{"id":142211,"date":"2019-09-09T12:00:30","date_gmt":"2019-09-09T11:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=142211"},"modified":"2019-09-16T11:08:37","modified_gmt":"2019-09-16T10:08:37","slug":"emails-show-monsanto-orchestrated-gop-effort-to-intimidate-cancer-researchers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/09\/emails-show-monsanto-orchestrated-gop-effort-to-intimidate-cancer-researchers\/","title":{"rendered":"Emails Show Monsanto Orchestrated GOP Effort to Intimidate Cancer Researchers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

Illustration: Soohee Cho\/The Intercept<\/p><\/div>\n

23 Aug 2019 – <\/em>In 2015, the World Health Organization\u2019s cancer research\u00a0arm,\u00a0the International Agency for Research on Cancer, classified\u00a0glyphosate,\u00a0an active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup,\u00a0as a \u201cprobable carcinogen,\u201d setting off a global debate about the world\u2019s most popular weedkiller.<\/p>\n

Over the last four years,\u00a0Republicans\u00a0in Congress have\u00a0excoriated and\u00a0pushed to defund the IARC, casting their defense of the chemical\u00a0as a quest on behalf of small American farmers. Rep. Frank Lucas, R-Okla., has written<\/a> that his outrage over the cancer research is on behalf of the \u201cfarmers and food manufacturers who rely on traditional farming methods to produce the food that fuels America \u2014 and the world.\u201d<\/p>\n

But according to a recent trove of documents, the ongoing political assault on the IARC has been scripted in part by Monsanto, the St. Louis-based chemical and seed conglomerate that produces Roundup and Roundup-resistant crops.<\/p>\n

Roundup has been cash cow for the company since the 1970s, fueling billions of dollars in annual profits. Its use has skyrocketed in recent decades since the company developed genetically modified corn and other crops that are resistant to it; it is now the world\u2019s leading herbicide.<\/p>\n

A growing number of individuals say that\u00a0Monsanto\u00a0failed to warn consumers\u00a0of the dangers of using Roundup and had marketed the chemical spray as harmless to humans, while internally\u00a0recommending that its own employees use gloves and protective gear. Critics\u00a0say that the Roundup formula used in the U.S. also contains a surfactant that makes the herbicide far more toxic<\/a>\u00a0than the variation of the spray sold in the European market.<\/p>\n

Monsanto, which\u00a0merged with German multinational pharmaceutical company Bayer AG last year, is facing as many as\u00a011,000 cases relating to glyphosate. Last year,\u00a0Dewayne Johnson, a former groundskeeper now dying of cancer, was the first to win his\u00a0jury trial in San Francisco state court against Monsanto, alleging that years of using Roundup contributed to his non-Hodgkin\u2019s lymphoma. Johnson was awarded $289 million by a jury, though a judge later reduced the amount to $78 million<\/a>.\u00a0Another plaintiff, Edwin Hardeman, also alleged that he spent decades spraying the glyphosate-based weedkiller with little to no protective gear and developed the same blood cancer, won a similar case in federal court this year.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Plaintiff Dewayne Johnson after hearing the verdict in his case against Monsanto at the Superior Court of California in San Francisco on Aug. 10, 2018. Photo: Josh Edelson, Pool\/AP<\/p><\/div>\n

The newly disclosed files, released by\u00a0a plaintiff\u2019s\u00a0law firm<\/a>, Baum Hedlund, include company emails, documents, and deposition transcripts showing that Monsanto lawyers and lobbyists guided lawmakers, coordinating efforts to question the IARC\u2019s credibility and slash\u00a0U.S. support for the international body.<\/p>\n

The company has denied claims that its products cause cancer, and Monsanto lawyers have declared that Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s designation of glyphosate as safe should clear the company of any legal liability. In a recent marketing campaign<\/a>, Bayer touted its friendly cooperation with regulators as a sign that the public should have nothing to fear from its products.<\/p>\n

But the documents also suggest that the firm has used its influence with lawmakers to antagonize regulators, applying pressure and investigative threats to shape the science used to research glyphosate and other controversial chemical compounds, as part of a larger campaign to silence critics and discredit the IARC.<\/p>\n

In June 2015,<\/u> Michael Dykes, then serving as Monsanto\u2019s vice president of government affairs, laid out<\/a> the company\u2019s strategy for \u201cmanaging the IARC issue,\u201d\u00a0following the\u00a0cancer research center\u2019s\u00a0determination\u00a0that March.<\/p>\n

