{"id":203184,"date":"2022-01-17T12:00:36","date_gmt":"2022-01-17T12:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=203184"},"modified":"2022-01-14T05:03:57","modified_gmt":"2022-01-14T05:03:57","slug":"the-day-cnns-jake-tapper-sold-his-soul-to-pharma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2022\/01\/the-day-cnns-jake-tapper-sold-his-soul-to-pharma\/","title":{"rendered":"The Day CNN\u2019s Jake Tapper Sold His Soul to Pharma"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

There\u2019s a reason CNN\u2019s Jake Tapper is intent on branding me a \u201cmenace\u201d and \u201ca liar,\u201d and why he refuses to debate me on the merits of facts and scientific evidence. Here\u2019s the back story.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Photo Credit: “Jake Tapper-Caricature” by DonkeyHotey \u2014 licensed under CC BY 2.0<\/p><\/div>\n

6 Jan 2022 – <\/em>Apparently, appalled by robust sales of my bestseller, \u201cThe Real Anthony Fauci<\/a>,\u201d CNN anchor Jake Tapper \u2014 in lieu of critically reviewing the work \u2014 used his Twitter feed to unleash a barrage of ad hominem insults against me.<\/p>\n

Breaking with the traditional restraints of journalistic neutrality, professional propriety and intellectual rigor, he branded me<\/a> \u201cdangerous,\u201d a \u201cmenace,\u201d a \u201cliar,\u201d a \u201cgrifter,\u201d a fraud, \u201cunhinged\u201d and more.<\/p>\n

But Tapper\u2019s defamations hang in the atmosphere without substantiation or citation. If I\u2019m a liar, then what was my lie? If I\u2019m a grifter, then what is my personal profit or advantage? If I am a fraud, then where is my inaccurate statement?<\/p>\n

I concede that I\u2019m a dangerous menace, but only to the pharmaceutical industry, its captive technocrats and its media toadies.<\/p>\n

When I responded to his slander with a respectful tweet<\/a> inviting him to debate me, Tapper declined, explaining he would not debate<\/a> a \u201cconspiracy theorist.\u201d Characteristically, he neglected to cite any conspiracy theory he believes I promoted.<\/p>\n

And is it credible to dismiss me as a conspiracy theorist unworthy of debate? After all, I am founder and former president of the world\u2019s largest water protection group<\/a>, and founder and current chairman of one of the largest children\u2019s health advocacy groups<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve won hundreds of successful lawsuits, including milestone victories against Monsanto<\/a>, DuPont<\/a>, Exxon<\/a>, Smithfield Foods<\/a> and leading polluters from the chemical, carbon, pharmaceutical and agricultural industries. (Many of these also initially dismissed me as a \u201cconspiracy theorist.\u201d)<\/p>\n

My current book, \u201cThe Real Anthony Fauci<\/a>,\u201d may be the most heavily footnoted volume to ever sit atop global best-seller lists for six consecutive weeks. With 500,000 copies sold, it has attracted a whopping 5,500+ five-star reviews<\/a> (92%).<\/p>\n

Despite extreme hostility toward this volume from mainstream media and the medical cartel, no one has yet identified a factual inaccuracy in its 250,000 words.<\/p>\n

If my book is baseless conspiracy theories, then shouldn\u2019t Mr. Tapper welcome an opportunity to correct me with facts or arguments that go beyond name-calling?<\/p>\n

Allow me, then, to offer my own theory for Mr. Tapper\u2019s apoplexy.<\/p>\n

Many people make Faustian bargains during their lives, trading personal integrity for material advantage. Oftentimes the metamorphosis occurs as a gradual erosion of moral fiber. Occasionally it happens in an instant; a man stands at a moral crossroads and chooses the dark side.<\/p>\n

I happened to have a front-row seat when Jake Tapper had his moment of moral crisis. I\u2019m guessing his fierce vitriol toward me is a reaction to his embarrassment that I was witness to the instant when Mr. Tapper chose career over character.<\/p>\n

In July 2005, Jake Tapper was ABC\u2019s senior producer when the network ordered him to pull a lengthy expos\u00e9 on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention\u2019s (CDC) secret 2000 Simpsonwood conference<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Here is the background:<\/p>\n

In 1999, in response to exploding epidemics of autism and other neurological disorders, CDC decided to study its vast Vaccine Safety Datalink<\/a> \u2014 the medical and vaccination record of millions of Americans, archived by the top HMOs \u2014 to learn whether the dramatic escalation of the vaccine schedule, beginning in 1989, was a culprit. CDC\u2019s in-house epidemiologist, Thomas Verstraeten, led the effort.<\/p>\n

