{"id":180916,"date":"2021-03-15T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-03-15T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=180916"},"modified":"2021-03-13T07:21:06","modified_gmt":"2021-03-13T07:21:06","slug":"the-sovietization-of-the-american-press","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2021\/03\/the-sovietization-of-the-american-press\/","title":{"rendered":"The Sovietization of the American Press"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<p class=\"subtitle\"><em>The transformation from phony &#8220;objectivity&#8221; to open one-party orthodoxy hasn&#8217;t been an improvement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/pravda-taibbi-media.png\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-180918\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/pravda-taibbi-media-1024x717.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/pravda-taibbi-media-1024x717.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/pravda-taibbi-media-300x210.png 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/pravda-taibbi-media-768x537.png 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/pravda-taibbi-media.png 1456w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>12 Mar 2021 &#8211; <\/em>I collect Soviet newspapers. Years ago, I used to travel to Moscow\u2019s Izmailovsky flea market every few weeks, hooking up with a dealer who crisscrossed the country digging up front pages from the Cold War era. I have <em>Izvestia\u2019s <\/em>celebration of Gagarin\u2019s flight, a <em>Pravda <\/em>account of a 1938 show trial, even an ancient copy of <em>Ogonyek <\/em>with Trotsky on the cover that someone must have taken a risk to keep.<\/p>\n<p>These relics, with dramatic block fonts and red highlights, are cool pieces of history. Not so cool: the writing! Soviet newspapers were wrought with such anvil shamelessness that it\u2019s difficult to imagine anyone ever read them without laughing. A good Soviet could write almost any <em>Pravda <\/em>headline in advance. What else but \u201cA Mighty Demonstration of the Union of the Party and the People\u201d fit the day after Supreme Soviet elections? What news could come from the Spanish civil war but \u201cSuccess of the Republican Fleet?\u201d Who could earn an obit headline but a \u201cFaithful Son of the Party\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>Reality in Soviet news was 100% binary, with all people either heroes or villains, and the villains all in league with one another (an SR was no better than a fascist or a \u201cRight-Trotskyite Bandit,\u201d a kind of proto-horseshoe theory). Other ideas were not represented, except to be attacked and deconstructed. Also, since anything good was all good, politicians were not described as people at all but paragons of limitless virtue \u2014 95% of most issues of <em>Pravda <\/em>or <em>Izvestia <\/em>were just names of party leaders surrounded by lists of applause-words, like \u201cglittering,\u201d \u201cfull-hearted,\u201d \u201cwise,\u201d \u201cmighty,\u201d \u201ccourageous,\u201d \u201cin complete moral-political union with the people,\u201d etc.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the headlines in the U.S. press lately sound suspiciously like this kind of work:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>\u2014 Biden stimulus showers money on Americans, sharply cutting poverty <\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>\u2014 Champion of the middle class comes to the aid of the poor<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>\u2014 Biden&#8217;s historic victory for America <\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The most Soviet of the recent efforts didn\u2019t have a classically Soviet headline. \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/2021\/03\/08\/snl-biden-impressions-presidents\/\" >Comedians are struggling to parody Biden. Let\u2019s hope this doesn\u2019t last<\/a>,\u201d read the <em>Washington Post <\/em>opinion piece by Richard Zoglin, arguing that Biden is the first president in generations who might be \u201cimpervious to impressionists.\u201d Zoglin contended Biden is \u201cimpregnable\u201d to parody, his voice being too \u201cdevoid of obvious quirks,\u201d his manner too \u201cmuted and self-effacing\u201d to offer comedians much to work with. He was talking about this person:<\/p>\n<div id=\"youtube2-ve8kE4SXXTs\" class=\"youtube-wrap\" data-attrs=\"{&quot;videoId&quot;:&quot;ve8kE4SXXTs&quot;,&quot;startTime&quot;:null,&quot;endTime&quot;:null}\">\n<p>httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ve8kE4SXXTs<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Forget that the \u201cimpregnable to parody\u201d pol spent the last campaign year jamming fingers in the sternums of voters, challenging them to pushup contests, calling them \u201clying dog-faced pony soldiers,\u201d and forgetting what state he was in. Biden, on the day Zoglin ran his piece, couldn\u2019t remember the name of his Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, and referred to the Department of Defense as \u201cthat outfit over there\u201d:<\/p>\n<div id=\"youtube2-GdNm-rvodZU\" class=\"youtube-wrap\" data-attrs=\"{&quot;videoId&quot;:&quot;GdNm-rvodZU&quot;,&quot;startTime&quot;:null,&quot;endTime&quot;:null}\">\n<p>httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=GdNm-rvodZU<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>It doesn\u2019t take much looking to find comedians like James Adomian and Anthony Atamaniuk <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=6oHJtGbUsJw\" >ab-libbing riffs on Biden<\/a> with ease. He checks almost every box as a comic subject, saying inappropriate things, engaging in wacky Inspector Clouseau-style physical stunts (like biting his wife\u2019s finger), and switching back and forth between outbursts of splenetic certainty and total cluelessness. The parody doesn\u2019t even have to be mean \u2014 you could make it endearing cluelessness. But to say nothing\u2019s there to work with is bananas.