{"id":153671,"date":"2020-02-17T12:00:59","date_gmt":"2020-02-17T12:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=153671"},"modified":"2020-02-11T08:15:04","modified_gmt":"2020-02-11T08:15:04","slug":"the-golden-age-of-white-collar-crime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2020\/02\/the-golden-age-of-white-collar-crime\/","title":{"rendered":"The Golden Age of White Collar Crime"},"content":{"rendered":"

Elite lawbreaking is out of control. This is the grotesque story of an existential threat to American society.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

1 – A Slow-Motion Looting<\/h3>\n

10 Feb 2020 – <\/em>Over the last two years, nearly every institution of American life has taken on the unmistakable stench of moral rot. Corporate behemoths like Boeing and Wells Fargo have traded blue-chip credibility for white-collar callousness. Elite universities are selling admission spots to the highest Hollywood bidder. Silicon Valley unicorns have revealed themselves as long cons (Theranos), venture-capital cremation devices (Uber, WeWork) or straightforward comic book supervillains (Facebook). Every week unearths a cabinet-level political scandal that would have defined any other presidency. From the blackouts in California to the bloated bonuses on Wall Street to the entire biography of Jeffrey Epstein, it is impossible to look around the country and not get the feeling that elites are slowly looting it.<\/p>\n

And why wouldn\u2019t they? The criminal justice system has given up all pretense that the crimes of the wealthy are worth taking seriously. In January 2019, white-collar prosecutions fell to their lowest level since researchers started tracking them in 1998. Even within the dwindling number of prosecutions, most are cases against low-level con artists and small-fry financial schemes. Since 2015, criminal penalties levied by the Justice Department have fallen from $3.6 billion to roughly $110 million. Illicit profits seized by the Securities and Exchange Commission have reportedly dropped by more than half. In 2018, a year when nearly 19,000 people were sentenced in federal court for drug crimes alone, prosecutors convicted just 37 corporate criminals who worked at firms with more than 50 employees.<\/p>\n

With few exceptions, the only rich people America prosecutes anymore are those who victimize their fellow elites. Pharma frat boy Martin Shkreli, to pick just one example, wasn\u2019t prosecuted for hiking the price of a drug used to treat HIV from $13.50 to $750 per pill. He went to prison for scamming investors in a hedge fund scheme years before. Meanwhile, in 2016, the CEO whose company experienced the deadliest mining disaster since 1970 served less than one year in prison and paid a fine of 1.4 percent of his salary and stock bonuses the previous year. Why? Because overseeing a company that ignores warnings and causes the deaths of workers, even 29 of them, is a misdemeanor<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Construction magnate Bruce Karatz provides an infuriating case study of how the criminal justice system treats wealthy defendants. In 2010, Karatz was convicted of failing to disclose in a financial statement that he had secretly \u201cbackdated\u201d his stock options (think Biff with the Sports Almanac in \u201cBack to the Future II\u201d) to boost his pay by more than $6 million. Prior to his sentencing hearing, his lawyer submitted letters of support from former mayor of Los Angeles Richard Riordan and billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad. Prosecutors recommended six-and-a-half-years in prison; the judge gave Karatz five years\u2019 probation and eight months of house arrest in his Bel Air mansion. After two years, the judge terminated the remainder of the sentence. Karatz later received a civic award from The Malibu Times for volunteer work he did to make a good impression for his sentencing hearing.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

HARVEY WEINSTEIN AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

Country-club nepotism and Gilded Age avarice are nothing new in America, of course. But the rich are enjoying a golden age of impunity unprecedented in modern history. \u201cAmerican elites have become more brazen than they were even five years ago,\u201d said Matthew Robinson, a professor at Appalachian State University and the author of several books on \u201celite deviance\u201d\u2014 all the legal and illegal social harms caused by the wealthy.<\/p>\n

Elite deviance has become the dark matter of American life, the invisible force around which the country\u2019s most powerful legal and political systems have set their orbit. Four members of the Sackler family, the owners of Oxycontin maker Purdue Pharma, have retained the services of former SEC head Mary Jo White as their personal lawyer. Epstein\u2019s dinner party guest lists included Harvard professors, billionaire philanthropists and members of political dynasties in at least two countries. In 2017, the pharmaceutical company Novartis spent about 14 percent of its annual lobbying budget on payments to a shell company controlled by ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen.<\/p>\n

Tax evasion siphons 10,000 times more money out of the U.S. economy every year than bank robberies. <\/em><\/strong>
\n— <\/em>SOURCE: FBI; IRS <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And this clubbiness has human costs. Tax evasion, to pick just one crime concentrated among the wealthy, already siphons up to 10,000 times more money out of the U.S. economy every year than bank robberies. In 2017, researchers estimated that fraud by America\u2019s largest corporations cost Americans up to $360 billion annually between 1996 and 2004. That\u2019s roughly two decades\u2019 worth of street crime every single year. As the links between corporations and regulators become increasingly incestuous, the future will bring more crude-soaked coastlines, price-gouging corporate behemoths and Madoff-style Ponzi schemes. More hurdles to suing companies for poisoning their customers or letting bosses harass their employees. And more uniquely American catastrophes like the opioid crisis and the price of insulin.<\/p>\n

