{"id":180365,"date":"2021-03-08T12:00:38","date_gmt":"2021-03-08T12:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=180365"},"modified":"2021-03-03T05:44:32","modified_gmt":"2021-03-03T05:44:32","slug":"by-putting-big-pharmas-patents-before-patients-doctors-will-further-erode-trust-in-experts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2021\/03\/by-putting-big-pharmas-patents-before-patients-doctors-will-further-erode-trust-in-experts\/","title":{"rendered":"By Putting Big Pharma\u2019s Patents before Patients, Doctors Will Further Erode Trust in Experts"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

22 Feb 2021 – <\/em>I have spent the past several years on this blog trying to highlight one thing above all others: that the institutions we were raised to regard as authoritative are undeserving of our blind trust.<\/p>\n

It is not just that expert institutions have been captured wholesale by corporate elites over the past 40 years and that, as a result, knowledge, experience and expertise have been sidelined in favour of elite interests \u2013 though that is undoubtedly true. The problem runs deeper: these institutions were rarely as competent or as authoritative as we fondly remember them being. They always served elite interests.<\/p>\n

What has changed most are our perceptions<\/em> of institutions that were once beloved or trusted. It is we who have changed more than the institutions. That is because\u00a0we now have far more sources \u2013 good and bad alike \u2013 than ever before against which we can judge the assertions of those who claim to speak with authority.<\/p>\n

Hanging out together<\/h3>\n

Here is a personal example<\/a>. When I started work as an editor at the foreign section of the Guardian newspaper in the early 1990s, there were few ways, from the paper\u2019s London head office, to independently evaluate or scrutinise the presentation of events by any of our correspondents in their far-flung bureaus. All we could do was compare the copy they sent with that from other correspondents, either published in rival newspapers or available from two or three English-language wire services.<\/p>\n

Even that safeguard is far less meaningful than it might sound to an outsider.<\/p>\n

The correspondents for these various publications \u2013 whether based in\u00a0Bangkok, Amman, Moscow, Havana or Washington \u2013 are a small group. Inevitably they each bring to their work a narrow range of mostly unconscious but almost identical biases<\/a>. They hang out together \u2013 like any other expat community \u2013 in the same bars, clubs and restaurants. Their children attend the same international schools, and their families socialise together at the weekends.<\/p>\n

Similar pasts<\/h3>\n

Correspondents from these various newspapers also have similar backgrounds<\/a>. They have received much the same privileged education, at private or grammar schools followed by Oxford or Cambridge, and as a result share largely the same set of values. They have followed almost identical career paths, and their reports are written chiefly to impress their editors and\u00a0each other. They are appointed by a foreign editor who served a decade or two earlier in one of the same bureaus they now head, and he (for invariably it is a he) selected them because they reminded him of himself at their age.<\/p>\n

The \u201clocal sources\u201d quoted by these correspondents are drawn from the same small pool of local politicians, academics and policymakers \u2013 people the correspondents have agreed are the most authoritative and in a position to speak on behalf of the rest of the local population.<\/p>\n

Nowhere in this chain of news selection, gathering, editing and production are there likely to be voices questioning or challenging<\/a> the correspondents\u2019 shared view of what constitutes \u201cnews\u201d, or their shared interpretation and presentation of that news.<\/p>\n

Working in the guild<\/h3>\n

This is not the news business as journalists themselves like to present it. They are not fearless, lone-wolf reporters pursuing exclusives and digging up dirt on the rich and powerful. They comprise something more akin to the guilds of old. Journalists are trained to see the world and write about it in near-identical terms.<\/p>\n

The only reason the media \u201cguild\u201d looks far less credible than it did 20 or 30 years ago is because now we can often cut out the middleman \u2013 the correspondent himself. We can watch videos on Youtube of local events as they occur, or soon afterwards. We can hear directly from members of the local population who would never be given a platform in corporate media. We can read accounts from different types of journalists, including informed local ones, who would never be allowed to write for a corporate news outlet because they are not drawn from the narrow, carefully selected and trained group known as \u201cforeign correspondents\u201d.<\/p>\n

\n

My latest: A short video of settlers disrupting a family picnic may be the best field guide yet to Israel\u2019s complex apartheid system of state-sponsored Jewish supremacy https:\/\/t.co\/5RqMrNbgwy<\/a><\/p>\n

— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) February 17, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n