<\/p>\n<p>The first 50 days of Biden\u2019s administration have been a surprise on multiple fronts. The breadth of his stimulus suggests a real <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/cifamerica\/2012\/jan\/24\/larry-summers-memo-hobbled-obamas-stimulus\" >change from the Obama years<\/a>, while hints that this administration wants to <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/09\/us\/politics\/amazon-union-alabama-biden.html\" >pick a unionization fight with Amazon<\/a> go against every tendency of Clintonian politics. But it\u2019s hard to know what much of it means, because coverage of Biden increasingly resembles official press releases, often featuring embarrassing, Soviet-style contortions.<\/p>\n<p>When Biden decided not to punish Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman for the murder of <em>Washington Post <\/em>writer Jamal Khashoggi on the grounds that the \u201ccost\u201d of \u201cbreaching the relationship with one of America\u2019s key Arab allies\u201d was too high, the <em>New York Times <\/em>headline read: \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/02\/26\/us\/politics\/biden-mbs-khashoggi.html\" >Biden Won\u2019t Penalize Saudi Crown Prince Over Khashoggi\u2019s Killing, Fearing Relations Breach<\/a>.\u201d When Donald Trump made the same calculation, saying he couldn\u2019t cut ties because \u201cthe world is a very dangerous place\u201d and \u201cour relationship is with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,\u201d the paper joined most of the rest of the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2019\/06\/29\/trump-mbs-khashoggi-g20-1390412\" >press<\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/global-opinions\/trumps-embrace-of-mohammed-bin-salman-is-now-costing-him-dearly\/2020\/03\/15\/e9c0fcca-6474-11ea-845d-e35b0234b136_story.html\" >corps<\/a> in howling in outrage.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/11\/20\/world\/middleeast\/trump-saudi-khashoggi.html\" >In Extraordinary Statement, Trump Stands With Saudis Despite Khashoggi Killing<\/a>.\u201d was the <em>Times<\/em> headline, in a piece that said Trump\u2019s decision was \u201ca stark distillation of the Trump worldview: remorselessly transactional, heedless of the facts, determined to put America\u2019s interests first, and founded on a theory of moral equivalence.\u201d The paper noted, \u201cEven Mr. Trump\u2019s staunchest allies on Capitol Hill expressed revulsion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This week, in its \u201cCrusader for the Poor\u201d piece, the <em>Times <\/em>described Biden\u2019s identical bin Salman decision as mere evidence that he remains \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/11\/us\/politics\/biden-stimulus.html\" >in the cautious middle<\/a>\u201d in his foreign policy. The paper previously had David Sanger dig up a quote from former Middle East negotiator Dennis Ross, who \u201capplauded Mr. Biden for \u2018trying to thread the needle here\u2026 This is the classic example of where you have to balance your values and your interests.\u2019\u201d It\u2019s two opposite takes on exactly the same thing.<\/p>\n<p>The old con of the <em>Manufacturing Consent <\/em>era of media was a phony show of bipartisanship. Legitimate opinion was depicted as a spectrum stretching all the way from \u201cmoderate\u201d Democrats (often depicted as more correct on social issues) to \u201cmoderate\u201d Republicans (whose views on the economy or war were often depicted as more realistic). That propaganda trick involved constantly narrowing the debate to a little slice of the Venn diagram between two established parties. Did we need to invade Iraq right away to stay safe, as Republicans contended, or should we wait until inspectors finished their work and then invade, as Democrats insisted?<\/p>\n<p>The new, cleaved media landscape advances the same tiny intersection of elite opinion, except in the post-Trump era, that strip fits inside one party. Instead of appearing as props in a phony rendering of objectivity, Republicans in basically all non-Fox media have been moved off the legitimacy spectrum, and appear as foils only. Allowable opinion is now depicted stretching all the way from one brand of \u201cmoderate\u201d Democrat to another.<\/p>\n<p>An example is the Thursday <em>New York Times<\/em> story, \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/10\/business\/economy\/inflation-markets-federal-reserve.html\" >As Economy Is Poised to Soar, Some Fear a Surge in Inflation<\/a>.\u201d It\u2019s essentially an interview with JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who\u2019s worried about the inflationary impact of the latest Covid-19 rescue (\u201cThe question is: Does [it] overheat everything?\u201d), followed by quotes from Fed chair Jerome Powell insisting that no, everything is cool. This is the same <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2021-02-07\/yellen-summers-spar-about-overheating-risk-in-stimulus-debate\" >Larry Summers vs. Janet Yellen<\/a> debate that\u2019s been going on for weeks, and it represents the sum total of allowable economic opinions about the current rescue, stretching all the way from \u201cit\u2019s awesome\u201d to \u201cit\u2019s admirable but risky.