Verstraeten\u2019s initial data run<\/a> suggested that mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines \u2014 administered during the first month of life \u2014 were associated with a wide range of neurological injuries, including a dramatic 1,135% rise in autism risks among vaccinated children<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Verstraeten\u2019s findings propelled CDC into DEFCON 1. The agency\u2019s top vaccine officials summoned 52 pharmaceutical industry leaders, the foremost vaccinologists from academia and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and public health regulators from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CDC, World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency to a secret two-day meeting<\/a> at the remote Simpsonwood retreat center in Norcross, Georgia, to strategize about how to hide these awful revelations from the public.<\/p>\n

In 2005, I obtained the explosive transcripts of this meeting and was about to publish excerpts in Rolling Stone (Deadly Immunity<\/a>, July 18, 2005). Those recordings, ironically, portrayed these leading kingpins of the vaccine cartel poised at their own moral brink, and chronicled their collapse into corruption over two sickening days of debate.<\/p>\n

Most of these individuals were physicians and regulatory officials who had committed their lives to public health out of idealism and deep concern for children. Verstraeten\u2019s data confronted them with the fact that the cumulative mercury levels in all those new vaccines they had recommended had overdosed a generation of American children<\/a> with mercury concentrations over a hundred times<\/a> the exposures the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considered safe.<\/p>\n

In recommending a vast battery of new vaccines for children, public health regulators had somehow neglected to calculate the cumulative mercury and aluminum loads in all the new jabs.<\/p>\n

Dr. Peter Patriarca<\/a>, the then-director of the FDA Office on Vaccine Research and Review, expressed the general feeling of horror when he asked why no one had calculated the cumulative mercury exposure to children as policymakers added this cascade of new vaccines to the childhood schedule: \u201cConversion of the percentage thimerosal to actual micrograms of mercury involves ninth-grade algebra. What took the FDA so long to do the calculations?\u201d<\/p>\n

In the tense days leading up to the Simpsonwood conclave, children\u2019s health champion Dr. Ruth Etzel<\/a> of the EPA pleaded with her fellow public health leaders to publicly admit they made a terrible mistake by inadvertently poisoning American children, and to repair the damage.<\/p>\n

Dr. Etzel urged<\/a> AAP and the government regulators to handle the crisis with the same honesty and public remorse that Johnson & Johnson had demonstrated on discovering toxic chemicals in its Tylenol formulations:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe must follow three basic rules: (1) act quickly to inform pediatricians that the products have more mercury than we realized; (2) be open with consumers about why we didn\u2019t catch this earlier; (3) show contrition. If the public loses faith in the Public Health Services recommendations, then the immunization battle will falter. To keep faith, we must be open and honest and move forward quickly to replace these products.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Confronted with scientific proof of their role in the chronic disease calamity, the cabal did exactly the opposite. The shocking Simpsonwood transcripts<\/a> show Dr. Patriarca and the other public health panjandrums warning each other of their reputational liabilities, their vulnerability to litigation by plaintiffs\u2019 lawyers and potential damage to the vaccine program.<\/p>\n

Dr. Patriarca cautioned that public disclosure of CDC\u2019s explosive findings would make Americans feel that the FDA, CDC and vaccine policymakers had been \u201casleep at the switch<\/a>\u201d for decades in allowing Thimerosal to remain in childhood vaccines.<\/p>\n

Over two days of intense discussion, these Big Pharma operatives and government technocrats persuaded each other to transform their disastrous error into villainy \u2014 by doubling down and hiding their mistake from the public.<\/p>\n

Tapper saw an early draft of my Rolling Stone story and proposed that, in exchange for exclusivity, he would do a companion piece for ABC timed to air on the magazine\u2019s publication day.<\/p>\n

Tapper spent several weeks working on the story with me and a team of enthusiastic ABC reporters and technicians. During his frequent conversations with me over that period, he was on fire with indignation over the Simpsonwood revelations. He acted like a journalist hoping to win an Emmy.<\/p>\n

The day before the piece was to air, an exasperated Tapper called me to say that ABC\u2019s corporate officials ordered him to pull the story. The network\u2019s pharmaceutical advertisers were threatening to cancel their advertising.<\/p>\n

\u201cCorporate told us to shut it down,\u201d Tapper fumed<\/a>. Tapper told me that it was the first time in his career that ABC officials had ordered him to kill a story.<\/p>\n

ABC had advertised the Simpsonwood expos\u00e9, and its sudden cancellation disappointed an army of vaccine safety advocates and parents of injured children who deluged the network with a maelstrom of angry emails.<\/p>\n

In response, ABC changed tack and publicly promised to air the piece. Instead, following a one-week delay, the network duplicitously aired a hastily assembled puff piece promoting vaccines and assuring listeners that mercury-laden vaccines were safe.<\/p>\n

