{"id":217051,"date":"2022-07-25T12:00:29","date_gmt":"2022-07-25T11:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=217051"},"modified":"2022-07-25T03:24:43","modified_gmt":"2022-07-25T02:24:43","slug":"neutralizing-dirty-tricksters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2022\/07\/neutralizing-dirty-tricksters\/","title":{"rendered":"Neutralizing Dirty Tricksters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><em>Immunize Yourself to Propaganda<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/hollywood_propaganda_sign_mock_28x16-640x429.png\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-120186 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/hollywood_propaganda_sign_mock_28x16-640x429-300x201.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"201\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/hollywood_propaganda_sign_mock_28x16-640x429-300x201.png 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/hollywood_propaganda_sign_mock_28x16-640x429.png 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>6 Jul 2022 &#8211; <\/em>I stumbled across a new dirty trick (statistical use of <em><strong>neutralizing geometric titers &#8211; <\/strong>described later and scroll all the way down for decoding a list of tricks)<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>One need not be a total expert to detect something unfamiliar and fishy in order to follow one\u2019s intuition, and confirm with a true expert (James Lyons-Weiler \u2013 see below).<\/p>\n<p>Familiarity with any phenomenon enables you recognize the language, concepts, landscape, major players and patterns so that your radar can detect when something is off and pursue what is behind it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Creating a Parallel Universe<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Mystification is a plausible misrepresentation of reality, presenting forms of exploitation as forms of benevolence. Fabrication weaves together fragments of truths, half-truths, facts out of context, images, and distortions to create a coherent, internally consistent, compelling, convincing worldview.<\/p>\n<p>A variety of big and little dirty tricks are combined and deployed to support the illusory false narrative. <strong>\u201cThe whole is greater than the sum of the parts\u201d<\/strong> is a principle of Gestalt psychology.<\/p>\n<p>I have been compiling a list of dirty tricks (still mostly in my head) including statistical gimmicks, numbers games, redefinitions, and illusions used to mystify the public. A well-fabricated plausible, alternative reality appears obviously true to an unquestioning public.<\/p>\n<p>Tricks make Covid shots appear necessary, safer and more effective than they are and cover up dangers and negative efficacy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pfizer\u2019s Unintentionally Revealing Announcements<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The day after the June 28 FDA\u2019s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting to authorize reformulated, \u201c<em>Omicron-adapted<\/em>\u201d Covid Spikeshots, I came across this Pfizer announcement: \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.businesswire.com\/news\/home\/20220629005833\/en\/Pfizer-and-BioNTech-Announce-New-Agreement-with-U.S.-Government-to-Provide-Additional-Doses-of-COVID-19-Vaccine\"  rel=\"\">Pfizer and BioNTech Announce New Agreement with U.S. Government to Provide Additional Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Excerpts with <strong>my bolds<\/strong> of deceptive manipulative language to raise awareness of propaganda literacy.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) and BioNTech SE (Nasdaq: BNTX) today announced a new vaccine supply agreement with the U.S. government <strong>to support the continued fight against COVID-19. <\/strong>\u00a0\u2026<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. government will pay the companies $3.2 billion upon receipt of the first 105 million doses. Under this agreement, the U.S. government also has <strong>the option to purchase up to 195 million additional doses<\/strong>, bringing the total number of potential doses to 300 million.<\/p>\n<p><strong>On June 25, 2022, Pfizer and BioNTech\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pfizer.com%2Fnews%2Fpress-release%2Fpress-release-detail%2Fpfizer-and-biontech-announce-omicron-adapted-covid-19&amp;esheet=52766217&amp;newsitemid=20220629005833&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=reported+pivotal+data&amp;index=1&amp;md5=342746bf5c0973035b7bb87fa0868590\"  rel=\"\">reported pivotal data<\/a>\u00a0demonstrating the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of two Omicron-adapted vaccine candidates..\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Having followed data on safety and efficacy since 2020, I was naturally curious about what they meant by \u201cpivotal data\u201d so I clicked the link and got this article, already suspicious of the title\u2019s claim for a \u201cHigh Immune Response.