Perhaps the greatest myth about white-collar crime is that Americans struggle to understand it\u2014as if chemical companies toxifying rivers or insurance executives gouging their customers fail to stimulate our moral intuitions. In fact, surveys consistently show that the vast majority of the population considers white-collar crime more harmful than street crime and powerful offenders more odious than common criminals.<\/p>\n

Those intuitions are correct: An entrenched, unfettered class of superpredators is wreaking havoc on American society. And in the process, they’ve broken the only systems capable of stopping them.<\/p>\n

2 – An Increasingly Desperate Pantomime of Legal Enforcement<\/h3>\n

Every year, at branded cocktail receptions and bloated buffet breakfasts, government agents spend two days hobnobbing with the tax-haven attorneys they spend the rest of the year investigating.<\/p>\n

The Offshore Alert conference takes place in Miami each spring, in London each fall and in \u201ckey offshore jurisdictions\u201d all year round. Officially, participants come to discuss \u201cwealth creation, preservation and recovery.\u201d Less officially, the tax lawyers come to learn what the feds will crack down on next year. The government investigators come to fish for future jobs. Imagine a yearly picnic where sheriffs give drug dealers tips on hiding baggies from pat-downs and leave with a new set of endorsements on LinkedIn.<\/p>\n

In person, the conference is even more surreal than it sounds. From across a cologne-scented hotel lobby, I watched tanned attorneys fresh off flights from the Caribbean mingle with ashen IRS agents who bring business cards from Kinko\u2019s because the agency won\u2019t pay to get them printed anymore. I listened to officials from the FBI and SEC lay out enforcement priorities as cryptocurrency investors and Russian bankers took notes. At lunch, I talked \u201cGame of Thrones\u201d with a Senate advisor, a government auditor and a Bahamanian lawyer who later offered to set me up a shell corporation for $5,000.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe killed a generation of agents,\u201d said Arthur VanDesande, a former IRS investigator. \u201cIf you investigate mom and pop grocery stores for 20 years, you lose the ability to do Bernie Madoffs.\u201d <\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The finance types were frosty during the day\u2014an investor who appeared to be wearing monogrammed slacks wouldn\u2019t tell me his first name\u2014but they loosened up at the happy hours. An offshore tax advisor bragged that he could take his clients\u2019 tax rates from 49 percent to 15 percent and complained that they were constantly pushing him to go lower. Another told me that most of his clients aren\u2019t trying to hide money from the government but from their second or third wives. \u201cThe first one raised their kids so they feel like she\u2019s entitled to something,\u201d he explained. \u201cIt\u2019s the trophy wives they want to lock out.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jack Albertson is a government investigator\u2014that\u2019s not his real name and he won\u2019t let me get more specific about his job description\u2014who has been coming to Offshore Alert for years. When I ask him how this cops-and-robbers conflagration even exists, he tells me I\u2019m thinking about it the wrong way. He, like all the other investigators here, knows that many of the lawyers who attend are hiding their clients\u2019 money sketchily or outright illegally. He even knows how they\u2019re doing it. The tactics for hiding money from tax authorities are not particularly sophisticated and have barely changed in the last 50 years. Set up a shell company and buy an appreciating asset\u2014Iowa farmland, a London apartment, a New York pizzeria, something common enough that it won\u2019t attract attention.<\/p>\n

Contrary to the \u201cCatch Me If You Can\u201d myth, Albertson said, solving financial crimes is not a cat-and-mouse game between cunning investigators and slippery con artists. Most of the time it is simply the blunt application of resources to a series of unimaginably tedious tasks. \u201cInvestigators can already crack almost any offshore account if they have enough time and money,\u201d he said. \u201cThe problem is that they only get that for a few cases a year.\u201d<\/p>\n

Over the last four decades, the agencies responsible for investigating elite and white-collar crime\u2014roughly speaking, the IRS, SEC, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI\u2014have seen their enforcement divisions starved into irrelevance. More than a third of the FBI investigators who patrol Wall Street were reassigned between 2001 and 2008. Enforcement funding at the IRS has fallen by 23 percent over the last decade. And, worst of all, every time a scandal exposes the government\u2019s inadequacy, Congress steps in to squeeze the regulators even harder.<\/p>\n

The most instructive case of this deliberate stunting is the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Founded in 1972, the CPSC\u2019s job is to make sure the things you buy won\u2019t pierce, poison or burn you. In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan slashed its budget as part of his crusade against bureaucratic waste. In the 1990s, Clinton instructed the agency to produce more data as part of his push for government accountability. No matter which party was in power, every administration gave the CPSC more to do and less money to do it with. By 2007, it had shrunk from its initial 786 employees to just 420.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

SINCE DONALD TRUMP BECAME PRESIDENT, WHITE COLLAR PROSECUTIONS HAVE FALLEN TO A RECORD LOW. Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

That same year, Mattel announced a recall of more than 1 million\u2060 of its children\u2019s toys that had been contaminated with lead paint. Despite the company\u2019s sophisticated international operations and billions in revenues, it had never bothered to inspect the Chinese sub-contractors. By then, the CSPC had fewer than 100\u2060 inspectors to monitor all imports to the United States. The Los Angeles-area ports where a chunk of the tainted toys arrived was overseen by a single part-time inspector.<\/p>\n

