{"id":222340,"date":"2022-10-24T12:00:56","date_gmt":"2022-10-24T11:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=222340"},"modified":"2022-10-20T04:37:53","modified_gmt":"2022-10-20T03:37:53","slug":"the-time-to-negotiate-peace-in-ukraine-is-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2022\/10\/the-time-to-negotiate-peace-in-ukraine-is-now\/","title":{"rendered":"The Time to Negotiate Peace in Ukraine Is NOW"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Although some people consider it difficult or even impossible for the Ukrainians and Russians to make peace right now, this is actually a very good time for urgently needed negotiations to end this hugely destructive, increasingly dangerous war.<\/p>\n<p>Experts in conflict resolution understand that, in many cases, the best time to undertake peace negotiations is exactly when warring parties, having stepped up their military efforts, declare that they will never negotiate with the enemy, since to do so would be to abandon the hope of victory and to surrender to an evil aggressor.<\/p>\n<p>Why is this bleak environment often conducive to negotiations?\u00a0 Because the present situation in Ukraine is what specialists like I. William Zartman of Johns Hopkins University call a \u201cmutually hurting stalemate.\u201d \u00a0Each side can claim some victories, but neither side has a realistic hope of defeating the other, and meanwhile the costs mount for everyone.<\/p>\n<p>Ukrainian forces have made significant gains recently in Ukraine\u2019s southern and eastern provinces, but Kyiv\u2019s claims that victory is on the horizon are wildly overblown. \u00a0Overall, the operational warring forces are quite evenly matched.\u00a0 This means that the alternative to making peace is a major escalation of the conflict with costly, potentially catastrophic results.<\/p>\n<p>When escalation is discussed these days in the U.S., the focus is on Russia\u2019s nuclear arsenal and Vladimir Putin\u2019s possible use of tactical nuclear weapons.\u00a0 President Joe Biden says that the situation is as risky as the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. \u00a0But if he really believes that, why doesn\u2019t he favor negotiations to end the crisis like the Kennedy-Khrushchev exchanges that produced an agreement to remove offensive missiles from both Cuba and Turkey? \u00a0Why up the ante by supplying Kyiv with billions of dollars more of the world\u2019s most advanced non-nuclear weapons?<\/p>\n<p>Biden may well believe that the Russian leader is bluffing by calling attention to his nation\u2019s nuclear capabilities. \u00a0Another explanation, however, is that the focus on nukes is what magicians call a \u201cmisdirection\u201d \u2013 a diversion that draws attention away from what is really going on.\u00a0 The real danger here is that Putin can make a wide range of escalatory moves without pulling any nuclear triggers, and that he will almost certainly do so if the Ukrainians appear to be on the verge of driving Russian forces out of the Donbas region.<\/p>\n<p>Consider what Russia has <em>not <\/em>done up to now.\u00a0 With the exception of sporadic attacks, it has not targeted Ukraine\u2019s critical infrastructure \u2013 the network of transportation, communication, energy, and production facilities relied on by the armed forces and tens of millions of civilians. \u00a0It has not systematically assaulted major population centers or disrupted the transmission pipeline through which advanced weapons are shipped to Ukrainian armed forces.\u00a0 Nor has it attempted to decapitate the Kyiv regime through terrorist attacks, used chemical or biological weapons, or engaged in other extreme activities associated with \u201ctotal war.\u201d\u00a0 Recent missile strikes on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities are a <em>demonstration<\/em> \u2013 a warning of what the next stage of escalation is likely to involve if Kyiv continue to press its offensive in the east.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, in fact, is a particularly opportune time to begin peace talks between Russia and Ukraine.\u00a0 President Zelensky\u2019s current claims of imminent victory, accompanied by military adventures such as the assassination of Russian journalist Daria Dugina, the truck bombing of the Kerch Strait bridge, and (quite possibly) the sabotage of the Nord Stream II pipeline, should not be allowed to obscure the fact that a \u201cmutually hurting stalemate\u201d does exist. \u00a0Peace negotiations need to begin now.\u00a0 If they do not, the next step will be a major increase in violence that brings the world a step closer to total war.<\/p>\n<p>If peace talks are to have a chance of succeeding, a central issue that will have to be negotiated is the fate of the residents of the Donbas region. \u00a0The recent referenda asking people in that part of the country whether they wanted to be ruled by Kyiv or to become part of the Russian Federation were immediately branded \u201csham\u201d by U.S. and European officials, since pro-Russian local governments administered them under chaotic wartime conditions.