The company, he wrote in an email, had\u00a0dispatched its team of lobbyists to brief \u201ckey staff at EPA, USTR, USDA, and the State Department as well as members of Congress\u201d to raise concerns with the IARC\u2019s scientific process, and with how the decision could impact agriculture as well as international trade.\u00a0Lobbyists also met with an official at the Department of Health and Human Services; they saw the agency\u2019s support as key \u201cto secure a WHO clarification.\u201d<\/p>\n

Later in the year, Dykes\u00a0updated<\/a>\u00a0the Monsanto team with plans to push back against the IARC, including the possible\u00a0<\/strong>placement of advertisements \u2014 in the form of letters from third-party groups \u2014 in Capitol Hill newspapers, as well as preparation to use a Senate Agriculture Committee hearing as a venue to get the EPA to reaffirm support for glyphosate. \u201cWe will make sure Committee members ask EPA the glyphosate safety question,\u201d Dykes wrote.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Roundup weed killing products on May 14, 2019.
Photo Illustration: Scott Olson\/Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

The following year, FTI Government Affairs, one of several consulting firms guiding Monsanto\u2019s political response to the IARC decision, assisted GOP lawmakers with an effort to investigate U.S. support for the IARC.<\/p>\n

In one email sent by Todd Rands, a former Monsanto attorney working with FTI, sent a draft of a letter ostensibly written by Rep. Rob Aderholt, R-Ala., a senior lawmaker on the House Appropriations Committee, addressed to Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes for Health. NIH is the government agency responsible for most federal public health research and is the largest funder\u00a0to the IARC. The letter, in fact, had been written by FTI consultants, along with Rands\u2019s\u00a0edits<\/a>, according<\/a> to his deposition testimony.<\/p>\n

The FTI-written letter<\/a>\u00a0declared that glyphosate \u201cdoes not cause cancer,\u201d accused the IARC of peddling \u201cbunk science,\u201d and threatened a reassessment of the NIH budget to ensure that the agency is \u201ccommitted to only funding organizations that produce information and conclusions based on sound science, robust processes, and credible methodology.\u201d<\/p>\n

During his deposition, Rands said that he believed it appropriate for Monsanto to draft a letter on behalf of a lawmaker to NIH, calling such ghostwriting a \u201ccommon practice in Washington.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not clear what Aderholt\u2019s office did with the FTI-authored letter. Aderholt\u2019s office did not respond to a request for comment from The Intercept. On June 2, 2016, Aderholt sent a letter to NIH to request<\/a> a briefing on the IARC\u2019s designation of glyphosate as a probable carcinogen and \u201cthe standards that NIH places on research funded by the U.S. taxpayers,\u201d a letter that mirrored many of the demands in the FTI letter, though it used different language.<\/p>\n

More GOP letters<\/a> and\u00a0demands for investigation<\/a> over NIH\u2019s funding for IARC followed.\u00a0Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, then-chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., Chaffetz\u2019s successor as Oversight chair, and Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, then-chair of the House Science Committee, all called for inquiries into IARC funding and the designation of glyphosate as a carcinogen.<\/p>\n

The Monsanto lobbyists closely conferred with the committees as they honed in on the IARC\u2019s funding. Drew Feeley, an attorney for the GOP staff of the House Oversight Committee, emailed an FTI consultant to\u00a0explain that his office was working to attach a line to a government budget bill designed \u201cto apply to IARC\u201d in order to slash its funding over the glyphosate issue. \u201cThanks again for coordinating,\u201d Feeley wrote<\/a> to the Monsanto consultant. Feeley, notably, is now serving\u00a0as an attorney with the Council on Environmental Quality, the White House office that oversees environmental policy.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe expect the House OGR investigation about IARC to expand as they move into the new administration,\u201d wrote Rands, in an update to Monsanto colleagues.<\/p>\n

Last year, under Smith, the House Science Committee devoted<\/a> an entire committee hearing into questioning the IARC, with a focus on its conduct around glyphosate. Smith subsequently sent more letters to cancer researchers in Norway, demanding<\/a> they \u201ccorrect the flaws in IARC.\u201d\u00a0The House\u00a0Appropriations\u00a0Committee followed up by\u00a0cutting\u00a0$2 million<\/a> in funding to the IARC, a symbolic move to distance the U.S. from the international body, which relies on a budget of around $40 million<\/a> from a range of member countries.<\/p>\n

The congressional outreach<\/u> was only part of a multifaceted effort to control the\u00a0backlash sparked by the IARC designation.<\/p>\n

