{"id":146789,"date":"2019-11-04T12:00:38","date_gmt":"2019-11-04T12:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=146789"},"modified":"2024-09-23T14:41:31","modified_gmt":"2024-09-23T13:41:31","slug":"how-the-us-regime-justifies-the-theft-of-syrias-oil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2019\/11\/how-the-us-regime-justifies-the-theft-of-syrias-oil\/","title":{"rendered":"How the US Regime \u2018Justifies\u2019 the Theft of Syria\u2019s Oil"},"content":{"rendered":"

30 Oct 2019 – <\/em>On 26 Oct, the New York Times<\/em> headlined \u201cKeep the Oil\u2019: Trump Revives Charged Slogan for New Syria Troop Mission\u201d<\/a> and opened by saying that \u201cin recent days, Mr. Trump has settled on Syria\u2019s oil reserves as a new rationale for appearing to reverse course and deploy hundreds of additional troops to the war-ravaged country.\u201d They closed with a statement from Bruce Riedel, retired from the CIA: \u201c\u2018Let\u2019s say he does do it,\u2019 Mr. Riedel said. \u2018Let\u2019s say we establish the precedent that we are in the Middle East to take the oil. The symbolism is really bad.\u2019\u201d The propaganda-value of a \u2018news\u2019-report is concentrated in its opening, and especially in what the \u2018reporter\u2019 (fulfilling the intentions of his editors) selected to be at the very end (such as Riedel\u2019s statement). However, is what\u2019s wrong with taking Syria\u2019s oil actually the \u201csymbolism<\/em>,\u201d as Riedel said, or is it instead the theft \u2014 the reality<\/em> (and why did the NYT<\/em> pretend that it\u2019s the latter)? Nowhere did that NYT<\/em> article use the word \u201ctheft,\u201d or anything like it, but that is the actual issue here \u2014 not<\/em> mere \u2018symbolism\u2019.<\/p>\n

Trump had been so lambasted by the Democratic Party\u2019s \u2018news\u2019-media (such as the NYT<\/em>) and by all the rest of the neoconservative \u2018news\u2019-media (the Republican ones), for his trying to withdraw forces from Obama\u2019s regime-change war against Syria, he\u2019s now switched to trying to \u2018justify\u2019 continuation<\/em> of America\u2019s invasion-occupation of Syria by his promising to steal the oil there \u2014 but the \u2018news\u2019-media almost never use that term (\u201ctheft\u201d), or anything like it, to describe what he is promising to do, because they themselves have been propagandizing the American people to oppose<\/em> withdrawal from Syria, which would mean ending Obama\u2019s invasion-occupation of Syria. Both the Republican and the Democratic Parties, and their \u2018news\u2019-media, have been full-bore \u201cAssad must step-down.\u201d None of America\u2019s \u2018news\u2019-media had stated, either, that America\u2019s invasions-occupations of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria, have all been disasters (though they all were), and that all of them have been and are defeats for America (though they all were that, on all of America\u2019s leaders\u2019 lies about \u2018protecting human rights\u2019, and about \u2018bringing democracy\u2019, and about what would have been producing improved lives \u2014 instead of producing continued bloodshed \u2014 for the residents in the countries that we had invaded and occupied). It\u2019s all lies, nothing but that; and any \u2018news\u2019-media which operate this way will find themselves increasingly trapped in their lies, like the politicians themselves are. The only way \u2018out\u2019, for any of them (including for Trump, and for both the Republican and the Democratic press) is yet more<\/em> lies \u2014 and all of these lies are cover-ups, by the press and by the politicians. (This is why they\u2019re torturing<\/a> Julian Assange to death: he has seriously challenged that ongoing deceit, in which they all participate.) Unless the public stop the media from doing it \u2014 by cancelling their subscriptions, and otherwise demonetizing the ones who have been doing it \u2014 the lies, and deceits, and invasions, and destructive US national expenditures of tens of trillions of dollars (being paid to corporations such as Lockheed Martin, and not only<\/em> to our soldiers) will continue. This enormous counterproductive expenditure will drain America\u2019s abilities to fund health care, education, etc. It is bringing the US economy down and not merely bringing America to an ethically lower and lower point. The more that America\u2019s leaders try to continue expanding the American empire, the more that they will both embarrass, and weaken, America. This is real. It is no propaganda, at all. It\u2019s \u201cthe truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

