{"id":157114,"date":"2020-04-06T12:00:02","date_gmt":"2020-04-06T11:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=157114"},"modified":"2020-04-01T10:51:24","modified_gmt":"2020-04-01T09:51:24","slug":"inspiration-from-a-father-johan-galtung-interviewed-by-henrik-urdal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2020\/04\/inspiration-from-a-father-johan-galtung-interviewed-by-henrik-urdal\/","title":{"rendered":"Inspiration from a Father: Johan Galtung Interviewed by Henrik Urdal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_6213\" class=\"wp-caption image-width-730 alignnone\">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-article-width-730 wp-image-6213\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-730x743.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Bn3fzdwz3P.webp\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-730x743.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Bn3fzdwz3P.webp 730w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-295x300.jpg.pagespeed.ic.ZX_o35kY-Z.webp 295w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-768x782.jpg.pagespeed.ic.OQand1dbz2.webp 768w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-1006x1024.jpg.pagespeed.ic.vtKflu3Bzp.webp 1006w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-584x595.jpg.pagespeed.ic.dl1WGrkA-N.webp 584w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-292x297.jpg.pagespeed.ic.oVIxoDpsIp.webp 292w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xJohan-Galtung-365x372.jpg.pagespeed.ic.TDeVwZqxEd.webp 365w\" alt=\"\" width=\"730\" height=\"743\" data-pagespeed-url-hash=\"3637590086\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Johan Galtung at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) in 1968. <\/strong><strong>Photo: Henrik Laurvik \/ NTB \/ Scanpix<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ingress\">\n<blockquote><p><em>15 May 2019 &#8211; <\/em>The Second World War had a lasting effect on me. Especially because my beloved father was imprisoned at Grini (west of Oslo). And we were informed that every time there was a British bombing, prisoners would be shot. So, every night the air raid siren went, my mother and I would run out to the air raid shelter and sit there with only one thing on our minds. And my mother never wanted to go and get the paper the day after in case the headline read: \u2018Dr Galtung shot this morning in retaliation for last night\u2019s bombing raid\u2019.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_131015\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/prio-logo.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-131015\" class=\"wp-image-131015 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/prio-logo-300x158.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"158\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/prio-logo-300x158.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/prio-logo-768x403.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/prio-logo-1024x538.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/prio-logo.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-131015\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Peace Research Institute Oslo &#8211; Founder: Johan Galtung<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<h2>*********************************<\/h2>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.prio.org\/People\/Person\/?x=3473\" >Henrik Urdal<\/a>:\u00a0You were born six years before the war came to Norway. Could you tell me a bit about your childhood? What sort of influence did your father and mother have on you?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.prio.org\/People\/Person\/?x=5704\" >Johan Galtung<\/a>:\u00a0<\/strong>My father\u2019s educational background had a real influence on me. He\u2019d attended the Norwegian Military Academy and received top marks in tactics, something he was very proud of. So he knew quite a bit about war and that sort of thing. And, of course, he\u2019d completed a medical degree. And, on top of that, he\u2019d studied political economy. As a politician in the 1920s, a deputy mayor and acting mayor at one point, he\u2019d felt he needed a better understanding of economics. All of which is to say that he was, in effect, fully qualified in three distinct fields. And I suppose I\u2019ve copied him to some extent. Studying one subject shouldn\u2019t stand in the way of studying another. So, when I chose to take both a cand. real. degree in mathematics and a mag. art. degree in sociology, you could say I was following in my father\u2019s footsteps.<\/p>\n<p>It all comes back to my beloved father \u2013 he always supported me. He also had a daughter, of course, my sister Ingegerd, who was a strict conservative. She idealized people like Salazar and Franco, while I stood for the complete opposite. She wrote in <em>Morgenbladet<\/em> and I wrote in <em>Dagbladet<\/em>. My father would try to reconcile this conflict by praising our writing: \u2018You both write such elegant Norwegian!\u2019 You might say he was a bridge builder. But there was, of course, also something of the politician in this approach. At the same time, he supported me completely when I terminated my membership of the state church. He was a devout Christian and went to church every Sunday, but he understood that when I left the state church, it was the state and not the church I was rejecting. It was my view that the state and the church should have nothing to do with each other.<span id=\"more-6205\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>It\u2019s interesting to try to understand how the historical context in which you grew up was formative for you and for your perspective on peace research. Let me return to the impact of the Second World War. How would you say your childhood experiences and your experience of war contributed to your views on social change and on the significance of peace work?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Since my mother was afraid of finding news in the newspaper that my father had been shot, it became my job to collect the paper each morning. Pretty intense, but it is a memory of war. Another memory I have is of visiting my father in Grini. We were allowed to visit him twice a year. We were pale and exhausted, he was brown, sunburnt from working on the commandant\u2019s <em>Kr\u00e4utergarten<\/em>, a medical herb garden. The war played an enormous role in my life and had a considerable effect on my views on peace research. My sense of the madness of war was very much focused on my father: no-one was allowed to take my beloved father away from me.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_6229\" class=\"wp-caption image-width-730 alignnone\">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-article-width-730 wp-image-6229\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-730x620.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8dHCW1JMLF.webp\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-730x620.