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This format isn\u2019t all that different from the one we had before, except in one respect: without the superficial requirement to tend to a two-party balance, the hagiography in big media organizations flies out of control. These companies already tend to wash out people who are too contentious or anti-establishment in their leanings. Promoted instead, as even Noam Chomsky described a generation ago, are people with the digestive systems of jackals or monitor lizards, who can swallow even the most toxic piles of official nonsense without blinking. Still, those reporters once had to at least pretend to be something other than courtiers, as it was considered unseemly to openly gush about a party or a politician.<\/p>\n<p>Now? Look at the <em>Times<\/em> feature story on Biden\u2019s pandemic relief bill:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>On Friday, \u201cScranton Joe\u201d Biden, whose five-decade political identity has been largely shaped by his appeal to union workers and blue-collar tradesmen like those from his Pennsylvania hometown, will sign into law a\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/10\/us\/politics\/covid-stimulus-bill.html\" title=\"\" >$1.9 trillion spending plan<\/a>\u00a0that includes the biggest antipoverty effort in a generation\u2026<\/p>\n<p>The new role as a crusader for the poor represents an evolution for Mr. Biden, who spent much of his 36 years in Congress concentrating on foreign policy, judicial fights, gun control, and criminal justice issues\u2026 Aides say he has embraced his new role\u2026 [and] has also been moved by the inequities in pain and suffering that the pandemic has inflicted on the poorest Americans\u2026<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>You\u2019d never know from reading this that Biden\u2019s actual record on criminal justice issues involved boasting about authoring an infamous crime bill (that did \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/joe-biden-touted-crime-bill-1992-death-penalty-jaywalking-senate-2019-6\" >everything but hang people for jaywalking<\/a>\u201d), or that he\u2019s long been a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.propublica.org\/article\/bidens-cozy-relations-with-bank-industry-825\" >voracious devourer<\/a> of corporate and especially financial services industry cash, that his \u201cScranton Joe\u201d rep has been belied by a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jacobinmag.com\/2021\/02\/joe-biden-amazon-workers-unionizing-labor\" >decidedly mixed history<\/a> on unions, and so on. Can he legitimately claim to be more pro-union than his predecessor? Sure, but a news story that paints the Biden experience as stretching from \u201chero to the middle class\u201d to \u201chero to the poor,\u201d is a <em>Pravda-<\/em>level stroke job.<\/p>\n<p>We now know in advance that every Biden address will be reviewed as historic and exceptional. It was only a mild shock to see Chris Wallace say Biden\u2019s was the &#8220;the best inaugural address I have ever heard.\u201d More predictable was <em>Politico <\/em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/newsletters\/playbook\/2021\/03\/12\/last-night-is-why-joe-biden-won-the-presidency-492086\" >saying<\/a> of Thursday night\u2019s address that \u201cit is hard to imagine any other contemporary politician\u00a0making the speech Biden did\u2026 channeling our collective sorrow and reminding us that there is life after grief.\u201d (Really? Hard to imagine <em>any <\/em>contemporary politician doing that?).<\/p>\n<p>This stuff is relatively harmless. Where it gets weird is that the move to turn the bulk of the corporate press in the \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/news\/our-columnists\/why-are-some-journalists-afraid-of-moral-clarity\" >moral clarity\u201d era<\/a> into a single party organ has come accompanied by purges of the politically unfit. In the seemingly endless parade of in-house investigations of journalists, paper after paper has borrowed from the Soviet style of printing judgments and self-denunciations, without explaining the actual crimes.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>New York Times <\/em>coverage of the recent staff revolt at <em>Teen Vogue <\/em>against editor Alexi McCammond noted \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/09\/business\/media\/teen-vogue-alexi-mccammond-tweets.html\" >Staff Members Condemn Editor\u2019s Decade-Old, Racist Tweets<\/a>,\u201d but declined to actually publish the offending texts, so readers might judge for themselves. The <em>Daily Beast <\/em>expose on <em>Times <\/em>reporter Donald McNeil did much the same thing. Even the ongoing (and in my mind, ridiculous) <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/jessesingal\/status\/1370092370583244800\" >moral panic<\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.garbageday.email\/p\/starting-to-think-we-are-acting-like\" >over Substack<\/a> ties in. Aimed at people already banished from mainstream media, the obvious message is that anyone with even mildly heterodox opinions shouldn\u2019t be publishing anywhere.<\/p>\n<p>Those still clinging to mainstream jobs in a business that continues to <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/09\/business\/media\/huffpost-layoffs-buzzfeed.html\" >lay people off<\/a> at an extraordinary rate read the gist of all of these stories clearly: if you want to keep picking up a check, you\u2019d better talk the right talk.