On October 24th, USA Today<\/em> headlined \u201cPentagon planning to send tanks, armored vehicles to Syrian oil fields\u201d<\/a>, and reported that \u201cThe Pentagon is preparing to send tanks and armored vehicles to Syrian oil fields, according to a US official \u2013 a stunning reversal of President Trump\u2019s decision to withdraw US forces from the war-torn country after he declared victory over ISIS.\u201d Those oil fields don\u2019t belong to the US, but to Syria\u2019s Government, and their operation is vital to funding Syria\u2019s reconstruction, which the US regime is determined to prevent; but USA Today\u2019<\/em>s \u2018news\u2019-report says nothing about any of that. The US Government is trying to steal Syria\u2019s oil fields \u2014 but this USA Today<\/em> article says nothing about that, either. American troops are invaders of Syria, unlike Russian troops, who are defenders of Syria, and who had been invited into Syria by Syria\u2019s Government (the only government Syria has) in order to help defend Syria\u2019s sovereignty, over Syria\u2019s own land, including its oil wells, against the US-and-allied invasion. All of that vital context is missing from this deceptive report.<\/p>\n

That report said \u201cNow, Russian troops, which are in Syria to bolster the regime of Bashar al-Assad, and Turkish forces, are operating in the region previously patrolled by US and Kurdish forces.\u201d It\u2019s saying that, whereas the region had been \u201cpatrolled\u201d \u2014 instead of invaded<\/em> and now occupied<\/em> \u2014 by US and Kurdish forces, \u201cRussian troops \u2026 and Turkish forces \u2026 are in Syria to bolster the regime of Bashar al-Assad,\u201d though his \u2018regime\u2019 is actually the only legitimate Government of Syria<\/em>. But the US regime claims the right to force Assad to be overthrown.<\/p>\n

This report stated that \u201cThe deployment of armor is aimed at Russia and Syria, not ISIS, said Nicholas Heras, an expert on Syria with the Center for a New American Security. \u2026 \u2018Pure and simple,\u2019 he said, \u2018the Pentagon is making contingencies for a big fight with Russia for Syria\u2019s oil.\u2019\u201d But Russia<\/em> isn\u2019t trying to seize Syria\u2019s oil \u2014 the US regime is doing that, actually. Russian forces are in Syria only in order to assist Syria to defend its oil, and its land. If the US regime will go into World War III so as to steal Syria\u2019s oil, then the likelihood of Russia\u2019s letting this theft happen is slight: that would be Russia\u2019s capitulation without a fight, and Russia has never given any indication it would do such a thing. (And Russian media DO refer to this as being \u201ctheft\u201d<\/a>; they\u2019re not trying to hide<\/em> the fact<\/em>. Russia already<\/em> is fighting the US regime in Syria. And on October 26th, Russia\u2019s Sputnik News headlined \u201cThe Russian military described the US scheme as nothing less than \u2018international state banditism\u2019,\u201d<\/a> and reported that, \u201cAccording to Russian intelligence, the illegal US-supervised extraction of Syrian oil was being carried out by \u2018leading American corporations\u2019 and private military contractors, with US special forces and air power used for protection. Konashenkov said the estimated monthly revenue of this \u2018private enterprise\u2019 was over $30 million.\u201d) This is the territory of Syria, which is a Russian ally. The thief here is clearly the US regime, not Syria, and not Russia. It is no one else than the US regime that is aiming to steal Syria\u2019s oil by sending in tanks. Nowhere does the USA Today<\/em> article even so much as hint <\/em>that this is the case.<\/p>\n

An October 21st Wall Street Journal<\/em> article reported the US Government\u2019s theft of Syria\u2019s oil, but it was instead headlined with the misleading, more innocuous, and less attention-grabbing \u201cTrump Calls for Defense, Use of Syrian Oil Fields\u201d<\/a> \u2014 nothing<\/em> about any \u201ctheft\u201d \u2014 and it opened with the seemingly US-or-Syria defense<\/em>-related statement (as if US troops were in Syria as defenders, instead of as attackers and thieves) that \u201cPresident Trump said he is planning to keep a small number of troops in northeast Syria to protect the oil fields there and suggested that an American company might help the Syrian Kurds develop the oil for export.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, since when does a thief break into your residence in order to \u201cprotect\u201d anything? And since when does such a thief have a right to sell your property, or to determine what people (such as \u201cthe Syrian Kurds\u201d) will sell it?<\/p>\n

Was that article news, or was it instead propaganda? It certainly misrepresents. What it reports, is reported as if <\/em>this thieving operation were only being contemplated<\/em>, and would be new<\/em>, but the thieving is actually nothing new \u2014 it\u2019s an already-existing, and longstanding, coordinated and international operation, by the US regime and its allies, as will here be documented.<\/p>\n

America\u2019s mainstream media now (such as in USA Today,<\/em> WSJ<\/em>, and NYT)<\/em> are normalizing this theft. This normalization is being done by their propaganda, which now is for a Republican Government, but formerly was for a Democratic Government. Previously, Democrats had done the same hiding of the regime\u2019s evil, when their Democratic President Barack Obama was the person who was perpetrating it.<\/p>\n

This theft \u2014 and the normalization of it \u2014 are actually bipartisan, and longstanding. When the \u2018news\u2019 presents false historical context, it lies; it is propaganda, and that\u2019s what the American nation\u2019s mainstream \u2018news\u2019-media now are. They are deceptive garbage, regime-propaganda.<\/p>\n