The new \u201cbait and switch\u201d segment precisely followed Pharma\u2019s talking points. \u201cI\u2019m putting my faith in the Institute of Medicine,\u201d ABC\u2019s obsequious medical editor, Dr. Tim Johnson, declared in closing. Two pharmaceutical advertisements bracketed the story.<\/p>\n

After that piece aired, I called Jake to complain. He neither answered nor returned my calls.<\/p>\n

During the 16 intervening years, Pharma has returned Mr. Tapper\u2019s favor by aggressively promoting his career. Pfizer shamelessly sponsors Tapper\u2019s CNN news show, announcing its ownership of the space \u2014 and Mr. Tapper\u2019s indentured servitude \u2014 before each episode with the loaded phrase: \u201cBrought to you by Pfizer<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Under the apparent terms of that sponsorship, CNN and Tapper provide Pfizer a platform to market its products and allow the drug company \u2014 a serial felon<\/a> \u2014 to dictate content on CNN.<\/p>\n

This arrangement has transformed CNN\u2019s The Lead with Jake Tapper<\/a> into a propaganda vehicle for Pharma and effectively reduced Mr. Tapper to the role of a drug rep \u2014 shamelessly promoting fear porn, confusion, and germophobia, and ushering his audience toward high-yield patent pharmaceuticals.<\/p>\n

Tapper\u2019s main thrust during the pandemic has been to promote levels of public terror sufficient to indemnify all the official lies against critical thinking.<\/p>\n

All that Pharma money naturally requires that Mr. Tapper kowtow to Dr. Fauci, and the CNN host\u2019s slavishness has helped make Tapper\u2019s show the go-to pulpit for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a safe place for Dr. Fauci to hit all Jake\u2019s reliable softballs out of the park.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe bootlicking competition at CNN is pretty nauseating,\u201d observed investigative journalist Celia Farber who has chronicled Dr. Fauci\u2019s mismanagement at NIAID for more than 25 years. \u201cIt\u2019s ruinous for both democracy and for public health.\u201d<\/p>\n

Another journalist has compared Tapper\u2019s mortifying on-air servility toward Dr. Fauci to the adulation of a loyal and obedient canine. \u201cIt\u2019s like a dog watching a chess match,\u201d says former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson. \u201cSo much intensity and so little understanding.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tapper has gone two years without asking Dr. Fauci a single tough question. He has covered up Fauci\u2019s involvement with Wuhan, suppressed news of vaccine injuries, gaslighted the injured, and defended every official orthodoxy on masks, lockdowns, social distancing, vaccines, remdesivir, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.<\/p>\n

He has never asked about the public health, mental health, and economic costs of lockdown, about the disproportionate burdens of Dr. Fauci\u2019s policies on minorities, the working class and the global poor.<\/p>\n

He has never asked Dr. Fauci to explain why countries and states that refused Dr. Fauci\u2019s prescription have consistently experienced dramatically better health outcomes. For example, why are U.S. death rates 1,000x the death rates of African countries<\/a> like Nigeria and Indian states<\/a> that widely use hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin? Mr. Tapper simply never allows contrary views on his show.<\/p>\n

He continues to extol COVID vaccines as a miracle technology that individuals can take four times and still both get and spread the illness.<\/p>\n

\u201cHe never calls Dr. Fauci on his vacillating science-free pronouncements,\u201d said Farber. \u201cDr. Fauci seems to be able to paralyze the curiosity features of Tapper\u2019s brain.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tapper has to ask Dr. Fauci why, under his direction, America suffered the world\u2019s highest body count<\/a>. With 4.2% of the global population, our nation suffered 15% of COVID deaths.<\/p>\n

Instead, he functions as high priest of every official orthodoxy, working to deify Dr. Fauci and anoint all his absurd, vacillating and contradictory pronouncements with papal infallibility. The sure way to earn Tapper\u2019s indignation is to criticize Dr. Fauci<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Here are just a few examples of Mr. Tapper\u2019s brazen deceptions:<\/p>\n

On Feb. 2, 2021, Tapper \u201cdebunked\u201d claims<\/a> that baseball great Hank Aaron may have died from a COVID shot<\/a>. The home run king submitted to a CDC-staged press conference 17 days earlier. Tapper assured his audience that the Fulton County coroner had determined Aaron to have died from \u201cnatural causes.\u201d<\/p>\n

When the Fulton County coroner subsequently denied ever having seen Aaron\u2019s body<\/a>, much less performed an autopsy, Tapper refused to correct his story.<\/p>\n

In August 2021, Tapper gave Dr. Fauci a platform to spread the rumor that deluded Americans were poisoning themselves with a \u201chorse medicine\u201d called ivermectin.<\/p>\n

