{"id":204358,"date":"2022-03-07T12:00:29","date_gmt":"2022-03-07T12:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=204358"},"modified":"2022-03-08T03:06:22","modified_gmt":"2022-03-08T03:06:22","slug":"does-gabriel-boric-have-the-answer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2022\/03\/does-gabriel-boric-have-the-answer\/","title":{"rendered":"Does Gabriel Boric Have the Answer?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Who is Gabriel Boric?\u00a0 He is the recently elected 35-year-old President of Chile.<\/p>\n<p>What is the question to which Gabriel Boric might have the answer?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It is:\u00a0 <em>\u201cHow can the tide be turned so that social democracy, which is now \u00a0at best beating an orderly retreat, makes a comeback, and becomes again, as it was in the heyday of the Swedish Model, a credible vision of humanity\u00b4s future?\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What is Gabriel Boric\u2019s answer?\u00a0 I translate selected typical phrases from a flyer widely distributed by his campaign:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cI am Gabriel Boric, born and raised in Punta Arenas, a member of parliament, and a candidate for President.\u00a0 I want to invite you [using the familiar <em>te<\/em>, not the formal <em>usted<\/em>] to participate, because the country we dream [<em>so\u00f1amos<\/em>] we will build all together [<em>con todas y todos<\/em>, all women and all men]<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAdd yourself to the builders of the country we dream [in one Spanish word <em>S\u00famate<\/em>] for a green Chile<\/p>\n<p><em>S\u00famate<\/em> for a feminist Chile<\/p>\n<p><em>S\u00famate<\/em> for a just Chile where the voice of the workers is heard<\/p>\n<p><em>S\u00famate<\/em> for a Chile that takes care of us and values diversity.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em>Social Democracy Is Now Checkmated, Game Over, a Non-Starter<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Non-starter?\u00a0 Game Over?\u00a0 This is strong language.\u00a0 Nevertheless, I think I can make a case that it is not an exaggeration by calling just two witnesses, Joseph Schumpeter, and Jeffrey Winters.<\/p>\n<p>But first a qualification: Under unusual conditions (such as those that prevailed in Europe during the <em>trente glorieuses<\/em>) social democracy <em>is <\/em>a viable option.\u00a0 Contemporary examples are Norway and Bolivia.\u00a0 Both are in the embarrassing position of enjoying \u00a0high and stable (Norway) or growing (Bolivia) levels of social justice made possible by capturing rents from fossil fuels, during a period of history when the natural sciences and Greta Thunberg are telling us (truthfully) that fossil fuels ought not be mined, sold, and burned.\u00a0 Nonetheless, Norway and Bolivia are making social democracy work.<\/p>\n<p><em> First Witness:<\/em> \u00a0In 1919, at the age of 36, Joseph Schumpeter became Minister of Finance in the newly founded Republic of Austria. In 1918 he had published <em>Die Krise des Steuerstaats <\/em>(<em>The Crisis of the Tax State<\/em>).\u00a0 He had argued, first, that prior to modern republics, rulers had many sources of income. Their greatest single source of income was rents from land ownership. Second, the modern republic was inseparable from a liberal legal framework, limited government, reliance on taxes for government income, and a market economy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201c<em>What matters is that\u00a0 the potential tax yield is limited not only by the supply of the taxable object, less the subsistence minimum of the taxable subject, but also by the nature of the driving forces of the economy.\u201d<\/em> (p. 115 of the English translation)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This somewhat opaque sentence from 1918 predicts the tax competition among nations of 2022.\u00a0 Given the nature of the driving forces of the economy, persons and corporations whose permissive acts (investments) start economic activity are wined and dined and subsidized.\u00a0 Low taxes, access to credit; infrastructure and security provided at public expense, and guarantees that profits made in a country can freely be moved out of it, are among the standard policy tools for getting investors \u201cexcited\u201d about investing.\u00a0 (Dani Rodrik, <em>One Economics, Many Recipes<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>Schumpeter\u00b4s tenure as Minister of Finance lasted less than eight months.\u00a0 In his letter of resignation, he explained that he was being asked to perform an impossible task and to deceive the public.\u00a0 A tax state (<em>Steuerstaat<\/em>) could not be a welfare state. My conclusion:\u00a0 A model like the classical Swedish model of social democracy could govern a high wage and full employment island (Sweden) in a low wage and high unemployment ocean (the world) under unusual circumstances.\u00a0 But when normality came home, illusions became homeless.<\/p>\n<p><em> Second Witness:<\/em> In 1996 Jeffrey Winters published <em>Power in Motion: Capital Mobility and the Indonesian State.\u00a0 <\/em>Winters:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u201cAnd it is precisely in designing and implementing policies [of the governments hr] that meet the population\u00b4s investment and production needs [the population\u00b4s first need is good jobs] , <\/em>by first satisfying the core objectives <em>[i.e. high profits, low risk] \u00a0<\/em>of those controlling capital <em>that the structural dimension of investors\u00b4 political power finds expression.\u201d <\/em>\u00a0(Page 3)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It follows that governments do not govern.\u00a0 Markets command governments more than governments command markets. Winters further elaborates: Governments, whatever their ideology may be, in practice devote themselves to attracting investment and to discouraging disinvestment.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cWhen investors choose not to invest, policymakers are powerless to force them.\u201d<\/em> (Winters, Ibid.) This is not just a fact about economics.\u00a0 It is a fact about social structure.\u00a0\u00a0 It is presupposed, not created, by economic models.\u00a0 Social structures tend to be taken for granted as natural, and to be ferociously defended as sacred. \u00a0\u00a0Today\u00b4s basic social structure is the allegedly God- given or Nature-given right of a person (and also of a corporation granted the rights of a person) to liberty and to property.\u00a0 Basic structural rights trump needs.