{"id":17950,"date":"2012-03-19T12:00:24","date_gmt":"2012-03-19T12:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=17950"},"modified":"2012-03-15T18:39:20","modified_gmt":"2012-03-15T18:39:20","slug":"goldman-stunned-by-op-ed-loses-2-2-billion-for-shareholders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2012\/03\/goldman-stunned-by-op-ed-loses-2-2-billion-for-shareholders\/","title":{"rendered":"Goldman Stunned by Op-Ed Loses $2.2 Billion for Shareholders"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. saw $2.15 billion of its market value wiped out after an employee assailed Chief Executive Officer Lloyd C. Blankfein&#8217;s management and the firm&#8217;s treatment of clients, sparking debate across Wall Street.<\/p>\n<p>The shares dropped 3.4 percent in New York trading yesterday [14 Mar 2012], the third-biggest decline in the 81-company Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 Financials Index, after London-based Greg Smith made the accusations in a New York Times op-ed piece.<\/p>\n<p>Smith, who also wrote that he was quitting after 12 years at the company, blamed Blankfein, 57, and President Gary D. Cohn, 51, for a &#8220;decline in the firm&#8217;s moral fiber.&#8221; They responded in a memo to current and former employees, saying that Smith&#8217;s assertions don&#8217;t reflect the firm&#8217;s values, culture or &#8220;how the vast majority of people at Goldman Sachs think about the firm and the work it does on behalf of our clients.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, 84, whose &#8220;Volcker rule&#8221; would limit banks like New York-based Goldman Sachs from making bets with their own money, called Smith&#8217;s article &#8220;a radical, strong&#8221; piece. &#8220;I&#8217;m afraid it&#8217;s a business that leads to a lot of conflicts of interest,&#8221; Volcker said at a conference in Washington sponsored by the Atlantic.<\/p>\n<p>Goldman Sachs slid $4.17 to $120.37 yesterday. The shares are still up 33 percent this year.<\/p>\n<p>David Wells, a spokesman for Goldman Sachs in New York, declined to comment beyond the contents of the memo and an earlier e-mailed statement in which the firm said it disagrees with the views expressed in the op-ed.<\/p>\n<p>Fraud Lawsuit<\/p>\n<p>Executives at Goldman Sachs haven&#8217;t changed their behavior even after the firm paid $550 million to settle a fraud lawsuit with the Securities and Exchange Commission and was accused by the U.S. Senate&#8217;s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of misleading clients, Smith wrote. The company published a report in January 2011 with 39 recommendations on how to improve its business practices and client focus.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as &#8216;muppets,&#8217; sometimes over internal e-mail,&#8221; Smith wrote. &#8220;It astounds me how little senior management gets a basic truth: If clients don&#8217;t trust you they will eventually stop doing business with you.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The article was e-mailed across Wall Street. One employee at Bank of America Corp.&#8217;s Merrill Lynch division, a competitor to Goldman Sachs, said his team was told not to send copies to clients. Parodies such as &#8220;Why I am leaving the Empire, by Darth Vader&#8221; on <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/thedailymash.co.uk\/\" >thedailymash.co.uk<\/a> and theborowitzreport.com&#8217;s &#8220;A Response from Goldman Sachs&#8221; also circulated.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Does Hurt&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It does hurt them,&#8221; said Stephane Rambosson, managing partner at executive search firm Veni Partners in London and a former Citigroup Inc. banker. &#8220;The perception of the firm has gone down, and a lot of the winners of tomorrow are sitting back and thinking, &#8216;Do I want to be with Goldman?'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s little evidence that the firm&#8217;s popularity with clients has been hurt by the SEC lawsuit, the Senate&#8217;s criticism or a recent ruling by Delaware Chancery Court Judge Leo Strine, who faulted Goldman Sachs&#8217;s handling of a conflict of interest. The bank won more business than any other in advising companies on takeovers and equity offerings last year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.<\/p>\n<p>Some clients of Goldman Sachs&#8217;s sales and trading department, the business in which Smith worked, said they are always cautious in dealings with Wall Street banks, understanding that their interests can diverge.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Prostitution in Vegas&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The argument that Goldman has become increasingly profit- driven, sometimes at the expense of clients&#8217; best interests, and that some employees use vulgar and disrespectful language, is hardly news,&#8221; Whitney Tilson, founder of hedge fund T2 Partners LLC, wrote in an e-mailed commentary. &#8220;What&#8217;s the next &#8216;shocking&#8217; headline: &#8216;Prostitution in Vegas!?'