\u201d This usually means a deceptive, short-term antibody response.<\/em><\/p>\n<h4 class=\"header-with-anchor-widget\"><em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pfizer.com\/news\/press-release\/press-release-detail\/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-omicron-adapted-covid-19\"  rel=\"\">Pfizer and BioNTech Announce Omicron-Adapted COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates Demonstrate<\/a><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pfizer.com\/news\/press-release\/press-release-detail\/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-omicron-adapted-covid-19\"  rel=\"\"> High Immune Response<\/a><\/strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pfizer.com\/news\/press-release\/press-release-detail\/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-omicron-adapted-covid-19\"  rel=\"\"> Against Omicron<\/a> 6\/25\/22<\/em><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>Omicron-adapted monovalent candidate given as a fourth booster dose elicited a 13.5 and 19.6-fold increase in neutralizing geometric titers<\/strong> against Omicron BA.1 at 30 \u00b5g and 60 \u00b5g dose levels; bivalent vaccine candidate exhibited a 9.1 and 10.9-fold increase against Omicron<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>Geometric mean ratios for Omicron neutralizing antibody response consistent with regulatory requirement of superiority.<\/strong><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Preliminary laboratory studies demonstrate <strong>both Omicron-adapted candidates neutralize Omicron<\/strong> BA.4 and BA.5 though to a lesser extent than they do for BA.1<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Both vaccine candidates <strong>demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile<\/strong> <strong>similar to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine<\/strong><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>Data to be discussed with regulators with goal of rapidly introducing adapted booster to address current and future variants<\/strong><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>What the Heck are \u201cNeutralizing Geometric Titers\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I never heard of \u201c<em><strong>neutralizing geometric titers\u201d <\/strong><\/em>before, so I was curious. I was expecting a claim of a strong <em>antibody response<\/em>, which is deceptive enough as even FDA VRBPAC Committee members claimed that antibodies were not a reliable \u201ccorrelate of protection\u201d and inquired about T-Cells as a better measure but \u201cdifficult to study.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Btw, I am not a statistician, epidemiologist or virologist. I am psychologist who had a sub specialty in psychoneuroimmunology. I have followed the literature on Covid since March 2020. I took a course in the Biology of Immunology with Dr. James Lyons Weiler at <strong>IPAK EDU <\/strong>so that I could better understand the literature. (Check out the wonderful courses at <strong>http:\/\/ipak-edu.org <\/strong>with the added side effect of being part of a conscious, compassionate, curious learning community.)<\/p>\n<p>Still, \u201c<em><strong>neutralizing geometric titers\u201d <\/strong><\/em>never came up in any of the articles I read on a daily basis or in the wonderful class which I highly recommend.<\/p>\n<p>I no longer \u201cGoogle\u201d so I Duck Duck Goed \u201c<em><strong>neutralizing geometric titers.\u201d <\/strong><\/em>I expected it to be a trick. I am catching on to them. Hint: the <em>geometric mean<\/em> introduces a bias that gives a different impression from using the <em>arithmetic mean<\/em> which is considered unbiased. (Do not assume that I fully understand these mathematical terms, although I was good at math in high school. I have a fuzzy understanding which is on the right track.<\/p>\n<p>My Duck Duck Go \u00a0search revealed this thread on <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/post\/Why-do-we-use-geometric-mean-concentration-for-antibody-titer\"  rel=\"\">https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/post\/Why-do-we-use-geometric-mean-concentration-for-antibody-titer<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Asked 15th Oct, 2015. <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/post\/profile\/Thao-Tran-107\"  rel=\"\">Thao Mai Phuong Tran<\/a>\u00a0 <\/strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/institution\/Hasselt-University\"  rel=\"\">Hasselt University<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Why do we use geometric mean concentration for antibody titer?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dear researchers,<\/p>\n<p>I come across some papers in Epidemiology field where they use geometric mean concentration for antibody titer. <strong>I wonder why do we want to use geometric mean concentration, what is the advantage(s) and disadvantage(s) of using this calculation for antibody titer.