On October 20th, Republican US Senator Lindsey Graham, and Republican Maria Bartiromo of Fox News \u201cSunday Morning Futures,\u201d discussed the Republican Trump\u2019s plan to steal Syria\u2019s oil, and they both agreed that it might turn out to be an excellent policy. This show was headlined \u201cSen. Lindsey Graham: I am increasingly optimistic we can have historic solutions in Syria.\u201d<\/a> It was a remarkably bold defense of the US Government\u2019s \u2014 and of its allies\u2019 \u2014 thefts from Syria. Already, the US Government had said that it won\u2019t pay even a cent in order to provide restitution for the estimated $388 billion in damages to Syria<\/a> from the invasion of Syria by the US and by its allies such as Al Qaeda<\/a> and the Sauds<\/a>, but this show presented an endorsement by those two Republicans, backing the Republican US President\u2019s plan to steal Syria\u2019s oil, which goes beyond merely supporting zero restitution to the invaded country. No mention was being made, by them, on this \u2018news\u2019-medium, that (as will be documented here) those thefts by the US Government, and by its allies, have, in fact, been going on ever since the invasions of Syria by them and their proxies (or \u201cagents\u201d \u2014 such as Al Qaeda<\/a>) had started in 2012. No mention was made by them that this was the policy of Democratic President Barack Obama and that it\u2019s merely being continued further by Trump. To the exact contrary: Trump was being praised by these propagandists for starting this program, and, so, their praise was not just evil; it was actually entirely false.<\/p>\n

Right before the interview, Bartiromo had been pretending to be a critical non-partisan journalist instead of the propagandist that she is, and so she stated that \u201cmy biggest issue here is the strength of Iran [as if Iran had ever invaded or even threatened to invade the United States, and as if Trump\u2019s anti-Iran policies aren\u2019t sufficiently stringent, or maybe even are vastly too stringent, or maybe even are altogether unjustified]. And I feel like the administration had the Iranians on their heels and ruining the economy through sanctions, through this pressure campaign. And now we give up and leave Syria.\u201d The Senator disagreed with her make-pretend criticism of the Republican President, and he said that, instead,<\/p>\n

The big thing for me is the oil fields. President Trump is thinking outside the box. I was so impressed with his thinking about the oil. Not only are we going to deny the oil fields falling into Iranian hands. I believe we\u2019re on the verge of a joint venture between us and the Syrian Democratic Forces, who helped destroy ISIS and keep them destroyed, to modernize the oil fields and make sure they get the revenue, not the Iranians, not Assad. \u2026 That\u2019s why what President Trump is proposing in Syria, a joint venture dealing with the southern oil fields in Syria, between our allies, the Kurds and the Arabs who helped us destroy ISIS, is a historic change that could pay dividends for the region. And, quite frankly, we could generate revenue to pay for our commitment in Syria. \u2026 I am increasingly optimistic that we can have some historic solutions in Syria that have eluded us for years, if we play our cards right.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Bartiromo replied \u201cWow. \u2026 You actually do see a way forward after you have spoken with the president on his plan to secure those oil fields.\u201d<\/p>\n

This theft is pushed by all of the US mainstream media, and Trump knows that he will need at least some degree of support from them if he is to be able to win re-election. This is the reason why he keeps contradicting himself<\/a> \u2014 trying to appeal to the \u201cNo More War\u201d crowd, while still drawing donations from the \u201cmilitary-industrial complex\u201d or owners of America\u2019s \u2018defense\u2019 contractors. (There\u2019s a lot of crossover between the controlling owners of those firms and the controlling owners of the \u2018news\u2019-media \u2014 and<\/em> of the \u2018non-profit\u2019 foundations.) America\u2019s major \u2018news\u2019 media have always buried the truth about this long-ongoing theft.<\/p>\n

And not only was the theft of Syria\u2019s oil the policy of Democratic US President Barack Obama, but it was participated in by his coalition, which included both EU heads-of-state and Arab heads-of-state, and this policy began in 2011. Here\u2019s how it, in fact, developed:<\/p>\n

On 28 November 2012, Syria News headlined \u201cEmir of Qatar & Prime Minister of Turkey Steal Syrian Oil Machinery in Broad Daylight\u201d<\/a>and accompanied it by video of the alleged event. (At that time, Qatar and Turkey were allies of the US arming the \u2018rebels\u2019 in Syria to overthrow Syria\u2019s Government; so, they were part of America\u2019s broader operation, and were also profiting from it.) But that video is no longer active. A subsequent description of that video was posted under the headline \u201cEmir of Qatar & Prime Minister of Turkey Steal Syrian Oil Excavators \u2013 No Translation\u201d<\/a>. Another posting of the video online has lasted from 6 October 2013 to the present time, under the headline \u201cEmir of Qatar & Prime Minister of Turkey Steal Syrian Oil Excavators \u2013 BiffiSyrien\u201d<\/a>, where it still can be viewed.<\/p>\n