In recent years, a great deal<\/a> of new information has come to light around Monsanto\u2019s work to conceal the potential health risks around glyphosate.\u00a0Earlier this month, new documents revealed<\/a> that Monsanto operated a \u201cfusion center\u201d to discredit critics of the company, including former Reuters journalist Carey Gillam, who has written extensively about glyphosate. The operation even monitored and considered legal action again\u00a0singer Neil Young, a critic of Monsanto.<\/p>\n

Le Monde, the French newspaper, published an award-winning investigation on the controversy, referring to the Monsanto-run campaign to discredit the IARC as an effort to \u201cintimidate<\/a>\u201d the cancer research center.<\/p>\n

A\u00a0separate cache of litigation files, released in May, revealed<\/a> that Monsanto also contracted<\/a> with Hakluyt, a corporate intelligence firm, to keep close tabs on political elites in Washington. The company consulted with senior Trump and EPA officials, and confirmed that the administration would support Monsanto on glyphosate issues. \u201cWe have Monsanto\u2019s back on pesticide regulation,\u201d a domestic policy adviser in the White House told Hakluyt.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

A building on the campus of Monsanto headquarters in St. Louis on May 23, 2016. Photo: Michael B. Thomas\/AFP\/Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

The last year has exposed other cloak-and-dagger tactics.\u00a0The company was criticized<\/a> for ghostwriting scientific studies on the safety of glyphosate, which were presented<\/a> as independent research. At the San Francisco civil trial over glyphosate, an FTI consultant working for Monsanto was caught<\/a> posing as a journalist working for the\u00a0<\/strong>BBC and another British outlet.<\/p>\n

And in\u00a02017,<\/strong> one of the most stunning disclosures revealed that a senior EPA staffer, Jess Rowland, had quietly tipped Monsanto off to the fact that federal agencies had sought to reevaluate the safety of glyphosate, boasting to the company that he could \u201ckill<\/a>\u201d federal investigations into glyphosate.\u00a0Shortly before a crucial European Union vote on glyphosate products, the EPA suddenly<\/a> released a report declaring the safety of the product. The document was later taken down because it had not yet been completed. One Monsanto official relayed to a colleague that Rowland had told him, \u201cIf I can kill this I should get a medal,\u201d in regards to the glyphosate review conducted by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, a department of Health and Human Services.<\/p>\n

After leaving the EPA, Rowland went to work in the private sector, consulting for chemical companies.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s also a revolving door\u00a0between\u00a0lawmakers\u00a0supporting Monsanto and professionals working on behalf of the company. Shortly after retiring from Congress this year, following his investigation of the IARC, Lamar Smith took a job at\u00a0Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, a lobbying firm that represents<\/a> Bayer-Monsanto\u2019s interests in Washington.<\/p>\n

***********<\/p>\n

Correction, August 23<\/strong><\/p>\n

This story has been updated to clarify that Hardeman\u2019s case was in federal court and that Rowland\u2019s comments about killing a federal study of glyphosate referred to ASTDR.<\/em><\/p>\n

Update, August 23<\/strong><\/p>\n

After publication, Bayer\u00a0sent\u00a0the following\u00a0statement: \u201cNone of the documents cherry-picked by plaintiffs\u2019 lawyers and their surrogates contradict the findings of the extensive body of science and conclusions of leading health regulators that glyphosate-based herbicides are safe when used as directed and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Instead, they show that Monsanto\u2019s activities were intended to ensure there was a fair, accurate and science-based dialogue about the company and its products in response to significant misinformation. We take the safety of our products and our reputation very seriously and work to ensure that everyone \u2013 from regulators to customers to other stakeholders \u2013 has accurate and balanced information to make decisions about our products.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

______________________________________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Lee Fang<\/a> – lee.fang@\u200btheintercept.com<\/a> <\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 theintercept.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

23 Aug 2019 – In 2015, the World Health Organization\u2019s cancer research arm, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, classified glyphosate, an active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, as a \u201cprobable carcinogen,\u201d setting off a global debate about the world\u2019s most popular weedkiller.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":142214,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,55,145,52,140,200],"tags":[952,232,120,354,401,1212,932,1055,931,651,234,929,1122,109,287,1102,935,985,70,921],"class_list":["post-142211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anglo-america","category-capitalism","category-science","category-health","category-organic-gmo-genetic-engineering","category-academia-knowledge-scholarship","tag-agriculture","tag-capitalism","tag-conflict","tag-economics","tag-environment","tag-fraud","tag-genetic-engineering","tag-genetic-manipulation","tag-gmo","tag-justice","tag-media","tag-monsanto","tag-organic-food","tag-politics","tag-power","tag-public-health","tag-roundup","tag-social-justice","tag-usa","tag-whistleblowing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=142211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142211\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/142214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=142211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=142211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=142211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}