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Also if anyone can suggest a good reference to read about it, I would really appreciate.<\/p>\n<p>Thank you.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Here are some excerpts from answers with my bolds.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>6th Dec, 2015<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/post\/profile\/Andrey-Davydenko\"  rel=\"\">Andrey Davydenko<\/a><\/p>\n<p>JSC &#8220;CSBI&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The arithmetic mean is usually what is used to estimate mathematical expectation of the population. <strong>The advantage of the arithmetic mean is that it gives us an unbiased estimation.<\/strong> When data distribution is heavy-tailed, the arithmetic mean becomes very inefficient (a lot of data is required to get reliable estimates), but, nonetheless, the <strong>arithmetic mean remains an unbiased estimator of the population mean.<\/strong> <strong>The geometric mean does not give us an unbiased estimator of the population mean and it is used for different purposes.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Indira Gandhi Medical College<\/p>\n<p><strong>But GMTs are notorious to hide low responders to vaccines, be careful when interpreting results.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>30th Oct, 2017<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/post\/profile\/Omesh-Bharti\"  rel=\"\">Omesh Kumar Bharti<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Indira Gandhi Medical College<\/p>\n<p><strong>GMTs hide non responders to vaccine<\/strong> suppose 10 people have good vaccine response and three do not have a threshold vaccine response <strong>GMTs would hide all non responders and show all have good response. So they are deceptive.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>320th Feb, 2018<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/post\/profile\/Omesh-Bharti\"  rel=\"\">Omesh Kumar Bharti<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Indira Gandhi Medical College<\/p>\n<p><strong>In human beings even one non response can be life threatening for him so GMT may be academic but not practical in human trials.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Indira Gandhi Medical College<\/p>\n<p><strong>To conclude group titres are ok but they may be dangerous<\/strong> in case an outlier is not responding to say rabies vaccine which can be life threatening for him\/her. So <strong>interpretation of results matters if this is a health group or patients<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar<\/p>\n<p><strong>Interesting information as GMT will hide non responder in case of antibodies titration and evaluation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Dr. Jack\u2019s Input<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Once I had enough to go on, I called Jack, aka Dr. James Lyons Weiler, my immunology teacher.<\/p>\n<p>I recommend his Substack, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/popularrationalism.substack.com\" >https:\/\/popularrationalism.substack.com<\/a>. Here is his latest; <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/popularrationalism.substack.com\/p\/a-perpetual-pandemic-is-on-the-way?utm_source=email\"  rel=\"\">A Perpetual Pandemic is On the Way Thanks to Planned New COVID-19 Vaccines and FDA&#8217;s Insanity<\/a> <\/strong>FDA will allow Moderna &amp; Pfizer to update the variants targeted by their mRNA injections and require no new studies. What&#8217;s even more insane? Their &#8220;updates&#8221; will ensure a Perpetual Pandemic<\/p>\n<p><strong>Regarding GMTs &#8211; <\/strong><em><strong>geometric titers<\/strong><\/em><strong> &#8211; Jack wrote: (bolds <\/strong>are mine<strong>)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is not clear that the measure GMTs should be used instead of arithmetic means &#8211; for a number of important reasons.\u00a0 <strong>First, geometric means are known\u00a0to be upwardly biased. This could dramatically artificially increase\u00a0statistical power<\/strong>. Statistical testing should have used the anti-logged values anyway, which would have led them back to the original data and the arithmetic mean, and they would have done the t test. <strong>More importantly, geometric means are sensitive to outliers.<\/strong> It would be easier to falsify data with a few false large observations than with arithmetic mean\u00a0analysis mainly because the data are already upwardly skewed with a long tail.\u00a0 <strong>This also means that even relatively few people with large antibody\u00a0responses could make vaccines look more effective than they truly are.<\/strong>\u00a0 And I agree with the epidemiologist\u00a0Omesh Kumar Bharti in his position that <strong>the use of GMT hides non-responders.<\/strong>\u00a0 <strong>The unaddressed problem is a violation of the first principle of statistical hypothesis testing: a homogenous population.