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8dHCW1JMLF.webp 730w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-300x255.jpg.pagespeed.ic.L-YUz1TlgL.webp 300w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-768x652.jpg.pagespeed.ic.vYLmoA7v_u.webp 768w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-1024x870.jpg.pagespeed.ic.apwUk-NH4U.webp 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-584x496.jpg.pagespeed.ic.WS-Is1AAVm.webp 584w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-292x248.jpg.pagespeed.ic.zBfGLOCWRC.webp 292w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum-365x310.jpg.pagespeed.ic.z98KqU7TgI.webp 365w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xcropAugust-Andreas-Logn-Galtung_Photo-Unknown-CC-BY-SA-Oslo-Museum.jpg.pagespeed.ic.kTmsO-h2Hc.webp 1200w\" alt=\"\" width=\"730\" height=\"620\" data-pagespeed-url-hash=\"2523609914\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Galtung\u2019s father, August Andreas Logn Galtung in 1935. <\/strong><strong>Photo: Unknown \/ CC BY-SA \/ Oslo Museum<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>But then I entered a period of my life in which another figure would play an increasingly important role, and that was Gandhi. When he was shot on 30<sup>th<\/sup> January 1948, I found myself crying \u2013 much to my puzzlement and dismay. I was 17 and 17-year-olds don\u2019t cry. And a boy to boot. And it wasn\u2019t a habit of mine to cry. Somehow or other, Gandhi\u2019s message had affected me so deeply that I reacted in this unexpected way. So I emerged from the war with a palpable disgust for war, primarily because the war had stolen my father from me, even if he ultimately came back. The war was over, and Gandhi\u2019s message was that there was an alternative.<\/p>\n<p><strong>When did you discover Gandhi? \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In \u201948. I knew about him before then, of course: I kept myself informed, like any bright teenager. But I had no idea that he had affected me so deeply that I would cry when he was shot. And out of \u201948 came \u201951, when I became a conscientious objector. I\u2019ve told this story many times before, but if it hadn\u2019t been for obligatory military service in Norway, I wouldn\u2019t have become the campaigner for and specialist on peace that I am today.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>When [Gandhi] was shot on 30th January 1948, I found myself crying \u2013 much to my puzzlement and dismay. I was 17 and 17-year-olds don\u2019t cry. And a boy to boot. And it wasn\u2019t a habit of mine to cry. Somehow or other, Gandhi\u2019s message had affected me so deeply that I reacted in this unexpected way.<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My father had always told me not to just go along with what you\u2019re supposed to do, but to be conscious of everything you do. And he was a first lieutenant in the Army Medical Service, which isn\u2019t an especially high rank, but even so. With his medical background and education from the Military Academy, he\u2019d become an officer. So, I took his advice seriously and decided to try to find out more about it. Coincidentally, I\u2019d receive a stipend that month to study in Finland. So this was how it all started: as a former big man on campus, with a succession of positions in student politics under my belt, I was awarded this stipend, at the same time as I was very unsure whether to carry out my military service or become a conscientious objector.<\/p>\n<p><strong>It was quite popular to be a conscientious objector at the time, wasn\u2019t it?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It wasn\u2019t that uncommon, that\u2019s true. But a lot of objectors were Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses. There was a community of them in Vennesla, north of Kristiansand, where a lot of the conscientious objectors came from. But objecting to military service on political grounds was still quite rare, although it was starting to become less so.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<aside class=\"pullquote right\"><strong><em>\u2018Well, that\u2019s interesting,\u2019 I thought. \u2018Peace studies doesn\u2019t exist\u2019. And the idea struck me that perhaps this would be my life\u2019s work.<\/em><\/strong><\/aside>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Anyway, while I was in Helsinki, I went to the library. I didn\u2019t tell the librarian that I was being conscripted or anything like that. I just asked: \u2018Do you have any good books on peace studies?\u2019 \u2018No, but I\u2019ll ask our parent library in Uppsala\u2019. Finland had been a Swedish colony. \u2018Come back tomorrow\u2019. Well, Uppsala said that we don\u2019t have anything as silly as peace studies, but we do have a brilliant book on war studies. \u2018Well, that\u2019s interesting,\u2019 I thought. \u2018Peace studies doesn\u2019t exist\u2019. And the idea struck me that perhaps this would be my life\u2019s work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And you were twenty?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It was actually more or less on my twenty-first birthday that this happened. The 24<sup>th<\/sup> of October. There were various elements that coincided here: my military service was a very important element, but also this librarian who searched the catalogue for <em>rauhantutkimus<\/em>, the Finnish word for \u2018peace research\u2019. The first book in Finnish on <em>rauhantutkimus<\/em> was written by me, and that was published ten to fifteen years later. When I returned to Norway from Finland in \u201951, I\u2019d made a decision: I was going to dedicate my life to peace, and I was going to do it through research. I had some sort of intuition that I ought to combine the word \u2018peace\u2019 with the word \u2018conflict\u2019: peace and conflict research.<\/p>\n<p>So, in \u201951, this defining decision was made. But I\u2019d also made another decision. I\u2019d read an awful lot in preparation for a potential application for transfer from military service to alternative civilian service. And something that had really struck me was that the arguments against war were very clear, but there seemed to be very little on peace and arguments for peace. This is the difference between negative and positive peace, a key conceptual distinction that I went on to formulate in 1968.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>Arguments against war were very clear, but there seemed to be very little on peace and arguments for peace. This is the difference between negative and positive peace, a key conceptual distinction that I went on to formulate in 1968.<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What I took from this lack of work on peace was that if I was going to do this, if this was going to be my life, I\u2019d have to start from scratch, from nothing. Not accept or reject any of the things I\u2019d heard or read, but simply try to free myself from all presuppositions and begin again from zero. This is impossible, of course. You can\u2019t be \u2018pure\u2019. That is, a Buddhist monk sitting in front of a white wall is trying, but it seems to me that Buddhist monks all arrive at the same conclusion in the end, and that makes me sceptical. So, what ended up happening is that I <em>jobbet med saken<\/em>, as we say in Norwegian \u2013 I worked on it. As the years passed and I made my way through my education, it rapidly became clear to me that if you\u2019re going to work on peace, Johan, a degree in mathematics isn\u2019t going to be sufficient. You\u2019re going to have to learn something about these so-called social sciences as well.