Congress responded to the scandal by compounding the mistakes that had caused it. Lawmakers agreed to double the CPSC\u2019s budget and increase its staff, but also obligated the agency to carry out dozens of new activities, including the creation of a public database to track safety hazards for every single product sold in the U.S.<\/p>\n

The new mandate swallowed up all the agency\u2019s new funding and more. Soon, the CPSC was dedicating nearly all of its time to lead abatement in children\u2019s toys, neglecting millions of products that posed far greater risks to children, like flammable blankets or dangerous table saws. The product database filled up with unconfirmed complaints and spammy comments. Mattel, meanwhile, faced no consequences for manufacturing the lead-tainted toys beyond a $2.3 million fine\u2014roughly 0.006 percent\u2060 of its net income. According to Rena Steinzor, the author of \u201cWhy Not Jail? Industrial Disasters, Corporate Malfeasance, and Government Inaction,\u201d the same cycle has repeated itself across every form of elite deviance, from tax compliance to financial regulation to environmental protection. In 2010, following a series of tax-haven scandals, the IRS set up a \u201cwealth squad\u201d to investigate the ultra-rich \u2014but only staffed it with enough agents to perform 36 audits in its first two years.<\/p>\n

After the Enron-led avalanche of corporate bankruptcies in the early 2000s, Congress gave the SEC enough funding to hire 200 new auditing staff. At the same time, however, lawmakers obligated the agency to review the filings of every publicly traded U.S. financial firm every three years\u2014a mandate far larger than the agency\u2019s new staffing levels. Then, after the financial crisis, it happened again: The Dodd-Frank act tasked the SEC with monitoring even more companies and trillions of new assets while increasing its enforcement staff by less than 10 percent.<\/p>\n

This cycle has left America\u2019s regulators with no choice but to engage in an increasingly desperate pantomime of white-collar law enforcement. On the outside, they report impressive performance statistics to avoid even more budget cuts. Behind the scenes, they\u2019ve retreated to investigating only the defendants they know are guilty and the crimes they know where to find.<\/p>\n

The primary beneficiaries of this shift are American elites. Rich people generate mountains of financial data. Millionaires can have over 100 bank accounts; billionaires\u2019 tax returns run to 800 pages long. For people who earn most of their income from working (i.e. almost everyone), the IRS has an automatic system that compares individuals\u2019 reports to the records submitted by their employers and banks. For the wealthy, who make much of their income from interest and investments, the agency has nothing to compare their reports against. The only way to tell if a rich person is cheating on their taxes is to sit down and go through them line by line.<\/p>\n

In 2018, prosecutors convicted just 37 corporate criminals who worked at companies with more than 50 employees.<\/em><\/strong>
\n\u00a0— SOURCE: U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cLet\u2019s say you get a tip that some billionaire is hiding a bunch of money offshore and not paying taxes on it,\u201d said Arthur VanDesande, who spent 25 years as a criminal investigator for the IRS. \u201cAnd you manage to narrow the tax evasion down to 20 of his bank accounts. OK, now you have to prepare 20 subpoenas, get them signed by a judge and deliver them to the banks. But when you go to Bank of America, they say, \u2018We don\u2019t accept subpoenas at this location, you have to go to our authorized representative in Orlando.\u2019 So then you go to Orlando and and you find out the money is linked to an offshore account. So then you have to write to the embassy…\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Due to the IRS’ lean resources, VanDesande did most of this legwork himself. \u201cYou type your own shit, you make your own copies, you write every single affidavit. Sometimes you feel like, \u2018I\u2019m a senior-level person with a college degree. Why am I calling Wells Fargo and sitting on hold for 45 minutes?\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Only some of this drudgery can be outsourced to lower-level staffers. White-collar cases involve understanding arcane laws, absorbing thousands of pages of documents, traversing international jurisdictions and coordinating a vast array of agencies from the Secret Service to the Post Office. They require investigators to be Jack Ryan, Magnum P.I. and Leslie Knope all at once. Even though auditing millionaires and billionaires is one of the most cost-effective government activities imaginable\u2014an independent report<\/a> estimated in 2014 that it yielded up to $4,545 in recovered revenue per hour<\/em> of staff time\u2014the IRS investigated the returns of just 3 percent of American millionaires in 2017.<\/p>\n

In addition to reducing their caseload, America\u2019s white-collar enforcement agencies have started prioritizing crimes they can prosecute in bulk. In 2017, the Department of Justice took on 889 prosecutions for identity theft (which, according to a 2010 survey, is estimated to cost individuals $371 out-of-pocket) and just 24 for antitrust violations. According to a ProPublica report<\/a>, 43 percent of all tax filers audited by the IRS earn less than $56,000 per year. Roughly one in six of the SEC\u2019s enforcement actions in fiscal 2019 were against financial firms for filing paperwork late\u2014a six-fold increase since 2004.<\/p>\n

Helen Richmond, a paralegal in a white-collar prosecutor\u2019s office (that\u2019s not her real name), said most of the defendants her office pursues are \u201ceither dumb or unlucky.\u201d She\u2019s worked on cases against money launderers who named stolen items on their wire transfers and fraudsters who sent emails with recipe-like details of their schemes. Criminals with even a scrap of sophistication, Richmond said, mostly avoid detection.<\/p>\n

