{"id":177251,"date":"2021-01-18T12:00:16","date_gmt":"2021-01-18T12:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=177251"},"modified":"2024-06-12T21:24:47","modified_gmt":"2024-06-12T20:24:47","slug":"israel-is-losing-the-fight-to-obscure-its-apartheid-character","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2021\/01\/israel-is-losing-the-fight-to-obscure-its-apartheid-character\/","title":{"rendered":"Israel Is Losing the Fight to Obscure Its Apartheid Character"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

New report by rights group B\u2019Tselem will make it harder to smear Israel\u2019s critics as antisemites for arguing that Israel is a racist state<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

14 Jan 2021 – <\/em>For more than a decade, a handful of former Israeli politicians and US diplomats identified with what might be termed the \u201cpeace process industry<\/a>\u201d\u00a0have intermittently warned that, without a two-state solution, Israel is in danger of becoming an \u201capartheid state\u201d.<\/p>\n

The most notable among them include Ehud Barak<\/a> and Ehud Olmert<\/a>, two former Israeli prime ministers, and John Kerry<\/a>, who served as former US President Barack Obama\u2019s secretary of state. Time is rapidly running out, they have all declared in the past.<\/p>\n

Their chief concern, it seems, was that without the alibi of some kind of Palestinian state \u2013 however circumscribed and feeble \u2013 the legitimacy of Israel as a \u201cJewish and democratic state\u201d would increasingly come under scrutiny. Apartheid will arrive, the argument goes, when a minority of Israeli Jews rule over a majority of Palestinians in the area controlled by Israel between the Mediterranean Sea and the River Jordan.<\/p>\n

Demographic threshold<\/h3>\n

The apartheid threat has been wielded by the so-called \u201cpeace camp\u201d in hopes of mobilising international pressure on the Israeli right, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The goal has been to force it into making sufficient concessions that the Palestinian leadership agrees to a demilitarised statelet, or statelets, on fragments on the original Palestinian homeland.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, demographic trends have continued apace, and the Israeli right has ignored all warnings, preferring to pursue their Greater Israel ambitions instead. But strangely, the apartheid moment never arrived for the Israeli peace camp. Instead, its expressions of concern about apartheid fizzled into silence, as did its once-vocal worries about a Palestinian demographic majority.<\/p>\n

This entirely cynical approach to Palestinian statehood was very belatedly blown apart this week with the publication of a report<\/a> by B\u2019Tselem, Israel\u2019s most prominent and respected human rights group. It broke ranks to declare what has been obvious for many, many years. Israel has created a permanent reality in which there are two peoples, Jews and Palestinians, sharing the same territorial space, but \u201ca regime of Jewish supremacy\u201d has been imposed by the stronger side. This unequivocally qualifies as apartheid, B\u2019Tselem said.<\/p>\n

It dismisses the sophistry that apartheid relates to some self-serving demographic deadline \u2013 one that never materialises \u2013 rather than the explicitly segregationist practices and policies Israel has enforced throughout the territories it rules.\u00a0It also dismisses arguments made by Israel\u2019s partisans abroad that Israel cannot be an apartheid state because there are no South African-style \u201cwhites only\u201d signs on park benches.<\/p>\n

Hagai El-Ad, B\u2019Tselem\u2019s executive director, notes<\/a> that Israel\u2019s version \u2013 \u201capartheid 2.0, if you will \u2013 avoids certain kinds of ugliness \u2026 That Israel\u2019s definitions do not depend on skin colour make no material difference: it is the supremacist reality which is the heart of the matter.\u201d The report concludes that the bar for apartheid was met after considering<\/a> \u201cthe accumulation of policies and laws that Israel devised to entrench its control over Palestinians\u201d.<\/p>\n

Daring analysis<\/h3>\n

What is perhaps most daring about B\u2019Tselem\u2019s analysis is its admission that apartheid exists not just in the occupied territories, as has been observed<\/a> before, including by former US President Jimmy Carter. It describes the entire region<\/a>\u00a0between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River \u2013 which encompasses both Israel and the Palestinian territories \u2013 as an apartheid regime. It thereby denies Israel\u2019s claims to be a democratic state even inside its internationally recognised borders.<\/p>\n

B\u2019Tselem has abandoned the pretence that apartheid can be limited to the occupied territories, as though Israel \u2013 the state that rules Palestinians \u2013 is somehow exempt from being classified as integral to the apartheid enterprise it institutes and oversees.<\/p>\n

That was always obvious. How much sense would it have made in the former South Africa to claim that apartheid existed only in the Bantustans or black townships, while exempting white areas? None at all.\u00a0And yet, Israel has been getting away with precisely this clearcut casuistry for decades \u2013 largely aided by the peace camp, including B\u2019Tselem.<\/p>\n

