{"id":201544,"date":"2021-12-20T12:00:38","date_gmt":"2021-12-20T12:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=201544"},"modified":"2024-09-23T14:38:52","modified_gmt":"2024-09-23T13:38:52","slug":"the-nyt-reports-us-forces-killed-dozens-in-syria-the-reality-is-far-worse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2021\/12\/the-nyt-reports-us-forces-killed-dozens-in-syria-the-reality-is-far-worse\/","title":{"rendered":"The NYT Reports US Forces \u2018Killed Dozens in Syria\u2019–The Reality Is Far Worse"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

FILE PHOTO. \u00a9 AFP \/ Delil souleiman<\/p><\/div>\n

15 Dec 2021 – <\/em>Two recent reports by the New York Times highlight some of the US’ manifold crimes in Syria, murdering untold numbers of Syrian civilians over the years, under the pretext of fighting the Islamic State.<\/p>\n

\n

They<\/a> exposed a 2019 US bombing in Baghuz, eastern Syria, which killed 70 civilians, and that this was but one of numerous instances, with the Delta Force routinely launching \u201creckless airstrikes\u201d<\/em> while purportedly fighting ISIS.<\/p>\n

Stating the obvious: had the wanton and repeated mass murder of civilians been committed by Syria or Russia, it would have been in headlines, ad nauseam… because the legacy media genuinely cares about the Syrian people. But, since the crimes were committed by the US, we’ll neither see outrage nor crocodile tears. In fact, it’s pretty shocking that the New York Times, a noted apologist for American Imperialism which has promoted outright fabrications<\/a> about Syria over the years, has deigned to report honestly on actual war crimes in the country.<\/p>\n

https:\/\/twitter.com\/ASBMilitary\/status\/1470165986317946889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1470165986317946889%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rt.com%2Fop-ed%2F543206-us-syria-air-strikes%2F<\/p>\n

In April 2019, Airwars (and Amnesty International) reported<\/a> that, \u201cat least 1,600 civilians died in Coalition strikes on the city of Raqqa in 2017 during the battle to evict so-called Islamic State \u2013 ten times the number of fatalities so far conceded by the US-led alliance, which had admitted 159 deaths to April 24th.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

It noted that, \u201cmost of the destruction during the battle for Raqqa was caused by incoming Coalition air and artillery strikes \u2013 with at least 21,000 munitions fired into the city over a four-month period. The United Nations would later declare it the most destroyed city in Syria, with an estimated 70% laid waste.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Along with reporting from Syria\u00a0since 2014<\/a>, I’ve keenly followed news on the subject and, unless my memory betrays me, I don’t recall overwhelming media outrage following this report.<\/p>\n

In November, former United Nations Weapons Inspector and former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer, Scott Ritter,\u00a0wrote<\/a>: \u201cThe Battle of Raqqa became a template for all future anti-ISIS operations involving the SDF and the US going forward. By the time the mopping up operations around Baghuz were conducted, in March 2019, there was in place a seamless killing machine which allowed the US to justify any action so long as it was conducted in support of an SDF unit claiming to be in contact with ISIS.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

https:\/\/twitter.com\/ASBMilitary\/status\/1470165313685704710?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1470165313685704710%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rt.com%2Fop-ed%2F543206-us-syria-air-strikes%2F<\/p>\n

The US strikes were apparently<\/a> meant to be portrayed as \u201cself-defense\u201d protecting US proxies on the ground, a feeble excuse for the slaughter that occurred. Yet, what Syria, with the aid of allies, has been doing the past ten years has literally been self-defense: defending the country against the death squads supported and funded by the West, the Gulf, Turkey and Israel in their war on Syria.<\/p>\n

Were such death squads to descend on Western cities, they would almost immediately be eviscerated. This scenario is highly unlikely given that the terrorists are tools of the West, but this illustrates the hypocrisy of the situation: Syria has been doing its utmost to restore security to the nation, via strategic warfare against terrorist factions, as well as reconciliation deals enabling Syrian armed men among the foreign terror groups to lay down their weapons and return to civilian life. Simultaneously, the US, their allies, and the terrorists they support, have wantonly murdered Syrian civilians and wreaked destruction on the country.<\/p>\n

Referring to the New York Times reports, RT reported<\/a> recently that former Pentagon and State Department adviser Larry Lewis, who co-authored a 2018 DoD report on civilian harm based on classified casualty data, said the rate was \u201c10 times that of similar operations he tracked in Afghanistan.’ \u2026 and that, w<\/em>hen interviewed by the New York Times, Gen. Townsend blamed any civilian casualties on \u201cthe misfortunes of war.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Funny how that works. When Syria is actually fighting terrorism, they are condemned. When the US is fake fighting terrorism and slaughtering civilians, it’s just a \u201cmisfortune of war.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

It should be no surprise to any thinking person that the US has committed untold war crimes in Syria (and many other countries) during its illegal presence in the country. Still, even with ample documentation of these crimes, the US is not held accountable. Completing this unjust scenario, the US and allies have repeatedly hurled\u00a0unfounded accusations<\/a> of chemical weapons attacks and Russian war crimes, providing no evidence and generally relying on unnamed sources or the al-Qaeda-affiliated White Helmets.<\/p>\n

I\u00a0wrote about this<\/a> last year, noting, \u201cA UN-mandated report, which accuses Russia of war crimes in Syria, heavily relies on anonymous sources and lacks evidence, but also smacks of deliberate disinformation that is halting the eradication of terrorism in Idlib.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Emphasizing that this report was based on testimonies taken in Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon or by phone, I noted, \u201cI scoured the 24 pages of the report, but even in the annexes I could find no transparent and credible sources, only the following vague terms repeatedly referred-to: Witnesses, civilians,\u00a0<\/em>NGO rescuers<\/em><\/a>, medical teams, first responders, flight spotters, and early warning observers.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

In the\u00a0relentless propaganda<\/a> against Syria, and Russia, that report got a lot of traction in regime-change media. The recent reports on US crimes in Syria? Not so much.<\/p>\n

Some days ago, the Twitter account @USEmbassySyria tweeted about the US standing firm in its commitment to human rights and the rights of women. A ludicrous tweet given the US’ support for terrorists who quash human rights and imprison and rape women.<\/p>\n

\n

…which is why the US backed terrorism in Syria. …because: women's rights \ud83d\ude44\ud83e\udd26\ud83e\udd26\u200d\u2642\ufe0f\ud83e\udd26\u200d\u2640\ufe0f https:\/\/t.co\/1LhIL23khR<\/a><\/p>\n

— Eva Karene Bartlett (@EvaKBartlett) December 10, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n