{"id":15669,"date":"2011-11-14T12:00:54","date_gmt":"2011-11-14T12:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=15669"},"modified":"2011-11-10T17:53:21","modified_gmt":"2011-11-10T17:53:21","slug":"away-with-objectivity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2011\/11\/away-with-objectivity\/","title":{"rendered":"Away With Objectivity"},"content":{"rendered":"

It is assumed, as a divine command, that the journalist should be \u201cimpartial, objective, balanced and fair\u201d as a prerequisite for being a true \u201cprofessional.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

I answer that to keep our balance, swings and seesaws at the park or trapezes in the circus will do, but it just so happens that journalists are not acrobats. Nor is journalism a spectacle to show off keeping one\u2019s balance on a tightrope, getting along with all and getting the public\u2019s acclaim.<\/p>\n

But journalism must always have both sides of the story, reads the creed of the faithful devotees of \u201cobjective and balanced information,\u201d and here I ask: Is it then, that as journalists we are required, for example, to take the point of view of Hitler and the Nazis to be fair or balance the points of view of Jews and other non-Jewish victims of Nazism during World War II? In fact, most stories are not antagonistic or symmetrically reduce to only two sides, and that optical geometric simplification is not applicable to the journalistic task to reflect diverse and complex facts of reality that have more sides than a dodecahedron.<\/p>\n

For as the acclaimed American journalist and Pulitzer Prize winner Chris Hedges, considered one of the greatest moral voices of journalism in the United States today, wrote for Truthdig, \u201cThe creed of objectivity and balance, formulated at the beginning of the 19th century by newspaper owners to generate greater profits from advertisers, disarms and cripples the press.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hedges said that this creed became \u201ca convenient and profitable vehicle to avoid confronting unpleasant truths or angering a power structure on which news organizations depend for access and profits. This creed transforms reporters into neutral observers or voyeurs. It banishes empathy, passion and a quest for justice. Reporters are permitted to watch but not to feel or to speak in their own voices,\u201d wrote this graduate of Harvard University with decades of experience reporting in conflict zones in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans.<\/p>\n

When I am invited to speak at various universities in Southern California, I always speak against the \u201ccreed of objectivity and balance.\u201d I say that you cannot balance the truth with falsehood, and that the rules of objectivity, as theory taught in universities and schools of journalism, promote the practice that what is published becomes, many times, the official version of events.<\/p>\n

That version, presented under the guise of objectivity and balance, ends up imposing what is \u201ctrue or false\u201d and is accepted by the public as an article of faith, while hiding the perspective, both social and historical, from which it is written and published. Thus, anything else written outside that framework that does not conform to the dogmatic worship of a false objectivity permits those in power to design, manage and impose a consensus of \u201copinion\u201d useful to them, while sending other nonconforming versions, without passing through purgatory, to the hell of paranoia or so-called \u201cconspiracy theories\u201d to scorch there.<\/p>\n

The essence of journalism is for me the search for truth, which is not usually sitting in a corner waiting for the arrival of reporters to run into it, pick it up as it was found\u2014chaste, pure, immaculate and free of contaminants\u2014and then transfer it without subjective media interests, \u201cprofessional, objective and balanced,\u201d to the readers, the public and audiences beyond.<\/p>\n

The great Polish journalist Ryszard Kapuscinski wrote that \u201cto be a journalist, first of all, you have to be a good human being. Bad people cannot be good journalists. If you\u2019re a good person, you can try to understand others, their intentions, their faith, their interests, their difficulties, their tragedies.\u201d A good person, then, who exercises journalism can keep his eyes subjective, but honest, to describe what he sees from his specific place and tell from there what he sincerely sees, whether it is literally a physical place, or a social or economic context in which he is immersed.<\/p>\n

I wonder, for example if anyone believes that the mainstream media had honest, sincere, professional, objective and balanced coverage on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I contend that there was not even any coverage; instead, they had propaganda intended to stop other opinions from being voiced, turning the propaganda into \u201cpublic opinion,\u201d thanks to what Sigmund Freud\u2019s nephew, Edward Bernays, a pioneer in the use of collective manipulation technique, called \u201cthe engineering of consent.\u201d<\/p>\n

Those who hold political and economic power are very comfortable with the journalists who claim to be neutral and objective. We live in a world where no one can be neutral, where neutrality is often confused with hypocrisy and indifference.<\/p>\n

How to be neutral between truth and falsehood, between hatred and love, between construction and destruction? How to be neutral with such impunity, so much injustice, so many repulsive acts committed by man against man? How to be neutral to the children killed in Iraq and Afghanistan? How to be neutral when so many demons, disguised as humans, are on the loose causing grief, pain and immeasurable suffering to so many people in this world who don\u2019t deserve it? Do not ask me for neutrality, please; I plead I am partial toward the search for truth and all that may give us back a more human way of life.<\/p>\n

I maintain that theologians who believe that so-called objectivity, balance and fairness are required to consecrate a reporter at the sacred altar of the \u201cprofessional\u201d have been successful in that many \u201cjournalists,\u201d unconsciously nostalgic of when they were babies rocked with a pacifier in their cribs, today\u2014with their news, interviews, features and reports\u2014are mollifying a society that is in urgent need of waking up.<\/p>\n

Journalism that does not make you uncomfortable is not journalism. Journalism that soothes and numbs instead of alerts and awakens is not journalism. For human beings, being awake is an indispensable requirement to realize our dreams, for if we take a good look at the world with sincerity and honesty, we can see how millions are living and others are watching with indifference, and we can see it is the corrupt and evil face of a nightmare.<\/p>\n

______________________<\/p>\n

Veteran Mexican journalist Ruben Luengas is host of Telemundo\u2019s 11 p.m. newscast in Los Angeles and the program \u201cContragolpe\u201d on KPFK 90.7 FM. This article was translated by Isabel Carreon Scheer.<\/em><\/p>\n

This article originally appeared in Spanish on LatinoCalifornia.com and on TRANSCEND Media Service (<\/em>In Other Languages, 14 Nov 2011).<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 truthdig.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It is assumed, as a divine command, that the journalist should be \u201cimpartial, objective, balanced and fair\u201d. Is it then, that as journalists we were required, for example, to take the point of view of Hitler and the Nazis to be fair to Jews and other victims of Nazism? The essence of journalism is for me the search for truth, which is not usually sitting in a corner waiting for the arrival of reporters to run into it and pick it up as it was found. I wonder, for example if anyone believes that the mainstream media had honest, sincere, professional, objective and balanced coverage on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Journalism that does not make you uncomfortable is not journalism. Journalism that soothes and numbs instead of alerts and awakens is not journalism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tms-peace-journalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15669\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}