{"id":11904,"date":"2011-05-02T12:00:24","date_gmt":"2011-05-02T11:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=11904"},"modified":"2011-04-28T15:45:57","modified_gmt":"2011-04-28T14:45:57","slug":"sorry-but-it%e2%80%99s-not-your-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2011\/05\/sorry-but-it%e2%80%99s-not-your-project\/","title":{"rendered":"Sorry but it\u2019s not YOUR project"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>(Whispering.) <\/em>\u201cPsst, excuse me, but actually it\u2019s not <em>\u2018your\u2019<\/em> program. And if you think that it is, we may have a problem on our hands.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Many would argue that who owns what in development is a key aspect, if not <em>the<\/em> aspect, to a project\u2019s or program\u2019s success.<\/p>\n<p>And so a person\u2019s choice word choice when describing their work or do-gooder endeavor can actually reveal quite a lot.<\/p>\n<p>Some may think I\u2019m just being fussy about semantics. They\u2019ll argue that that well done is more important than well said. They\u2019ll point to the fact that international assistance is constantly riddled with phrases and jargon that are eventually forgotten or rendered meaningless. But it\u2019s deeper than that and I\u2019m not talking nouns and acronyms.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m talking about possessive adjectives. MINE \u2013 YOURS \u2013 ITS \u2013 HERS \u2013 HIS \u2013 OURS \u2013 THEIRS \u2013 WHOSE.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s be honest. How many of you, when talking to a friend, another NGO colleague, or donor refers to \u201cour program\u201d in [insert Country X or District Y or Village Z]?<\/p>\n<p>But let me ask you something \u2013 Do <em>you<\/em> live in Country X or District Y or Village Z?<\/p>\n<p>If you don\u2019t, that should be your first clue that \u201cmy project\u201d or \u201cour program\u201d is not the phrase for you to use. Here\u2019s some others.<\/p>\n<p>When people from your community are knocking on <em>your<\/em> door for help and you are working day and night to help fulfill their self-identified needs, then yes, by all means, lay your claim.<\/p>\n<p>When you are coming up with the ideas and steps forward, based on a collective process to generate solutions to shared problems with <em>your<\/em> neighbors\u2019 and fellow community members, then yes, \u201cour project\u201d is appropriate.<\/p>\n<p>When you are implementing a project and it\u2019s not just a job or a hobby, it is a matter of life and personal responsibility to people <em>you<\/em> face every day, go ahead, \u201cour project\u201d can be yours.<\/p>\n<p>When you can identify with the people you\u2019re serving to such an extent that <em>you<\/em> feel an obligation to be directly accountable to them in a tangible rather than an abstract way, the program is truly \u201cyours.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Essentially, unless you\u2019re on the ground, doing the work with and on behalf of your own community on a daily basis, I believe a program cannot and should not ever be considered \u201cyours,\u201d grammatically or otherwise.\u00a0Without this awareness, \u201cour project\u201d can be dismissive and disrespectful to local activists and grassroots leaders.<\/p>\n<p>Every aid worker probably has their own bugaboos. (See posts by <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/bloodandmilk.org\/2010\/11\/08\/the-words-i-dont-use\/\" >Alanna Shaikh<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/lessonsilearned.org\/2011\/01\/guidelines-for-writing-about-development-issues\/\" >Daniela Papi<\/a> on theirs.) These come and go as the aid lexicon shifts and changes with the latest development trend. There was a time near the turn of this century when I felt as if I had to discuss the definition of CABA (children affected by AIDS) then later OVC (orphans and vulnerable children) in one more stakeholder meeting, I would literally pitch a fit like a three-year-old.<\/p>\n<p>But this \u201cour project\u201d issue for me has never left. When I was with [insert US-based, corporate aid agency here], though we claimed to work in partnership with local implementing organizations, all the programs were conceived of and spoken of as \u201cours.\u201d This always struck me as extremely hypocritical, and frankly counter-productive to sound and proven principles of assets-based, community-driven development.<\/p>\n<p>What made them <em>our<\/em> programs? The fact that we wrote the proposals? (Eh hum, in consultation with our partners of course.) Or were they <em>our<\/em> programs because, through our funding of local partners, we ultimately controlled how each cent was spent? Or because we were supposedly the ones who had to be accountable to USAID?<\/p>\n<p>How is <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.how-matters.org\/2010\/09\/13\/spotting-community-ownership\/\" >community ownership<\/a> even possible under such circumstances? Local partners and communities didn\u2019t have a chance to make the projects <em>theirs<\/em>. If a project is considered to be someone else\u2019s, and your sense of agency and autonomy are clearly not on their radar, why would you even bother?