that the new rulers will not represent the\u00a0interest of the masses but that of a small minority of the privileged\u00a0classes and, thus, that of foreign capital.<\/p>\n<p>In Vietnam this took the\u00a0form of Diem, imposed, maintained and armed by the US, and of the\u00a0proclaimed decision to reject the Treaty of Geneva and to constitute\u00a0the Vietnamese territory south of the 17th parallel as an independent\u00a0state.<\/p>\n<p>The natural results of this were a police force and an army to\u00a0hunt those who, frustrated in their victory, immediately and even\u00a0before any effective resistance movement, declared themselves to\u00a0be the enemies of the new government. It was the reign of terror that\u00a0provoked a new uprising in the South and re-ignited the popular war.\u00a0Did the US ever think that Diem would quash the revolt at its outset?\u00a0In any event, they did not delay in sending experts, then troops,\u00a0until they were up to their necks in the conflict.<\/p>\n<p>And\u00a0gradually we can retrace almost exactly the same war that Ho Chi Minh\u00a0waged against the French, even though the American government declared\u00a0at the beginning that they were sending their troops out of generosity\u00a0and\u00a0out of duty to an ally.<\/p>\n<p>This is how it appears. But, fundamentally, these two successive\u00a0conflicts do have a different nature: the United States, unlike the\u00a0French, do not have any economic interests in Vietnam. A few private\u00a0American companies have invested there, but they are not so large that\u00a0they could not, if necessary, be sacrificed without really affecting\u00a0the American economy or harming the monopolies.<\/p>\n<p>Because the US is not\u00a0pursuing the war for direct economic reasons, it need not rule out\u00a0putting an end to it by the ultimate strategy of genocide. This does\u00a0not prove that America has thought of this solution, only that nothing\u00a0bars it from such a strategy.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, according to the Americans themselves, the war has two\u00a0objectives. Recently, Dean Rusk declared: \u2018We are defending\u00a0ourselves.\u2019 It is no longer Diem, the ally in danger, or Ky that they\u00a0have come to rescue. It is\u00a0the United States that is in danger in Saigon. This means that their\u00a0first aim is military: it is to encircle Communist China, the major\u00a0obstacle to their expansionism. Thus, they will not let south-east\u00a0Asia escape.<\/p>\n<p>America has put men in power in Thailand, it controls\u00a0part of Laos and threatens to invade Cambodia. But these conquests\u00a0will be useless if the US has to face a free Vietnam with thirty-one\u00a0million united people. That is why the military chiefs often talk of\u00a0\u2018key positions\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>That is why Dean Rusk says, with unconscious humour,\u00a0that the armed forces of the United States are fighting in Vietnam \u2018to\u00a0avoid a Third World War\u2019. Either this phrase makes no sense at all, or\u00a0it must be understood to mean \u2018to win a Third World War\u2019. In short,\u00a0the first objective is governed by the necessity of establishing a\u00a0Pacific Defence Line, which can only be imposed in the general\u00a0political framework of imperialism.<\/p>\n<p>The second objective is economic. General Westmoreland defined it\u00a0in these terms in October 1966: \u2018We are making war in Vietnam to show\u00a0that guerrilla warfare does not pay.\u2019 To show whom? The Vietnamese?\u00a0That would be very surprising. Is it necessary to spend so many human\u00a0lives and so much money to convince a nation of poor peasants\u00a0struggling thousands of miles from San Francisco?<\/p>\n<p>And, above all, what\u00a0need was there to attack, to provoke to battle and then crush it so as\u00a0to show the uselessness of the fight, when the interests of the large\u00a0companies are so negligible?<\/p>\n<p>Westmoreland\u2019s phrase &#8211; like that of Rusk\u00a0quoted above &#8211; needs to be completed. It is to the others that they\u00a0want to prove that guerrilla warfare does not pay: all the exploited\u00a0and oppressed nations who may be tempted to free themselves from the\u00a0Yankee yoke with a war for freedom, first of all against their own\u00a0pseudo-governments and the compradores supported by a national army,\u00a0then against the \u2018Special Forces\u2019 of the United States and finally\u00a0against the GIs.