{"id":139941,"date":"2019-08-12T12:00:08","date_gmt":"2019-08-12T11:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=139941"},"modified":"2019-08-21T11:28:30","modified_gmt":"2019-08-21T10:28:30","slug":"rohingya-in-india-no-direction-home","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/08\/rohingya-in-india-no-direction-home\/","title":{"rendered":"Rohingya in India: No Direction Home"},"content":{"rendered":"

How the world\u2019s largest democracy treats the world\u2019s most persecuted minority.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/a>

In November 2016, this madrasa in one of the camps in Narwal, the largest Rohingya settlement in Jammu, caught fire. No one knows the origins of the fire. Most of the houses in the camp were charred, and it was rebuilt from scratch. Hashim Badani<\/p><\/div>\n

{ONE}<\/strong><\/p>\n

1 Jul 2019 –<\/em>Fifteen kilometres from the headquarters of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, located in the posh south-Delhi neighbourhood of Vasant Vihar, lie the dusty lanes of the industrial district of Okhla. Near the banks of the Yamuna, the neighbourhood of Madan Khadar houses Muslim migrant communities that provide cheap labour for Okhla\u2019s furniture, sugar and leather factories.<\/p>\n

Here, in a neat row of tenements that the locals call Darul Hijrat<\/em>\u2014abode of the migrant\u2014Mohammad Salimullah\u2019s wife, Fatima Begum, was brewing tea in a five-by-six-foot grocery store. It was December 2017. In the lane outside, the children were concluding their evening games in the mud, singing the popular Rohingya song \u201cArakan desher Rohingya jaati<\/em>\u201d\u2014The Rohingya from the country of Arakan.<\/p>\n

Salimullah left Myanmar in 2002, fleeing what the United Nations describes as a genocide. His first stop was Cox\u2019s Bazar, the district in Bangladesh that borders the Arakan and today houses the largest refugee camp in the world. Five years later, he pushed further west, into India, drawn by the ideals historically attached to the world\u2019s largest democracy: secularism, peace and prosperity. India, he was sure, would shelter him and his fellow countrymen.<\/p>\n

After an itinerant existence spent doing odd jobs in different Indian cities, Salimullah settled in Delhi. Between 2012 and 2017, he started the grocery store, enrolled his three children in government schools and even sent a nephew to university. An uncanny placidity characterised his life in India, a luxury he had not known in Myanmar.<\/p>\n

On 9 August 2017,<\/strong> during question hour at the Rajya Sabha, MV Rajeev Gowda, a Congress member from Karnataka, asked whether the home ministry had framed a policy with regard to Rohingya refugees in India, and whether reports stating that the government planned to deport forty thousand Rohingya refugees were true. Kiren Rijiju, then a junior home minister, responded that the Rohingya were \u201cliving illegally in the country,\u201d and that the government had \u201cissued detailed instructions for deportation of illegal foreign nationals including Rohingyas,\u201d using its powers under the Foreigners Act, 1946.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Mysterious fires at Rohingya camps have broken out several times over the past few years. On 15 April 2018, Rohingya shelters in the Darul Hijrat neighbourhood in Okhla were destroyed in a fire. A member of the BJP\u2019s youth wing claimed responsibility in a tweet, but has since deleted his Twitter account. money sharma \/ afp \/ getty images<\/p><\/div>\n

As Rijiju acknowledged in his response to another question asked that day about the government\u2019s Rohingya policy, over sixteen thousand Rohingya had been registered as refugees by the UNHCR. The designation of refugee\u2014which is obtained after a process that can stretch for years, including at least one exhaustive interview at the UNHCR\u2019s Delhi office\u2014is supposed to protect them from \u201charassment, arbitrary arrests, detention and deportation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rijiju, however, would have none of that. \u201cWe can\u2019t stop them from registering\u201d with the UNHCR, he told Reuters<\/em> a week later. \u201cBut we are not signatories to the accord on refugees. As far as we are concerned, they are illegal immigrants. They have no basis to live here. Anyone who is illegal migrant will be deported.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the weeks that followed, the lives of the Rohingya refugees living in cramped accommodations\u2014most of them in Delhi, Jammu, Haryana, Rajasthan, Hyderabad and West Bengal\u2014began to change. In Okhla, Salimullah told me, \u201cWe feel a difference in the places we go to every day. People look at us differently after the government threatened to deport us.\u201d<\/p>\n

Soon after 3 am on 15 April 2018, Salimullah awoke to find that Darul Hijrat was on fire. Fire trucks arrived almost an hour after the fire started, and took four hours to contain the blaze. By dawn, almost all the houses were gutted. Most residents had lost everything they had scrounged together during their peripatetic existence, including the few photographs that remained from their days in Myanmar and the crucial documents that identified them as refugees.<\/p>\n