<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, I hear \u201cour project\u201d used just as egregiously by the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.how-matters.org\/2010\/11\/08\/missing-from-diy-aid-debate\/\" >DIY aid<\/a> and social enterprise folks. How many times have I had to endure hearing all about \u201cour project\u201d from the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.how-matters.org\/2010\/08\/13\/our-most-important-job\/\" >do-gooder newly returned from Kenya at a cocktail party<\/a>? As I nod and listen, I\u2019m silently thinking to myself that the fact that this project is \u201cyours,\u201d will more than likely contribute to its downfall.<\/p>\n<p>In the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.insightonconflict.org\/now-we-know-exactly-how-locally-led-the-aid-really-is\/\" >Keystone INGO Partner Survey 2010<\/a>, an initiative to measure the performance of northern NGOs, local organizations sent a clear message. They do not want to be treated as sub-contractors, carrying out international agencies\u2019 projects and priorities. Rather they want help from aid agencies to become independent and influential organizations in their own right, enabling them to respond flexibly to local people\u2019s needs.<\/p>\n<p>When are we going to realize that participation is not just a nice-to-have in this work? Nor is it even enough.<\/p>\n<p>To bring about real change, we need to be talking ownership.<\/p>\n<p>And not our own.<\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p>See below a participation typology I\u2019ve adapted and used and am sharing for further discussion on this issue. Reflections and comments are most welcome.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PARTICIPATION LADDER<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>(Adapted from Hart, 1992 and Pretty, 1995.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Self-mobilization: <\/strong>People participate by taking initiatives independent of any external institutions. Such self-initiated mobilization and collective action based on mutual obligations may challenge existing inequitable distributions of power.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Community-initiated, shared decisions:<\/strong> Community members have the initial ideas, set up the program\/project, only coming to the NGO\/CBO for advice, discussion and support.\u00a0 The NGO\/CBO does not direct, but offers their expertise to consider and may bring financial resources to bear.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NGO\/CBO-initiated, shared decision with community:<\/strong> NGO\/CBO has the initial idea for the program\/project but the community is involved in every step of the planning and implementation through the formation of new local groups or the strengthening of existing ones.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Consulted and informed:<\/strong> The program\/project is designed and run by NGO\/CBO but community has understanding of the predetermined objectives related to the project. External agents define both problems and solutions, and may modify these in the light of people\u2019s responses.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Informed and assigned:<\/strong> Community members are asked to contribute their time and say what they think about a program\/project but have little or no influence about how the program\/project is run. Such a consultative process does not concede any share in decision-making and outsiders are under no obligation to incorporate people\u2019s views.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Extraction\/Tokenism\/Decoration:<\/strong> People participate by giving information to outsiders using questionnaire surveys or similar approaches. The information shared belongs only to external professionals and the findings of the research or project design are neither shared nor checked for accuracy. Community members may take part in an event, e.g. by singing, dancing or wearing T-shirts with logos, but they do not really understand the program\/project. People have no stake in prolonging activities when the incentives end.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Manipulation:<\/strong> Community members do or say what NGO\/CBO suggests they do but they have no real understanding of the program\/project.\u00a0People participate by being told what is going to happen or what has already happened.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.how-matters.org\/2011\/04\/27\/not-your-project\/\" > <\/a><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.how-matters.org\/2011\/04\/27\/not-your-project\/\" >Go to Original \u2013 how-matters.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019m talking about possessive adjectives. MINE \u2013 YOURS \u2013 ITS \u2013 HERS \u2013 HIS \u2013 OURS \u2013 THEIRS \u2013 WHOSE. Let\u2019s be honest. How many of you, when talking to a friend, another NGO colleague, or donor refers to \u201cour program\u201d in [insert Country X or District Y or Village Z]? But let me ask you something \u2013 Do you live in Country X or District Y or Village Z?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analysis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11904\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}