Another bargain-hunting strategy is to try cases in administrative proceedings rather than civil courts, an innovation that reduces hearings from months to hours. The downside, though, is that these cases largely play out in secret, resulting in fines rather than prison time and don\u2019t compel defendants to testify, turn over evidence or admit guilt. In 2007, the SEC<\/a> filed 60 percent of its settlements in civil courts. In 2015, that proportion was 17 percent. In 2014 and 2015, the agency didn\u2019t file a settlement against a single U.S. Wall Street firm.<\/p>\n

One of the most conspicuous aspects of white-collar cases is the doting, near-veterinary care with which judges try to prevent defendants from facing harsh punishment. <\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

According to former OSHA assistant secretary David Michaels, these strategies are designed to achieve the all-consuming yet unstated goal of every regulation agency in America: Make yourself look more powerful than you are.<\/em> The best way to do this is to focus on the cases that will yield the maximum deterrence for the lowest cost. At OSHA, Michaels said, \u201cwe would issue press releases announcing waves of random inspections so employers would look at their hazards. We never told them we only planned to do a few inspections.\u201d<\/p>\n

Similarly, the IRS has explicitly instructed<\/a> agents to prioritize cases likely to generate headlines. (Ever wonder why so many B-list celebrities get busted for tax evasion?). Federal investigators go after media punching bags like Martin Shkreli, Martha Stewart and Fyre Festival scammer Billy McFarland to make the public think criminal prosecutions are routine. They\u2019re not: In a case-by-case analysis of the 216 alleged large-scale corporate frauds discovered between 1996 and 2004, researchers found that the media uncovered twice as many<\/a> as the SEC.<\/p>\n

And so, after decades of operating in survival mode, white-collar enforcement agencies are better at reporting success than producing it. In a 2016 study, a Georgetown University School of Law professor named Urska Velikonja discovered that while the SEC reported a steady rise in prosecutions between 2002 and 2014, most of the increase was statistical padding. When a trader was charged with fraud and then lost her license to trade securities, for example, the SEC logged the sanctions as two separate cases. When the agency was in danger of posting sluggish performance stats for the year, investigators filed dozens of slam-dunk cases in September to catch up. As Velikonja put it, \u201cthey\u2019re engaging in their own version of accounting fraud.\u201d (The SEC declined to comment.)<\/p>\n

For the agents charged with cracking offshore tax schemes and protecting consumers from lead-painted Elmo collectibles, this charade is profoundly demoralizing. \u201cWe killed a generation of agents,\u201d VanDesande said. \u201cIf you investigate mom and pop grocery stores for 20 years, you lose the ability to do Bernie Madoffs.\u201d<\/p>\n

VanDesande has spent months building cases only to have the DOJ toss them with little explanation. Richmond, the paralegal, tells me federal and state prosecutors have been playing hot potato with one of her cases for months because they can\u2019t justify an expensive prosecution for a fraud that adds up to the low six digits. During his first year on the job, Lewis Winters, an SEC examiner (and another government employee who couldn\u2019t use his real name), had an investigation of a shady CEO rejected by the agency’s enforcement division. Even though he had found plenty of violations, the crimes just weren\u2019t \u2026 grand enough for the agency to pursue.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt felt personal,\u2019\u201d Winters said. \u201cWhy did I spend three months examining this guy if enforcement just goes, \u2018meh\u2019?\u201d<\/p>\n

3 – Defining Deviance Downward<\/h3>\n

Enron used to be considered the capstone to the Golden Age of white-collar prosecutions, a shining example of the system working like it\u2019s supposed to. Weeks after the company filed America’s then-largest corporate bankruptcy, federal agents searched its headquarters and discovered a $63 billion game of three-card monte. Using an intricate network of off-the-books shell companies, Enron executives made loans look like income and debt look irrelevant. The year before the company collapsed, its leaders had falsified 96 percent of its net income and 105 percent of its cash flow.<\/p>\n

Between 2002 and 2006, the FBI\u2019s Enron Task Force filed charges against more than 30 architects of Enron’s fraud. Investigators discovered a \u201cshred room\u201d at the company\u2019s financial auditor, Arthur Andersen, and convicted the company of obstruction of justice. Four Merrill Lynch bankers were found guilty of helping Enron falsify its financial returns by purchasing three Nigerian barges. Task force agents convinced the company\u2019s chief financial officer to testify against his higher-ups by threatening to charge his wife with a felony. He flipped; they convicted her of a misdemeanor.<\/p>\n

Eventually, after a five-year investigation, Enron founder Ken Lay and former CEO Jeffrey Skilling were convicted of securities fraud and a meal deal of lesser charges. Though Lay died at a rented mansion in Colorado shortly afterwards, Skilling got 24 years in prison. At the time, it was one of the longest white-collar sentences in U.S. history. Prosecutors called it a victory. Skilling\u2019s lawyers called it just the beginning.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

ENRON’S JEFFREY SKILLING AND KEN LAY. Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

As soon as the nation turned its attention elsewhere, Skilling\u2019s lawyers began quietly dismantling his sentence. They filed appeals objecting to the statutes used to convict him, the trial\u2019s Houston location and the questionnaires filled out by potential jurors. In 2013, citing the \u201cextraordinary resources\u201d it had spent prosecuting and defending Skilling\u2019s conviction, the Department of Justice agreed to cut ten years off Skilling\u2019s sentence if he promised not to file any more appeals. He was released in February 2019 after serving less than half his original sentence.<\/p>\n

