{"id":204563,"date":"2022-02-07T12:00:27","date_gmt":"2022-02-07T12:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=204563"},"modified":"2022-02-04T05:08:40","modified_gmt":"2022-02-04T05:08:40","slug":"beyond-leviathan-critique-of-the-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2022\/02\/beyond-leviathan-critique-of-the-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond Leviathan: Critique of the State"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>3 Feb 2022 – <\/em>Istv\u00e1n M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros was one of the greatest political theorists of the twentieth century. Left unfinished at the time of his death, Beyond Leviathan<\/em> is written on the magisterial scale of his previous book, Beyond Capital<\/em>, and meant to complement that work. It focuses on the transcendence of the state, along with the transcendence of capital and alienated labor, while traversing the history of political theory from Plato to the present. Aristotle, More, Machiavelli, and Vico are only a few of the thinkers discussed in depth.<\/p>\n

The larger objective of this work is no less than to develop a full-fledged critique of the state, in the Marxian tradition, and set against the critique of capital. Not only does it provide, for the first time, an-all-embracing Marxian theory of the state, it gives new political meaning to the notion of \u201cthe withering away of the state.\u201d In his definitive, final work, M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros seeks to illuminate the political preconditions for a society of substantive equality and substantive democracy.<\/p>\n

In his scholarly and personal introduction, John Bellamy Foster traces the gestation of this masterwork and its place in the history of political theory.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\u201cThe pathfinder of socialism.\u201d<\/em>
\n\u2014Hugo Ch\u00e1vez, former Venezuelan President\u00a0and a leader of the Bolivarian revolution<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

From the Introduction
\nby John Bellamy Foster<\/h3>\n

Since Me\u0301sza\u0301ros was primarily concerned with the problem of the eradication of the state form as crucial to the socialist struggle, he took his inspiration not from the literature of the post\u2013Second World War period, in which the analysis was overwhelmingly about how to carry out struggles within the parameters of the capitalist state, but from the theories aimed at the eventual \u201cwithering away\u201d of the state associated with Marx\u2019s Critique of the Gotha Programme and Lenin\u2019s State and Revolution.31 Unlike most of the Western left, he was concerned with the conception of the \u201chistorical actuality of the socialist offensive\u201d aimed at going beyond capital, beyond Leviathan, and beyond alienated labor.<\/p>\n

What was called in socialist discussions \u201cthe withering away of the state\u201d was, for Me\u0301sza\u0301ros, \u201cnot a \u2018romantic faithfulness to Marx\u2019s unrealisable dream,\u2019 as some people try to discredit and dismiss it.\u201d Rather,<\/p>\n

In truth the \u201cwithering away of the state\u201d refers to nothing mysterious or remote but to a perfectly tangible process which must be initiated right in our own historical time. It means, in plain language, the progressive reacquisition of the alienated powers of political decision-making by the individuals in their enterprise of moving toward a genuine socialist society. Without the requisition of these powers\u2014 to which not only the capitalist state but also the paralysing inertia of the structurally well-entrenched material reproductive practices are fundamentally opposed\u2014neither the new mode of political control of society as a whole by its individuals is conceivable, nor indeed the nonadversarial and thereby cohesive and plannable everyday operation of the particular productive and distributive units by the self-managing freely associated producers.<\/p>\n

Judged from this standpoint, which denied the permanence of the state\u2014conceived as a form of hierarchical decision-making or command structure imposed through various alienations on the underlying population\u2014a whole new theory of the state in Marxist terms was needed, one that would encompass the origins, development, and eventual eradication of the state.<\/p>\n

Such a theory could only be developed in a meaningful way in historical terms, addressing the major state theories and their underlying material relations from ancient times to the present. The theoretical structure of Beyond Leviathan was therefore concerned with the historic evolution and critique of the state and law, focusing on such key thinkers as Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Augustine, Niccolo\u0301 Machiavelli, Thomas More, Francis Bacon, Tommaso Campanella, Giambattista Vico, James Harrington, Thomas Hobbes, Christian Thomasius, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Franc\u0327ois- Noe\u0308l Babeuf, Thomas Paine, Robert Owen, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Hegel, Henry Maine, Ernst Troeltsch, Otto Gierke, Weber, Barker, Bobbio, and Robert Nozick; together with Marx, Engels, Lenin, Luxemburg, Gramsci, Max Horkheimer, Ernst Bloch, Jean-Paul Sartre, Ernesto Cardenal, Cha\u0301vez, and others.<\/p>\n

Only in this way was it possible to account for the manner in which the state, civil society, the law, sovereignty, class domination, and power had arisen, along with the forces of resistance that pointed toward (or anticipated) the state\u2019s revolutionary transcendence. No approach that simply began with the contemporary state, or even with the early modern state, was su cient, since the Leviathan state contained features that transcended particular social formations and were inherited in part from previous historical formations. The path to the critique of the state thus passed through Plato\u2019s hydra laws and nocturnal guardians, Aristotle\u2019s treatment of equality, Machiavelli\u2019s Prince, More\u2019s Utopia, Hobbes\u2019s Leviathan, Thomasius\u2019s communal property, Rousseau\u2019s general will, Kant\u2019s perpetual peace, and Hegel\u2019s Recht philosophy.<\/p>\n

All of this, though, was an attempt to clarify the historical problem of the state. In contrast to all previous comprehensive theories of the state, Me\u0301sza\u0301ros\u2019s theory was aimed at the withering away of the state as the command center of capital along with the eradication of capital viewed as an absolute necessity, since the question was ultimately one, as Marx had said, of \u201cruin or revolution.\u201d<\/p>\n

________________________________________________<\/p>\n

Publication Date:<\/strong> 22 Feb 2022 – 512 pp.<\/em><\/p>\n

Istv\u00e1n M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros<\/span> was a professor emeritus at the University of Sussex and a world renowned philosopher and critic. He authored <\/em>Marx\u2019s Theory of Alienation, Beyond Capital<\/a>, and over a dozen other titles.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original – monthlyreview.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

3 Feb 2022 – Istv\u00e1n M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros was one of the greatest political theorists of the twentieth century. Left unfinished at the time of his death, Beyond Leviathan focuses on the transcendence of the state, along with the transcendence of capital and alienated labor, while traversing the history of political theory from Plato to the present. Aristotle, More, Machiavelli, and Vico are only a few of the thinkers discussed in depth.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":204567,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[67],"tags":[232,354,642,1022,308,870,2747],"class_list":["post-204563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reviews","tag-capitalism","tag-economics","tag-literature","tag-marxism","tag-philosophy","tag-reviews","tag-state-system"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204563\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/204567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}