{"id":146309,"date":"2019-11-04T12:00:23","date_gmt":"2019-11-04T12:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=146309"},"modified":"2019-11-11T11:28:14","modified_gmt":"2019-11-11T11:28:14","slug":"britain-obstructs-spanish-investigation-into-cia-spying-on-julian-assange","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/11\/britain-obstructs-spanish-investigation-into-cia-spying-on-julian-assange\/","title":{"rendered":"Britain Obstructs Spanish Investigation into CIA Spying on Julian Assange"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>26 Oct 2019 &#8211; <\/em>In a blatant attempt to obstruct justice, British judicial authorities are stymieing an investigation into the US Central Intelligence Agency\u2019s (CIA) illegal spying on WikiLeaks\u2019 publisher Julian Assange. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/10\/uk-blocks-spanish-judge-from-questioning-julian-assange-over-spying-allegations\/\" ><em>El Pais<\/em> reported on Wednesday [23 Oct]<\/a> that a request by Spanish judge Jos\u00e9 de la Mata to interview Assange via videolink had been rejected by the United Kingdom Central Authority last month. De la Mata is investigating a complaint by Assange\u2019s lawyers alleging that UC Global, the private company hired to provide security to Ecuador\u2019s London embassy, illegally surveilled him on behalf of US authorities while he was protected with political asylum inside the building.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_146310\" style=\"width: 230px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/julian-assange.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-146310\" class=\"wp-image-146310 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/julian-assange-220x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"220\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/julian-assange-220x300.jpg 220w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/julian-assange.jpg 469w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 220px) 100vw, 220px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-146310\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Julian Assange<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The decision further demonstrates that the British judiciary and the country\u2019s political establishment are acting as the accomplices of the US government\u2019s attempt to destroy Assange. <em>El Pais\u2019<\/em> revelation follows a case management hearing on Monday, over the US attempt to extradite Assange, that can only be described as a lawless show trial.<\/p>\n<p>The presiding judge, Vanessa Baraitser, dismissed arguments that should have led to the immediate dismissal of the American case, including a ban on extraditions from Britain to the US for political offences. She exuded indifference to the deterioration of Assange\u2019s health, and waved away his lawyer\u2019s statements about the CIA spying, despite its blatant criminality.<\/p>\n<p>Information about the surveillance operation was first reported by <em>El Pais<\/em> last month. It revealed that UC Global\u2019s David Morales came into contact with US officials in 2015 and agreed to furnish them with confidential information about Assange.<\/p>\n<p>Over the following two years, the spying dramatically escalated. It included live video and audio feeds from inside the embassy, which were streamed to CIA offices in Langley, Virginia. Every area of the building, including the women\u2019s toilet, was under surveillance.<\/p>\n<p>The spying covered Assange\u2019s privileged conversations with his lawyers, and private consultations with doctors. It allegedly came to include the theft of his legal and medical documents. A diaper was even DNA-tested to see if Assange was the father of a baby who had been brought to the building.<\/p>\n<p>The WikiLeaks founder\u2019s visitors were also scrutinised. A follow-up report in <em>El Pais<\/em> indicated that US visitors, along with lawyers and journalists, were particularly targeted. Details of their personal documents and their electronic devices, including information that could be used to hack their phone, was transmitted by UC Global to the CIA.<\/p>\n<p>The extent of the surveillance is known, in part, because copies of the material were in the possession of a group of Spanish criminals. Earlier this year, they sought to extort millions of euros in exchange for videos, photos and audio recordings of Assange and his visitors.<\/p>\n<p>Assange\u2019s lawyers filled a criminal complaint in Spain earlier this year. Morales was arrested last month and released on bail. <em>El Pais<\/em> reported: \u201cOn September 25, Judge Jos\u00e9 de la Mata sent British authorities an European Investigation Order (EIO) requesting permission to question Assange by videoconference as a witness in the case opened by Spain\u2019s High Court, the Audiencia Nacional\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On behalf of the United Kingdom Central Authority, Rashid Begun rejected the request, claiming that \u201cthese types of interviews are only done by the police\u201d in Britain, that the events described by de la Mata were \u201cunclear\u201d and that the Spanish judge may not have jurisdiction to authorise the interview.