{"id":185625,"date":"2021-05-24T12:00:33","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T11:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=185625"},"modified":"2021-05-23T06:21:01","modified_gmt":"2021-05-23T05:21:01","slug":"why-biden-is-right-to-leave-afghanistan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2021\/05\/why-biden-is-right-to-leave-afghanistan\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Biden Is Right to Leave Afghanistan"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_185626\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/scahill-biden-afghanistan-usa.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-185626\" class=\"wp-image-185626\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/scahill-biden-afghanistan-usa.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"332\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/scahill-biden-afghanistan-usa.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/scahill-biden-afghanistan-usa-300x199.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/scahill-biden-afghanistan-usa-768x510.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-185626\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A mural in Kabul, Afghanistan, depicting Washington\u2019s peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, left, and Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the leader of the Taliban delegation. Rahmat Gul\/Associated Press<\/p><\/div>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\"><em>20 May 2021 &#8211; <\/em>When Joe Biden assumed the presidency in January, he embarked on a mission to reverse a slew of policies put in place by former President Donald Trump while leaving untouched the elite foreign policy consensus. Mr. Biden issued 42 executive orders in his first 100 days \u2014 more than than any other president since Franklin D. Roosevelt \u2014 and has waged a methodical campaign against Mr. Trump\u2019s agenda. With one major exception: Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Beginning with his campaign for the presidency, Mr. Trump railed against America\u2019s forever wars and pledged to bring American troops home and to get out of Afghanistan. Despite his rhetoric, Mr. Trump vacillated between winding down some Obama-era lethal U.S. campaigns (in Pakistan and Libya) and expanding others (in Syria, Somalia and Yemen). He <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/05\/01\/us\/politics\/trump-drone-strike-rules.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" >loosened<\/a> the dubious Obama-era <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/blog\/national-security\/targeted-killing\/president-obamas-new-long-promised-drone-transparency-not\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">restrictions<\/a> on killing civilians in airstrikes after <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2015\/12\/02\/politics\/donal\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">suggesting<\/a>, when he was a candidate, that the United States should kill the families of suspected terrorists. He also reauthorized the C.I.A. to conduct drone operations after Barack Obama\u2019s administration shifted those powers to the Pentagon.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Mr. Trump basked in his self-perceived glory when in April 2017 the United States dropped the 21,600-pound \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/04\/20\/opinion\/mother-of-all-bombs.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" >mother of all bombs<\/a>,\u201d the most powerful nonnuclear weapon, on a village in Afghanistan. In 2019 alone, the United States carried out more than 2,400 airstrikes in Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Nonetheless, Mr. Trump made a serious, if clumsy and contradictory, attempt in the latter half of his term to make good on his promise to end the Afghanistan war. His administration struck <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/02\/18\/opinion\/afghanistan-taliban-deal.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" >a deal with the Taliban<\/a>, offering an American commitment to withdraw troops from Afghanistan by May 2021 for a Taliban promise not to allow the country to be used by transnational terrorists.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"><\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Congressional Democrats and a group of hawkish Republicans led by Representative Liz Cheney were <a href=\"https:\/\/mcusercontent.com\/301a28247b80ab82279e92afb\/files\/9bb84f8b-8162-4ece-9f05-9521c8c264c4\/CROWCO_055_xml_10_.pdf?utm_source=House+GOP+Media+List&amp;utm_campaign=da6dc54a60-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_01_03_06_14_COPY_01&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_38d91d4596-da6dc54a60-\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">intent<\/a> on slow-walking the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.military.com\/daily-news\/2020\/12\/05\/congress-moves-block-us-troop-withdrawal-afghanistan-and-germany.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">execution<\/a> of the plan and sought to deny funding for U.S. troop reductions in Afghanistan. There are also indications that some Pentagon and intelligence officials <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/trump-pentagon-afghan-war\/2020\/11\/13\/5ac54c7e-25cb-11eb-8599-406466ad1b8e_story.