<\/p>\n<p>Thus you see bizarre transformations like that of David Brooks, who spent his career penning paeans to \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/09\/24\/opinion\/24brooks.html\" >personal responsibility<\/a>\u201d and the \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/07\/22\/opinion\/22brooks.html\" >culture of thrift<\/a>,\u201d but is now writing stories about how \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/11\/opinion\/biden-covid-relief-bill.html\" >Joe Biden is a transformational president<\/a>\u201d for casting aside fiscal restraints in the massive Covid-19 bill. When explaining that \u201cboth parties are adjusting to the new paradigm,\u201d he\u2019s really explaining his own transformation, in a piece that reads like a political confession. \u201cI\u2019m worried about a world in which we spend borrowed money with abandon,\u201d he says, but \u201cincome inequality, widespread child poverty, and economic precarity are the problems of our time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Maybe Brooks is experiencing the same \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/11\/us\/politics\/biden-stimulus.html\" >evolution<\/a>\u201d Biden is being credited with of late. Or, he\u2019s like a lot of people in the press who are searching out the safest places on the op-ed page, the middle of the newsroom middle, in desperate efforts to stay on the masthead. It\u2019s been made clear that there\u2019s no such thing as overdoing it in one direction, e.g. if you write as the <em>Times <\/em>did that Biden \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/01\/20\/us\/politics\/president-joe-biden.html\" >has become a steady hand who chooses words with extraordinary restraint<\/a>\u201d (which even those who like and admire Biden must grasp is not remotely true of the legendary loose cannon). Meanwhile, how many open critics of the Party on the left, the right, or anywhere in between still have traditional media jobs?<\/p>\n<p>All of this has created an atmosphere where even obvious observations that once would have interested blue-state voters, like that Biden\u2019s pandemic relief bill \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wsws.org\/en\/articles\/2021\/03\/11\/bill-m11.html\" >does not establish a single significant new social program<\/a>,\u201d can only be found in publications like the <em>World Socialist Web Site. <\/em>The bulk of the rest of the landscape has become homogenous and as predictably sycophantic as Fox in the \u201cMission Accomplished\u201d years, maybe even worse. What is this all going to look like in four years?<\/p>\n<div class=\"captioned-image-container\">\n<figure><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.substack.com\/image\/fetch\/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep\/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2148a047-e333-4596-92f4-59f7df66da6e_484x711.png\" class=\"image-link image2 image2-89-60\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.substack.com\/image\/fetch\/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep\/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2148a047-e333-4596-92f4-59f7df66da6e_484x711.png\" alt=\"\" data-attrs=\"{&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com\/public\/images\/2148a047-e333-4596-92f4-59f7df66da6e_484x711.png&quot;,&quot;height&quot;:711,&quot;width&quot;:484,&quot;resizeWidth&quot;:60,&quot;bytes&quot;:664688,&quot;alt&quot;:null,&quot;title&quot;:null,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;href&quot;:null}\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>______________________________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/matt-taibbi-e1511009078146.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-39943\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/matt-taibbi-e1511009078146.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"67\" \/><\/a><em>Matthew C. Taibbi is an American author, journalist, and podcaster. He has reported on finance, media, politics, and sports. He is a contributing editor for <\/em>Rolling Stone<em>, author of several books, a winner of the National Magazine Award for commentary<\/em>,<em> co-host of <\/em>Useful Idiots<em>, and publisher of a newsletter on <\/em>Substack.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/taibbi.substack.com\/p\/the-sovietization-of-the-american?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxODc3MDY0OCwicG9zdF9pZCI6MzM1NjM2MTcsIl8iOiJkK2kxYSIsImlhdCI6MTYxNTYxODc0OCwiZXhwIjoxNjE1NjIyMzQ4LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMTA0MiIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.kaAzJYBBrqOSMUxwlkqbda_1F6rqD6jVGc7e-v8_dJE\" >Go to Original \u2013 taibbi.substack.com<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>12 Mar 2021 &#8211; The transformation from phony &#8220;objectivity&#8221; to open one-party orthodoxy hasn&#8217;t been an improvement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":39943,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62],"tags":[2375,2314,378,1855,234],"class_list":["post-180916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-media","tag-alternative-media","tag-corporate-media","tag-journalism","tag-mainstream-media-msm","tag-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180916","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180916\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}