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, it is an example for Latin America\u00a0and the entire underdeveloped world. To Guevara, who used to say: \u2018We\u00a0need many Vietnams\u2019, the American government replies: \u2018They will all\u00a0be crushed as we are crushing this one.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>In other words, this war is primarily a warning for three, and\u00a0perhaps four, continents. After all, Greece is also a peasant nation\u00a0and a dictatorship has just been established there. It is best to\u00a0warn: submission or complete liquidation. So, this exemplary genocide\u00a0is a warning to all humanity. It is with this warning that six per\u00a0cent of mankind hope, without too much expense, to control the\u00a0remaining ninety-four per cent.<\/p>\n<p>At this point in our discussion, three facts emerge:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the US government wants a base and an example;<\/li>\n<li>this can be achieved, without any greater obstacle than the\u00a0resistance of the Vietnamese people themselves, by liquidating\u00a0an entire people and establishing a Pax Americana on a\u00a0Vietnamese desert;<\/li>\n<li>to attain the second, the US must achieve, at least partially,\u00a0this extermination.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The declarations of American statesmen are not as frank as those\u00a0that Hitler made in his day. But honesty is not indispensable; the\u00a0facts speak for themselves. The speeches that accompany them, ad usum\u00a0internum, will only be believed by the American people; the rest of\u00a0the world understands only too well.<\/p>\n<p>Friendly governments keep silent.\u00a0The others denounce the genocide, but the Americans reply to them that\u00a0they are showing which side they are really on by their unproven\u00a0accusations.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, say the American government. we\u00a0have done nothing but offer the Vietnamese &#8211; North and South &#8211; this\u00a0choice: either you stop your aggression or we break you.<\/p>\n<p>There is no\u00a0longer any need to point out that this proposition is absurd since the\u00a0aggression is American, so that only the Americans themselves can put\u00a0an end to it. But this absurdity is not uncalculated: it is clever to\u00a0formulate a demand which the Vietnamese cannot possibly satisfy.<\/p>\n<p>In\u00a0this way, America remains the master of the decision to stop the\u00a0fighting. But, one might read the alternatives as: declare yourselves\u00a0conquered, or \u2018we will take you back to the Stone Age\u2019. It does not\u00a0cancel out the second term of the alternative, which is genocide. They\u00a0have said: genocide, yes, but only conditional genocide. Is this\u00a0legally valid? Is it even conceivable?<\/p>\n<p>If the argument had any legal meaning, the government of the\u00a0United States would only just escape the accusation of genocide. But,\u00a0as Ma\u00eeTre Matarasso has remarked, the law, in distinguishing between\u00a0intention and motive, does not leave room for this escape clause.<\/p>\n<p>Genocide, especially as it has been carried on for several years, may\u00a0well have blackmail as a motive. One may declare that one will stop if\u00a0the victim submits. Those are the motivations and the act does not\u00a0cease to be genocide by intention. This is particularly so when, as in\u00a0this case, part of the group has been annihilated to force the rest to\u00a0submission.<\/p>\n<p>But let us look more closely and see what the terms of the\u00a0alternative are. In the South, this is the choice: the villages are\u00a0burnt, the population has to endure massive and deliberately\u00a0destructive bombardments, the cattle\u00a0are shot at, the vegetation is ruined by defoliants, what does grow is\u00a0ruined by toxic elements, machine guns are aimed haphazardly, and\u00a0everywhere there is killing, rape and pillage. That is genocide in its\u00a0most rigorous meaning of massive extermination.<\/p>\n<p>What is the other\u00a0choice? What must the Vietnamese people do to escape this atrocious\u00a0death? Join the American armed forces or those of Saigon, or let\u00a0themselves be enclosed in strategic hamlets or in those \u2018new life\u2019\u00a0compounds, which are two names for concentration camps.<\/p>\n<p>We know about these camps from numerous witnesses. They are\u00a0surrounded by barbed wire. The most elementary needs are ignored.