<\/p>\n<p><strong>But when you chose to study mathematics, did you see this as part of the process of equipping yourself to study peace, before you changed tack and turned to the social sciences? Did you see maths as a useful tool for studying peace?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Maths taught me to think. This way of thinking could be applied to anything. I knew full well that one way in which mathematical thinking had been used was the development of nuclear weapons, but it could also be used to develop peace. And after a while, the ball really got rolling. One question I needed to consider was which social science to study: psychology, down at the level of the individual; sociology, in the middle; or international relations on top? I thought I\u2019d go for the middle. And that\u2019s how I ended up taking two degrees in parallel at two different faculties.<\/p>\n<p><strong>You were studying both at the same time?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I didn\u2019t make it easy for myself.<\/p>\n<p><strong>No, that\u2019s ambitious.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I found my time as a student incredibly rewarding. In the end, I majored in mathematics with a minor in physics for my cand. real. in natural science and majored in sociology with a minor in philosophy for my mag. art. in social science. I completed the first in 1956 and the second in 1957. And in the autumn of that same year, I was appointed assistant professor at the Department of Sociology at Columbia University.<\/p>\n<p>At that time, Columbia was the Mecca of Sociology. Two greats of the discipline, Paul Lazarsfeld and Robert K. Merton, both wanted me to be their successor. I was granted tenure in 1960. I gave a speech and thanked my colleagues \u2013 I was deeply grateful and it had been a fantastic year \u2013 but my job now was to return to Norway and continue work I\u2019d set in motion to establish peace research as a field of study. And this would never have happened if it wasn\u2019t for the Rinde family: Erik Rinde and Sigurd Rinde. Sigurd Rinde was the CEO of Norske Skog. In other words: capital! Erik had a law degree, but he was completely uninterested in business. His passion was for social science. His father provided him with funds to set up the Institute for Social Research, ISF.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_6224\" class=\"wp-caption image-width-730 alignnone\">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-article-width-730 wp-image-6224\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-730x767.jpg.pagespeed.ic.D6mEopiTh3.webp\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-730x767.jpg.pagespeed.ic.D6mEopiTh3.webp 730w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-286x300.jpg.pagespeed.ic._B49YnFeRQ.webp 286w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-768x807.jpg.pagespeed.ic.gyxSmJ5JDT.webp 768w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-975x1024.jpg.pagespeed.ic.leE_3jABRB.webp 975w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-584x614.jpg.pagespeed.ic.wtuciAZ4im.webp 584w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-292x307.jpg.pagespeed.ic.HIhnBAbIib.webp 292w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/xErik-Rinde_Photo-Jan-Nordby-,40-NTB-scanpix-365x383.jpg.pagespeed.ic.AabaOccTF3.webp 365w\" alt=\"\" width=\"730\" height=\"767\" data-pagespeed-url-hash=\"2246620620\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Director of the Institute for Social Research, Erik Rinde in 1960. Photo: Jan Nordby \/ NTB \/ Scanpix<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>And this was in 1950, the establishment of ISF?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ve played a huge role. So then I joined the institute.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How did that come about? Did you already know the Rinde family?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>No.<\/p>\n<p><strong>They contacted you while you were still at Columbia?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I had a free semester autumn 1958, and that\u2019s when I travelled to Norway to establish peace research. It was a question of where and how. Erik was very keen to bring me to the institute as a researcher. He was pretty horrified when I told him I wanted to set up a department for conflict and peace research. He wanted to have me there as an individual specialist. I got the department.<\/p>\n<p>And we worked very well together, Erik and I. And a little while later, when we needed more funding, Erik said: \u2018I think you ought to have a meeting with my father. He makes the decisions\u2019. I\u2019ll never forget that meeting. Sigurd Rinde was a strong and very capable man, self-assured, like me. We sat there and looked at each other. He opened with the problem, as he saw it: \u2018What is this conflict and peace research?\u2019 Afterwards, he told his son, Erik: \u2018I didn\u2019t understand much of what he said, but what I did understand was that this Galtung is an entrepreneur, and as a businessman I appreciate that. He\u2019ll get his funding\u2019. It was as an entrepreneur, someone who sets things in motion and gets things to work, that I secured the funding we needed. So, in the beginning, we had private funding from the Rinde family.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Who perhaps weren\u2019t people you\u2019d expect to harbour much of an interest in this topic? They weren\u2019t motivated by a desire to contribute to a political process?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>No, neither Sigurd nor Erik. But what they were interested in was a strong institute for social research, and if conflict and peace research had to be a part of social research, so be it. I never had any good conversations with Erik about international issues or anything like that. He was an entrepreneur. In any case, he had Sverre Lysgaard, Vilhelm Aubert, and then Sverre Holm, who was professor at the Department of Sociology, as a rather small, rather innocent counterpoint.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And when was this, Johan?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In the early \u201950s. In the summer of 1952, I\u2019d refused military service and was called up for alternative civilian service. I had a motorbike, and I was very happy that our camp was at Havn\u00e5s, near Mysen, an hour\u2019s drive from Oslo. And I remember I often asked myself: \u2018Johan, be honest, would you have become a conscientious objector if the camp was halfway up a mountain in \u00d8sterdalen?\u2019<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_6251\" class=\"wp-caption image-width-730 aligncenter\">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-article-width-730 wp-image-6251\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-730x480.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-730x480.jpg 730w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-300x197.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-768x505.