By no later than 12 December 2012<\/a>, US President Barack Obama made the decision to hire Al Qaeda in Syria (called \u201cAl Nusra\u201d) to train and lead almost all of America\u2019s proxy-forces on the ground in Syria to overthrow Syria\u2019s Government. (Kurds were assigned to be America\u2019s lead proxy-forces in far northeastern Syria.) (Obama was so determined to protect<\/em> Al Qaeda in Syria as to sabotage<\/em> on 17 September 2016<\/a> his own Secretary of State, John Kerry\u2019s, just-signed Syrian ceasefire agreement with Russia, because that agreement allowed not only ISIS, but also Al Qaeda forces, to continue<\/em> to be bombed in Syria by Russia. Obama was protecting Al Qaeda in Syria.)<\/p>\n

On 22 April 2013, the AP headlined \u201cEU lifts Syria oil embargo to bolster rebels\u201d<\/a> and reported that<\/p>\n

The European Union on Monday lifted its oil embargo on Syria to provide more economic support to the forces fighting to oust President Bashar Assad\u2019s regime. The decision will allow for crude exports from rebel-held territory. \u2026 The oil exports could open an important revenue stream for Syria\u2019s opposition. \u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

While Syria was never one of the world\u2019s major oil exporters, the sector was a pillar of Syria\u2019s economy until the uprising, with the country producing about 380,000 barrels a day and exports \u2014 almost exclusively to Europe \u2014 bringing in more than $3 billion in 2010. Oil revenues provided around a quarter of the funds for the national budget. Being able to take advantage of the country\u2019s oil resources will help the Syrian uprising \u201cbig time,\u201d said Osama Kadi, a senior member of the Syrian opposition.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On 27 April 2013, the New York Times<\/em> headlined \u201cIslamist Rebels Create Dilemma on Syria Policy\u201d<\/a> and reported that<\/p>\n

Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of. \u2026 The religious agenda of the combatants sets them apart from many civilian activists, protesters and aid workers who had hoped the uprising would create a civil, democratic Syria. \u2026 Of most concern to the United States is the Nusra Front, whose leader recently confirmed that the group cooperated with Al Qaeda in Iraq and pledged fealty to Al Qaeda\u2019s top leader, Ayman al-Zawahri, Osama bin Laden\u2019s longtime deputy. Nusra has claimed responsibility for a number of suicide bombings and is the group of choice for the foreign jihadis pouring into Syria.<\/em><\/p>\n

Another prominent group, Ahrar al-Sham, shares much of Nusra\u2019s extremist ideology but is made up mostly of Syrians\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

In the oil-rich provinces of Deir al-Zour and Hasaka, Nusra fighters have seized government oil fields, putting some under the control of tribal militias and running others themselves.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThey are the strongest military force in the area,\u201d said the commander of a rebel brigade in Hasaka reached via Skype. \u201cWe can\u2019t deny it.\u201d\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cWe all want an Islamic state and we want Shariah to be applied,\u201d said Maawiya Hassan Agha, a rebel activist reached by Skype in the northern village of Sarmeen. He said a country\u2019s laws should flow from its people\u2019s beliefs and compared Syrians calling for Islamic law with the French banning Muslim women from wearing face veils.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On 1 May 2013, TIME<\/em> bannered \u201cSyria\u2019s Opposition Hopes to Win the War by Selling Oil\u201d<\/a> and reported that<\/p>\n

Without an embargo, European companies can now legally begin importing barrels of oil directly from rebel groups, which have seized several oil fields in recent months, mostly around the eastern area of Deir Ezzor. That would provide the opposition with its first reliable source of income since the revolt erupted in Feb. 2011, and in theory hasten the downfall of Bashar Assad\u2019s regime, by giving rebels the means to run skeletal local governments and consolidate their control.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On 15 June 2013, Global Research headlined \u201cFormer French Foreign Minister: The War against Syria was Planned Two years before \u2018The Arab Spring\u2019\u201d<\/a> and Gear\u00f3id \u00d3 Colm\u00e1in reported that<\/p>\n

In an interview with the French TV station LCP, former French minister for Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas said:<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria<\/em> [in other words, in 2009] on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.<\/em><\/p>\n