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Another Unfamiliar Term &#8211; Non-inferiority<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Another new term I heard at the June 28 VRBPAC meeting was \u201cnon-inferiority.\u201d After Duck Duck Going I learned that \u201csuperiority trials\u201d are convincing ways to demonstrate superiority of a treatment over placebo control, an active control (another treatment), or a dose-response relationship.<\/p>\n<p>A \u201cnon-inferiority trial\u201d attempts to demonstrate that a new experimental treatment is not unacceptably or significantly worse than a control treatment currently in use, that is, almost as good as a comparator by a small amount.<\/p>\n<p>While searching on my computer for my notes on non-inferiority, Dr. Peter McCullough\u2019s CV came up with this line &#8211; \u201c2009 trial stopped early for non-inferiority but futility on superiority outcome.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Pfizer announcement claims \u201c<em><strong>Geometric mean ratios for Omicron neutralizing antibody response consistent with regulatory requirement of superiority.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t fully understand this, but it seems fishy \u2013 \u201c<em><strong>consistent with regulatory requirement of superiority\u201d <\/strong><\/em>is not the same as claiming superiority. It gives an illusion of superiority.<\/p>\n<p>Like I said, I have a fuzzy understanding of this \u2013 which can be correct and worth something.<\/p>\n<p>I then asked Dr. Jack about this and he said, <strong>\u201cThe point is they bias the results in every way possible via sanctioned p-hacking.\u201d<\/strong> (P-value is probability value, or significance of a result, how likely to occur by chance. <strong>P-hacking is \u201cStatistical Bullshit\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 playing with statistics \u2013 dirty tricks &#8211; to make something look more effective than it is). You don\u2019t have to be an expert in statistics to smell statistical BS.<\/p>\n<p>Please write any insights in comments.<\/p>\n<p><strong>De-Hypnosis from Mass Hypnosis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All of these 360-degree, 24\/7 wall-to-wall, layered, interconnected, coordinated dirty tricks comprise a mass hypnotic induction. Maybe we are living in an \u201cactual virtual reality\u2122\u201d (oxymoron?) designed to induce the \u201cmass formation\u201d Mattias Desmet has enlightened us about. (see my deep dive on Desmet, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/coronawise.substack.com\/p\/the-anatomy-and-dynamics-of-mass?s=w\"  rel=\"\">The Anatomy and Dynamics of Mass Formation<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Their language is compelling to the general public who are not aware that they are being tricked with professional sounding words. The manipulative redefinition and repetition of the inappropriate word \u201cvaccine,\u201d which by definition must prevent infection and transmission, has lifelong, positive associations with safety and savinghumanity (see my <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/coronawise.substack.com\/p\/dont-use-the-v-word-at-all?s=w\"  rel=\"\">Don\u2019t Use the V word \u2013 at all: Our Choice to Frame or Be Framed<\/a>.\u00a0 The word \u201cvaccine\u201d is familiar, seductive and something most have already done. If we called these experimental genetic toxin generating spike protein factories fewer would rush out to get them.<\/p>\n<p>Wild claims and inferences are based on no data, animal data, minimal data, falsified data.<\/p>\n<p>The answer to 1000 different questions is \u201cYes, you or your baby must still get the shot.\u201d If you have natural immunity, if you are pregnant, if you are a baby with no risk \u2013 get the shot. If you had a reaction to the first shot, get the second. \u00a0If necessity, safety and efficacy cannot be claimed outright, they are implied and exaggerated. Dangers are denied or minimized.<\/p>\n<p><strong>We Have to Be the Sentinels<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Before voting Yes to authorize shots, our alleged \u201cregulators,\u201d FDA VRBPAC Committee members spent an entire day expressing doubts, raising concerns and lacking answers.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>They seemed confused about ingredients (BA1 or BA4\/5, monovalent or bivalent) and dosing.<\/li>\n<li>Some worried about lack of \u201ccorrelates of protection,\u201d waning efficacy, erosion of immune protection, side effects and failure (or refusal) to study T-cell immunity.<\/li>\n<li>They didn\u2019t deal with potential dangers from shots that may have double the amount of mRNA which might increase adverse reactions and deaths.<\/li>\n<li>They never deal with the fact that a 6 month-old gets the same dose as a 4 year old, or a 5 year old as a 12 year old, problems of ignoring weight and maturity, more important than age.