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-1024x673.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-584x384.jpg 584w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-292x192.jpg 292w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1-365x240.jpg 365w, https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Havn\u00e5s-in-1957-Photo-\u00d8stfold-fylkes-billedarkiv-CC-BY-NC-ND-Oslo-Museum-1.jpg 1200w\" alt=\"\" width=\"730\" height=\"480\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Havn\u00e5s in 1957. Photo: \u00d8stfold fylkes billedarkiv \/ CC BY-NC-ND \/ Oslo Museum<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>And what\u2019s the answer to that question?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I prefer not to think about it. Because I have no idea what the answer would be. Anyhow. I ended up on these motorbike rides. And every Saturday and Sunday I was at home in Oslo. And every Saturday morning I taught Sverre Holm maths, and every Saturday afternoon I taught statistics at the Institute for Social Research. Throughout my civilian service I kept this up. And I recall that Hansen, the leader of the camp at Havn\u00e5s, was sceptical to this set-up, but went along with my having four Saturdays a month off instead of just three. I was very grateful to him for that. It all worked out in the end, with a bit of help from my motorbike.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>I\u2019d refused military service and was called up for alternative civilian service. I had a motorbike, and I was very happy that our camp was [\u2026] an hour\u2019s drive from Oslo. And I remember I often asked myself: \u2018Johan, be honest, would you have become a conscientious objector if the camp was halfway up a mountain in \u00d8sterdalen?\u2019<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Havn\u00e5s was the central camp for civilian service in Norway at that time?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>And Hustad, which is further north, up near Molde, \u00c5ndalsnes, around there. That was the camp for the northern part of the country. Havn\u00e5s was for Southern and Eastern Norway.<\/p>\n<p><strong>So if Havn\u00e5s had been a little further north, the situation for peace research in Norway might have been considerably worse?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the question I\u2019d rather not answer. Obviously, I weighed up the pros and cons, and some self-interested considerations played a role there.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Of course.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>But anyway, we know how things turned out in the end. And I must say that these Saturdays were unbelievably fulfilling for me. At just 21 years of age, I was teaching a full professor maths every Saturday morning, and giving lectures on statistics for a bunch of researchers double my age. It was very challenging.<\/p>\n<p><strong>There are loads of exciting things I\u2019d like to ask you about, Johan. We touched on your childhood and formative years.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ask whatever you like!<\/p>\n<p><strong>You\u2019ve had an international orientation in your professional life from an early stage. But since we\u2019ve been talking a little bit about personal things and family: how has it been for you to be so rootless, to not be connected to a place? It\u2019s clearly opened up possibilities, but has it also had personal costs? Is there anything you\u2019ve found challenging in terms of family, social life, that sort of thing?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There are women in every country. There are attractive women in every country. I got to know, and know well, a fair few of them. My first marriage was Norwegian. That lasted 12 years. My second and last marriage is Japanese, and we\u2019re celebrating our 50<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary next year. Why didn\u2019t the Norwegian marriage last as long as the Japanese marriage has?<\/p>\n<p>Well, one answer is that there\u2019s no difference in class between me and my Japanese wife. We both come from old, lower aristocratic families. Her family were samurai, while mine were Norwegian Viking petty nobility. My Norwegian wife and I had the same nationality, but came from different classes. I came from a Norwegian upper class, socially if not economically. She came from a family who had worked their way up from a spartan existence in Western Norway. For them, the Labour Party had provided a social ladder to climb, whilst I saw the Labour Party as a tool of American imperialism. So, we had some different viewpoints where my Japanese wife and I had a shared viewpoint. But it was also a matter of the difference between class and nation. Perhaps it\u2019s more important to have the same class background than it is to have the same nationality. So, an East-West project, from Japanese samurai to Norwegian lower Viking nobility, has worked well. We\u2019ve had our ups and downs, like any marriage. But it works and has done now for nearly 50 years.<\/p>\n<p><strong>But what you\u2019re saying is that, on a personal level, it\u2019s harder to overcome class background than cultural and linguistic differences?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes, in my experience.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Has your international orientation made it difficult to keep in touch with your children or with friends?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Well, I remember somebody asked one of my children if it\u2019s difficult having a strong father. And their response was: \u2018Well, he is very strong, but one advantage is that he travels so much, so he comes in small doses!\u2019<\/p>\n<p><strong>I wondered whether we could talk a little bit about the creation of PRIO. We\u2019ve dated the origin of PRIO to 1959, the date when we, or rather you, started the department at ISF. You\u2019ve talked about how the creation of this department was the result of your ultimatum to Rinde, that you would only be willing to come to ISF if he was willing to fund a department.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes, not just an individual, but a whole department.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How big was this department at that time?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It consisted of me, my wife, Ingrid, and her best friend, and wife of my best friend, Mari Holmboe Ruge, who became my assistant. She lagged a bit behind Ingrid in her education. We three were the core of the department. But we made connections with others from disciplines we wanted to bring on board. I\u2019m thinking of Arne Martin Klausen, an anthropologist, and Sivert Langholm, a historian. So we ended up being five people. And that was the department.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Were they based at ISF already? Did you recruit them?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes, they were there already. But the department got stronger and stronger as more people came on board. And, in many ways, we were more dynamic than many of the other departments. So eventually we became such a strong department that we had a basis for a discussion with Erik about maybe becoming an autonomous institute.