{"id":214571,"date":"2022-06-06T12:01:17","date_gmt":"2022-06-06T11:01:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=214571"},"modified":"2022-06-05T05:22:54","modified_gmt":"2022-06-05T04:22:54","slug":"kissinger-nails-it-for-once","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2022\/06\/kissinger-nails-it-for-once\/","title":{"rendered":"Kissinger Nails It. For Once."},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

TUR<\/p><\/div>\n

3 Jun 2022 – Do you know why Henry Kissinger\u2019s speech at the World Economic Forum touched-off such a furor?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Kissinger didn\u2019t criticize the way the war in Ukraine is being conducted or the lack of progress on the ground. No. What Kissinger criticized was the policy itself<\/b>, that\u2019s what triggered the firestorm. He was throwing a bucket of cold water on the people who concocted this loony policy by telling them to their faces that they \u201cgot it wrong.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

And, they did get it wrong, because the policy they are currently pursuing is hurting US allies and US interests. <\/b>That is the metric we use to determine whether a particular policy is stupid or not and, unfortunately, this passes the \u201cstupid test\u201d with flying colors.<\/span><\/p>\n

Let me explain: Our basic strategy is to \u201cweaken\u201d and \u201cisolate\u201d Russia by severing Russia\u2019s economic ties with Europe and goading them into a long and costly quagmire in Ukraine. That\u2019s the plan.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now you might think that it sounds pretty reasonable but\u2013 according to Kissinger\u2013 it\u2019s the wrong plan.<\/span><\/p>\n

Why?<\/span><\/p>\n

Because US National Security Strategy identifies China as America\u2019s number one rival (which it certainly is) so, naturally, any policy that makes China stronger, runs counter to US strategic interests.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Got it? So, the question is: Does our proxy-war in Ukraine make China stronger?<\/span><\/p>\n

And the answer is: Of course, it does. It makes China alot stronger because it forces Russia to strengthen relations with China.<\/span><\/p>\n

What does that mean in practical terms?<\/span><\/p>\n

It means that relations between the world\u2019s manufacturing powerhouse (China) and the world\u2019s second biggest producer of hydrocarbons (Russia) just got a helluva alot better because of Washington\u2019s counterproductive war in Ukraine.<\/b> That\u2019s what it means. It also means that\u2013 as relations between the two countries improve\u2013 the pace of US imperial decline is going to accelerate as the non-dollar zone expands and bilateral trade gradually replaces the current US-dominated global trade system.<\/span><\/p>\n

You can see this happening already. The war in Ukraine has triggered a shocking collapse in global trade, major disruptions in critical supplylines, unprecedented food and energy shortages, and the greatest redivision of the world since the breakup of the Soviet Union. Washington has decided to stake its future and the future of the American people on a senseless geopolitical gambit could turn out to be the greatest strategic catastrophe in US history.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Kissinger grasps the gravity of the situation which is why he decided to put in his two-cents. But he wasn\u2019t just critical of the policy, he also offered an ominous warning that has been almost-entirely ignored by the media.<\/b> Here\u2019s what he said:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\u201cNegotiations need to begin in the next two months before it creates upheavals and tensions that will not be easily overcome.<\/b> Ideally, the dividing line should be a return to the status quo ante (\u2026) Pursuing the war beyond that point would not be about the freedom of Ukraine, but a new war against Russia itself\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

There it is in black and white, but let\u2019s break it into two parts to get a better sense of what he\u2019s saying:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The policy is wrong<\/li>\n
  2. The policy must be changed immediately or the damage to the US and its allies will be severe and permanent.<\/strong> (\u201cNegotiations need to begin in the next two months\u201d)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    That might sound too apocalyptic for some, but I think Kissinger is on to something here. After all, look at the massive changes the world has already experienced since the conflict began; the disruptions in supplylines, the food and energy shortages, and the rolling-back of the globalization project. Pretty big changes, I\u2019d say, but they\u2019re probably just be the tip of the iceberg. The real pain is still ahead of us.<\/span><\/p>\n

    What is this winter going to look like when home heating bills go through the roof, industries across Europe succumb to the higher energy costs, unemployment soars to Great Depression levels, and rolling blackouts become a regular feature of life in the west?<\/b> That\u2019s what the future holds for Europe and America if the policy isn\u2019t reversed and a negotiated settlement quickly reached.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Putin has already stated that Russia will not put itself in a position where it is economically dependent on Europe again. Those days are over. Instead, he is redirecting critical energy flows to China, India and beyond. Europe is no longer a priority customer,<\/b> in fact, they have emerged as a threat to Russia\u2019s survival, which means, Russia will continue to reorient its production eastward.<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n

    How will this impact Europe?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    That\u2019s easy. Europe is going to pay more for its energy that any country in the world.<\/b> That is the choice they made by shrugging off Russia\u2019s legitimate security demands, and that is the outcome they will have to live with.<\/span><\/p>\n

    So, here\u2019s what you need to know:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n