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Yet, the vote was 19 Yes and <strong>two historic No votes<\/strong>, from Drs. Paul Offit and Hank Bernstein.<\/p>\n<p>At the October 26., 2021 meeting Dr. Eric Rubin infamously admitted that <em><strong>\u201c\u2026\u00a0we\u2019re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>On June 28, Dr. Mark Sawyer made a similar unselfish-conscious comment and said, \u00a0<strong>&#8220;We will only<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>know when we roll out vaccines\u00a0and the \u00a0safety systems do their review<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After disparaging the underreported, familiar VAERS safety system we have used for 30 years, Dr. Peter Marks said we would use their new, unheard of by us, <strong>Sentinel Best System<\/strong>, to detect myocarditis, etc.<\/p>\n<p>They have given us every reason not to trust them to be our sentinels, guardians, watchdogs, protectors, gatekeepers, etc.<\/p>\n<p><strong>They expect us to be mindless, lazy and ignorant.<\/strong> We need to learn how to detect BS.<\/p>\n<p>For starters, learn as much as you can. Follow CHD TV, Del Bigtree and other regular updates to become informed. Question everything. Develop your radar.<\/p>\n<p>As a rule, note in their claims, <strong>\u201cMe thinks they doth bombast too much.\u201d<\/strong> They always overplay benefits and deny harms.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decoding Some Examples of Manipulative Framing<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here are some examples to prime your consciousness. If you have others, please add in the comments.<\/p>\n<p>Learn the code. Recognize mystification. Develop your intuition.<\/p>\n<p>Over time, they have changed definitions, stopped using phrases that could get them in trouble, and evolved new deceptive language and more dirty tricks. Here are a few of infinitely more.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>* Replace definition of vaccine as producing \u201cprotection from infection and transmission\u201d <\/strong>with<strong> \u201cimmune response\u201d <\/strong>which does not protect from infection and transmission and in fact increases them known as <strong>negative efficacy<\/strong>. By <strong>\u201cimmune response\u201d <\/strong>they mean <strong>antibody response, which wanes and is unreliable<\/strong>. The shots may provoke an antibody response which has proven not to be a <strong>\u201ccorrelate of protection.\u201d <\/strong>They don\u2019t study more reliable T-Cell immunity because it\u2019s inconvenient.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>They use the \u201cantibody myth\u2122 when they want to claim efficacy of shots. They deceptively use waning of antibodies in cases of natural immunity to claim that natural immunity wanes. After natural infection, antibodies wane, but T-Cells are enduring, likely for years or a lifetime. They never tell you that. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>* Replace <\/strong>\u201c<strong>Natural Immunity\u201d<\/strong> <strong>(NI)<\/strong> with <strong>\u201cPreviously infected\u201d<\/strong> They dare not use the term \u201cnatural immunity.\u201d They don\u2019t like anything natural, like vitamin D levels, never mentioned, or the idea of having immunity you acquired all by yourself without their interventions.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s differentiate what I call <strong>\u201cpure natural immunity\u201d <\/strong>from those who had Covid shots before NI and after NI. NI is a threat to the multibillion-dollar industry. Pure NI contributes to herd immunity and the obsolescence of these shots. Btw, the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/fullmeasure.news\/news\/shows\/amish-covid?fbclid=IwAR21mAkHsrruG0tNCoQ4QhbO5CnoS96vRtvF0o0BIG1O_pcWR3JYJQ5M8tU\"  rel=\"\">Amish achieved herd immunity<\/a> by May 2020 with no lockdown, no shots, and no TV.<\/p>\n<p><strong>* Cast doubt on <\/strong>\u201c<strong>Natural Immunity\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 <strong>replace with \u201cHybrid Immunity<\/strong>\u201d\u2013 not a thing, dangerous. Fauci tells people with natural immunity that a Covid shot will give them superior \u201chybrid immunity,\u201d a false, made-up concept. Even worse, people with natural immunity, which is as good as it gets, have a much higher risk of adverse reactions and deaths if they get these shots they don\u2019t need. See studies <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/brownstone.org\/articles\/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted\/\"  rel=\"\">here<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/sharylattkisson.com\/2022\/03\/COVID-19-NATURAL-IMMUNITY-COMPARED-TO-VACCINE-INDUCED-IMMUNITY-THE-DEFINITIVE-SUMMARY\/\"  rel=\"\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>* \u201cSafe and Effective\u201d replaced with \u201cBenefits Outweigh Risks<\/strong>\u201d or \u201cknown benefits outweigh known risks.