The rest of the FBI\u2019s victory has crumbled under the same blitzkrieg of high-priced lawyering. The Supreme Court overturned Arthur Andersen\u2019s conviction in 2005. The convictions of three of the Merrill Lynch bankers were vacated after they convinced an appeals court that they were merely trying to \u201csolidify business relationships\u201d rather than acting for personal gain. In the end, just 18 people served prison sentences (by comparison, more than 500 served time for the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s). Fourteen of them served fewer than four years. Andrew Fastow, the mastermind of Enron\u2019s network of shell companies, now makes his living lecturing business school students and fraud investigators about how he did it.<\/p>\n

Nearly every high-profile corporate scandal has the same overlooked epilogue. The wealthy have always attempted to spend their way to lighter sentences, but in the last two decades, the American judicial system has become increasingly willing to let them.<\/p>\n

Fraud by large corporations costs Americans up to $360 billion per year\u2014the equivalent of two decades\u2019 worth of street crime.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>
\n— Source: New York University, Drug and Alcohol Dependence<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve seen a concerted effort to define deviance downward,\u201d said Paul Leighton, a professor at Eastern Michigan University and the co-author of \u201cThe Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison.\u201d \u201cWe\u2019ve made felonies into misdemeanors, misdemeanors into torts and torts into regulatory offenses.\u201d<\/p>\n

Honest services fraud, for example, is the subsection of mail and wire fraud that prohibits companies from lying to customers to get their business and CEOs from lying to investors after they\u2019ve already been hired. Think of a mechanic telling you that your perfectly functional transmission is busted, then telling you it will cost $2,000 to fix it. He hasn\u2019t defrauded you exactly\u2014he really will replace your transmission\u2014but he used his position of authority to scam you into paying for something you didn\u2019t need.<\/p>\n

Since 1909, prosecutors have used the honest services fraud provision to go after companies that lie to boost their stock price and politicians who give golfing buddies lucrative procurement contracts. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff, a former white collar prosecutor, once referred to the statute as \u201cour Colt 45, our Louisville Slugger, our Cuisinart.\u201d<\/p>\n

But over the last three decades, the Supreme Court has taken the law apart piece by piece. In 1987, the Rehnquist Court ruled that the statute should never have been used to protect the so-called \u201cright to honest services.\u201d In 2010, the court restricted its application to public-sector bribery and kickbacks. From now on, the lying mechanic is breaking the law only if someone else is paying him<\/em> to scam you.<\/p>\n

Based on that ruling, several white collar criminals\u2014including, wait for it, Jeffrey Skilling\u2014had their sentences or convictions vacated. This year, two former Chris Christie underlings will tell the Supreme Court that orchestrating the “Bridgegate” conspiracy, in which they deliberately orchestrated traffic jams to get revenge on a Democratic mayor, is no longer illegal under the new, narrowed definition. If the Supreme Court agrees, the law will get even weaker.<\/p>\n

There will never be a wake-up call for corporations; the justice system doesn\u2019t do that anymore. <\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Other white collar statutes have suffered the same slow strangulation. In 2006, a district court judge reaffirmed the right of companies to pay the legal fees of their executives, effectively giving every C-suite defendant the same deep pockets as their corporate employer. Since 1996, the Supreme Court has consistently blocked plaintiffs from receiving punitive damages, arguing that large punishments deprive corporations of their due process rights. In 2016, the court ruled that federal bribery law only applies to politicians who traded official acts for personal benefit\u2014the kind of immediate, explicit kickback that rarely happens outside of corporate HR training videos.<\/p>\n

\u201cCriminal law used to be more closely aligned to our moral intuitions,\u201d said Will Thomas, a University of Michigan professor who studies corporate liability. \u201cWe still talk about it like it\u2019s a guiding moral force, but it\u2019s a much more administrative process now.\u201d<\/p>\n

Today, Thomas explained, judges are more willing to disregard the consequences of their rulings (like, say, an Enron-scale fraud going unpunished) in favor of resolving obscure procedural ambiguities. In 2017, for instance, a case against New York financier Benjamin Wey was dismissed after he successfully argued that the search warrant used to gather evidence against him was overly broad and vaguely worded.<\/p>\n

The confounding thing about these challenges is that they often highlight real weaknesses in the criminal justice system. American law is a contradictory jungle of century-old statutes and arbitrary definitions. Lying to government investigators, for example, is prohibited by at least 215 separate laws, each with their own standard of proof. Mens rea<\/em>, the concept of \u201cguilty mind\u201d central to establishing criminal liability, has more than 100 definitions across various statutes.<\/p>\n

So of course<\/em> wealthy defendants win cases by arguing that fraud statutes and insider trading rules are poorly written. They are. But so are the rest of the laws. (Numerous state anti-gang statutes<\/a>, for example, define “gang” so imprecisely that they could apply to most sororities.) The only difference is that white-collar defendants have the ability to dispute every step of the process used to convict them\u2014and a judicial system all too happy to oblige.<\/p>\n

One of the most conspicuous aspects of white-collar cases is the doting, near-veterinary care with which judges try to prevent defendants from facing harsh punishment. In 2014, a Colorado judge ruled that two farm owners whose tainted cantaloupes caused a listeria outbreak and killed 33 people couldn’t be sent to prison because it would interfere with their ability to earn income for their families<\/a>. As he announced a sentence of five years probation, the judge explained, \u201cI must deliver both justice and mercy.\u201d<\/p>\n