This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.<\/em><\/p>\n

Naturally, I refused, I said I\u2019m French, that doesn\u2019t interest me.<\/em>\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Dumas attributed it to Israel, not to the US, nor to the Sauds (who actually had always been the CIA\u2019s choice to appoint the leaders of Syria<\/a>), and he didn\u2019t even so much as mention either of those, except to say that \u201cthis will enable it [Israel] to replace the United States as a global hegemon\u201d (which is a crackpot idea). Though his interpretation was ridiculous, his allegation that in 2009 \u201ctop British officials \u2026 confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria\u201d is a factual matter, which is either true or false. (Back in 2009, there is actual evidence that American\u2019s President Barack Obama was aiming to overthrow Assad<\/a>. Furthermore, Obama\u2019s team started by no later than 23 June 2011<\/a> to plan both the coup in Ukraine which succeeded and the coup in Syria, which failed. And as the great investigative journalist Gareth Porter reported<\/a> on 5 January 2017, \u201cIn August 2011, national security officials began urging Obama to call on Assad to step down,\u201d but at that time \u201cHe wasn\u2019t willing to go along with anything except small arms,\u201d until CIA Director David Petraeus \u2014 who soon thereafter became a member of the Bilderberg group \u2014 persuaded him to go all-out in arming the \u2018rebels\u2019. Furthermore, \u201cwhen Obama was making crucial Syria policy decisions in September 2011,\u201d his advisors assumed that both Russia and Iran would stay out of the matter and just just let the US and the Sauds take-over Syria. Obama respected his advisors. And, then, Porter headlined on 22 June 2017, \u201cHow America Armed Terrorists in Syria\u201d<\/a>. So: this theft-operation was extensively armed by the US regime, and funded by the Sauds.)<\/p>\n

In any case, the EU was certainly<\/em> helping ISIS and other such groups to steal Syria\u2019s oil, so as to help fund their overthrow-Assad operation. So, the participation also of UK was likely, even if not, at that time, proven.<\/p>\n

On 14 October 2015, the Financial Times<\/em> headlined \u201dIsis Inc: how oil fuels the jihadi terrorists\u201d<\/a> and reported that \u201cSelling crude is Isis\u2019 biggest single source of revenue. \u2026 While al-Qaeda, the global terrorist network, depended on donations from wealthy foreign sponsors, Isis has derived its financial strength from its status as monopoly producer of an essential commodity consumed in vast quantities throughout the area it controls.\u201d (In other words, when TIME<\/em>, on 1 May 2013, bannered \u201cSyria\u2019s Opposition Hopes to Win the War by Selling Oil\u201d<\/a> and said \u201cThat would provide the opposition with its first reliable source of income since the revolt erupted in Feb. 2011,\u201d the \u201copposition\u201d being referred to there was actually ISIS, not Al Qaeda. The EU was buying its black-market oil from ISIS.)<\/p>\n

On 1 December 2015, another great investigative journalist, Nafeez Ahmed, bannered \u201cWestern firms primed to cash in on Syria\u2019s oil and gas \u2018frontier\u2019\u201d<\/a> and he reported:<\/p>\n

US, British, French, Israeli and other energy interests could be prime beneficiaries of military operations in Iraq and Syria designed to rollback the power of the \u2018Islamic State\u2019 (ISIS) and, potentially, the Bashar al-Assad regime.<\/em><\/p>\n

A study for a global oil services company backed by the French government and linked to Britain\u2019s Tory-led administration, published during the height of the Arab Spring, hailed the significant \u201chydrocarbon potential\u201d of Syria\u2019s offshore resources.<\/em><\/p>\n

The 2011 study was printed in GeoArabia, a petroleum industry journal published by a Bahrain-based consultancy, GulfPetroLink, which is sponsored by some of the world\u2019s biggest oil companies, including Chevron, ExxonMobil, Saudi Aramco, Shell, Total, and BP. GeoArabia\u2019s content has no open subscription system and is exclusively distributed to transnational energy corporations, corporate sponsors and related organisations, as well as some universities.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On 28 August 2018, Abdel Bari Atwan, one of the Middle East\u2019s most respected journalists, headlined \u201cCarrots and Sticks\u201d<\/a> and reported that<\/p>\n

Damascus has been inundated with secret offers in recent weeks as part of a carrot-and-stick policy, two of which are particularly significant.<\/em><\/p>\n

The first, reported on Tuesday by the pro-Hezbollah Lebanese daily al-Akhbar and the semi-official Iranian Fars news agency, was conveyed by a senior US military officer accompanied by representatives of various intelligence agencies. They flew to Damascus on a private UAE jet, and were met by the head of the National Security Bureau Gen. Ali Mamlouk, intelligence chief Gen. Deeb Zaitoun, and deputy army chief-of-staff Gen. Muwaffaq Masoud. Their meeting lasted four hours. The Americans reportedly offered to withdraw all US forces from Syria in exchange for Damascus complying with three demands: to pull Iranian forces out of areas of southern Syria adjoining Israel; to guarantee US oil companies a share of Syria\u2019s oil east of the Euphrates; and to hand over all information about terrorist groups and their members in Syria.<\/em><\/p>\n

