{"id":20871,"date":"2012-08-13T12:00:48","date_gmt":"2012-08-13T11:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=20871"},"modified":"2012-08-13T09:56:24","modified_gmt":"2012-08-13T08:56:24","slug":"why-do-we-obey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2012\/08\/why-do-we-obey\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Do We Obey?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If some random guy ordered you to submit to his will \u2013 or else \u2013 most of us would at least consider it assault. Many of us would try to escape \u2013 or defend ourselves. Very few would quietly submit. And almost no one would submit <em>willingly<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>But when exactly the same thing is done to us by a person wearing a <em>uniform<\/em>, most of us not only submit and obey \u2013 we do so without even questioning the rightness of the thing.<\/p>\n<p>The uniform \u2013 and other totems of officialized authority \u2013 confer legitimacy upon the illegitimate. It is a startling thing. It reveals that most people are incapable of grasping the concept of a moral principle \u2013 that something which is wrong when committed by an unsanctioned individual is just as wrong when committed by a sanctioned individual \u2013 or a group of them.<\/p>\n<p>If it is wrong to kill, then it is <em>always<\/em> wrong to kill.\u00a0 If it is wrong to steal, then it is <em>always<\/em> wrong to steal. Neither killing no theft nor any other intrinsically wrong act becomes not-wrong because it\u2019s sanctioned, approved or euphemized by the state, or by a politician, or by a bureaucracy. Stalin reportedly once said that a single death is a tragedy, but a million deaths a statistic. Nothing could be further from the truth. A million <em>single deaths<\/em> is an atrocity \u2013 as much as a single individual death is a tragedy. And you are no less the victim of theft if the theft is done by a collective or its purported agent \u2013 under color of law, or via the ballot box.<\/p>\n<p>Theft is theft. The essential nature of the thing is not altered by <em>how<\/em> it is done \u2013 or by <em>whom<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>There may be shades of grey in many aspects of life \u2013 but not when it comes to questions of basic morality. Your life is <em>yours<\/em> \u2013 and it follows that you are entitled by right to be at <em>liberty<\/em>. Else your life is not yours, but rather the chattel property of someone else \u2013 to whatever extent that other person (or persons) exercises <em>control<\/em> over your life, and against <em>your<\/em> will.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, it follows that if you own your life, then you also own the fruits of the labor of your body and mind, of that which is <em>you<\/em>. To say that random others \u2013 what collectivist psychopaths refer to as \u201csociety\u201d \u2013 have a moral claim to the fruits of your labor is merely another way of saying you are owned, wholly or in part, to the extent you are forced by threat of violence to hand over the fruits of your body and of your mind. You are either free \u2013 or you are slightly more (or less) enslaved.<\/p>\n<p>There is no in-between. It is impossible \u2013 a contradiction in terms.<\/p>\n<p>A free man is beholden to <em>none<\/em> \u2013 except those he <em>freely chooses<\/em> to be beholden to. An enslaved man has no such free choice. He is beholden to whomever \u201csociety\u201d \u2013 that is, to whomever wields political power over him \u2013 decrees. At best, he may plead to be slightly less enslaved, or to have the fruits of the labor of his body and mind forcibly distributed against his will to random strangers or groups of them, or projects or causes, he finds somewhat less disagreeable. But he cannot <em>refuse<\/em>; he is not permitted to say <em>no<\/em>.\u00a0 He is bound by a \u201csocial contract\u201d he never signed, by consent he never gave. By debts and obligations assumed on his behalf by people he has never met, much less entrusted with proxy power.<\/p>\n<p>In a word, he is a <em>slave<\/em>. The question is merely of the degree to which he is enslaved \u2013 and to what extent he is aware of his condition.<\/p>\n<p>The system we have \u2013 that we suffer daily \u2013 cannot permit people to think along such lines, of course \u2013 because it would be its undoing.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, people are conditioned \u2013 from infancy and not just by the state, but by everything all around them \u2013 to accept that the immoral can be transmuted into the moral via the miracle of group assent, or the fiction thereof. That murder and theft are not merely permissible but <em>acceptable<\/em> when they are performed by people wearing special outfits, who have been anointed in some way <em>by<\/em> a group.<\/p>\n<p>In this way, the outrageous becomes <em>all right<\/em>. Most men worthy of the title would tell another man to go pound sand if he told them to \u201cbuckle up for safety.\u201d And they\u2019d punch him in the nose if he pursued the issue. But when the order-barker is wearing a <em>uniform<\/em>, most men\u2019s testicles seem to shrivel \u2013 and they submit and obey. They quail before The Law. They do as they are told. But that is understandable. When one is facing an armed opponent \u2013 one armed with an <em>army<\/em> \u2013 it is foolish bravado to do other than submit and obey.<\/p>\n<p>What is troubling is their acceptance of servility \u2013 of the implicit rightness (alleged) of what is done to them. And \u2013 much worse \u2013 of what they often do to one another. Rather than see the thing clearly, for what it is \u2013 and rebel in mind and spirit at least \u2013 the representative specimen will not only agree that it <em>is<\/em> all right \u2013 he will often insist the same (and worse) things be done to his fellow man. He is told what to do, therefore he will tell <em>others<\/em> what to do. His life is not his own, therefore, he will make damn sure no one else\u2019s life is their own, either. He is forced to hand over his property, the fruit of the labor of his body and mind? Damn straight others will, too.<\/p>\n<p>The great tragedy of our time is not that human liberty is dying. It is that so many of us are willing accomplices in its murder. All too many fail to chafe at what is being to others because they\u00a0fail to grasp that it is thereby\u00a0done to <em>them<\/em> as well. Or will be, in time. That it is our mutual interest as human beings to defend human liberty, everywhere and always.<\/p>\n<p>Freedom is in fact free. It is collectivism \u2013 authoritarianism \u2013 whose costs are incalculable.<\/p>\n<p><em>Throw it in the Woods?<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/ericpetersautos.com\/2012\/08\/11\/why-do-we-obey\/\" >Go to the Original \u2013 ericpetersautos.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The uniform \u2013 and other totems of officialized authority \u2013 confer legitimacy upon the illegitimate. It is a startling thing. It reveals that most people are incapable of grasping the concept of a moral principle \u2013 that something which is wrong when committed by an unsanctioned individual is just as wrong when committed by a sanctioned individual \u2013 or a group of them. If it is wrong to kill, then it is always wrong to kill.  If it is wrong to steal, then it is always wrong to steal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-focus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20871"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20871\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}