More than 50% of auditors for the country\u2019s largest companies said they had been asked to falsify internal audit reports. <\/em><\/strong>
\n— Source: Institute Of Internal Auditors<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

According to a study by the Federal Judicial Center, four out of five judges in federal courts (where the vast majority of white-collar cases are decided) are white. A 2010 survey found that they have an average age of nearly 70. Their base salary is $210,000 per year.<\/p>\n

It is, as one of those high-priced lawyers might say, improbable<\/em> that these demographic and economic facts exert no influence whatsoever on judges’ rulings. In a 2012 review of sentencing data in Florida, researchers found that \u201chigh-status\u201d white collar criminals, such as doctors scamming Medicaid, were 98.7 percent less likely to receive prison terms than welfare fraudsters. A 2015 study found that judges showed increasing mercy as fraud offenders moved up the income scale: Criminals who stole more than $400 million got sentences that were less than half of the minimum recommended by federal guidelines. Criminals who stole $5,000 or less served sentences well over the minimum.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen you zoom out, you see all the ways that bias accumulates throughout the system,\u201d said Justin Levinson, a University of Hawaii professor and the editor of \u201cImplicit Racial Bias Across The Law.\u201d Sentencing guidelines prescribe lighter punishments for first-time offenders and criminals who can afford to pay restitution. Evidence rules make it nearly impossible to seize records or computers from corporations. Jury selection weeds out the poor, the less educated and minorities.<\/p>\n

And then there\u2019s the matter of criminal liability. For many low-level crimes, prosecutors have to prove that a defendant should have known<\/em> a crime was taking place. If a renter deals drugs out of her apartment, her landlord can be prosecuted. If you loan your friend your car and he commits a murder while driving it, you can be charged with murder, too. For executive-level crimes, however, the bar of criminal liability is set impossibly high: Prosecutors have to prove that defendants knew their actions were illegal and did them anyway. This myopic focus on intent means that white-collar trials often come down to the question of whether the defendant was the kind of person who would commit a criminal act.<\/p>\n

John Lauro, an attorney who has represented healthcare and financial executives, said he always emphasizes the complexity of white-collar crimes to the jury\u2014financial disclosures are so technical! How could my client possibly know that stock wasn\u2019t going to pan out?<\/em> He also plays up the upstanding-citizen angle. The first thing he does when he lands a new client, he said, is visit their homes and meet their families.<\/p>\n

\u201cI bring in things like their marriage, their kids and whether they coach little league,\u201d he said. \u201cThe prosecution always wants to dehumanize them. They call my client \u2018the defendant.\u2019 I\u2019ll call him by his first name until a judge tells me to stop.\u201d<\/p>\n

The only way to get around this, said Sarah Larkin, a securities fraud prosecutor in Manhattan (she couldn\u2019t speak on the record, so that\u2019s not her real name), is to make every crime seem as simple as possible. It\u2019s lying, it\u2019s cheating, it\u2019s stealing. She structures every trial like a crash course, spending days explaining how the stock market works and what acronyms like SEC, CDO and GAAP stand for. Before she can convince jurors that the defendant lied on a financial statement, she has to do a week-long \u201cBig Short\u201d interlude to teach them what a financial statement even is\u2014without the help of Margot Robbie in a bathtub.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd after all that,\u201d she said, \u201cyou still have to make the case for why this person who looks very upper-middle-class and has a family sitting in the back row should be branded a criminal. It\u2019s a heavy lift.\u201d<\/p>\n

The near-impossibility of establishing white-collar defendants\u2019 motives combines with the high standard of reasonable doubt to create a paradox. Most Americans have a visceral aversion to greedy executives in general<\/em>. Introduce them to a single banker and a specific crime, however, and their moral outrage often melts away. As Sam Buell, a Duke University law professor, told me: \u201cPut people on a jury and they\u2019ll say, \u2018Gee, it seems like this guy was doing his job, so I don\u2019t think it was a crime.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Take the case of Brian Stoker, a Citigroup employee who was charged in 2011 with marketing risky investments (one trader called them \u201cdogsh!t\u201d in an internal communication) as safe bets. According to the SEC, the bank made $160 million while investors lost $700 million. In his closing argument, Stoker\u2019s attorney showed the jury an illustration from a \u201cWhere\u2019s Waldo\u201d book. Their client was a nobody, he suggested, a scapegoat for the culture of high-stakes gambling that had taken over the entire financial sector. Why make him a patsy when everyone else was doing the same thing?<\/p>\n

The jury declared Stoker not guilty. But in the same envelope as their decision, they included a handwritten note. \u201cThis verdict,\u201d it read, \u201cshould not deter the S.E.C. from continuing to investigate the financial industry.\u201d In other words: Keep trying to lock up greedy bankers. Just not this one.<\/p>\n

And this is it, the Rosetta Stone for understanding why judges are so comfortable explaining away the misconduct of corporate executives; why Congress never strengthened the castrated white-collar statutes; why so few pharmaceutical executives have been imprisoned for the opioid crisis and only a single banker went to prison for the financial crash. American law is incapable of prosecuting crimes in which elites use their legitimate power for nefarious ends.<\/p>\n