\u00a0There is under-nourishment and complete lack of sanitation. The\u00a0prisoners are packed into tents or primitive huts where they stifle.\u00a0The social structure is destroyed. Husbands are separated from wives,\u00a0mothers from their children, family life &#8211; so respected by the\u00a0Vietnamese &#8211; no longer exists.<\/p>\n<p>As the homes are broken up, the birth\u00a0rate diminishes; all possibility of cultural or religious life is\u00a0abolished. Even work that will improve the standard of living is\u00a0denied them. These unfortunates are not even slaves (the servile\u00a0condition of the American Negroes has not stifled their own deep\u00a0culture); this group is reduced to the state of an appendage, to the\u00a0worst of vegetative lives.<\/p>\n<p>Anyone who wants to escape can only make\u00a0contact with other men shattered and ravaged by hate, who can only\u00a0regroup clandestinely for political resistance. The enemy guesses\u00a0this, so that the camps are raked over two or three times. Even there,\u00a0security is never certain and the shattering forces are always at\u00a0work.<\/p>\n<p>If by any chance a broken family, e.g. some children with an\u00a0older sister or a\u00a0young mother, are freed, they go to swell the proletariat in the\u00a0towns. The elder sister or the young mother, without a breadwinner and\u00a0with so many mouths to feed, sinks to the utmost degradation in\u00a0prostitution to the enemy. This is the lot of one third of the\u00a0population in the South, according to Mr Duncan\u2019s evidence. It is the\u00a0sort of genocide condemned by the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tamilnation.co\/humanrights\/instruments\/genocide.htm\" >Convention of 1948<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Grave damage to physical or mental health of members of the group;<br \/>\nIntentional submission of the group to such conditions of\u00a0existence as result in total or partial physical damage;<br \/>\nSteps taken to prevent births within the group;<br \/>\nForcible removal of children&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, it is not true that the choice lies between death or\u00a0submission. Submission, under these circumstances, amounts to\u00a0genocide. Let us say that there is only a choice between immediate\u00a0violent death and a slow death after mental and physical de gradation.<\/p>\n<p>Is it any different in the North?<\/p>\n<p>One choice is extermination: not only the daily risk of death but\u00a0also the systematic destruction of the economic system, from the\u00a0irrigation ditches to the factories of which \u2018there must not be a\u00a0brick left upon another brick\u2019; deliberate attacks on the civilian\u00a0population, and in particular on the countryside; destruction of\u00a0hospitals, schools, places of worship, consistent effort towards\u00a0wiping out the achievements of twenty years of Socialism.<\/p>\n<p>Is this\u00a0simply to terrorize the population? That can only be achieved by the\u00a0daily extermination of an ever larger number of the group. This\u00a0terrorism itself, in its psycho-social consequences, is genocide. Who\u00a0knows if, with the children in particular, this will not result in\u00a0mental disturbances which will affect them permanently?<\/p>\n<p>The other choice is capitulation. This would mean acceptance from\u00a0the North Vietnamese that their country should be divided in two and\u00a0that the American dictatorship, either directly or through their\u00a0puppets, should be\u00a0imposed on their compatriots and on the members of their own families\u00a0from whom the war has separated them. Would this intolerable\u00a0humiliation put an end to the war?<\/p>\n<p>This is far from certain: the NLF\u00a0and the DRV, although united, have different strategies and tactics\u00a0because of their different stances in the war. If the NLF continued\u00a0the struggle, American bombers would carry on, even if the DRV\u00a0capitulated.<\/p>\n<p>But should the war come to an end, we know &#8211; from official\u00a0declarations &#8211; that the United States would be generously inclined to\u00a0rebuild the DRV with mountains of dollars. This would mean that they\u00a0would destroy, with their private investments or conditional loans,\u00a0all the economic basis of socialism.