The second offer was revealed by Lebanese Hezbollah MP Nawwaf al-Mousawi in a discussion programme on the Lebanese TV channel al-Mayadeen, at which I was also a panellist. He said that Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad Bin-Salman sent an envoy to Asad offering to support him remaining president for life and provide generous Saudi support for Syria\u2019s reconstruction in exchange for him severing ties with Iran and Hezbollah.<\/em><\/p>\n

Both offers were categorically turned down by the Syrian leadership.<\/em><\/p>\n

The American delegation was told that its troops in Syria were occupying forces which would be treated as such, that Syria could not abandon its strategic allies, and that issues such as US participation in the oil industry and exchanging intelligence could be discussed once political relations were re-established.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On 2 September 2018, the German intelligence analyst who blogs anonymously as \u201cMoon of Alabama\u201d headlined \u201cSyria Sitrep \u2013 US To Stay To \u2018Create Quagmires\u2019\u201d<\/a> and he reported:<\/p>\n

The claim that the US is there to fight ISIS is a lie. ISIS is still active in two places in Syria. Both are under US control. \u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

The US is not fighting ISIS in Syria. It is building semi-permanent bases, trains a large proxy force, and <\/em>controls <\/em><\/a>Syria\u2019s oilfields. Its aim is still regime change, the same aim it had when it launched the war on Syria seven and a half years ago. To achieve that it will continue to sow as much chaos as possible.<\/em><\/p>\n

As CIA and Pentagon mouthpiece David Ignatius <\/em>wrote this week<\/em><\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c[T]he administration has stopped the dithering and indecision of the past 18 months and signaled that the United States has enduring interests in Syria, beyond killing Islamic State terrorists \u2014 and that it isn\u2019t planning to withdraw its Special Operations forces from northeastern Syria anytime soon.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u2018Right now, our job is to help create quagmires [for Russia and the Syrian regime] until we get what we want,\u2019 says one administration official, explaining the effort to resist an Idlib onslaught. This approach involves reassuring the three key US allies on Syria\u2019s border \u2014 Israel, Turkey and Jordan \u2014 of continued American involvement.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But what seems ultimately to endure is: Steal the oil.<\/strong><\/p>\n

On 26 February 2019 the Syrian National News Agency reported that Syria\u2019s Government accused the US Government of having stolen from ISIS so much gold that ISIS had received as payment for oil that ISIS had stolen from Syria, so that the US Federal Reserve was enriched by at least 40 tons of gold<\/a>. The accusation is that this black-marketed oil produced that gold for the US Government, and purchased \u201csafe passage for the terrorists.\u201d<\/p>\n

So: Trump, and Fox News, and US Senators, etc., are planning to continue the operation that Democratic US President Barack Obama, and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the US CIA, and Britain\u2019s MI6, and the rest of the US regime and its allies, were trying to do even before the \u201cArab Spring\u201d began. As I have previously reported, Obama, even when he came into office in 2009<\/a>, was aiming to take control of Syria, for it to become ruled by agents of the Saud family, and he started planning the \u2018revolution\u2019 in Syria by no later than 23 June 2011<\/a>.<\/p>\n

So: the faker Donald Trump is really just old hat, nothing at all new. He\u2019s just trying to do what Obama was trying to do, but using different tactics to do it.<\/p>\n

And, so, what is the \u2018justification\u2019 for this theft? It is America\u2019s alliances:<\/strong><\/p>\n

BARTIROMO: Why are we sending troops to Saudi Arabia then?<\/em><\/p>\n

GRAHAM: Well, because Saudi Arabia is an ally and Iran is an enemy.<\/em><\/p>\n

And Iran is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism on the planet. \u2026<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The official position of the US Government is that Iran is the top state sponsor of terrorism and that the Saudis (whom in diplomatic cables and other internal communications the US regime acknowledge to be the biggest financial backer of Al Qaeda) isn\u2019t even a state sponsor of terrorism, at all, but is instead a US \u2018ally\u2019.<\/p>\n

