{"id":134550,"date":"2019-06-03T12:00:40","date_gmt":"2019-06-03T11:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=134550"},"modified":"2019-05-30T10:32:04","modified_gmt":"2019-05-30T09:32:04","slug":"rand-corporation-how-to-destroy-russia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/06\/rand-corporation-how-to-destroy-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"Rand Corporation: How to Destroy Russia"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Force the adversary to expand recklessly in order to unbalance him, and then destroy him. This is not the description of a judo hold, but a plan against Russia elaborated by the Rand Corporation, the most influential think tank in the USA. With a staff of thousands of experts, Rand presents itself as the world\u2019s most reliable source for Intelligence and political analysis for the leaders of the United States and their allies.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

25 May 2019 – <\/em>The Rand Corp prides itself on having contributed to the elaboration of the long-term strategy which enabled the United States to win the Cold War, by forcing the Soviet Union to consume its own economic resources in the strategic confrontation. It is this model which was the inspiration for the new plan, Overextending and Unbalancing Russia<\/strong>,<\/a> published by Rand [1].<\/p>\n

According to their analysts, Russia remains a powerful adversary for the United States in certain fundamental sectors. To handle this opposition, the USA and their allies will have to pursue a joint long-term strategy which exploits Russia\u2019s vulnerabilities. So Rand analyses the various means with which to unbalance Russia, indicating for each the probabilities of success, the benefits, the cost, and the risks for the USA.<\/p>\n

Rand analysts estimate that Russia\u2019s greatest vulnerability is that of its economy, due to its heavy dependency on oil and gas exports. The income from these exports can be reduced by strengthening sanctions and increasing the energy exports of the United States. The goal is to oblige Europe to diminish its importation of Russian natural gas, and replace it by liquefied natural gas transported by sea from other countries.<\/p>\n

Another way of destabilising the Russian economy in the long run is to encourage the emigration of qualified personnel, particularly young Russians with a high level of education.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Image from Zero Hedge<\/p><\/div>\n

In the ideological and information sectors, it would be necessary to encourage internal contestation and at the same time, to undermine Russia\u2019s image on the exterior, by excluding it from international forums and boycotting the international sporting events that it organises.<\/p>\n

In the geopolitical sector, arming Ukraine would enable the USA to exploit the central point of Russia\u2019s exterior vulnerability, but this would have to be carefully calculated in order to hold Russia under pressure without slipping into a major conflict, which it would win.<\/p>\n

More: The US Wants to Sanction Away Russia\u2019s \u201cGreat Society\u201d<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In the military sector, the USA could enjoy high benefits, with low costs and risks, by increasing the number of land-based troops from the NATO countries working in an anti-Russian function.<\/p>\n

The USA can enjoy high probabilities of success and high benefits, with moderate risks, especially by investing mainly in strategic bombers and long-range attack missiles directed against Russia.<\/p>\n

Leaving the INF Treaty and deploying in Europe new intermediate-range nuclear missiles pointed at Russia would lead to high probabilities of success, but would also present high risks.<\/p>\n

By calibrating each option to gain the desired effect \u2013 conclude the Rand analysts \u2013 Russia would end up by paying the hardest price in a confrontation, but the USA would also have to invest huge resources, which would therefore no longer be available for other objectives. This is also prior warning of a coming major increase in USA\/NATO military spending, to the disadvantage of social budgets.<\/p>\n

This is the future that is planned out for us by the Rand Corporation, the most influential think tank of the Deep State \u2013 in other words the underground centre of real power gripped by the economic, financial, and military oligarchies \u2013 which determines the strategic choices not only of the USA, but all of the Western world.<\/p>\n

The \u201coptions\u201d set out by the plan are in reality no more than variants of the same war strategy, of which the price in sacrifices and risks is paid by us all.<\/p>\n

______________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/em>Manlio Dinucci<\/em>, geographer and geopolitical scientist. In the 1980s, he directed the magazine <\/em>Lotta per la Pace (born from “Appeal against the installation of nuclear missiles in Italy”) and was Executive Director for Italy of the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, winner of the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize. <\/em>His latest books are <\/em>L\u2019arte della guerra \/ Annali della strategia Usa\/Nato 1990-2016, Zambon 2016; <\/em>Guerra Nucleare Il Giorno Prima, Zambon Editore; 2017.<\/em><\/p>\n

Copyright \u00a9 Manlio Dinucci<\/a>, <\/em>Global Research, 2019<\/em><\/p>\n

This article was originally published on <\/em>Il Manifesto.\u00a0Translated by\u00a0Pete Kimberley.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 globalresearch.ca<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Force the adversary to expand recklessly in order to unbalance him, and then destroy him. This is not the description of a judo hold, but a plan against Russia elaborated by the Rand Corporation, the most influential think tank in the USA. With a staff of thousands of experts, Rand presents itself as the world\u2019s most reliable source for Intelligence and political analysis for the leaders of the United States and their allies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":134552,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[120,267,504,291,91,109,287,278,911,70,126,118,172,75],"class_list":["post-134550","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anglo-america","tag-conflict","tag-geopolitics","tag-international-relations","tag-military","tag-nato","tag-politics","tag-power","tag-russia","tag-surveillance","tag-usa","tag-violence","tag-war","tag-west","tag-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134550","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134550"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134550\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/134552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134550"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}