<\/p>\n<p>That, too, is genocide:\u00a0the cutting in two of a sovereign state; occupying one half with a\u00a0reign of terror, effectively ruining the enterprise so dearly paid for\u00a0by the other half with economic pressures and with calculated\u00a0investments, to be held in a tight stranglehold. The national unit of\u00a0\u2018Vietnam\u2019 would not be physically eliminated, but it would no longer\u00a0exist economically, politically or culturally.<\/p>\n<p>In the North, as in the South, there is a choice between two\u00a0types of destruction: collective death or disintegration. Most\u00a0significant is the fact that the American government has felt the\u00a0measure of NLF and DRV resistance: it knows now that only total\u00a0destruction will be effective. <strong>The Front is more powerful than ever;\u00a0North Vietnam is resolute. For this very reason, the calculated\u00a0extermination of the Vietnamese people can only be intended to make\u00a0them capitulate.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Americans offer them peace knowing that it wilt\u00a0not be accepted. This spurious alternative hides the real imperialist\u00a0intention, which is a gradual progress towards the ultimate escalation\u00a0of total genocide.<\/p>\n<p>The United States government could have achieved this immediately\u00a0by a Vietnamese Blitzkrieg. But, apart from the fact that this\u00a0extermination would have involved complicated preparations &#8211; for\u00a0example, the construction and unrestricted use of air bases in\u00a0Thailand, shortening the bombers\u2019 journey by 5,000 kilometres &#8211; <strong>the\u00a0essential aim of the \u2018escalation\u2019 was and still is, to this day, to\u00a0prepare bourgeois opinion for genocide<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>From this point of view, the\u00a0Americans have succeeded only too well. The repeated and systematic\u00a0bombing of the densely populated areas of Haiphong and Hanoi, which\u00a0two years ago would have given rise to violent protests, is carried on\u00a0today in a sort of general indifference which is more like gangrene\u00a0than apathy. <strong>The trick has\u00a0worked: public opinion accepts a constant and imperceptible increase\u00a0of pressure which is preparing their minds for the final genocide. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Is\u00a0this genocide possible? No. But only because of the Vietnamese, their\u00a0courage and the admirable efficiency of their organizations. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As for\u00a0the US government, nobody can excuse their crime just because the\u00a0intelligence and heroism of their victims limits its effects.<\/p>\n<p><strong>One can conclude that, in a \u2018popular\u2019 war (that product of our\u00a0times, the answer to imperialist aggression and the claim to\u00a0sovereignty of a people conscious of its own unity) only two attitudes\u00a0are possible: either the\u00a0aggressor gives way, makes peace and recognizes that a whole nation is\u00a0opposing him; or else, realizing the ineffectiveness of classical\u00a0strategy, if he can do so without damaging his own interests, he\u00a0resorts to extermination pure and simple. There is no other choice;\u00a0but, this choice, at least, is always possible. \u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>While the armed forces of the USA are digging deeper into\u00a0Vietnam, intensifying the massacres and bombings attempting to subject\u00a0Laos and intending to invade Cambodia, there is no doubt that the\u00a0government of the\u00a0United States, despite all the hypocritical denials, has opted for\u00a0genocide.<\/p>\n<p>The intention is obvious from the facts. And, as M. Aybar said,\u00a0it can only be premeditated. It is possible that in the past genocide\u00a0was committed suddenly, in a flash of passion, in the midst of tribal\u00a0or feudal conflicts.\u00a0Anti-guerrilla genocide, however, is a product of our times that\u00a0necessarily entails organization, bases and, therefore, accomplices\u00a0(from a distance) and the appropriate budget. It needs to be thought\u00a0over and planned. Does this mean that those responsible are fully\u00a0aware of their own intentions? It is difficult to decide: to do so one\u00a0would have to probe the latent ill-will of puritanical motives.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe some people in the State Department are so used to lying\u00a0that they still manage to believe that they only want the best for\u00a0Vietnam. But, after the most recent declarations of their spokesmen,\u00a0one can presume that there are fewer of these innocents.