So: that\u2019s how they \u2018justify\u2019 it. They \u2018justify\u2019 it by the rest of the gang \u2014 the very same gang that the US regime itself leads. Their \u2018justification\u2019, of themselves, is empty<\/em>. It is only propaganda, for fools to believe. Nothing more, than that. On Friday, October 26th, the Washington Post<\/em> headlined \u201cTrump decided to leave troops in Syria after conversations about oil, officials say\u201d<\/a>, and \u2014 like all of the regime\u2019s stenographic reporting of the regime\u2019s \u2018news\u2019 \u2014 reported the regime\u2019s more official \u2018explanation\u2019, which was: \u201cDefense Secretary Mark T. Esper confirmed on Friday that troops would remain in eastern Syria to prevent the oil fields from being retaken by the Islamic State.\u201d This is just more of the same: it\u2019s just citing \u2018ISIS\u2019 as being the \u2018enemy\u2019, instead of citing \u201cSyria\u201d as being that. They are asserting that they can steal Syria\u2019s oil so as to prevent ISIS from stealing it. First, ISIS and other US allies stole it; and, then, the US seized ISIS\u2019s gold from those sales; and, now, the US will be stealing Syria\u2019s oil directly<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Similarly, in 2002 and 2003, the US regime, and its stenographic press, kept shifting their \u2018explanation\u2019 as to why Iraq had to be immediately invaded. Americans believed it then, and they believe it now. The American public never learn. This is now 17 years later. There has been no change, except in whom the occupant of the White House is. But fortunately, this time, there is Russia that perhaps can say no to this plan. Only time will tell if it will. And, if it does, then will Trump pull his nuclear trigger \u2014 an invasion of Russia, WW III, an aggression against the other superpower? I doubt it, but it could happen. To overestimate the greed and the stupidity of the international Deep State is hard to do. These billionaires didn\u2019t get to be billionaires by being intelligent or being good \u2014 cunning and ruthless, yes, but that\u2019s very different. After all, the announced highest aspiration of Jeff Bezos, who owns the Washington Post<\/em>, is to send a trillion people out into space, \u201cgetting humanity established in the solar system\u201d<\/a>. Even conquering the world wouldn\u2019t be enough to satisfy some of these individuals.<\/p>\n

On 20 August 2018, Russia\u2019s RT News headlined \u201c\u2018Secret directive\u2019 bans UN agencies from helping rebuild Syria until \u2018political transition\u2019 \u2013 Lavrov\u201d<\/a> and reported that Russia\u2019s Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, said that the Executive branch of the UN, the UN Secretariat, had issued in October 2017 a \u201csecret directive\u201d (violating two resolutions of the UN General Assembly \u2014 the UN\u2019s Legislature), and that this secret directive ordered UN agencies to do nothing to help rebuild Syria unless the US first had approved of a new person to replace Syria\u2019s existing President, and unless that person had already become installed to lead Syria.<\/p>\n

According to the anti-Russian Haaretz<\/em> newspaper in anti-Russian Israel, on 31 August 2018<\/a>,<\/p>\n

One country that is likely going to stay out of the infighting over the reconstruction process is the United States. The Trump administration has no clear policy on the \u201cday after\u201d in Syria, except for one principle: No American money will be spent on it.<\/em><\/p>\n

The American ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, made that point clear at a speech she gave on Tuesday in Washington, explaining that Russia and the Assad regime \u201cown\u201d Syria now. \u201cYou broke it, you own it,\u201d Haley said at a summit organized by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies<\/em> [an organization that zionist Jews had set up in the US<\/a>]. \u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

Ken Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, expressed a similar view, <\/em>writing in the British newspaper The Independent<\/em><\/a>: \u201cLong before any talk of providing reconstruction assistance for Syria, which in any event would require lifting separate targeted sanctions, European governments should call out Russia\u2019s complicity in Syria\u2019s war crimes and vigorously press the Kremlin to end these atrocities and stop underwriting Syria\u2019s repression.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

It was the deployment of the Russian air force three years ago that tilted the scales of the war in favor of Assad, who at that time controlled only a quarter of the country\u2019s territory. Even today, Russia maintains its military presence in Syria to ensure the regime\u2019s upper hand. <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is similar to the policy of imperial Rome toward Carthage \u2014 a resisting city-state \u2014 in 146 BC, when the Emperor ordered the resisting city-state destroyed at the end of the final, the Third, Punic War<\/a>, except that, in the present instance, the imperial ruler is (on and off, depending on his whim of the day) quitting his efforts to conquer that land, and is instead (but this being consistent) commanding his agencies never to assist to restore Syria, unless and until it finally will surrender to the empire. In that sense, Syria may be considered to be today\u2019s Carthage. (Another difference is that Syria, unlike Carthage at that time, is no expansionist \u2014 or \u201cimperialist\u201d \u2014 power.) So: Donald Trump, Lindsey Graham, Maria Bartiromo, Barack Obama, the US Congress, Human Rights Watch, the United Nations, and the other agents and agencies of the US empire, are in an imperial tradition that goes back thousands of years, if not longer.<\/p>\n