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">tried<\/a> to stymie the plan, perhaps hoping that Mr. Biden would scrap the deal and Mr. Trump\u2019s timeline for withdrawal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Mr. Biden announced that while he did not agree with all of the particulars of Mr. Trump\u2019s plan and timeline, he would move forward with them. \u201cIt is perhaps not what I would have negotiated myself, but it was an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefing-room\/speeches-remarks\/2021\/04\/14\/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-way-forward-in-afghanistan\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">agreement made by the United States<\/a> government, and that means something,\u201d Mr. Biden said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">His decision was a bold one. There are powerful voices among Washington insiders, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/hillary-clinton-condoleezza-rice-biden-afghanistan-troops-9e115f31-85c4-4f30-9663-30dd6e572895.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">including<\/a> the former secretaries of state Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice, pushing for him to reverse course. A recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usip.org\/publications\/2021\/02\/afghanistan-study-group-final-report-pathway-peace-afghanistan\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">report<\/a> from the congressionally commissioned Afghanistan Study Group also advised Mr. Biden against withdrawing U.S. troops. As Responsible Statecraft first <a href=\"https:\/\/responsiblestatecraft.org\/2021\/02\/16\/weapons-biz-bankrolls-experts-pushing-to-extend-afghan-war\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">reported<\/a>, two of the group\u2019s co-chairs and a majority of its 12 other members have current or recent financial ties to defense contractors that profit from the proliferation of American wars.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">The Afghan government, aid organizations, corporations and other entities with an ongoing presence in Afghanistan rely on contractors for everything from logistics to security. In the post-9\/11 wars, the number of contractors on the ground has <a href=\"https:\/\/fas.org\/sgp\/crs\/natsec\/R44116.pdf\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consistently dwarfed<\/a> that of uniformed military personnel. Mr. Biden may be officially ending the U.S. military\u2019s official involvement, but it is still unknown how many of these private sector forces will follow suit or continue in the gray zones that have riddled the landscape of America\u2019s forever wars.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Even as the Pentagon says that it will withdraw its contractors, there are signs that the privatized aspects of the war may continue. The private security company Triple Canopy is <a href=\"https:\/\/nymag.com\/intelligencer\/2021\/05\/u-s-contractors-in-afghanistan-are-hiring-amid-withdrawal.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">hiring<\/a> armed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dcjobs.com\/job\/detail\/40697782\/Armed-Guard-Level-II-Afghanistan\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">guards<\/a> to operate at several sites in Afghanistan beyond the Sept. 11, 2021, withdrawal date announced by Mr. Biden. Its parent company, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.constellis.com\/who-we-are\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Constellis<\/a>, also owns Academi, the most recent name for Blackwater, the notorious mercenary firm founded by Erik Prince.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Mr. Biden has made clear he is reserving the option to go back into Afghanistan if he determines it is in America\u2019s interest. The Pentagon, which refers to the withdrawal as a \u201cstrategic retrograde,\u201d said it intends to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defense.gov\/Explore\/News\/Article\/Article\/2597990\/austin-milley-discuss-progress-of-retrograde-from-afghanistan\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">continue<\/a> \u201cover the horizon\u201d operations in Afghanistan as the conventional withdrawal moves forward. In plain terms, this can mean anything from drone strikes and targeted counterterrorism missions to logistical support of Afghan military forces. In recent weeks, senior U.S. military commanders <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defense.gov\/Explore\/News\/Article\/Article\/2579584\/us-plans-to-keep-threats-in-check-even-after-afghanistan-withdrawal\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">spoke of plans<\/a> to keep Special Operations strike forces in the region to conduct find-fix-and-finish operations in Afghanistan against the Islamic State, Al Qaeda and the Taliban if they create problems and threaten U.S. interests and to redeploy if ordered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">In the early 1980s, Mr. Biden <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/empire-politician\/biden-soviet-invasion-afghanistan-mujahideen-pakistan\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">supported<\/a> opening the spigot for American aid to Pakistan to combat the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. It was this conflict that helped incubate the rise of the Taliban and, to an extent, Al Qaeda. After the Sept. 11 attacks, Mr. Biden was a <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/empire-politician\/biden-invasion-afghanista\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">passionate<\/a> supporter of the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan. \u201cWas ever a war more justified than us going into Afghanistan?\u201d he <a href=\"https:\/\/www.c-span.org\/video\/?193498-1\/democratic-perspective-world-affairs\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">said<\/a> in 2006. \u201cI can\u2019t think of any war since World War II more justified.