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Were there many internal conflicts about this at the institute at that time?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On the contrary. I think there were more than a few who were happy to see the back of us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Because this was a milieu that must have been important, something of a flagship for ISF?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes, but we were so strong and dynamic, more than the others, although their work was also extremely strong, especially in industrial sociology and that sort of thing, no doubt about it. But I\u2019m pretty sure they saw us as competitors and that people were really quite pleased to see us go. I\u2019ve always had an innate drive for independence, and I still find it difficult having any kind of authority over me making decisions on my behalf.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Was it always your plan to form a separate institute?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Not right from the start, no. But an independent department, yes. But as the department grew, it became pretty clear that it was beginning to look more and more like its own institute. Erik and I entered negotiations and talked about how brilliant our collaboration would be, how this wouldn\u2019t be affected by our becoming an independent institute. We needed a name, and I came up with Peace Research Institute Oslo, PRIO, which worked very well internationally. At the same time, PRIO stood for <em>priority<\/em>. And that was that.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And this was around the same time SIPRI and COPRI were created, although they were a little later?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>They came later, yes.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>[They] believed in peace through numbers and data, the thought being that if you could just document how much money we waste on armaments, people would lose the taste for them. I was far more interested in whether this hypothesis was right or wrong, and my view was that it was wrong. If anything, people quite often seem to be of the view that we should pay our way out of our problems if we can.<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>As I understand it, PRIO was an important source of inspiration for them?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s my understanding, yes. Some people think SIPRI came first, but that\u2019s not the case. I sat on the board, and SIPRI was very important, but they had a completely different orientation. Gunnar Myrdal and Robert O\u2019Neill believed in peace through numbers and data, the thought being that if you could just document how much money we waste on armaments, people would lose the taste for them. I was far more interested in whether this hypothesis was right or wrong, and my view was that it was wrong. If anything, people quite often seem to be of the view that we should pay our way out of our problems if we can.<\/p>\n<p><strong>You say the orientation is different, is this still an orientation SIPRI has today, towards publishing this kind of data?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes, with the yearbook and that sort of thing. And it\u2019s a great yearbook, but it\u2019s based on the idea that if we can just get all the facts out into the open, we\u2019ll put people off the arms race.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Whereas you had a slightly broader idea of the social sciences producing knowledge that could alleviate society\u2019s problems \u2013 and specifically the ultimate societal disease that is armed conflict \u2013 just as medical research can alleviate health problems and the natural sciences can address natural-scientific problems.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That was the idea, without a doubt. Absolutely. And, in fact, you\u2019ve brought up an idea that was even more crucial, which was the similarity with medical research. My father and grandfather were both doctors. J\u00f8rgen Ulrik Galtung: if you take a trip to Moss, you\u2019ll find a street called \u2018Doktor Galtungs vei\u2019. It was my grandfather who\u2019d left Torsnes, where my family came from, and settled in Moss as the county doctor for Smaalenene. The County of Smaalenene, as it was called then, what we call \u00d8stfold today, with Vestfold on the other side of the Oslofjord. And here, at the mouth of the fjord, a body of medical knowledge accumulated. And it was this medical knowledge that was passed on to me as a model.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s my father\u2019s side of my intellectual inheritance, but my mother\u2019s side was also important. She was a nurse. You could say that a nurse is somewhat subordinate to a doctor, but her father was considerably superior to a doctor, he was a medical director. And so he \u2013 Mikael Holmboe \u2013 was of course a central figure in all this. And this is where governmental and organizational perspectives enter the frame. I grew up with all these models, and I absorbed this medical knowledge \u2013 one consequence of which is my impeccable health, even at the age of 88.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Let\u2019s return to the topic of the milieu at PRIO in the early days, Johan. The institute formally became independent in 1966. This was a time when political divisions were becoming more rigid, I\u2019m thinking perhaps especially of the \u201970s, but also the \u201960s. Critics of peace research, on both the left and the right, were becoming more vocal. At the same time, there was a certain degree of political breadth at PRIO, at least in the \u201970s. Was this a deliberate aim?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>No, I wouldn\u2019t say so. We were pretty uninterested in party politics. It was clear to us that foreign policy in Norway was developed and implemented over the heads of the political parties. I was actually part of a movement called \u201cForeign Policy at the Ballot Box\u201d, and we were harshly and dismissively criticized for sowing division that could be exploited by the nation\u2019s enemies. Our response was of course that you can be pretty sure that an attack on Norway would have a unifying effect, and that the risk of attack is in any case not a good reason not to discuss how to ensure that we aren\u2019t attacked in the first place. But that debate never got us anywhere. Foreign policy is still removed from the purview of party politics and handed over to secret meetings of the Standing Committees on Foreign Affairs and Constitutional Affairs. When it comes to foreign policy, democracy is suspended in favour of secret meetings.