    In 2021, Russia provided 40% of all the natural gas consumed in the EU.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    In 2021, Russia provided over 25% of the oil consumed in the EU.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    If you think that those quantities of hydrocarbons can be replaced by producers in Nigeria, Iran, Saudi Arabia or some other far-flung location, you are sadly mistaken. Europe is walking headlong into the biggest energy crisis in its history<\/b>, and it can only blame itself. Here\u2019s more from an article at RT:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n

    \u201cThe current energy crisis could be one of the worst and longest in history<\/b> and European countries could be hit particularly hard, the head of the International Energy Agency, Fatih Birol, said on Tuesday. In an interview with German magazine Der Spiegel, Birol said that the fallout from the events in Ukraine is likely to make the current energy crisis worse than the crises of the 1970s.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Back then it was all about oil. Now we have an oil crisis, a gas crisis and an electricity crisis at the same time,<\/b>\u201d Birol told the publication, adding that before the ongoing events in Ukraine, Russia was \u201ca cornerstone of the global energy system: the world\u2019s largest oil exporter, the world\u2019s largest gas exporter, a leading supplier of coal.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

    As part of its Ukraine-related sanctions, the EU introduced restrictions on Russian fossil fuels and has pledged to gradually phase them out. Birol warned that countries in Europe that are more dependent on Russian gas are facing a \u201cdifficult winter,\u201d as \u201cgas may well have to be rationed<\/b>,\u201d including in Germany. His comments came as Russia\u2019s state gas supplier Gazprom cut off supplies to some energy firms in Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands and other countries, after their failure to pay for the fuel in rubles as per new requirements.\u201d (\u201cFuel rationing may be coming to Europe \u2013 IEA<\/a>\u201c, RT)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    So, I guess, freezing to death in the dark is preferrable to insisting that Ukraine remain neutral and stop killing ethnic Russians in the east? Is that the \u201cprincipal\u201d that Europe is defending?<\/span><\/p>\n

    If so, it\u2019s a bad choice.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Here\u2019s something to mull over: Did you know that all \u201coil blends\u201d are not alike?<\/span><\/p>\n

    Why would that matter?<\/span><\/p>\n

    Because Germany currently imports 34% of its oil from Russia. And Russian oil is a fully-proven, high quality Urals blend that is delivered in vast quantities via the Druzhba pipeline to German refineries that have been engineered to meet particular processing requirements. Different oil from different providers would throw a wrench in the whole refinery process<\/b>. It would require significant \u201cmodification of new feedstock lines and infrastructure, an atmospheric distillation facility, a vacuum distillation system, a cat-crack unit, a visbreaking facility, an alkylation unit, a catalytic reformer, an isomerisation unit, and an ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) facility. Plus brand new storage facilities + handling equipment for Rostock feed to substitute the 24x7x365 smooth Druzhba pipeline.\u201d (\u201cGermany\u2019s Refinery Problem\u201d<\/a>, The Saker)<\/span><\/p>\n

    So, all oil blends aren\u2019t the same?<\/span><\/p>\n

    Nope, not even close. On top of that, industry experts estimate that the refinery modifications would take roughly 6 years to complete. In the meantime, Germany\u2019s economic growth\u2013 which is closely aligned with energy consumption\u2013 will dip dramatically, businesses will be shuttered, unemployment will spike, and the EU\u2019s most powerful and productive country will be brought to its knees. <\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    Maybe someone in the German government should have thought about these things before they decided to boycott Russia oil?<\/span><\/p>\n

    The point we\u2019re trying to make is simple: Kissinger is right and the neocon clowns that concocted the failed Ukraine strategy are wrong, dead wrong. And, if we don\u2019t convene \u201cNegotiations\u2026 in the next two months\u201d<\/b>, as Kissinger advices, then the break with Russia will be final and irreversible, at which point, Russia\u2019s voluminous energy resources, mineral wealth and agricultural products will be forever routed eastward to friendlier nations<\/b>. And that is going to inflict terrible suffering on both the United States and its allies in Europe.<\/span><\/p>\n

    The only reasonable course of action is to call for an immediate ceasefire so that peace talks can begin ASAP.<\/span><\/p>\n

    ______________________________________________<\/p>\n

    Michael Whitney is a renowned geopolitical and social analyst based in Washington State. He initiated his career as an independent citizen-journalist in 2002 with a commitment to honest journalism, social justice and World peace. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com<\/a>
    \n<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

    \n
    Go to Original – unz.com<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    3 Jun 2022 – Kissinger didn\u2019t criticize the way the war in Ukraine is being conducted or the lack of progress on the ground. No. What Kissinger criticized was the policy itself, that\u2019s what triggered the firestorm. He was throwing a bucket of cold water on the people who concocted this loony policy by telling them to their faces that they \u201cgot it wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":214572,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[867,2197,2136,253,278,923,961,70,1594,481],"class_list":["post-214571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anglo-america","tag-anglo-america","tag-biden","tag-henry-kissinger","tag-putin","tag-russia","tag-sanctions","tag-ukraine","tag-usa","tag-war-economy","tag-warfare"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214571\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/214572"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}