In an Aug. 29, 2021 interview<\/a>, Dr. Fauci told Tapper, \u201cThere\u2019s no evidence whatsoever that that works, and it could potentially have toxicity\u2026 with people who have gone to poison control centers because they\u2019ve taken the drug at a ridiculous dose and wind up getting sick. There\u2019s no clinical evidence that indicates that this works.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tapper never corrected Dr. Fauci. He never pointed out that there were by then 70 peer-reviewed studies<\/a> demonstrating ivermectin\u2019s miraculous efficacy against COVID.<\/p>\n

He didn\u2019t dispute Dr. Fauci\u2019s characterization of ivermectin as a horse medicine by noting that the drug had won both a Nobel Prize<\/a> and WHO\u2019s listing as an \u201cessential medicine\u201d<\/a> for its miraculous efficacy against human illnesses, and that people have consumed billions of doses with no significant safety signals.<\/p>\n

Mr. Tapper never thought to ask Dr. Fauci if he was trying to discourage use of a cheap, effective drug that might compete with his experimental vaccines.<\/p>\n

Instead, Tapper abjectly parroted<\/a> Dr. Fauci\u2019s talking points: \u201cPoison control centers are reporting that their calls are spiking in places like Mississippi and Oklahoma, because some Americans are trying to use an anti-parasite horse drug called ivermectin to treat coronavirus, to prevent contracting coronavirus.\u201d<\/p>\n

It mattered not to Tapper that both Mississippi and Oklahoma officials quickly denied<\/a> that anyone in their state had been hospitalized for ivermectin poisoning. Tapper never corrected his false story.<\/p>\n

On Sept. 14, 2021, Tapper obligingly gave Dr. Fauci a platform to dispute rapper Nicki Minaj\u2019s worry that COVID vaccines may affect fertility. Dr. Fauci simply declared<\/a>, \u201cThe answer to that, Jake, is a resounding no.\u201d<\/p>\n

As usual, Tapper did not ask Dr. Fauci to cite a study to support this assertion. He never pointed out to Dr. Fauci that all of the COVID vaccine manufacturers acknowledge that their products are not tested for effects on fertility, or that recent data has shown dramatic upticks in miscarriages<\/a> and pre-eclampsia<\/a> in vaccinated women.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, based upon Dr. Fauci\u2019s word alone, CNN rushed on to defame and discredit the rapper and to assure the public that Minaj was wrong. Dr. Fauci, after all, had spoken!<\/p>\n

It\u2019s easy to see how two years of such obsequious deference emboldened Dr. Fauci in November 2021<\/a> to declare that \u201cI represent science.\u201d<\/p>\n

There are too many other examples of Tapper\u2019s uncritical promotion of government and pharma falsehoods to even summarize. These are not harmless lies. Each of them has potentially disastrous consequences for public health.<\/p>\n

The term \u201cpsychological projection\u201d describes the uncanny precision with which a certain sort of person applies the very pejoratives to others that most accurately depict their own shortcomings.<\/p>\n

When Mr. Tapper calls me \u201cunhinged,\u201d a \u201cmenace to public health,\u201d a \u201cfraud,\u201d a \u201cliar,\u201d is he falling victim to projection?<\/p>\n

The critical functions of journalism in a democracy are to speak truth to power, relentlessly expose official corruption, and to forever maintain a posture of skepticism toward government and corporate power centers.<\/p>\n

What Jake Tapper does is the opposite of journalism. Tapper, instead, aligns himself with power, and makes himself a propagandist for official narratives and a servile publicist for powerful elites and government technocrats.<\/p>\n

No wonder his fury at those who challenge their narratives.<\/p>\n

_________________________________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a> Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.\u2019s reputation as a resolute defender of the environment stems from a litany of successful legal actions. Mr. Kennedy is the Chairman of <\/em>Children\u2019s Health Defense and was named one of <\/em>Time Magazine\u2019s \u201cHeroes for the Planet\u201d for his success to restore the Hudson River. The group\u2019s achievement helped spawn 300 Waterkeeper organizations across the globe. He serves as President of Waterkeeper Alliance and of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice. He was previously Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Hudson Riverkeeper, Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, and a Clinical Professor and Supervising Attorney at Pace University School of Law. Earlier in his career he served as Assistant District Attorney in New York City. Mr. Kennedy is a graduate of Harvard University. He studied at the London School of Economics and received his law degree from the University of Virginia Law School.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 childrenshealthdefense.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

6 Jan 2022 – There\u2019s a reason CNN\u2019s Jake Tapper is intent on branding me a \u201cmenace\u201d and \u201ca liar,\u201d and why he refuses to debate me on the merits of facts and scientific evidence. Here\u2019s the back story.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":203187,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62],"tags":[2761,887,1868,378,642,234,1864,1929,888],"class_list":["post-203184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-media","tag-anthony-fauci","tag-big-pharma","tag-covid-19","tag-journalism","tag-literature","tag-media","tag-pandemic","tag-robert-f-kennedy-jr","tag-vaccines"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203184"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203184\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/203187"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}