\u201d Although they changed their language, the hypnotized public, and tragically parents eager to jab their babies, still have the \u201csafe and effective\u201d mantra seared into their psyches and believe it as if their child\u2019s life depended on it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>* Replace safety trials for little ones with \u201cImmuno-bridging.\u201d \u201c<\/strong>Immuno-bridging\u201d is a junk science illusion used as a trick to justify voting for shots for little ones without adequate clinical trials. They falsely claim effectiveness for young children, who have efficient, na\u00efve, innate immune systems by comparing the immune responses of a small number of kids receiving a 2-dose series with immune responses older people with matured immune sytems, ages 16 \u2013 25, or 18-25 who received 3 doses of a different amount.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to my new friend, Jim Roguski for his comprehensive information in <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/jamesroguski.substack.com\/p\/pandemic-of-the-vaxxinated?utm_source=email\"  rel=\"\">PANDEMIC OF THE VAXXINATED<\/a>, and for his significant contribution to saving us from domination by the WHO and much more, and this outrageous quote from a ModeRNA document,<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe immune marker(s) used for immunobridging\u00a0<strong>do not need to be scientifically established<\/strong>\u00a0to predict protection\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/159189\/download\"  rel=\"\">https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/159189\/download<\/a>\u00a0(page 21)<\/p>\n<p>He states that,\u201d\u00a0immunobridging is NOT LEGALLY APPROVED.\u201d<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Beware of use of the word \u201cMAY\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 The U.S. government is paying companies billions for rigged junk science studies for shots that \u201c<em><strong>may provide protection<\/strong>\u201d-<\/em> convincing only to noncritical thinkers who don\u2019t know the code.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u201cAs the virus evolves, this new agreement will help ensure people across the country have access to vaccines that <strong>may provide protection<\/strong> against current and future variants,\u201d said Albert Bourla, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Pfizer.<\/p>\n<p>I believe it was Dr. Archana Chatterjee, who after being asked about \u201cMAY\u201d admitted that she used that word because she didn\u2019t have data indicating that it <em>did<\/em> indeed provide protection.<\/p>\n<p>When they don\u2019t have a basis for making a claim of protection, they use the word \u201cmay\u201d hoping that you aren\u2019t paying attention.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>* \u201cOmicron-Adapted Vaccine\u201d \u2013 <\/strong>Sounds impressive, scientific and plausible unless you realize that<\/em><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><em>It may be combined with the extinct Wuhan strain<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>If they use the B4\/B5 strains they may be obsolete by the time the shots come out<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The shots may have twice the amount of RNA which could provoke more side effects, but Omicron adapted sounds amazing.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Probably lost more problems I left out<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Context: FDA\u2019s VRBPAC Meeting to Authorize Untested Shots<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pfizer\u2019s aforementioned two unintentionally revealing announcements were made 3 days before (to \u201c<strong>Demonstrate High Immune Response<\/strong>\u201d) and one day after (<strong>New Agreement with U.S. Government<\/strong>) FDA\u2019s June 28 meeting of their Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to approve reformulated, \u201cOmicron-adapted\u201d Covid Spikeshots.<\/p>\n<p>For the richness and nuances of their manipulative language, presuppositions, and exaggerations, read the announcements in full to test your BS Detector for propaganda literacy.<\/p>\n<p>FDA will promote these \u201c\u201cOmicron-adapted\u201d shots with no requirement for clinical safety trials and no efficacy data (See Toby Rogers, <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/tobyrogers.substack.com\/p\/the-end-of-covid-19-vaccine-safety?utm_source=email\"  rel=\"\">The end of Covid-19 vaccine safety science in America<\/a>. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Representatives, aka \u201cSponsors,\u201d from Moderna, Pfizer, and Novavax, promoted their products and expressed readiness to manufacture as soon as possible. They said, \u201c<strong>So long as we don\u2019t have to provide any clinical data, we\u2019ll have them ready by fall<\/strong>.\u201d\u00a0(quote form Toby\u2019s article.