\u00a0 In fact, referenda of this sort are unlikely to convince other parties that they represent the views of those living in war zones. \u00a0But branding them invalid was itself a sham, since it ignored the crucial question: What do the people of the Donbas want?\u00a0 Partisan diplomats and reporters have no clue, and they have little interest in discovering the answer.<\/p>\n<p>We do know that Ukrainian society has for years been seriously split, ethnically, religiously, and politically, between pro-Western and pro-Russian populations. \u00a0The civil war in the Donbas region that began in 2014 killed more than 14,000 people, most of them in the first years of the war.\u00a0 Even before the war erupted, industrial workers in these impoverished, Russian-speaking provinces were demanding some form of independence from the Kyiv regime and seeking Moscow\u2019s support in their struggle. \u00a0The Minsk II accord negotiated in 2015 promised them political autonomy, but the agreement was never implemented, whereupon separatists proclaimed the existence of their own autonomous republics and Russian forces mobilized to support them.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. and NATO sources portray all this as a plot by Vladimir Putin to dismember Ukraine, but this narrative grossly oversimplifies and distorts a much more complex reality.\u00a0 Whether the people of Donbas would prefer to be part of Russia or citizens of an independent nation remains unclear, but the hostility of a great many of them to the Kyiv government is indisputable.\u00a0 Did Mr. Putin use this fact to promote Russian interests as he saw them?\u00a0 Certainly.\u00a0 But he no more created this situation than did \u201coutside agitators\u201d create the civil rights movement in the United States.<\/p>\n<p>When peace talks begin the status of the Donbas republics will certainly be a major topic for discussion \u2013 a tricky matter to negotiate, but certainly not impossible. \u00a0The status of ethnically distinct regions claimed by rival neighbors has been dealt with in a number of well-known international cases starting with the Aland Islands negotiation involving Sweden and Finland in 1922. \u00a0In this case, one possibility might be to redo the referenda in the eastern provinces under international supervision, perhaps with additional choices added to the menu. \u00a0Proposals such as this one will no doubt draw fire from both sides, but in this situation the alternative to a painful compromise is an escalation in violence vastly more destructive and dangerous than anything we have yet seen.<\/p>\n<p>Are things in Ukraine getting worse?\u00a0 Yes, for both sides.\u00a0 This is precisely the right time to give peace a chance.<\/p>\n<p><em>__________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Richard-E.-Rubenstein.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-132679\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Richard-E.-Rubenstein-133x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"133\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a> <\/em><em>Richard E. Rubenstein is a member of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/\" >TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment<\/a> and a professor of conflict resolution and public affairs at George Mason University\u2019s Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter Center for Peace and Conflict Resolution. A graduate of Harvard College, Oxford University (Rhodes Scholar), and Harvard Law School, Rubenstein is the author of nine books on analyzing and resolving violent social conflicts. His most recent book is <\/em>Resolving Structural Conflicts: How Violent Systems Can Be Transformed <em>(Routledge, 2017). <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Experts in conflict resolution understand that, in many cases, the best time to undertake peace negotiations is exactly when warring parties, having stepped up their military efforts, declare that they will never negotiate with the enemy. Are things in Ukraine getting worse?  Yes, for both sides.  This is precisely the right time to give peace a chance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[1035,1268,1126,1050,2462,91,1301,112,818,278,961,2200,95,70,1594,481,172],"class_list":["post-222340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editorial","tag-eastern-europe","tag-european-union","tag-hegemony","tag-imperialism","tag-military-industrial-media-complex","tag-nato","tag-nuclear-war","tag-pentagon","tag-proxy-war","tag-russia","tag-ukraine","tag-us-empire","tag-us-military","tag-usa","tag-war-economy","tag-warfare","tag-west"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}