{"id":136812,"date":"2019-07-08T12:00:43","date_gmt":"2019-07-08T11:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=136812"},"modified":"2019-07-15T12:00:39","modified_gmt":"2019-07-15T11:00:39","slug":"japan-resumes-commercial-whaling-researchers-on-how-the-world-should-respond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/07\/japan-resumes-commercial-whaling-researchers-on-how-the-world-should-respond\/","title":{"rendered":"Japan Resumes Commercial Whaling \u2013 Researchers on How the World Should Respond"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

The first whale to be taken from Japan\u2019s waters since the country resumed commercial whaling, July 1 2019.
\u00a9 EIAimage<\/p><\/div>\n

1 Jul 2019 – <\/em>Japan recently left the International Whaling Commission (IWC)<\/a> and has now caught the first whale in its waters<\/a> since resuming commercial whaling, 33 years after a global ban came into effect. As a non-member, Japan is no longer bound by the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) \u2013 the rules that the IWC has used to manage whaling since 1946.<\/p>\n

The IWC\u2019s moratorium on commercial whaling has broadly been a success \u2013 whale populations have increased where whaling was the primary threat. The humpback whale<\/a> is one example of successful recovery, but species such as the northern right whale have never recovered from centuries of whaling and are in critically low numbers<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Outrage and despair<\/a> greeted Japan\u2019s decision to relaunch commercial whaling in its waters, although the conservation status of many species may be unaffected. Still, Japan\u2019s exit from the IWC is a worrying message to the international community at a time when collaboration on environmental issues is sorely needed.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Protesters march in London to demonstrate against Japan\u2019s decision to resume commercial whaling, January 2019.\u00a0 Kevin J. Frost\/Shutterstock<\/p><\/div>\n

Why has Japan left the IWC?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Japan introduced a proposal at the IWC<\/a> in 2018 which would allow it to restart commercial whaling. This was voted down \u2013 the proposal<\/a> that was approved in its place supported a shift in the commission\u2019s goal towards banning all commercial whaling in perpetuity.<\/p>\n

A permanent commercial whaling ban might sound like an ordinary step, but the IWC\u2019s purpose<\/a> since 1946 has been \u201cthe orderly development of the whaling industry\u201d. The IWC has gradually pivoted to focus more on conservation and other threats to whales since then, but one of its founding goals was to support the whaling industry and the people it employed. As the whaling industry has declined and attitudes towards whales have changed around the world, the IWC has changed too. Japan meanwhile has always been clear it wants to resume commercial whaling and is leaving the IWC because the moratorium was only meant to be temporary and lifted when whale populations could support whaling.<\/p>\n

Japan isn\u2019t the first country to leave the IWC because of frustration with its rules on commercial whaling. Iceland left in 1992 and rejoined in 2002<\/a> as a full member but with a reservation to the moratorium that allows it to commercially whale<\/a>. Norway objected to the moratorium decision in 1982<\/a> and so kept its right to commercially whale<\/a> while remaining a full IWC member.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

A common minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) in the Pacific Ocean.
Aquapix\/Shutterstock<\/p><\/div>\n

A mixed outcome for whales<\/strong><\/p>\n

For most whale species, the exit of Japan from the convention banning commercial whaling will have few consequences<\/a>. Whale populations in the Southern Ocean are even likely to benefit as Japan will lose its special research permit for scientific whaling in the region by leaving the IWC. Japan mostly took Antarctic minke whales (Balaenoptera bonaerensis<\/em>) here, but this species is not considered endangered<\/a>.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a different story for whales found within Japan\u2019s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). No longer bound by the IWC\u2019s rules, Japan can harvest whales here under the right given by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea but the number and species it will decide to take hasn\u2019t been announced. One vulnerable population living in Japan\u2019s EEZ which may be affected are common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata<\/em>), which are genetically distinct and possibly number fewer than 5,500<\/a>. It\u2019s worrying this population hasn\u2019t shown the same robust recovery seen among other minke whales.<\/p>\n

Japan will want to prove to the world it can whale sustainably but the long-term future of whaling is uncertain. The market for whale meat in Japan peaked after World War II and is now a shadow of its former self. Although still eaten in cultural ceremonies and a few localities in northern Honshu, consumption is around 40g per capita each year<\/a> – about the size of a slice of ham. Whether Japan\u2019s diminished appetite for whale meat will reduce its whaling efforts though remains to be seen.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

In the Southern Ocean, the ban on commercial whaling has helped some populations of humpback whale increase by 10% per year.
\u00a0Nico Faramaz\/Shutterstock<\/p><\/div>\n

A way forward?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Research by the IWC scientific committee<\/a> has greatly advanced our understanding of whale ecology and how to address other threats to their survival, like pollution, bycatch and climate change. Japan\u2019s exit from the IWC doesn\u2019t threaten the organisation\u2019s activities and every effort should be made to continue this important research. But if the \u201cInternational Whaling Commission\u201d is to become a conservation organisation, then maybe its status as a whaling commission is outdated.<\/p>\n

Countries could continue to work together on whale conservation by using the Convention on Migratory Species<\/a>. This specifically targets the conservation of migratory species and their habitats, and would apply to protecting whales. In fact, there is already a regional agreement<\/a> between countries that\u2019s focused on whale conservation.<\/p>\n

Agreements made under this convention might be better able to deal with the diverse threats facing whales. A whale research programme focused on conservation \u2013 as opposed to a whaling research programme \u2013 made up of the IWC scientific committee and Japan might have fewer conflicts as their objective would be clearer.<\/p>\n

Japan\u2019s exit from the IWC is a complicated issue beyond just whale conservation<\/a> \u2013 it highlights the need for the international community to overcome disagreements. Asking why the IWC has succeeded and failed at different times<\/a> can help us improve the way we work together on global challenges as after all, whaling is only one example of the many urgent and complex environmental issues that demand a global response. How well we work together determines more than just the fate of the world\u2019s whales.<\/p>\n

_________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

Read More:<\/em><\/p>\n