<\/p>\n<p>In a reply cited by <em>El Pais<\/em>, de la Mata rejected these assertions. He reportedly noted previous cases, in which the British authority had accepted similar requests, and said that the only obstacle would be if the interviewee was accused of a crime. He reminded the British, however, that \u201cin this case, Julian Assange is a witness, not an accused party.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>De la Mata wrote: \u201cThe Spanish judicial system has jurisdiction and is able to hear cases of crimes committed by Spanish citizens outside of the country as long as the event is a crime in the place where it was committed, the victim or the public prosecutor present a criminal complaint, and the suspect has not been sentenced or acquitted in another country.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Assange\u2019s complaint, he insisted, met all of these criteria.<\/p>\n<p>EIO\u2019s are granted on a daily basis between European Union member states. The British decision to reject the Spanish request is clearly a political one. <em>El Pais<\/em> bluntly stated that it \u201cis being viewed by Spanish judicial bodies as a show of resistance against the consequences that the case could have on the process to extradite the Australian cyberactivist to the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The central role of CIA spying in the attempted American prosecution of Assange renders it illegal under international law and in violation of the US Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>In the 1970s, the US administration of President Richard Nixon moved to prosecute Daniel Ellsberg under the Espionage Act, the same legislation being used against Assange. Ellsberg, as a senior government employee, had leaked the Pentagon Papers exposing the extent of US criminality in the Vietnam war.<\/p>\n<p>The attempt to prosecute the whistleblower fell apart after it emerged that the government had conducted warrantless spying against him. The illegal surveillance included wiretaps and violations of Ellsberg\u2019s doctor-client privilege.<\/p>\n<p>The unlawful spying on Assange is of an even greater order of magnitude. As his lawyers argued in court on Monday, it should result in the immediate dismissal of the US extradition case.<\/p>\n<p>Baraitser, like Rashid Begun, however, was not interested. During the hearing, US officials, representing the very same government that violated Assange\u2019s rights, were visibly holding sway in the courtroom.<\/p>\n<p>According to former British diplomat Craig Murray and others present, the US officials were repeatedly involved in discussions with British prosecutors and appeared to be coaching them.<\/p>\n<p>The British prosecutors were particularly hostile to a request by Assange\u2019s lawyers for a three-month delay to the full extradition hearing scheduled for February. They insisted that the case continue on the \u201ctimetable\u201d dictated by the US government, a request that was upheld by Baraitser.<\/p>\n<p>The likely reason for the bitter opposition to any delay in both Washington and London, is that evidence from the ongoing Spanish case will further undermine the already discredited extradition case and place legal obstacles in the way of Assange\u2019s dispatch to the US.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wsws.org\/en\/articles\/2019\/10\/26\/span-o26.html?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=sharpspring&amp;sslid=MzM3MDYwMTc0MjcwBwA&amp;sseid=M7Q0MzIyNDY2twQA&amp;jobid=c3f3675b-a382-477c-90bb-f2b613b981e6\" >Go to Original \u2013 wsws.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El Pa\u00eds reported on Wednesday [23 Oct] that a request by Spanish judge Jos\u00e9 de la Mata to interview Assange via videolink had been rejected by the UK. He is investigating a complaint by Assange\u2019s lawyers alleging that UC Global, the private company hired to provide security to Ecuador\u2019s London embassy, illegally surveilled him on behalf of US authorities while he was protected with political asylum inside the building.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":146310,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,62,51,139,60],"tags":[229,910,120,276,942,487,378,651,234,291,91,444,287,985,380,1109,911,454,572,249,639,292,70,126,118,172,921,113,75],"class_list":["post-146309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anglo-america","category-media","category-europe","category-justice","category-whistleblowing-surveillance","tag-activism","tag-big-brother","tag-conflict","tag-democracy","tag-ecuador","tag-human-rights","tag-journalism","tag-justice","tag-media","tag-military","tag-nato","tag-nonviolence","tag-power","tag-social-justice","tag-solutions","tag-spying","tag-surveillance","tag-sweden","tag-torture","tag-trump","tag-uk","tag-un","tag-usa","tag-violence","tag-war","tag-west","tag-whistleblowing","tag-wikileaks","tag-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146309\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/146310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}