{"id":142692,"date":"2019-09-16T12:00:16","date_gmt":"2019-09-16T11:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=142692"},"modified":"2019-09-10T07:55:31","modified_gmt":"2019-09-10T06:55:31","slug":"the-shocking-paper-predicting-the-end-of-democracy-in-the-usa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/09\/the-shocking-paper-predicting-the-end-of-democracy-in-the-usa\/","title":{"rendered":"The Shocking Paper Predicting the End of Democracy [in the USA]"},"content":{"rendered":"

Human brains aren\u2019t built for self-rule, says Shawn Rosenberg. That\u2019s more evident than ever.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Ancient Greece Democracy<\/p><\/div>\n

8 Sep 2019 – <\/em>Everything was unfolding as it usually does. The academics who gathered in Lisbon this summer for the International Society of Political Psychologists\u2019 annual meeting had been politely listening for four days, nodding along as their peers took to the podium and delivered papers on everything from the explosion in conspiracy theories to the rise of authoritarianism.<\/p>\n

Then, the mood changed. As one of the lions of the profession, 68-year-old Shawn Rosenberg<\/a>, began delivering his paper, people in the crowd of about a hundred started shifting in their seats. They loudly whispered objections to their friends. Three women seated next to me near the back row grew so loud and heated I had difficulty hearing for a moment what Rosenberg was saying.<\/p>\n

What caused the stir? Rosenberg, a professor at UC Irvine, was challenging a core assumption about America and the West. His theory? Democracy is devouring itself\u2014his phrase \u2014 and it won\u2019t last.<\/p>\n

As much as President Donald Trump\u2019s liberal critics might want to lay America\u2019s ills at his door, Rosenberg says the president is not the cause of democracy\u2019s fall\u2014even if Trump\u2019s successful anti-immigrant populist campaign may have been a symptom of democracy\u2019s decline.<\/p>\n

We\u2019re <\/em>to blame, said Rosenberg. As in \u201cwe the people.\u201d<\/p>\n

Democracy is hard work. And as society\u2019s \u201celites\u201d\u2014experts and public figures who help those around them navigate the heavy responsibilities that come with self-rule\u2014have increasingly been sidelined, citizens have proved ill equipped cognitively and emotionally to run a well-functioning democracy. As a consequence, the center has collapsed and millions of frustrated and angst-filled voters have turned in desperation to right-wing populists.<\/p>\n

His prediction? \u201cIn well-established democracies like the United States, democratic governance will continue its inexorable decline and will eventually fail.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Democracy Praxis<\/p><\/div>\n

The last half of the 20th century<\/strong> was the golden age of democracy. In 1945, according to one survey<\/a>, there were just 12 democracies in the entire world. By the end of the century there were 87. But then came the great reversal: In the second decade of the 21st century, the shift to democracy rather suddenly and ominously stopped\u2014and reversed.<\/p>\n

Right-wing populist politicians have taken power or threatened to in Poland, Hungary, France, Britain, Italy, Brazil and the United States. As Rosenberg notes, \u201cby some metrics, the right wing populist share of the popular vote in Europe overall has more than tripled from 4% in 1998 to approximately 13% in 2018.\u201d In Germany, the right-wing populist vote increased even after the end of the Great Recession and after an influx of immigrants entering the country subsided.<\/p>\n

A brief three decades after some had heralded the \u201cend of history\u201d it\u2019s possible that it\u2019s democracy that\u2019s nearing the end. And it\u2019s not just populist rabble-rousers who are saying this. So is one of the establishment\u2019s pioneer social scientists, who\u2019s daring to actually predict the end of democracy as we know it.<\/p>\n

Rosenberg, who earned degrees at Yale, Oxford and Harvard, may be the social scientist for our time if events play out as he suggests they will. His theory is that over the next few decades, the number of large Western-style democracies around the globe will continue to shrink, and those that remain will become shells of themselves. Taking democracy\u2019s place, Rosenberg says, will be right-wing populist governments that offer voters simple answers to complicated questions.<\/p>\n

And therein lies the core of his argument: Democracy is hard work and requires a lot from those who participate in it. It requires people to respect those with different views from theirs and people who don\u2019t look like them. It asks citizens to be able to sift through large amounts of information and process the good from the bad, the true from the false. It requires thoughtfulness, discipline and logic.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, evolution did not favor the exercise of these qualities in the context of a modern mass democracy. Citing reams of psychological research, findings that by now have become more or less familiar, Rosenberg makes his case that human beings don\u2019t think straight. Biases of various kinds skew our brains at the most fundamental level. For example, racism is easily triggered unconsciously in whites by a picture of a black man wearing a hoodie. We discount evidence when it doesn\u2019t square up with our goals while we embrace information that confirms our biases. Sometimes hearing we\u2019re wrong makes us double down. And so on and so forth.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Athens Democracy Ancient Greece<\/p><\/div>\n

Our brains, says Rosenberg, are proving fatal to modern democracy. Humans just aren\u2019t built for it.<\/p>\n

People have been saying for two millennia that democracy is unworkable, going back to Plato. The Founding Fathers were sufficiently worried that they left only one half of one branch of the federal government in the hands of the people. And yet for two centuries democracy in America more or less proceeded apace without blowing itself up.<\/p>\n

So why is Rosenberg, who made his name back in the 1980s with a study<\/a> that disturbingly showed that many voters select candidates on the basis of their looks, predicting the end of democracy now?<\/p>\n

He has concluded that the reason for right-wing populists\u2019 recent success is that \u201celites\u201d are losing control of the institutions that have traditionally saved people from their most undemocratic impulses. When people are left to make political decisions on their own they drift toward the simple solutions right-wing populists worldwide offer: a deadly mix of xenophobia, racism and authoritarianism.<\/p>\n