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Something I want to try to get a handle on is the attitude to political contacts and allegiances at PRIO at that time. It\u2019s interesting to think about this in terms of dialogue. PRIO was characterized by collective decision making at this time, which had internalized and institutionalized a dialogue between people with different ideas about how PRIO should be run. You\u2019ve said that this wasn\u2019t a reflection of party politics or an attempt to ensure that a range of views were represented. But PRIO, and you personally, had good political contacts in the government and the Norwegian parliament at that time, who played an important part in establishing PRIO and ensuring a sufficient level of political and financial support for the institution.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>You could say that. Look, I didn\u2019t even know where people at PRIO stood in terms of their allegiances to political parties. I wasn\u2019t interested. I didn\u2019t think about it. I was only interested in the quality of their research.<\/p>\n<p><strong>But could you say something about how important your network of contacts was for securing PRIO\u2019s existence during its formative years?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Torstein Eckhoff, he was an extremely important person. His contacts were very important. He had contacts at the ministries and good political contacts in parliament. I also had a good relationship with the Norwegian authorities at this time. My own network was primarily through Knut Frydenlund, who was the Norwegian Foreign Minister for many years. He was a close personal friend of mine. Our friendship was based on total disagreement, except on all the really important things in life \u2013 love, life and death, that sort of thing \u2013 on which we agreed completely. We were particularly in agreement on the sexual element of life and death.<\/p>\n<p>There were three of us who often ended up sat in a room at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, making plans: Knut Frydenlund, Halvard Lange and myself. Knut had been the MFA\u2019s representative on the so-called Galtung committee, which had been looking at setting up a Norwegian peace corps, something I\u2019d come up with in 1960, a couple of months before Kennedy. And supposedly he was very impressed by how I\u2019d managed to organize a debate in which the different sides all got to have their say and together arrive at a conclusion that they could all live with. I took great care to make sure that each participant\u2019s main point had been heard. This has always been my approach. Everyone should feel at home: \u2018that\u2019s me, I remember that sentence, that was my best sentence\u2019. I suppose I have a certain talent for identifying each person\u2019s best statement and for merging all these together. In any case, Knut was impressed by this, and involved me quite heavily in the development of Norwegian foreign policy. For a while, I occupied a position that was frankly undemocratic.<\/p>\n<p><strong>As a sort of unofficial adviser?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Exactly. I had a great deal of influence. I don\u2019t think I did anything wrong, I don\u2019t think so. But there certainly wasn\u2019t an open debate on foreign policy, that\u2019s for sure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Did you feel like you made any real breakthroughs?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Oh yes, to some extent.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"left\">\n<blockquote>\n<aside class=\"pullquote left\"><strong><em>The so-called Galtung committee [\u2026] had been looking at setting up a Norwegian peace corps, something I\u2019d come up with in 1960, a couple of months before Kennedy.<\/em><\/strong><\/aside>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/aside>\n<p><strong>Can you give any examples that aren\u2019t confidential?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Not confidential! Well, for example, I said that Algeria would very quickly gain independence. In the wake of the \u00c9vian Accords, it\u2019ll happen any day now. We know from social research that there is something called imprinting, that a new born life\u2019s first impression is extremely important. This applies to animals and it applies to humans. Whether, for example, a baby is treated with love and warmth or is treated harshly is something that will have a lasting effect on its life.<\/p>\n<p>A new country was born in 1962, Algeria. Make sure Norway is one of the first in line with a gift. And that\u2019s what Norway did. We gave them some good-quality Norwegian wooden houses that could be placed up in the Atlas Mountains. And this created a positive impression of Norway in Algeria that I believe has persisted to this day. The so-called \u2018imprint\u2019, the impact of a first impression: this was applied social-scientific research.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Did this happen on any other occasions?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s just an example.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Did you contribute to changing the way people thought at the MFA?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a good question, but I wouldn\u2019t want to hazard a guess.<\/p>\n<p><strong>These are interesting processes.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I remember someone high up at the ministry lectured me once on the three pillars: the embassies, the consulates and the ministry. You circle upwards between these three pillars. You progress from secretary to the consul, to consul general to the counsellor, to ambassador, to director general and finally secretary general. And as the secretary general, you\u2019re in effect the deputy foreign minister. But you\u2019ll never become the foreign minister. As one of them said: \u2018That job goes to someone who\u2019s been drinking coffee at the party headquarters since he was 20 years old\u2019. He\u2019s the one who gets to be foreign minister. There\u2019s plenty of coffee drinking to be done at the party headquarters. And another thing he told me is that it doesn\u2019t matter that much in any case, as it\u2019s the secretary general, the consul general, and the ambassador who really run the ministry. So this was the sort of picture I had of things. There was no end to my insider knowledge of the workings of the Norwegian state and this was something I made use of. I wasn\u2019t out to involve myself in any political drama. My aim was to show what could be achieved directly through positive action.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How long did you have this unofficial role as adviser?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s an important question. With a very clear answer. And that answer perhaps doesn\u2019t cast me in an especially good light. I had a very close collaboration with Knut Frydenlund, as I\u2019ve said. What happened was that Ingrid and I got divorced. Knut had always got on very well with Ingrid. And then I married my lovely Japanese wife, Fumiko, who Knut also got on with. But you could say that I married out of a Norwegian reality and into an Asian reality. And then came Norway\u2019s support for NATO\u2019s decision on the Vietnam War, that Norway would unambiguously pledge support for the Americans in Vietnam. And the people the Americans were killing in Vietnam had the same skin colour as my wife. They looked like my wife. So I sat in Knut\u2019s office and said, \u2018Knut, they\u2019ve got the same skin colour as my wife. I\u2019m not with you on this one\u2019. \u2018Yes, but Johan, you must understand, Johan, we can\u2019t go against the US. If we do that, we\u2019ll have no guarantee that they\u2019ll be on our side \u201cwhen the Russians come\u201d\u2019. Not <em>if<\/em> the Russians come, but <em>when<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>And when was this?