No one was able to ascertain the source of the fire. However, within hours, Manish Chandela, a member of the youth wing of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, tweeted, \u201cYes we burnt the houses of Rohingya terrorists.\u201d The following day, he again tweeted, \u201cYes, we did it and we do it again #ROHINGYA QUIT INDIA.\u201d Chandela has since deleted his Twitter account.<\/p>\n

As they picked up what remained of their lives, Salimullah and his family began to realise that India had changed. This was no longer the India whose democratic values attracted persecuted peoples from throughout the subcontinent. This was the India of Narendra Modi.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

THE WORLD\u2019S LARGEST DEMOCRACY<\/strong> is home to around three hundred thousand refugees from 28 different countries, including stateless people. However, as Rijiju pointed out, India is not a signatory to the UN refugee convention of 1951, or the 1967 additional protocol relating to the status of refugees, and offers no legal protection for refugees. The fate of its refugee communities has historically been determined by the politics of the day.<\/p>\n

The Rohingya, described by the UN as the world\u2019s most persecuted minority, have mostly entered India in three waves, each of them in reaction to a ratcheting up of persecution in Myanmar\u2014during the 1970s, in 2012 and in 2017. There has also been a steady trickle between the waves. In 2015, the Rohingya caught the attention of the international media as the ill-fated \u201cboat people,\u201d when several thousands were stranded at sea after repeatedly being denied entry by the governments of Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand, none of which have signed the refugee convention either.<\/p>\n

India\u2019s strategic regional interests have put the Rohingya in an unenviable position, as their persecution continues in the context of geopolitical competition between India and China, both of which want more influence in Myanmar. On 25 August 2017, Rohingya insurgents armed with knives and homemade bombs attacked over thirty police posts in northern Rakhine State. In response, the military and Buddhist mobs burned villages and killed hundreds of Rohingya, leading to over four hundred thousand people fleeing into Bangladesh. Zeid Ra\u2019ad Al Hussein, the UN\u2019s high commissioner for human rights, called the crackdown \u201ca textbook example of ethnic cleansing.\u201d Meanwhile, India\u2019s foreign ministry issued a strongly worded statement promising to stand firmly behind Myanmar in its \u201cfight against terrorism.\u201d The statement said nothing about Myanmar\u2019s history of violence against the Rohingya.<\/p>\n

Since coming to power, in 2014, the Modi government has sought to refashion domestic and foreign policy to suit its worldview. Its antagonism towards the Rohingya community is a sign of India\u2019s drift towards Islamophobia, ultra-nationalism and communal disharmony under Modi. Its well-oiled propaganda machinery routinely denigrates the Rohingya as intruders who have no place in the country. This hatred is institutionalised, and given legitimacy by the top leadership. In September 2018 and again in April 2019, Amit Shah, the BJP president and now the home minister, called the Rohingya \u201ctermites,\u201d and promised to remove them if the BJP was returned to power, which it did in this year\u2019s general election.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is the normal politics of the BJP to spew venom against Muslims,\u201d the lawyer and activist Prashant Bhushan told me. \u201cHere, they are doing three things: calling them Rohingya Muslim instead of refugees, calling them terrorists when there is no proof of this allegation, claiming they have come here to eat into our resources. These three strands of propaganda fit perfectly into the general communal politics of the BJP.\u201d In Modi\u2019s India, the Rohingya face near-complete ghettoisation. Their movement is carefully monitored, and they are not allowed to leave their designated camps. Their conversations with relatives in Bangladesh and Myanmar are under constant surveillance by Indian intelligence.<\/p>\n

In Jammu, home to India\u2019s largest concentration of the Rohingya, the community has learnt to maintain a stoic silence in the face of offensive propaganda and mob violence. In the early hours of 3 June this year, nearly a hundred and fifty houses in the Maratha Basti in Jammu, which is home to many Rohingya as well as other migrant labourers, were gutted in a mysterious fire, similar to the one in Okhla. It was the third such fire in the slum in the past three years.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

The UNHCR issues identification cards to refugees, but the cards do not make much difference to the Rohingya, since the Indian government does not view them as grounds for legal residency.
Hashim Badani<\/p><\/div>\n

On 2 September 2017, a group of Rohingya living in the village of Mujedi in Haryana\u2019s Faridabad district were planning to sacrifice two buffalo calves for Eid. They were attacked by a group of locals, who assaulted four men and molested two women before releasing the calves. \u201cThey said if we tried to tell the police or complain about what happened to us, they would come and kill us at night,\u201d Mohammad Jamil, who was one of those attacked, told me. A UNHCR representative later helped them file a first-information report, charging \u201cunidentified persons\u201d with voluntarily causing hurt, rioting and other offences. As is increasingly the norm in such cases, nobody was arrested.<\/p>\n