\u00a0 When investors choose not to invest, policymakers are powerless to force them <em>because<\/em>, given the basic social structure, the need for food, for dignity, for employment, the need to save the biosphere, and any need whatever, can be satisfied if and only if, <em>first<\/em>, property owners freely choose to invest.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Conclusion: Checkmate. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Winters goes on to demonstrate the existence in our times of a further extension of a logic that has been implicit in capitalism from the beginning.<\/p>\n<p>We now live in the time of what Winters calls the Locational Revolution. Controllers of capital decide which laws to obey when they decide where to locate.\u00a0 Governments compete to please them.\u00a0\u00a0 Legislators write laws designed to stimulate a nation\u00b4s economy.\u00a0\u00a0 Governments try make the economy go, but only controllers of capital can actually make the economy go.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Conclusion. Game over.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>(I simplify, using the expression \u201cthe economy\u201d as it is commonly used, while knowing that, as Hazel Henderson and others have shown, more than half the world\u00b4s work is done outside \u201cthe economy\u201d that gets so much attention and whose malfunctioning does so much damage.)<\/p>\n<p>Now, in 2022, a hegemonic rule of law cements in place a locational revolution that disempowers governments that were already disempowered at the beginning of modernity by establishing tax states, assigning the bulk of money creation to private bankers, and by conditioning the legitimacy of government on obedience to the terms of a fictitious social contract that gives investors\u00a0 the power to decide whether the economy stops or goes.\u00a0 Failure to solve the employment problem leads to failure to solving many other problems.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Can we expect dignified employment for all who need it, when the quantity and quality of employment depends on how many people it is profitable to hire on what terms, and not on how many people need good jobs?<\/li>\n<li>Can we expect humanity to reinvent itself to become a species compatible with physical reality when to green or not to green is too often framed as ecology vs. jobs?<\/li>\n<li>Can we expect sexism to end while the total number of good jobs remains the same and therefore women getting more of them means men getting fewer of them?<\/li>\n<li>For similar reasons, can we expect racism and prejudice against migrants to end while the basic social structure is what it is?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>To expect to solve such problems by passing laws is a serious illusion, a non-starter.\u00a0 Worldwide, humans are called to step back from dominant assumptions, to put the rules of the economic game between parentheses, to question them, to go back to Square One and to ask. What does it mean to be human?\u00a0 What are we living for?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Does Gabriel Boric Have the Answer?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The answer to this question does not depend on Gabriel Boric.\u00a0\u00a0 It depends on whether his invitation to <em>sumarte <\/em>is accepted<em>.\u00a0 <\/em>It depends on whether the private sector, the public sector, civil society, families, and individuals align for the common good.\u00a0\u00a0 Chile, like the rest of the world, is not going to become sustainable because the Government, or the Constitution, decrees the maxim:\u00a0 act in such a way that if everyone acted as I act the biosphere would be sustainable.\u00a0 It is not going to become feminist because the police arrest all men who sometimes act like irresponsible macho dudes and the judges\u2019 sentence us to prison terms.<\/p>\n<p>The idea of inviting <em>todas y todos <\/em>to participate voluntarily in building sustainability, respect for women, justice, caring, and dignity in diversity is not something Gabriel Boric thought of all by himself.\u00a0 He speaks for a youth culture that has been gathering strength for many decades now in Chile and around the world.\u00a0 He speaks for women and men of all ages, and in all income groups from the poorest to the richest, who refuse to believe that another world is impossible.<\/p>\n<p><em>_____________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Howard-Richards.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-198781\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Howard-Richards-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a> <\/em><em>Prof. Howard Richards is a member of the\u00a0<\/em><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/\" ><strong>TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment<\/strong><\/a><\/em><em>. He <\/em><em>is a philosopher\u00a0of social science <\/em><em>and<\/em><em> Research Professor of Philosophy at <\/em><em>Earlham College, Richmond<\/em><em>, Indiana<\/em><em>, USA<\/em><em>.\u00a0He was educated at Redlands High School in California, Yale, Stanford, University of California at Santa Barbara, University of Toronto, Harvard and Oxford. He currently teaches in the University of Cape Town`s EMBA programme.\u00a0His books include:\u00a0<\/em>The Evaluation of Cultural Action; Letters from Quebec; Understanding the Global Economy; The Dilemmas of Social Democracies; Gandhi and the Future of Economics; Rethinking Thinking; Unbounded Organizing in Community;\u00a0<em>and<\/em>\u00a0The Nurturing of Time Future.<em>\u00a0His new book, written with the assistance of Gavin Andersson, <\/em>Economic Theory and Community Development: Why Putting Community First Is Essential for Survival, <em>is now available from the publisher, Dignity Press, and from Amazon and other major booksellers, as a print book and as an eBook<\/em><em>.<\/em> <em><a href=\"howardri@earlham.edu\">howardri@earlham.edu<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Markets command governments more than governments command markets. Governments, whatever their ideology, in practice devote themselves to attracting investment and to discouraging disinvestment. \u201cWhen investors choose not to invest, policymakers are powerless to force them.\u201d <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[1538,354,562,698,727,779],"class_list":["post-204358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editorial","tag-chile","tag-economics","tag-finance","tag-governance","tag-market-culture","tag-sovereignty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204358\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}