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This was right after Fumiko and I got married, so in 1969. That was the end of my close collaboration with Knut. Not the end of our friendship, but certainly of our collaboration. We were separated by a racial divide, and by lines of conflict.<\/p>\n<p><strong>So, from your point of view, it was you who withdrew from the relationship?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I was the one who withdrew, and I don\u2019t think I should have done. I\u2019ve regretted it since.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why is that?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I think I ought to have stayed and discussed the details with Knut, tried to find some kind or overarching perspective.<\/p>\n<p><strong>But that was difficult because this was also something personal for you?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes, exactly. There wasn\u2019t any pressure from my Japanese wife, not at all. I think she would have been more willing to collaborate than I was, in fact. Maybe I made too much of it. But the Norwegian support for the US was very strong. And here, Knut had two stories that were important for him. Let me see if I can remember them. He was sitting and talking with the American ambassador, and they\u2019re talking about some conflict or other in Europe. And Knut says to him, according to Knut himself, \u2018our ambassador doesn\u2019t quite agree with you there\u2019. And the American ambassador replies: \u2018Your ambassador is ill-informed\u2019. And so Knut asks, \u2018Ok, how can he be better informed?\u2019 And the American ambassador says, \u2018We can\u2019t reveal our sources\u2019. And so Knut responds, \u2018But we\u2019re a close ally\u2019. \u2018I can\u2019t reveal our sources\u2019. That made a real impression on Knut, and not a positive one.<\/p>\n<p>And then the other story. This same American ambassador says to Knut: \u2018We\u2019re in trouble now in Vietnam. We know it and we\u2019re being criticized around the world. If you also criticize a friend in trouble\u2026 Well, we\u2019re the friend and we\u2019re in trouble. You don\u2019t criticize a friend who\u2019s in trouble, but if you do, then we can\u2019t guarantee American support when the Russians come.\u2019 This was at the very foundation of Knut\u2019s worldview. I argued that you\u2019re better off without that kind of help, and that a much better approach would be something like Gerhardsen\u2019s foreign policy from \u201945\u2013\u201949, a foreign policy aimed at building good relations with both sides simultaneously.<\/p>\n<p><strong>But his attitude was coloured more by what he perceived to be realism than by idealism?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you want to use those terms, then yes. I find these terms a little difficult, as idealism often strikes me as more realistic than realism, which often seems to me more like submission than realism. You can talk about concrete policies and concrete things and their effects, and then observe the effects. It\u2019s a matter of how good you are at predicting the future. A future I predicted was a Norway even more subjugated to the US, and that\u2019s the Norway we\u2019ve ended up with, and to an ever increasing extent. It\u2019s gone so far that Norway is in effect occupied by the US, with American military bases positioned at all the most important points. A Norwegian foreign policy in any way in conflict with American foreign policy is in practice inconceivable.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Can I ask you about one last thing, if we spool back in time a little. I\u2019ve had the pleasure of enjoying another fruit of your labour, namely the Journal of Peace Research. I took over from Nils Petter Gleditsch as editor, and had this role from 2010 to 2017.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Such a long time?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yes, I decided not to try to beat Nils Petter\u2019s record \u2013 he was the editor for 26 years. The journal has changed over the years, but we\u2019ve certainly found it very rewarding to be able to build on the visibility and international standing that the journal achieved under your leadership, as a result of the way it was established as an international journal with the goal of making an impact on its field. Could you say something about the background for the development of the journal? This is something I\u2019ve personally wondered about, and that you perhaps haven\u2019t talked so much about previously.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We had something quite simple in mind. We\u2019d established a peace research institute, which had initially been a department, but which was in the process of establishing itself properly in 1965. The <em>Journal of Peace Research<\/em> was part of this struggle for independence. Of course, the journal could have been based at a department at the Institute for Social Research. But by establishing a journal, we distanced ourselves from the Norwegian Institute for International Affairs. Not that we were against them, but we were something else. They had their own publications, of course, but by establishing the journal, we also in effect signalled PRIO\u2019s status. So for me, the journal was a sort of predecessor to our becoming an independent institute. And this is basically what I wrote in my first editorial, where you can also read a fair bit about the things I\u2019d later try to achieve.<\/p>\n<p>It has of course upset me to see how the journal has, as many people have pointed out, effectively become an American journal, with the majority of articles written by Americans. And I remember mentioning this to Nils Petter, who pointed out to me that \u2018Americans have the enormous advantage that they know how to write an article. They have footnotes and lists of references, all ready to go. Ask a European, or especially a Norwegian, to write an article and they don\u2019t know where to start, there\u2019s an awful lot of work to be done\u2019. So that\u2019s one aspect of it, and I know what Nils Petter was saying. It\u2019s true, Americans know how to write, they\u2019ve had a better academic upbringing than Norwegians. But another aspect is Americanization, and if you take a look at the <em>Journal of Peace Research<\/em> and count the number of American and non-American contributors, it becomes very clear that it\u2019s an American journal.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Actually, they\u2019re in the minority now.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Are they? Maybe something\u2019s happened recently. But it was certainly that way for a long time.