{"id":193885,"date":"2021-09-06T12:00:39","date_gmt":"2021-09-06T11:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=193885"},"modified":"2021-09-01T04:48:02","modified_gmt":"2021-09-01T03:48:02","slug":"worrying-about-your-carbon-footprint-is-exactly-what-big-oil-wants-you-to-do","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2021\/09\/worrying-about-your-carbon-footprint-is-exactly-what-big-oil-wants-you-to-do\/","title":{"rendered":"Worrying about Your Carbon Footprint Is Exactly What Big Oil Wants You to Do"},"content":{"rendered":"

31 Aug 2021 – <\/em>Everybody\u2019s going carbon neutral these days, from the big boys \u2014 Amazon, Microsoft, Unilever, Starbucks, JetBlue \u2014 to your favorite outdoor brand, even ski resorts. Probably your neighborhood coffee roaster, too.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s not to like? Becoming carbon neutral means cutting greenhouse gas emissions as much as you can, then offsetting what you can\u2019t avoid with measures like tree planting. Seems admirable.<\/p>\n

Well, not exactly. Carbon neutrality doesn\u2019t achieve any sort of systemic change. A coal-powered business could be entirely carbon neutral as long it stops some landfill gas in Malaysia from entering the atmosphere equal to the emissions it\u2019s still releasing. American fossil fuel dependence would remain intact, and planet-warming emissions would continue to rise. The only way to fix that is through politics, policymakers and legislation. But distressingly, most businesses don\u2019t want to play in that arena.<\/p>\n

Instead, they\u2019re doing exactly what the fossil fuel industry wants: staying in their lane, accepting some blame for a global problem and maintaining the dominance of fossil fuels. They\u2019re well intentioned, sure, but also clueless, even complicit.<\/p>\n

Imagine if businesses put as much effort into climate lobbying as climate neutrality. Corporations wield tremendous influence over the political system. But on climate, most corporations have decided to sit this one out. Notably, the five biggest tech corporations \u2014 Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon \u2014 spend only 4 percent of their lobbying dollars on climate, according to Influence Map.<\/p>\n

As a result, they avoid the chance to put in place systemic solutions in favor of carbon neutral navel gazing. Large corporations will protest, saying that they are lobbying on climate. But they are typically working both sides of the aisle. And their political contributions are mostly going in the wrong direction. Bloomberg Green examined political donations by more than 100 major American corporations and found last year that they were \u201cthrowing their support behind lawmakers who routinely stall climate legislation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Climate never ascends to the level of mission-critical issues like trade policy and taxation. Sure, there are exceptions: Salesforce recently said it would intensify its focus on climate lobbying. And Patagonia has always been aggressive, along with Ben and Jerry\u2019s. But they are anomalies, led or inspired by charismatic founders.<\/p>\n

How did it come to this? The story of how what\u2019s considered the best approach to corporate sustainability became complicity with the very industry responsible for climate change starts with the famous \u201cCrying Indian\u201d commercial of the 1970s. The ad, in which an actor portraying a Native American is devastated by the sight of rampant pollution, created several generations of dutiful litter-picker-uppers. (Guilty!) But it wasn\u2019t so benign. It was, in fact, masterly propaganda from the beverage and container industries, designed to place responsibility for the trash problem on American consumers, not manufacturers.<\/p>\n

The approach was so good that the fossil fuel industry adopted the very same strategy.<\/p>\n

In 2004, BP hired the public relations firm Ogilvy & Mather to improve its image, in part by conveying the message that consumers of oil and natural gas bear the responsibility for their greenhouse gas emissions, not the producers of the oil and gas they use. The result was BP\u2019s ingenious carbon footprint calculator, which allows individuals to calculate the carbon emissions that result from their activities. It\u2019s \u201cabout helping you to go carbon neutral \u2014 reducing and offsetting your carbon footprint,\u201d BP says on its \u201ctarget neutral\u201d website.<\/p>\n