Now, B\u2019Tselem observes<\/a>: \u201cJews go about their lives in a single, contiguous space where they enjoy full rights and self-determination. In contrast, Palestinians live in a space that is fragmented into several units, each with a different set of rights \u2013 given or denied by Israel, but always inferior to the rights accorded to Jews.\u201d<\/p>\n

Israel\u2019s \u201cJewish supremacist ideology\u201d is revealed in its obsession with \u201cJudaising\u201d land, in its bifurcated citizenship laws and policies that privilege Jews alone, in its regulations that restrict movement for Palestinians only, and in its denial of political participation to Palestinians. These discriminatory policies, B\u2019Tselem notes, apply also to the fifth of Israel\u2019s population who are Palestinian and have nominal Israeli citizenship.<\/p>\n

El-Ad concludes: \u201cThere is not a single square inch in the territory Israel controls where a Palestinian and a Jew are equal. The only first-class people here are Jewish citizens such as myself.\u201d<\/p>\n

Permanent occupation<\/h3>\n

What B\u2019Tselem has done is echo the arguments long made by academics and Palestinian civil society, including the international boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement, that Israel is a settler-colonial society.<\/p>\n

In an emailed response to the report, Omar Barghouti, one of the founders of the BDS movement, said it helped to put an end to \u201cthe vicious and deeply racist lies about the not-so-perfect Israeli democracy that has a problem called \u2018the occupation\u2019\u201d.<\/p>\n

The B\u2019Tselem report observes that, while \u201coccupation\u201d must be a temporary situation, Israel has no intention of ending its military rule over Palestinians, even after more than five decades.\u00a0A Palestinian state is not conceivably on the agenda of any Israeli party in sight of power, and no one in the international community with any influence is demanding one. The two-state solution has been smothered into oblivion.<\/p>\n

For that reason, it argues, all of Israel and the Palestinian territories under occupation are organised \u201cunder a single principle: advancing and cementing the supremacy of one group \u2013 Jews \u2013 over another \u2013 Palestinians\u201d.<\/p>\n

There are good reasons why B\u2019Tselem is biting the bullet now, after decades of equivocation from it and the rest of the Israeli peace camp.\u00a0Firstly, no one really believes that Israel will be pressured from outside into conceding a Palestinian state. Trump\u2019s so-called \u201cpeace plan\u201d, unveiled a year ago, gave Netanyahu everything he wanted, including support for annexing<\/a> swaths of the West Bank on which illegal settlements have been built.<\/p>\n

Four years of Trump, and the recruitment of much of the Gulf to Netanyahu\u2019s side, has shifted the conversation a long way from efforts<\/a> to secure Palestinian statehood. Now, the focus is on how best to delay Israel\u2019s move towards formal annexation.<\/p>\n

US president-elect Joe Biden will at best try to push things back to the dismal state they were in before Donald Trump took office. At worst, he will quietly assent to all or most of the damage Trump has inflicted on the Palestinian national cause.<\/p>\n

Deeply isolated<\/h3>\n

Secondly, B\u2019Tselem and other human rights groups are more deeply isolated at home than ever before. There is simply no political constituency in Israel for their research into the systematic abuses of Palestinians by the Israeli army and settlers.\u00a0That means B\u2019Tselem no longer needs to worry about messaging that could antagonise the sensibilities of Israel\u2019s so-called \u201cZionist left\u201d \u2013 because there is no meaningful peace camp left to alienate.<\/p>\n

The disappearance of this peace camp, unreliable as it was, has only been underscored by the Israeli general election due in late March. The battle for power this time is being waged between three or four far-right parties that all support annexation to varying degrees.<\/p>\n

The Israeli left has ceased to exist at the political level. It comprises<\/a> a handful of human and legal rights groups, mostly seen by the public as traitors supposedly meddling in Israel\u2019s affairs on behalf of \u201cEuropean\u201d interests. At this stage, B\u2019Tselem has little to lose. It is almost entirely irrelevant inside Israel.<\/p>\n

Thirdly, and as a result, the only audience for B\u2019Tselem\u2019s careful research exposing Israeli abuses is overseas. This new report seeks to liberate a conversation about Israel, partly among Palestinian solidarity activists abroad.\u00a0Their campaigns have been stymied by the failure of the Palestinian leadership under Mahmoud Abbas to signal where they should direct their energies, now that prospects for Palestinian statehood have vanished.<\/p>\n

Activists have also been browbeaten into silence by smears from Israel\u2019s partisans in the US and Europe, decrying any trenchant criticism of Israel as antisemitic. These slurs were relentlessly deployed against the UK\u2019s Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn because of his support<\/a> for the Palestinian cause.<\/p>\n

Breaking a taboo<\/h3>\n

By calling Israel an apartheid state and a \u201cregime of Jewish supremacy\u201d, B\u2019Tselem has given the lie to the Israel lobby\u2019s claim \u2013\u00a0bolstered<\/a> by a new definition promoted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance \u2013 that it is antisemitic to suggest Israel is a \u201cracist endeavour\u201d.<\/p>\n

