{"id":173207,"date":"2020-11-23T12:00:15","date_gmt":"2020-11-23T12:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=173207"},"modified":"2020-11-22T11:41:38","modified_gmt":"2020-11-22T11:41:38","slug":"whats-not-being-said-about-the-pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-human-guinea-pigs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2020\/11\/whats-not-being-said-about-the-pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-human-guinea-pigs\/","title":{"rendered":"What\u2019s Not Being Said about the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine. \u201cHuman Guinea Pigs\u201d?"},"content":{"rendered":"

13 Nov 2020 – <\/em>Bill Gates is actively financing and promoting new untested vaccines supposed to keep us at least somewhat safe from a \u2018ghastly\u201d death from the novel coronavirus and supposedly allow us to resume somewhat \u201cnormal\u201d lives. The Pharma giant Pfizer has now announced what they claim were spectacular results in initial human tests. They use an experimental technology known as gene editing, specifically mRNA gene-editing, something never before used in vaccines. Before we rush to get jabbed in hopes of some immunity, we should know more about the radical experimental technology and its lack of precision.<\/span><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The financial world went ballistic on November 9 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for Covid19 that was \u201c90%\u201d effective.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The controversial US head of NIAID, Tony Fauci<\/strong> rushed to greet the news and the EU announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine. If you believe financial markets, the pandemic is all but past history.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Suspicious events<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n

However it seems Albert Bourla<\/strong>, the CEO of Pfizer, doesn\u2019t share the confidence of his own claims. On the day his company issued its press release on the proposed vaccine trials, he sold 62% of his stock in Pfizer, making millions profit in the deal. He made the sell order in a special option in August so it would not appear as \u201cinsider selling\u201d<\/strong>, however he also timed it just after the US elections and the mainstream media illegitimately declared Joe Biden President-elect. It seems from appearances that Bourla had a pretty clear conflict of interest in the timing of his press release on the same day<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bourla lied and denied to the Press that his company had received any funds from the Trump Administration to develop the vaccine when it came out they contracted in summer to deliver 100 million doses to the US Government. Further adding to the suspect actions of Pfizer was the fact the company first informed the team of Joe biden<\/strong> rather than the relevant US government agencies.<\/span><\/p>\n

But this is far from the only thing alarming about the much-hyped Pfizer announcement. <\/span><\/p>\n

The German Partner<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n

Pfizer, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech<\/strong>, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September, 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut. The agreement involved cooperation on developing new mRNA techniques to treat cancer and HIV. Curiously that press release, \u201cThe Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to \u2018dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis\u2019\u201d 05. September 2019, has now been deleted.<\/span><\/p>\n

BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd<\/strong> (\u201cFosun Pharma\u201d) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for novel coronavirus for the Chinese market. Ai-Min Hui,<\/strong> President of Global R&D of Fosun Pharma said in an August statement, \u201cDosing the first Chinese subject with BNT162b1 marks a milestone of the global co-development program in China. We are closely working with BioNTech and regulatory authorities to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BNT162b1 and other mRNA vaccine candidates<\/a>\u2026\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

This means that the same German biotech company is behind the covid vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU.<\/strong> The vaccine is being rushed through to eventual approval in an alarmingly short time. <\/span><\/p>\n

Both US and EU authorities and presumably also Chinese, waived the standard animal tests using ferrets or mice and have gone straight to human \u201cguinea pigs.\u201d Human tests began in late July and early August. Three months is unheard of for testing a new vaccine. Several years is the norm. Because of the degree of global panic engendered by WHO over the coronavirus, caution is thrown to the wind. Vaccine makers all have legal indemnity, meaning they can\u2019t be sued if people die or are maimed from the new vaccine. But the most alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech gene edited vaccine is that the gene edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved. Notably, two year peer reviewed tests with mice fed genetically modified corn sprayed with Monsanto glyphosate-rich Roundup first showed cancer tumors after nine months as well as liver and other organ damage. Earlier Monsanto company tests ended at three months and claimed no harm<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span>A similar situation exists with the gene edited mRNA vaccines that are being rushed out after less than 90 days human tests.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cExplicitly experimental\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n

Dr. Michael Yeadon<\/strong> replied in a recent public social media comment to a colleague in the UK; \u00a0\u201cAll vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been\u2026 in development for more than a few months.\u201d Yeadon then went on to declare, <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIf any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for\u2026whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information<\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Yeadon is well qualified to make the critique. As he notes in the comment, \u201cI have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO\u2026. of a biotech I founded (Ziarco \u2013 acquired by Novartis). I\u2019m knowledgeable<\/a>\u00a0about new medicine R&D.\u201d <\/span>He was formerly with Pfizer at a very senior level. <\/span><\/p>\n

Human guinea pigs?<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is experimental and far from guaranteed safe, despite the fact that Pfizer, the EU and the notorious Dr Tony Fauci seem ready to roll it out even before year end to hundreds of millions of humans. <\/span><\/p>\n