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Smith was an executive director in London, a title equal to vice president in New York. The firm employs almost 12,000 vice presidents, and most said in a recent internal survey that &#8220;the firm provides exceptional service&#8221; to clients, Blankfein and Cohn said in the memo. Smith, who sold U.S. equity derivatives to clients in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, didn&#8217;t respond to calls seeking comment.<\/p>\n<p>Seven former Goldman Sachs partners and managing directors, positions that are more senior than vice president, said in interviews that Smith shouldn&#8217;t be taken seriously because he was a junior employee and may have been disgruntled about his pay or career. All asked not to be identified because they didn&#8217;t want to risk ruining their relationship with the firm.<\/p>\n<p>Still, six of the seven said they agreed with Smith&#8217;s criticism of how the firm has treated clients under Blankfein and Cohn&#8217;s management and that current members of the management committee would, too. Even so, they said they don&#8217;t expect the board of directors to take action or that anything will change because the firm has made money and outperformed most rivals.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;On a Pedestal&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;He may have aired a few comments that are true, but he&#8217;s placed himself on a pedestal,&#8221; said Jason Kennedy, CEO of the Kennedy Group, a London-based recruitment firm. &#8220;The reason he&#8217;s been at Goldman Sachs for 12 years is that he liked the name and probably liked the money.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s rare for people on Wall Street, especially at Goldman Sachs, to speak out publicly against their employers or former employees, said Roy Smith, a former Goldman Sachs partner who&#8217;s now a finance professor at New York University&#8217;s Stern School of Business.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Who&#8217;s going to hire someone who would do that?&#8221; he said. &#8220;The industry will close ranks on such things as whistle- blowing in this context.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sales and Trading<\/p>\n<p>NYU&#8217;s Smith, who&#8217;s not related to the author of the op-ed, said Wall Street&#8217;s culture has changed because trading has become a more important source of revenue than the fees banks get from advising companies on takeovers or financing. Goldman Sachs generated 60 percent of its 2011 revenue from sales and trading.<\/p>\n<p>The relationship with clients in the trading department differs from the investment bank, Smith said. Firms often are on the opposite side of a client&#8217;s trade, and can profit at the client&#8217;s expense. Still, it&#8217;s not as simple as the article describes, he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It just doesn&#8217;t happen that it&#8217;s easy to make money by ripping off your clients or counterparties because they&#8217;re pretty smart people for the most part,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Though some competitors relished the criticism of Goldman Sachs, which was the most profitable securities firm in Wall Street history before it converted to a bank in 2008, they may not be so different.<\/p>\n<p>Smith&#8217;s opinion piece &#8220;seems to be symptomatic of many, if not most, of the banks around the world,&#8221; said Tom Kirchmaier, a fellow in the financial-markets group at the London School of Economics. &#8220;It might be that Goldman, as one of the most successful ones, is also one of the most extreme.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>______________________<\/p>\n<p><em>With assistance from Ambereen Choudhury and Liam Vaughan in London and Cheyenne Hopkins and Jeff Kearns in Washington. Editors: Peter Eichenbaum, Dan Reichl.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sfgate.com\/cgi-bin\/article.cgi?f=\/g\/a\/2012\/03\/14\/bloomberg_articlesM0WH081A1I4H01-M0WMZ.DTL&amp;ao=all\" >Go to Original \u2013 sfgate.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. saw $2.15 billion of its market value wiped out after an employee assailed Chief Executive Officer Lloyd C. Blankfein&#8217;s management and the firm&#8217;s treatment of clients, sparking debate across Wall Street. The shares dropped 3.4 percent in New York trading yesterday [14 Mar 2012], the third-biggest decline in the 81-company Standard &#038; Poor&#8217;s 500 Financials Index, after London-based Greg Smith made the accusations in a New York Times op-ed piece.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-capitalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17950"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17950\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}