<\/p>\n<p>Novavax, not yet approved for EUA, made a compelling, even seductive presentation, appealing to members struggling with mRNA problems. \u00a0Novavax said their shots could be available in July. If they have to change the formula, which will contain Wuhan strain (no longer in existence) and an Omicron variant, probably BA 4\/5, which may or may not be in circulation by that time, it may take 3 months.<\/p>\n<p>Note that they have been racing to manufacture these shots before approval, and Biden has ordered shots before approval, and previously mass injection pop up clinics were scheduled in schools before approval for kids in November.<\/p>\n<p><strong>So be aware it is always a done deal and these meetings and votes give an illusion of a legitimate process and vote. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On June 28, Dr. Cody Meisner, one of the more thoughtful members, worried about manufacturers losing money by making shots that we may not use if we change the formula. Dr. Peter Marks, unself-consciously said not to worry. The US government will make them whole. Amazing what they admit in public.<\/p>\n<p>Here are two of the Public Comments<\/p>\n<p>June 28<\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/standforhealthfreedom.com\/federal\/public-comment\/?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20Weekly%20Newsletter%20%28Wjx8uC%29&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter%20Sends-%20Updated&amp;_kx=3vymU3bvNr3HPSHpTn3hQEbbd-RuwgGcoLAe-hzjXXw%3D.K2vXAy\"  rel=\"\">Stand for Health Freedom\u2019s oral public comment at FDA\u2019s meeting on COVID shot strain replacement<\/a>\u00a0 Valerie Borek, JD<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>June 19, 22 Sam Dodson to FDA<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/forbiddenknowledgetv.net\/caller-drops-massive-truth-bomb-on-fda\/\"  rel=\"\">https:\/\/forbiddenknowledgetv.net\/caller-drops-massive-truth-bomb-on-fda\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Dirty tricks abound. Beware. Don\u2019t be a sucker. Call BS. Think for yourself.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>You are welcome to send in other dirty tricks in the comments.<\/p>\n<p><em>_____________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Part of my <\/em>Don\u2019t Be a Sucker<em> Series &#8211; <strong>Be Curious<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/diane-perlman-e1612677245534.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-178851\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/diane-perlman-e1612677245534.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a> Diane Perlman, PhD\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0is a clinical and political psychologist, devoted to applying knowledge from psychology, conflict studies and social sciences to designing strategies and policies to reverse nuclear proliferation, to drastically reduce terrorism, reduce enmity, and to raise consciousness about nonviolent strategies for tension reduction and conflict transformation. She is a visiting scholar at the School for <\/em><em>Conflict Analysis and Resolution at George Mason University, is active in\u00a0Psychologists for Social Responsibility,<\/em>\u00a0<em>the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/\" >TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment<\/a>,<\/em>\u00a0<em>and on the Global Council of Abolition 2000. Some of her writings can be found on her websites, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.consciouspolitics.org\/\" >www.consciouspolitics.org<\/a> \u00a0and \u00a0<\/em><em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.SanityandSurvival.com\" >www.SanityandSurvival.com<\/a>.\u00a0Email: <a href=\"mailto:dianeperlman@gmail.com\">dianeperlman@gmail.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/coronawise.substack.com\/p\/neutralizing-dirty-tricksters\" >Go to Original &#8211; coronawise.substack.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MYSTIFICATION is a plausible misrepresentation of reality, presenting forms of exploitation as forms of benevolence. FABRICATION weaves together fragments of truths, half-truths, facts out of context, images, and distortions to create a coherent, internally consistent, compelling, convincing worldview. Dirty tricks abound. Beware. Don\u2019t be a sucker. Think for yourself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":120186,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[2516,887,1868,1748,2571,372,888],"class_list":["post-217051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-transcend-members","tag-anti-vax","tag-big-pharma","tag-covid-19","tag-fake-report","tag-official-lies-and-narratives","tag-propaganda","tag-vaccines"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217051"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217051\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/120186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}