3% of the millionaires who filed tax returns in 2017 were audited by the IRS. <\/em><\/strong>
\n— Source: Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cThe way businesses harm people is the same way they interact with them normally,\u201d Albertson said. Banks collect debts and foreclose on homes every day. Banks give out home loans every day. When they entice customers into unaffordable mortgages or foreclose on borrowers tricked into signing loans they can\u2019t afford, the courts can\u2019t tell the difference.<\/p>\n

This insight also explains why the legal system applies the opposite logic to organizations run by the rich and organizations run by the poor. Teenage gang members who argue that they committed crimes due to the culture of the Crips or the Latin Kings receive harsher sentences\u2014stealing money for yourself is bad; stealing money for a criminal organization is worse. Corporate defendants who claim they committed crimes due to the internal culture of Goldman Sachs or HSBC, on the other hand, get lighter<\/em> sentences\u2014how could an individual possibly be held accountable for something everyone else was doing?<\/p>\n

And so, as they lose the ability to prosecute high-level crimes and elite offenders, many of America\u2019s criminal justice institutions have simply stopped trying. Of the 649 companies prosecuted by the Department of Justice since 2015, only eight were convicted in court. The rest either took settlements or negotiated themselves a deferred prosecution or non-prosecution agreement.<\/p>\n

These arrangements, like so many other aspects of America\u2019s white-collar enforcement apparatus, represent the cynical perversion of a benign idea. Deferred prosecution agreements were created in the 1930s to allow first-time juvenile offenders to avoid jail time if they followed probation rules and didn\u2019t reoffend. Since the early 1990s, prosecutors began extending the principle to corporations: If you agree to investigate your own crimes, turn over evidence against your employees and change your internal policies, we won\u2019t take you to court.<\/p>\n

Since then, deferred prosecutions have become one of the primary engines of American impunity. They don\u2019t require companies to explicitly admit guilt and don\u2019t apply steeper punishments to repeat offenders. While courts often appoint independent monitors to make sure corporations comply with the terms of their probation, these reports aren\u2019t released to the public. Since 1999, only three<\/a> companies have ever been prosecuted for violating the terms of their agreements.<\/p>\n

\u201cCriminal law isn\u2019t just about deterrence, it\u2019s about moral education,\u201d said John Coffee, the director of the Center on Corporate Governance at Columbia Law School. \u201cYou show the public that a crime occurred and how terrible its impact was. We\u2019re missing that catharsis now.\u201d<\/p>\n

4 – The Conundrum of Overdue Consequences<\/h3>\n

For multinational grocery store chains, self-checkout kiosks are a no-brainer. They save space, cut costs and speed up lines for shoppers. There is, however, one downside: Allowing customers to scan their own groceries dramatically increases the proportion of people who shoplift.<\/p>\n

What self-checkout kiosks provide, researchers have found, is plausible deniability. If a security guard spots you slipping a pack of Tic-Tacs into your pocket, there\u2019s no way to cast yourself as anything but a thief. If he catches you keying in a $10 bag of trail mix as a $2 bag of lentils, you can call it a mistake\u2014oops, I must have typed in the wrong code!<\/em> Perpetrators, especially middle-class white ones, know that if they get caught, everyone from the store manager to a small-claims court judge is likely to give them the benefit of the doubt. Self-checkouts turn shoppers into shoplifters by providing them with an opportunity to steal and a ready-made excuse to get away with it.<\/p>\n

Nearly all criminological research indicates that crime rates depend more on environments and incentives than the intrinsic morality of offenders. It\u2019s why shootings spike on hot days and drivers speed up on wider streets. People aren\u2019t good or bad; they drift into good or bad behavior when one or the other is rewarded.<\/p>\n

You can see where I\u2019m going with this. Since the 1980s, Wall Street, Congress and the courts have systematically encouraged American elites to commit more and larger graft. \u201cCorporate culture warps people,\u201d said Mihailis Diamantis, a University of Iowa professor who specializes in corporate crime. \u201cThey\u2019ve been placed in institutions that facilitate lawbreaking and predispose them to break the rules.\u201d Since 2009, the percentage of employees at large companies who report that they\u2019ve been pressured to commit ethical breaches has doubled. In a 2015 study, more than half the auditors for the country\u2019s largest companies said they had been asked to falsify internal audit reports. In Ernst & Young\u2019s 2016 Global Fraud Survey, 32 percent of American managers said they were comfortable behaving unethically to meet financial targets.<\/p>\n

32% of American managers said they were comfortable behaving unethically to meet financial targets. <\/em><\/strong>
\n— Source: Ernst and Young 2016 Global Fraud Survey<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And just like those shoppers standing in front of that unmanned kiosk, the scriptures of corporate America discourage white-collar criminals from reckoning with the reality of their crimes. Larkin, the Manhattan prosecutor, said that when she used to prosecute murderers, they would strike a plea deal and then immediately open up\u2014here\u2019s why I stabbed him, here\u2019s where I hid the knife. Once she switched to elite criminals, she was floored by their utter refusal to take responsibility. \u201cThey minimize and make excuses,\u201d she said. \u201cThey believe in their own brilliance. They keep saying what they did wasn\u2019t really wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jack Blum, a former staff attorney for the U.S. Senate, calls this impunity \u201cthe most urgent issue in America.\u201d In Russia and Ukraine, as government capacity deteriorated during the 2000s, oligarchs increased spending on bribes, lobbying and parallel systems of power\u2014their own private security forces, their pet media institutions. The same thing is already happening here: According to a 2016 analysis, political lobbying and regulatory maneuvering have eclipsed research and development as the primary reason for rising corporate profits. In a country of declawed regulators and untouchable executives, dishonest companies will increasingly drive out honest ones.<\/p>\n