The elites, as Rosenberg defines them, are the people holding power at the top of the economic, political and intellectual pyramid who have \u201cthe motivation to support democratic culture and institutions and the power to do so effectively.\u201d In their roles as senators, journalists, professors, judges and government administrators, to name a few, the elites have traditionally held sway over public discourse and U.S. institutions\u2014and have in that role helped the populace understand the importance democratic values. But today that is changing. Thanks to social media and new technologies, anyone with access to the Internet can publish a blog and garner attention for their cause\u2014even if it\u2019s rooted in conspiracy and is based on a false claim, like the lie that Hillary Clinton was running a child sex ring from the basement of a Washington D.C. pizza parlor, which ended in a shooting.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Alex Wong\/Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

While the elites formerly might have successfully squashed conspiracy theories and called out populists for their inconsistencies, today fewer and fewer citizens take the elites seriously. Now that people get their news from social media rather than from established newspapers or the old three TV news networks (ABC, CBS and NBC), fake news proliferates. It\u2019s surmised that 10 million people saw on Facebook the false claim that Pope Francis came out in favor of Trump\u2019s election in 2016. Living in a news bubble of their own making many undoubtedly believed it. (This was the most-shared news story on Facebook in the three months leading up to the 2016 election, researchers report.)<\/p>\n

The irony is that more<\/em> democracy\u2014ushered in by social media and the Internet, where information flows more freely than ever before\u2014is what has unmoored our politics, and is leading us towards authoritarianism. Rosenberg argues that the elites have traditionally prevented society from becoming a totally unfettered democracy; their \u201coligarchic \u2018democratic\u2019 authority\u201d or \u201cdemocratic control\u201d has until now kept the authoritarian impulses of the populace in check.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Compared with the harsh demands made by democracy, which requires a tolerance for compromise and diversity, right-wing populism is like cotton candy. Whereas democracy requires us to accept the fact that we have to share our country with people who think and look differently than we do, right-wing populism offers a quick sugar high. Forget political correctness. You can feel exactly the way you really want about people who belong to other tribes.<\/p>\n

Right-wing populists don\u2019t have to make much sense. They can simultaneously blame immigrants for taking jobs away from Americans while claiming that these same people are lazy layabouts sponging off welfare. All the populist followers care is that they now have an enemy to blame for their feelings of ennui.<\/p>\n

And unlike democracy, which makes many demands, the populists make just one. They insist that people be loyal. Loyalty entails surrendering to the populist nationalist vision. But this is less a burden than an advantage. It\u2019s easier to pledge allegiance to an authoritarian leader than to do the hard work of thinking for yourself demanded by democracy.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cIn sum, the majority of Americans are generally unable to understand or value democratic culture, institutions, practices or citizenship in the manner required,\u201d Rosenberg has concluded. \u201cTo the degree to which they are required to do so, they will interpret what is demanded of them in distorting and inadequate ways. As a result they will interact and communicate in ways that undermine the functioning of democratic institutions and the meaning of democratic practices and values.\u201d<\/p>\n

I should clarify that the loud whispers in the crowd in Lisbon weren\u2019t a response to Rosenberg\u2019s pessimism. This was after all a meeting of political psychologists\u2014a group who focus on flaws in voters\u2019 thinking and the violation of democratic norms. At the conference Ariel Malka reported evidence that conservatives are increasingly open to authoritarianism. Brian Shaffer related statistics showing that since Trump\u2019s election teachers have noted a rise in bullying. Andreas Zick observed that racist crimes shot up dramatically in Germany after a million immigrants were allowed in.<\/p>\n

What stirred the crowd was that Rosenberg has gone beyond pessimism into outright defeatism. What riled<\/em> the crowd was that he\u2019s seemingly embraced a kind of reverence for elitism no longer fashionable in the academy. When challenged on this front, he quickly insisted he didn\u2019t mean to exempt himself from the claim that people suffer from cognitive and emotional limitations. He conceded that the psychological research shows everybody\u2019s irrational, professors included! But it was unclear that he convinced the members of the audience he really meant it. And they apparently found this discomforting.<\/p>\n

There were less discomforting moments in Lisbon. The convention gave an award to George Marcus, one of the founders of the discipline, who has dedicated his career to the optimistic theory that human beings by nature readjust their ideas to match the world as it is and not as they\u2019d like it to be\u2014just as democracy requires.<\/p>\n

But this isn\u2019t a moment for optimism, is it? What is happening around the world shows that the far-right is on the march. And when it comes to the U.S., the problem might be larger than one man. Liberals have been praying for the end of the Trump presidency, but if Rosenberg is right, democracy will remain under threat no matter who is in power.<\/p>\n

___________________________________________________<\/p>\n

Rick Shenkman, founder of George Washington University\u2019s History News Network, is the author of <\/em>Political Animals: How Our Stone-Age Brain Gets in the Way of Smart Politics<\/a> (Basic Books).<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 politico.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

8 Sep 2019 – Human brains aren\u2019t built for self-rule, says Shawn Rosenberg. That\u2019s more evident than ever. People have been saying for two millennia that democracy is unworkable, going back to Plato. The Founding Fathers were sufficiently worried that they left only one half of one branch of the federal government in the hands of the people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":142694,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[276,642,234,109,287,70,172],"class_list":["post-142692","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anglo-america","tag-democracy","tag-literature","tag-media","tag-politics","tag-power","tag-usa","tag-west"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142692","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=142692"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142692\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/142694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=142692"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=142692"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=142692"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}