B\u2019Tselem, a veteran Israeli Jewish organisation with deep expertise in human rights and international law, has now explicitly declared that Israel is a racist state.\u00a0Israel\u2019s apologists will now face the much harder task of showing that B\u2019Tselem is antisemitic, along with the Palestinian solidarity activists who cite its work.<\/p>\n

The report is also intended to reach out to young American Jews, who are more willing than their parents to foreground the mistreatment of Palestinians and to forgo the Zionist idea that Israel is their bolthole in times of trouble.<\/p>\n

Significantly, the B\u2019Tselem report has been published in the wake of two groundbreaking essays this past summer by influential American Jewish journalist Peter Beinart.\u00a0In them, he broke a taboo in the US Jewish mainstream by declaring the two-state solution dead and calling<\/a> for a single democratic state for Israelis and Palestinians.<\/p>\n

It doubtless served as a wakeup call to Israeli groups such as B\u2019Tselem that the conversation about Israel is moving on in the US and becoming much more polarised. Israeli human rights groups need to engage with this debate, not shy away from it.<\/p>\n

Battle for equality<\/h3>\n

There is one possible lacuna in B\u2019Tselem\u2019s position. The report suggests a reticence to focus on outcomes. Nowhere is the two-state solution ruled out. Rather, the report notes<\/a>: \u201cThere are various political paths to a just future.\u201d Statements by El-Ad to Middle East Eye indicate that his organisation may still support a framework of international pressure for incremental, piecemeal change in Israeli policies that violate Palestinian human rights.<\/p>\n

That is very much what western states, particularly Europe, have been paying lipservice to for decades, while Israeli apartheid has entrenched.<\/p>\n

Does B\u2019Tselem hope its apartheid criticisms will prove more effective than Barak and Olmert\u2019s apartheid warnings, finally galvanising the international community into action to push for a Palestinian state? If so, Biden\u2019s performance in office should soon dispel any such illusions.<\/p>\n

El-Ad observes <\/a>that the goal now is \u201ca rejection of supremacy, built on a commitment to justice and our shared humanity.\u201d<\/p>\n

That cannot happen within the two-state framework, even on the untenable assumption that the international community ever seriously rallies behind Palestinian statehood, against Israel\u2019s wishes. So why not say so explicitly? The best-case two-state scenarios on the table are for a tiny, divided, demilitarised, pseudo-Palestinian state with no control over its borders, airspace or electromagnetic frequencies.<\/p>\n

That would not offer \u201cjustice\u201d\u00a0to Palestinians or recognise their \u201cshared humanity\u201d\u00a0with Israeli Jews.<\/p>\n

As welcome as the new report is, it is time for B\u2019Tselem \u2013 as well as Palestinian solidarity activists who look to the organisation \u2013 to explicitly reject any reversion to a \u201cpeace process\u201d\u00a0premised on ending the occupation. The logic of an apartheid analysis needs to be followed to the very end. That requires unequivocally embracing a democratic single state guaranteeing equality and dignity for all.<\/p>\n

___________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/em>Jonathan Cook is an award-winning British journalist based in Nazareth, Israel, since 2001. He is the author of: <\/em>Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish State (2006); <\/em>Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East (2008); and <\/em>Disappearing Palestine: Israel\u2019s Experiments in Human Despair (2008). In 2011 he was awarded the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize<\/a> for Journalism.<\/em> The same year, Project Censored<\/a> voted one of Jonathan\u2019s reports, \u201cIsrael brings Gaza entry restrictions to West Bank\u201d, the ninth most important story censored in 2009-10.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 jonathan-cook.net<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

14 Jan 2021 – New report by rights group B\u2019Tselem will make it harder to smear Israel\u2019s critics as antisemites for arguing that Israel is a racist state. For more than a decade, Israeli politicians and US diplomats from the \u201cpeace process industry\u201d warned that, without a two-state solution, Israel is in danger of becoming an \u201capartheid state\u201d. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":168014,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[2221,120,1829,1030,87,267,1029,487,2395,88,771,1027,427,85,109,287,1572,985,880,292,70,126,1025,886],"class_list":["post-177251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-palestine-israel-gaza-genocide","tag-checkpoints","tag-conflict","tag-coronavirus","tag-fatah","tag-gaza","tag-geopolitics","tag-hamas","tag-human-rights","tag-international-criminal-court-icc","tag-israel","tag-nakba","tag-oslo-accords","tag-palestine","tag-palestine-israel","tag-politics","tag-power","tag-settlers","tag-social-justice","tag-state-terrorism","tag-un","tag-usa","tag-violence","tag-west-bank","tag-zionism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177251"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177251\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":264211,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177251\/revisions\/264211"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/168014"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}