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This has been a very interesting conversation, Johan. Just one final question. It seems to me that you\u2019ve to a large extent succeeded in using your research skills, your thinking, your intellectual inheritance and your experience in a way that is increasingly practical, although still clearly anchored in your earlier research. Is this your impression too, or do you feel you\u2019ve made a definitive move from research to practical politics?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019d put it slightly differently. We have an empirical reality, the actually existing world. And when it comes to understanding this reality, I\u2019m an empiricist, a sociologist, and I work in the same way as any other researcher to try to understand it. But we also have another world, the potential world. And if you look at history, it\u2019s the history of how the potential world supplants the old empirical world. Look at how the Middle Ages supplanted the Roman Empire, or how modernity supplanted the Middle Ages, to use a European example. And there are corresponding examples from other civilizations. In light of this, the potential world becomes very real, as opposed to what we might call the non-world. An example of something non-worldly is a unicorn. There are no unicorns. Animals only ever have two or more horns, never just one. And it then becomes an interesting question to ask why this is the case. And this is where I\u2019m more interested in the potential world.<\/p>\n<p>But that isn\u2019t to say that I\u2019m unempirical. I draw parallels from history and geography. I look at other epochs of Western history and other locations and ask, \u201cWhy couldn\u2019t that have happened here?\u201d That isn\u2019t unempirical, but it isn\u2019t necessarily empirical in the society in which we find ourselves. There\u2019s historical knowledge and geographical knowledge that needs to be grounded in your having really been there. That\u2019s why my method has been conversations, dialogue, all over the world. Unfortunately, it isn\u2019t possible to have a dialogue with the past, but you can have a global dialogue with the present. I see this as empirical research, but you also need critical and constructive research. We have critical research in medicine, we critique illnesses, we want to do something about them. We have it in law, we critique the law and breaches of the law, we want to do something about them. And, in my view, this also applies to war, violence \u2013 these are things we critique and want to do something about. So, not just empirical research, but critical and constructive research. And this is where we get this triangle of data, theory and value. If you draw a line between data and theory, you get empirical research. You can start with data and develop a theory, or you can look at the data to see if it matches your theory. That\u2019s empirical research. Then you have data and value, and I\u2019m thinking of law and medicine in particular. Here you have values, for example obedience to the law, or good health, and you can investigate how the data fits with these. And on this basis, you can critique reality and suggest that something needs to change. Reality is data. And then you have the exciting relationship between value and theory. It\u2019s here we can talk about being constructive. Say I want a more egalitarian society, more equality in international collaborations, with reciprocity and equal utility for all parties. Then we have all sorts of theories, and the question is what kind of theory we need to build the society we want.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Thank you very much, Johan.<\/strong><\/p>\n<aside class=\"infobox\"><em>__________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/johan-galtung.jpeg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-133844\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/johan-galtung.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"211\" height=\"239\" \/><\/a><\/em><em>Johan Galtung, a professor of peace studies, dr hc mult, is founder of <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/\" >TRANSCEND International<\/a><em> and rector of <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tpu\/\" >TRANSCEND Peace University<\/a><em>. <\/em><em>He was awarded among others the 1987 Right Livelihood Award, known as the Alternative Nobel Peace Prize.<\/em> <em>Galtung\u00a0has mediated in\u00a0over 150 conflicts in more than 150 countries, and written more than 170 books on peace and related issues<\/em>,<em> 96 as the sole author. More than 40 have been translated to other languages, including <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tup\/index.php?book=1\" >50 Years-100 Peace and Conflict Perspectives<\/a><em> published by <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tup\/\" >TRANSCEND University Press<\/a><em>. His book, <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tup\/index.php?book=46\" >Transcend and Transform<\/a>, <em>was translated to 25 languages<\/em>.<em> He has published more than 1700 articles\u00a0and book\u00a0chapters and over 500 Editorials for <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/\" >TRANSCEND Media Service<\/a>.<em> More<a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/galtung\/\" > information about Prof. Galtung<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/galtung\/#publications\" >all of his publications<\/a> can be found at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/galtung\/\" >transcend.org\/galtung<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>This published English-language interview is an abridged, translated and language-edited version of an audio recording. The full transcript of the audio, in the interviewee\u2019s preferred language, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/files.prio.org\/Projects\/Stories\/Johan Galtung interviewed by Henrik Urdal.pdf\" >is available here (.pdf)<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>We must emphasize that these interviews are based solely on the memories of individuals, and have not undergone any form of editorial review.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.prio.org\/2019\/05\/inspiration-from-a-father-johan-galtung-interviewed-by-henrik-urdal\/\" >Go to Original &#8211; prio.org<\/a><\/p>\n<\/aside>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;When [Gandhi] was shot on 30th January 1948, I found myself crying \u2013 much to my puzzlement and dismay. I was 17 and 17-year-olds don\u2019t cry. And a boy to boot. And it wasn\u2019t a habit of mine to cry. Somehow or other, Gandhi\u2019s message had affected me so deeply that I reacted in this unexpected way.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":133844,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[443,432,809,826,424],"class_list":["post-157114","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tms-peace-journalism","tag-culture-of-peace","tag-education-for-peace","tag-johan-galtung","tag-peace-studies","tag-peaceful-transformation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157114","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157114"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157114\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/133844"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}