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018We are\u00a0defending ourselves: even if the Saigon government asked us to, we\u00a0would not leave Vietnam\u2019, etc. In any case, we do not have to worry\u00a0about this psychological hide-and-seek. The truth is to be found on\u00a0the field, in the racialism of the American troops. Naturally, this\u00a0racialism &#8211; anti-black, anti-Asiatic, anti-Mexican &#8211; is a fundamental\u00a0characteristic which has deep-rooted origins and which existed, latent\u00a0or apparent, long before the Vietnam war.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The proof lies in the United\u00a0States government\u2019s refusal to ratify the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tamilnation.co\/humanrights\/instruments\/genocide.htm\" >Geneva Convention on\u00a0genocide<\/a>.<\/strong> This does not mean that ever since 1948 the Americans have\u00a0intended to exterminate whole peoples but that, according to their own\u00a0declaration, the Convention would have conflicted with the internal\u00a0legislation of many of the American States.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the\u00a0present leaders consider themselves unshackled in Vietnam today thanks\u00a0to their predecessors who had wanted to respect the anti-Negro\u00a0racialism of the South. In any case, ever since 1965, the racialism of\u00a0the Yankee soldiers from Saigon to the 17th parallel has increased.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The young Americans torture without repugnance, shooting at unarmed\u00a0women for the\u00a0pleasure of completing a hat-trick: they kick the wounded Vietnamese\u00a0in the testicles; they cut off the ears of the dead for trophies. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0officers are worst: a general was boasting in front of a Frenchman who\u00a0testified at the\u00a0Tribunal of hunting the VC from his helicopter and shooting them down\u00a0in the rice fields. They were, of course, not NLF fighters, who know\u00a0how to protect themselves, but peasants working in their rice fields.\u00a0In these confused American minds the Viet Cong and the Vietnamese tend\u00a0to become more and more indistinguishable. A common saying is \u2018The\u00a0only good Vietnamese is a dead one\u2019, or, what comes to the same thing,\u00a0\u2018Every dead Vietnamese is a Viet Cong.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>The peasants get ready to harvest the rice south of the 17th\u00a0parallel. American soldiers come and burn their houses and want to\u00a0transfer them to a strategic hamlet. The peasants protest. What else\u00a0can they do bare-handed\u00a0against these Martians? They say \u2018The rice is so good; we would like\u00a0to stay to eat our rice.\u2019 No more, but that is enough to exasperate\u00a0the young Americans: \u2018It is the Viet Cong who have put this into your\u00a0heads. It is they\u00a0who have taught you to resist.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>These soldiers are so muddled that\u00a0they consider as \u2018subversive\u2019 violence the feeble protests that their\u00a0own violence has provoked. Originally, they were probably\u00a0disappointed: they came to save Vietnam from Communist aggressors.\u00a0They soon saw that the Vietnamese actually disliked them. Instead of\u00a0the attractive role of the liberator they found themselves the\u00a0occupiers. It was the beginning of self-appraisal: &#8220;They do not want\u00a0us, we have no business here.&#8221; But their protest goes no further: they\u00a0become angry and simply tell themselves that a Vietnamese is, by\u00a0definition, a suspect.<\/p>\n<p>There is not a single Vietnamese who is not really a Communist:\u00a0the proof is their hatred of the Yankees. Here, in the shadowy and\u00a0robot-like souls of the soldiers, we find the truth about the war in\u00a0Vietnam: it matches all of Hitler\u2019s declarations. He killed the Jews\u00a0because they were Jews.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The armed forces of the United States torture\u00a0and kill men, women and children in Vietnam because they are\u00a0Vietnamese. Whatever the lies or nervous hedging of the government,\u00a0the spirit of genocide is in the soldiers\u2019 minds.