So how do we stop this? The obvious temptation is to bring back the glory days of white-collar prosecutions, to lengthen the sentences for CEO dirtbags and finally arrest the bankers that got us into the financial crisis. It felt good<\/em> to hear that Martin Shkreli cried<\/a> at his sentencing hearing, damn it. America deserves the catharsis of overdue consequences.<\/p>\n

But retribution has been the government\u2019s approach for decades. Every corporate scandal since the savings and loan crisis has produced a wave of prosecutions and a sprint to strengthen white-collar punishments. The maximum penalty for the most common securities fraud charge is already 20 years in prison and a $5 million fine. Bernie Madoff is 120-odd months into a 150-year sentence. It might feel good, but there\u2019s little indication that handing out life sentences for the bankers who caused the last crash will prevent the next one.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s because criminologists have consistently found that increasing the likelihood of punishment works better than increasing its severity. In a study of wastewater discharge from chemical plants, researchers noticed that managers who received large but inconsistent fines actually started emitting more<\/em> toxic chemicals. The harsh penalty may have made them resentful for being singled out for something everyone else was doing\u2014and the low probability of getting caught twice encouraged them to increase their lawbreaking to catch up with their competitors. Locking up one corporate criminal out of a million might make the other 999,999 feel even more entitled and invincible than they do now.<\/p>\n

And yet elites, like everyone else, do change their behavior after experiencing immediate, reliable consequences. Three independent studies have found that when the wealthy get their taxes audited, they cheat less the following year. In 2008, Norway offered a \u201ctax amnesty\u201d to its richest residents. If they reported their overseas wealth and paid taxes on their hidden income, they would be immune from prosecution. For the next four years, the targets of the amnesty reported a 60 percent increase in their net worth and paid 30 percent more in taxes.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you follow a company over its life cycle, studies have found that most of them engage in some kind of lawbreaking and almost all of them reoffend,\u201d said Sally Simpson, a University of Maryland professor and the author of \u201cUnderstanding White-Collar Crime: An Opportunity Perspective.\u201d \u201cThe way you get deterrence is by showing them they\u2019re being watched.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a 2016 review of dozens of studies on corporate crime and deterrence, researchers found that nearly every individual strategy for punishing companies and executives had little to no deterrent effect on its own. The only thing that consistently worked was to combine them\u2014 warnings from government agencies, surveillance of the worst actors, harsher punishments for repeat offenders and, yes, at the top of the ladder, criminal prosecutions for corporations that refused to shape up.<\/p>\n

This is hardly some exotic, untested concept. When it comes to every other form of crime, law enforcement agencies are perfectly comfortable cracking down on offenses at every level. This is the country that invented three-strikes laws and \u201cbroken windows\u201d policing. When it comes to street gangs and drug distribution networks, the criminal justice system has no problem simplifying complex criminal liability questions into four simple words: You should have known<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe law is just a way of saying that an immoral act is something we\u2019re not going to tolerate anymore,\u201d said Robinson. \u201cIt\u2019s up to us to decide what\u2019s a crime and what isn\u2019t. We do it all the time.\u201d<\/p>\n

We\u2019ve just never done it for the immorality of elites.<\/p>\n

__________________________________________<\/strong><\/p>\n

Michael Hobbes<\/a> is a senior enterprise reporter for <\/em>HuffPost and the co-host of <\/em>You’re Wrong About<\/a>.<\/a> He previously wrote for <\/em>Highline about millennials<\/a>, obesity<\/a>, gay loneliness<\/a> and sweatshops<\/a>. He lives in Seattle. <\/em><\/p>\n

Matt Giles<\/a> is a freelance writer and the head of research and fact-checking at Longreads.<\/a> <\/em><\/p>\n

Una Janicijevic<\/a> is an art director in Toronto. <\/em><\/p>\n

Rebecca Yanovskaya<\/a> is a Toronto based illustrator whose focus is decorative and narrative works in a signature ballpoint pen and gold leaf style. <\/em><\/p>\n

Gladeye<\/a> is a digital innovations agency in New Zealand and New York. <\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 huffpost.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

10 Feb 2020 – Elite lawbreaking is out of control. This is the grotesque story of an existential threat to American society. One of the most conspicuous aspects of white-collar cases is the doting, near-veterinary care with which judges try to prevent defendants from facing harsh punishment. 32% of American managers said they were comfortable behaving unethically to meet financial targets. –Ernst and Young Global Fraud Survey<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":153673,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[232,550,652,101,555,562,610,651,1442,109,985,99,1213,1132,70],"class_list":["post-153671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anglo-america","tag-capitalism","tag-corruption","tag-crime","tag-cultural-violence","tag-elites","tag-finance","tag-inequality","tag-justice","tag-multinational-corporations","tag-politics","tag-social-justice","tag-structural-violence","tag-super-rich","tag-tnc","tag-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153671\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}