Jamil and the 45 Rohingya families living in Mujedi fled to Shahin Bagh in Delhi following the attack. For many of them, who had migrated to Mujedi from Delhi, this marked an ignominious return. Such circuitous migrations are becoming routine. Fearing mass deportation and further attacks, many Rohingya have begun fleeing back into Bangladesh\u2014according to official statistics, over a thousand have done so since the beginning of this year.<\/p>\n

Although he admitted the government could not stop the Rohingya from registering with the UNHCR, Rijiju said that since India had not signed the refugee convention, it considered the Rohingya \u201cillegal immigrants\u201d who \u201chave no basis to live here.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

FOR SALIMULLAH,<\/strong> Rijiju\u2019s comment signalled an existential threat for his community. He resolved to fight the policy of mass deportations in court. Represented by Bhushan, Salimullah and Mohammad Shaqir, another Rohingya refugee, filed a petition in the Supreme Court, in August 2017.<\/p>\n

Their petition argued that Rijiju\u2019s threat violated the constitutional rights to equality, life and liberty, as well as India\u2019s obligations under international law and treaties. The government had claimed in an affidavit that it was not bound by the principle of non-refoulement\u2014which prohibits states from sending refugees back to where they face oppression\u2014since it had not ratified the refugee convention. The petitioners responded that the principle was enshrined in the international covenant on civil and political rights, the universal declaration of human rights and the 1967 declaration on territorial asylum, all of which India had signed. They noted that the Supreme Court had upheld this principle as part of the right to life, enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. They argued that they were not \u201cclaiming the rights of an illegal immigrant to reside in India,\u201d but the application of fundamental rights to all persons, including refugees.<\/p>\n

In response to the government\u2019s contention that it had intelligence inputs that the Rohingya have links with terror groups, the petitioners argued that \u201cthere is not a single FIR registered against the members of the Rohingya community so far, in any matter that would jeopardise national security.\u201d They quoted the home minister of Jammu and Kashmir, who had told the state\u2019s legislative assembly earlier that year that no Rohingya had been found to be involved in militancy-related incidents.<\/p>\n

Unlike the Tibetans or Sri Lankan Tamils or Chin Buddhists from Myanmar, who were all granted asylum by Indian governments in the past, the Rohingya have never been granted refugee status. In 2012, some two thousand Rohingya squatted outside the UNHCR office for a month, asking for recognition as refugees, but their demands were never met. Instead, the government granted a few Rohingya\u2014most of them settled in and around Delhi\u2014long-term visas, ambiguous documents that allow them to stay in the country and enrol their children in government schools. These visas can be revoked, or made redundant, through a change in government policy, much like the one Rijiju was proposing.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court bench hearing the petition has not yet passed a judgement. However, on 4 October 2018, another bench refused to entertain a plea by Bhushan to halt the deportation of seven Rohingya refugees, who had been arrested in Manipur under the Foreigners Act. Human-rights groups have denounced the verdict. \u201cGiven the ethnic identity of the men, this is a flagrant denial of their right to protection and could amount to refoulement,\u201d Tendayi Achiume, the UN special rapporteur on racism, said in response. Aakar Patel of Amnesty International\u2019s India branch called the decision \u201ca dark day for human rights in India\u201d and \u201cbereft of empathy.\u201d He added that it \u201cnegates India\u2019s proud tradition of providing refuge to those fleeing serious human rights violations.\u201d<\/p>\n

{TWO}<\/strong><\/p>\n

TO CONTINUE READING Go to Original \u2013 caravanmagazine.in<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

How the world\u2019s largest democracy treats the world\u2019s most persecuted minority.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":139943,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56,677,180],"tags":[229,240,1149,1198,526,120,1199,865,267,260,487,926,866,651,291,287,103,107,527,985,380,124,126,92,118],"class_list":["post-139941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-asia-pacific","category-asia-updates-on-myanmar-rohingya-genocide","category-brics","tag-activism","tag-asia","tag-asia-and-the-pacific","tag-buddhism","tag-burma-myanmar","tag-conflict","tag-ethnic-cleansing","tag-genocide","tag-geopolitics","tag-history","tag-human-rights","tag-humanitarianism","tag-indigenous-rights","tag-justice","tag-military","tag-power","tag-racism","tag-religion","tag-rohingya","tag-social-justice","tag-solutions","tag-united-nations","tag-violence","tag-violent-conflict","tag-war"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139941\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/139943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}