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is their way of\u00a0enduring the genocidal situation in which their government has put\u00a0them. The witness Peter Martinsen, a young student of twenty-three who\u00a0had &#8220;interrogated&#8221; prisoners for six months and could not bear his\u00a0memories, told us: &#8220;I am an average American, I am like any other\u00a0student, and here I am a war criminal.&#8221; And he was right to add:\u00a0&#8220;Anyone in my place would have acted as I did.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>His only error was to attribute these degrading crimes to the\u00a0influence of war in general. No: it is not war in the abstract, but\u00a0war waged by the largest power against a people of poor peasants, and\u00a0war lived by those\u00a0who wage it as the only possible relationship between an overdeveloped\u00a0nation and an underdeveloped one, that is to say genocide expressed\u00a0through racialism. The only possible relationship, apart from stopping\u00a0short\u00a0and leaving.<\/p>\n<p>Total war implies a certain equilibrium of strength, a certain\u00a0reciprocity. The colonial wars were waged without reciprocity, but\u00a0colonial interests limited genocide. This present genocide, the latest\u00a0development of the unequal progress of societies, is total war waged\u00a0to the end by one side and with not one particle of reciprocity.<\/p>\n<p>The American government is not guilty of having invented modern\u00a0genocide, nor even of having chosen it from other possible answers to\u00a0the guerrilla. It is not guilty &#8211; for example &#8211; of having preferred it\u00a0on the grounds of strategy or economy. In effect, genocide presents\u00a0itself as the only possible reaction to the insurrection of a whole\u00a0people against its oppressors.<\/p>\n<p>The American government is guilty of\u00a0having preferred a policy of war and\u00a0aggression aimed at total genocide to a policy of peace, the only\u00a0other alternative, because it would have implied a necessary\u00a0reconsideration of the principal objectives imposed by the big\u00a0imperialist companies by means of pressure groups.<\/p>\n<p>America is guilty\u00a0of following through and intensifying the war, although each of its\u00a0leaders daily understands even better, from the reports of the\u00a0military chiefs, that the only way to win is to rid\u00a0Vietnam of all the Vietnamese.<\/p>\n<p>It is guilty of being deceitful, evasive, of lying, and lying to\u00a0itself, embroiling itself every minute a little more, despite the\u00a0lessons that this unique and unbearable experience has taught, on a\u00a0path along which there can\u00a0be no return. It is guilty, by its own admission, of knowingly\u00a0conducting this war of \u2018example\u2019 to make genocide a challenge and a\u00a0threat to all peoples. When a peasant dies in his rice field, cut down\u00a0by a machine-gun, we are\u00a0all hit.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the Vietnamese are fighting for all men and the\u00a0American forces are fighting all of us. Not just in theory or in the\u00a0abstract. And not only because genocide is a crime universally\u00a0condemned by the rights of\u00a0man. But because, little by little, this genocidal blackmail is\u00a0spreading to all humanity, adding to the blackmail of atomic war. This\u00a0crime is perpetrated under our eyes every day, making accomplices out\u00a0of those who do not denounce it.\u00a0 In this context, the imperialist genocide can become more\u00a0serious. For the group that the Americans are trying to destroy by\u00a0means of the Vietnamese nation is the whole of humanity.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tamilnation.co\/humanrights\/sartre.htm\" >Go to Original \u2013 tamilnation.co<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jean Paul Sartre&#8217;s Statement at the Second  Session of the Bertrand Russell International War Crimes Tribunal on Vietnam held in Denmark in November 1967 remains, almost 40 years later, an inspiring appeal to the conscience of humanity &#8211; inspiring not only because of  the force of its reason but also because it reveals Sartre&#8217;s passionate commitment to justice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":60096,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[197],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-special-feature"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118974"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118974\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60096"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}