Nor was BP alone among the big oil companies communicating this message. A study by Naomi Oreskes and Geoffrey Supran at Harvard published in May in the journal One Earth found that since 1972, ExxonMobil has consistently used \u201crhetoric aimed at shifting responsibility for climate change away from itself and onto consumers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yes, those consumers want the hot showers, warm homes and cold beer that coal, oil and gas provide. But they did not insist on the burning of fossil fuels for those amenities. Now there are other ways to produce energy, and responsibility to tap those renewable resources lies with the world\u2019s energy companies.<\/p>\n

Today, almost 20 years after BP\u2019s carbon calculator went live, cutting a firm\u2019s carbon footprint is still the gold standard of corporate climate action. The phrase is firmly lodged in the environmental lexicon.<\/p>\n

The idea of offsetting one\u2019s carbon footprint by reducing or eliminating greenhouse gas emissions in one place to make up for emissions elsewhere has grown into an enormous industry. Businesses often do this by buying carbon credits to offset emissions they can\u2019t or won\u2019t reduce. The consulting firm McKinsey estimates that \u201cthe market for carbon credits could be worth upward of $50 billion in 2030.\u201d<\/p>\n

Many of these offsets underwrite worthwhile projects \u2014 protecting virgin expanses in some of the world\u2019s last great forests, as in the Amazon, or the deployment of solar power. But according to an analysis by the private-sector Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets, fewer than five percent of offsets in 2020 removed carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.<\/p>\n

Which, of course, is what we desperately need to be doing.<\/p>\n

A giant, systemic problem like climate needs to be addressed like other huge environmental challenges the world has successfully taken on \u2014 reducing ozone-depleting chemicals worldwide, for example, and sharply cutting back on smog and water pollution in the United States. Imagine if, in response to the expansion of the ozone hole, businesses and governments had said, \u201cWe\u2019ll just hope businesses do the right thing.\u201d Instead, international policymakers created the Montreal Protocol, which set standards that phased out ozone-destroying chlorofluorocarbon use worldwide.<\/p>\n

We need more of that approach \u2014 citizens, businesses and governments working together to address this crisis. It might result in policy solutions like government regulation, effective carbon taxes, national standards for renewable energy and electrification, the elimination of legacy subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, strict auto emission standards and new national building codes. All of these approaches threaten fossil fuel\u2019s business model and, not coincidentally, would help to slow the warming of the planet.<\/p>\n

What do fossil fuel companies prefer? They like consumers and corporations to do anything and everything as long as they stay out of the companies\u2019 way and avoid doing anything that could actually make a difference.<\/p>\n

Tragically, the overwhelming majority of American businesses are on a path of complicity. Their climate strategy avoids conflict and generates great P.R. Unfortunately, it also allows fossil fuel interests to monetize their remaining assets unhindered, ensuring catastrophe for all.
\nHow carbon neutral is that?<\/p>\n

\u200b\u200b_________________________________________<\/p>\n

Auden Schendler is the senior vice president of sustainability at the Aspen Skiing Company, the chairman of the board of the group Protect Our Winters and the author of<\/em> \u201cGetting Green Done.\u201d<\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 nytimes.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

31 Aug 2021 – In 2004, BP hired the public relations firm Ogilvy & Mather to improve its image by conveying the message that consumers of oil and natural gas bear the responsibility for their greenhouse gas emissions, not the producers of the oil and gas they use. The result was BP\u2019s ingenious carbon footprint calculator, which allows individuals to calculate the carbon emissions that result from their activities. It\u2019s \u201cabout helping you to go carbon neutral \u2014 reducing and offsetting your carbon footprint,\u201d BP says on its \u201ctarget neutral\u201d website.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":148449,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[1441,2645,686,993,894,372],"class_list":["post-193885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-environment","tag-big-oil","tag-bp","tag-climate-change","tag-global-warming","tag-pollution","tag-propaganda"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193885\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/148449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}