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">But as vice president in 2009, Mr. Biden <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/empire-politician\/biden-afghanistan-troops-surge\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">argued against<\/a> a large-scale surge in U.S. troops in Afghanistan. He wanted the United States to move away from a nation-building enterprise and to use C.I.A., Special Operations forces and drones to conduct targeted operations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">He argued that such actions were more in line with the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force than an occupation. That measure, which was passed by Congress days after the 9\/11 attacks, was intended to support the targeting of the perpetrators of the attacks. It has since been stretched by successive administrations to justify military actions outside declared war zones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">In the end, Mr. Obama did both: He surged conventional military forces in Afghanistan and expanded the use of Special Operations teams, C.I.A. activities and drone strikes. And large numbers of Afghan civilians were killed in U.S. operations during his two terms in office.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">The current Afghanistan plan, as Mr. Biden has publicly described it, is similar to what he advocated in 2009, albeit with U.S. strike forces being positioned elsewhere in the region rather than inside Afghanistan. In addition to the considerable maritime options of the United States, the Pentagon is <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/04\/15\/us\/politics\/united-states-al-qaeda-afghanistan.html\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" >reportedly<\/a> looking at bases in Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to host U.S. forces.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">In a way, Mr. Biden\u2019s plan is an indictment of the Afghanistan policies of the Obama White House and raises a bigger question: What was the point of continuing the occupation all these years?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"><\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">The Taliban control large swaths of territory in Afghanistan, and as vice president, Mr. Biden argued during the internal White House debate over surging troops in 2009 that the only sustainable solution in Afghanistan will require recognizing the Taliban as an indigenous political force. In a 2009 handwritten memo for Mr. Obama, Mr. Biden <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2010\/08\/biden-on-the-afghanistan-debate-in-his-own-words\/60868\/https:\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2010\/08\/biden-on-the-afghanistan-debate-in-his-own-words\/60868\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">assessed<\/a> the Taliban as not \u201can existential threat to the United States of America\u201d and said that \u201cit was against their interest\u201d to welcome Al Qaeda back to Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">Once the United States pulls out its conventional military forces, hawkish figures in the American security and foreign policy establishment will use every subsequent incident of Taliban violence to argue that withdrawal was a mistake. In his speech announcing the withdrawal, Mr. Biden seemed to understand this dynamic, and he offered a pre-emptory argument: \u201cWe cannot continue the cycle of extending or expanding our military presence in Afghanistan, hoping to create ideal conditions for the withdrawal, and expecting a different result.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-axufdj evys1bk0\">For now, Mr. Biden deserves credit for continuing the course set by his deeply flawed predecessor and making the case to his supporters that the war must end. He must remain steadfast and end America\u2019s longest war.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>_____________________________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/jeremy-scahill.png\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-124647\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/jeremy-scahill-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>Jeremy Scahill is an investigative journalist at <\/em>The Intercept<em> and the author, most recently, of<\/em> \u201cDirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield.\u201d <em>He is working on<\/em> \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/empire-politician\/\" class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Empire Politician<\/a>,\u201d <em>a project examining a half-century of President Biden\u2019s positions on militarism.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/05\/20\/opinion\/biden-afghanistan-war.html?action=click&amp;module=Opinion&amp;pgtype=Homepage\" >Go to Original &#8211; nytimes.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>20 May 2021 &#8211; When Joe Biden assumed the presidency in January, he embarked on a mission to reverse a slew of policies put in place by former President Donald Trump while leaving untouched the elite foreign policy consensus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":124647,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[93,867,2197,133,555,654,1126,1050,504,950,86,112,484,249,70,1594,481],"class_list":["post-185625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anglo-america","tag-afghanistan","tag-anglo-america","tag-biden","tag-cia","tag-elites","tag-foreign-policy","tag-hegemony","tag-imperialism","tag-international-relations","tag-invasion","tag-occupation","tag-pentagon","tag-taliban","tag-trump","tag-usa","tag-war-economy","tag-warfare"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185625\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/124647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}