The experimental technology is based on a rather new gene manipulation known as gene editing. In a major article in the 2018 New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine, <\/span>Foreign Affairs<\/span>, Bill Gates effusively promoted the novel gene editing CRISPR technology as being able to \u201ctransform global development.\u201d He noted that his Gates Foundation had been financing gene editing developments for vaccines and other applications for a decade<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

But is the technology for breaking and splicing of human genes so absolutely safe that it is worth risking on a novel experimental vaccine never before used on humans? Contrary to what Bill Gates claims, the scientific answer is no, it is not proven so safe. <\/span><\/p>\n

In a peer reviewed article in the October, 2020 journal <\/span>Trends in Genetics<\/span>, the authors conclude that \u201cthe range of possible molecular events resulting from genome editing has been underestimated and the technology remains unpredictable on, and away from, the target locus<\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Romeo Quijano<\/strong>, retired professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, noted some of the dangers of the experimental gene editing when applied to human vaccines. Quijano warns of, <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cthe danger that the vaccine might actually \u201cenhance\u201d the pathogenicity of the virus, or make it more aggressive possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), as what happened with previous studies on test vaccines in animals. If that should happen in a major human trial the outcome could be disastrous. This serious adverse effect may not even be detected by a clinical trial especially in highly biased clinical trials laden with conflicts of interest involving vaccine companies. Even when a serious adverse event is detected, this is usually swept under the rug.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

He cites the case of another Gates mRNA vaccine candidate, Moderna, where \u201cthree of the 15 human experimental subjects in the high dose group suffered serious and medically significant symptoms. Moderna, however, concluded that the vaccine was \u201cgenerally safe and well tolerated,\u201d which the corporate-dominated media dutifully reported, covering-up the real danger<\/a>\u2026\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

He notes, <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cExogenous mRNA is inherently immune-stimulatory, and this feature of mRNA could be beneficial or detrimental. It may provide adjuvant activity and it may inhibit antigen expression and negatively affect the immune response. The paradoxical effects of innate immune sensing on different formats of mRNA vaccines are incompletely understood.\u201d Quijano adds, \u201cA mRNA-based vaccine could also induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity\u2026 and may promote blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation<\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Quijano writes in the extensively documented article, <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201camong other dangers, the virus-vectored vaccines could undergo recombination with naturally occurring viruses and produce hybrid viruses that could have undesirable properties affecting transmission or virulence. The\u2026possible outcomes of recombination are practically impossible to quantify accurately given existing tools and knowledge. The risks, however, are real, as exemplified by the emergence of mutant types of viruses, enhanced pathogenicity and unexpected serious adverse events (including death) following haphazard mass vaccination campaigns and previous failed attempts to develop chimeric vaccines using genetic engineering technology<\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Bill Gates, the mRNA vaccine makers including Pfizer\/BioNTech and Moderna, and their close allies such as Dr. Tony Fauci<\/strong> of the NIAID are clearly playing fast and loose with human lives in their rush to get these experimental vaccines into our bodies. Notably, the same Dr. Fauci and his NIAID owns the patent on a vaccine for dengue fever known as Dengvaxia, marketed by Sanofi-Pasteur and \"\"<\/a>promoted as an \u201cessential\u201d vaccine by Tedros\u2019 WHO since 2016. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.<\/strong>\u00a0(right) noted that Fauci and NIAID \u201cknew from the clinical trials that there was a problem with paradoxical immune response,\u201d but they gave it to several hundred thousand Filipino kids anyway. It was estimated that as many as 600 vaccinated children died before the government stopped the vaccinations<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Clearly the well-established Precautionary Principle\u2013if in serious doubt, don\u2019t\u2013 is being ignored by Fauci, Pfizer\/BioNTech and others in rushing to approve the new mRNA vaccine for coronavirus. Messenger RNA technology has yet to produce an approved medicine, let alone a vaccine.<\/span><\/p>\n

________________________________________________<\/p>\n

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he\u00a0holds\u00a0a degree in politics from Princeton University and\u00a0is a best-selling author\u00a0on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine\u00a0\u201cNew Eastern Outlook\u201d<\/a>. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original – journal-neo.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

13 Nov 2020 – he Pharma giant Pfizer has now announced what they claim were spectacular results in initial human tests. They use an experimental technology known as gene editing, specifically mRNA gene-editing, something never before used in vaccines. Before we rush to get jabbed in hopes of some immunity, we should know more about the radical experimental technology and its lack of precision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":173210,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2124],"tags":[2017,244,271,1879,1829,1868,530,289,744,401,710,1937,2115,1864,2186,1102,723,304,1447,1998,124,1836],"class_list":["post-173207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-debates-on-covid-vaccines","tag-airborne-contagion","tag-china","tag-community","tag-compassion","tag-coronavirus","tag-covid-19","tag-cuba","tag-economy","tag-empathy","tag-environment","tag-health","tag-lockdown","tag-orthomolecular-medicine","tag-pandemic","tag-pcr-tests","tag-public-health","tag-research","tag-science","tag-science-and-medicine","tag-swiss-policy-research","tag-united-nations","tag-who"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173207\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/173210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}