However, though Syria is an ally of Iran, and of Russia; and so the US regime want regime-change there, Donald Trump might have reached the limit of his regime-change aspirations when on 10 September 2019 he finally fired John Bolton, who (along with his predecessors) had failed against Iran, failed against Venezuela, failed against Russia, and failed against China. Trump\u2019s most intensive regime-change effort has been against Iran (though Fox\u2019s Maria Bartiromo thinks it\u2019s not enough). On 5 July 2018, the excellent investigative journalist Sibel Edmonds headlined at her Newsbud site her 33-minute video \u201cBreaking: Insiders Reveal Secret Deal to Topple Iran Government!\u201d<\/a> revealing (starting at 19:00) that ever since Trump entered office in 2017, his Administration was planning to execute an operation not only to terminate the Iran deal and re-institute sanctions but to enforce sanctions so stringently against any country that would continue trading with Iran, so as to strangle Iran\u2019s economy and thus impose such misery upon the Iranian population so that they would welcome a military coup in order to end their (US-imposed) misery. This operation had a Plan A and a Plan B. In Plan A, Iran\u2019s generals who would participate in the coup would institute an \u2018anti-American\u2019 \u2018independent\u2019 government which would buy US-made weapons from EU countries and thus not<\/em> be viewed by Iranians as a US-stooge regime (though becoming a US stooge regime); the sanctions would be lifted, and Iran\u2019s economy would be restored. In Plan B, 3-3.5M Iranians would be killed by the bombing, and all of Iran\u2019s generals would be among them. Plan A would be Iran\u2019s generals \u2018standing up for the Iranian people\u2019, a \u2018nationalistic\u2019 (instead of capitulationist) coup, to remove the \u2018dictatorship\u2019. Plan B would be a much bigger slaughter of Iranians. Edmonds said (27:30) the coup \u201cwould take place, I would say, in less than six months.\u201d (29:00) \u201cThere is a large, powerful military faction that have said Yes [to Plan A]. \u2026 How sure of this am I? 100%.\u201d But she was wrong in this prediction; she hadn\u2019t considered the bigger picture. What\u2019s that? Trump was getting too close to his own re-election campaign. And not enough Iranian generals could be corrupted to become traitors; the coup didn\u2019t occur. Bolton, etc., had been too rosy in their predictions that the threats would be enough and that the patriotism of enough of Iran\u2019s generals could just be bought off. (Perhaps the corrupt Americans had expected Iranians to be as corrupt as they themselves were.) Plan B was thus supposed to become imposed \u2014 an outright US invasion of Iran. But what would this invasion have done to Trump\u2019s re-election chances? The Deep State had actually suckered him. That\u2019s why Bolton (part of the Deep State) was fired. And, so, now, Congress and the US media are finally out for Trump\u2019s scalp, because he wouldn\u2019t follow through with the Deep State\u2019s plan. Maybe he\u2019ll do it if he becomes re-elected, but they can\u2019t trust him; they want President Mike Pence. That\u2019s become their new Plan B: impeachment in the House, and forced removal in the Senate. His intensified effort, now, to steal Syria\u2019s oil, isn\u2019t enough to stop that.<\/p>\n

The reason why Julian Assange, ever since 12 June 2012, has been under various forms of imprisonment \u2014 and now torture<\/a> \u2014 without there having been any conviction for anything, and not even any trial being held in his case, is that the US and its allied regimes need to keep their secrets, and therefore need to eliminate him. To publishers, and to journalists, throughout the US-and-allied world, his case is the ultimate warning of what each one of them could face. This is how the real<\/em> law actually operates, throughout the empire. Assange is simply the personification of it, for everyone. However, as might logically follow from this situation, the only country in the world where Assange \u2014 who is globally<\/em> viewed more favorably than unfavorably \u2014 is widely despised, is the United States<\/a>, where the handwriting against him is \u201con the wall,\u201d almost everywhere. America\u2019s \u2018news\u2019-media have been uniquely devoted to doing their job. But, of course, authentic<\/em> news-media perform a different<\/em> job. And Assange\u2019s case is the most effective possible warning to whatever authentic news-media might still exist within the US empire. To call this empire a \u2018democracy<\/a>\u2019 anywhere, insults <\/em>that noble term.<\/p>\n

___________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/em>Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 <\/em>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/a>,<\/em> of\u00a0<\/em>Christ\u2019s Ventriloquists: The Event that Created Christianity<\/a>, and\u00a0of<\/em>\u00a0Feudalism, Fascism, Libertarianism and Economics<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

30 Oct 2019 – Since when does a thief break into your residence in order to \u201cprotect\u201d anything? And since when does such a thief have a right to sell your property, or to determine what people (such as \u201cthe Syrian Kurds\u201d) will sell it?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,65,147,66,55,204],"tags":[1441,232,120,354,401,267,1126,1050,866,504,263,767,291,545,109,287,329,923,985,413,249,292,70,126,75],"class_list":["post-146789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-militarism","category-anglo-america","category-energy","category-middle-east-north-africa","category-capitalism","category-syria-in-context","tag-big-oil","tag-capitalism","tag-conflict","tag-economics","tag-environment","tag-geopolitics","tag-hegemony","tag-imperialism","tag-indigenous-rights","tag-international-relations","tag-matw","tag-middle-east","tag-military","tag-neoliberalism","tag-politics","tag-power","tag-resources","tag-sanctions","tag-social-justice","tag-syria","tag-trump","tag-un","tag-usa","tag-violence","tag-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146789"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146789\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":275105,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146789\/revisions\/275105"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}