{"id":233797,"date":"2023-04-24T12:00:43","date_gmt":"2023-04-24T11:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=233797"},"modified":"2023-04-21T03:41:48","modified_gmt":"2023-04-21T02:41:48","slug":"it-may-be-in-no-ones-interest-to-reveal-more-cancelling-facts-that-challenge-establishment-power","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2023\/04\/it-may-be-in-no-ones-interest-to-reveal-more-cancelling-facts-that-challenge-establishment-power\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018It May Be in No One\u2019s Interest to Reveal More\u2019: Cancelling Facts That Challenge Establishment Power"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>18 Apr 2023 &#8211; <\/em>As we have <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2003\/outrageous-omissions-how-the-press-has-buried-the-truth-of-iraqi-disarmament\/\" >noted<\/a> before, a systemic feature of state-corporate media is <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2021\/propaganda-by-omission-libya-syria-venezuela-and-the-uk\/\" >propaganda by omission<\/a>. Missing out salient facts, informed commentary and context about the machinations of government and big business means that the public is less able to:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Understand the world around us;<\/li>\n<li>Challenge state-corporate power; and<\/li>\n<li>Bring about the fundamental changes in society that have never been more necessary.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Current examples are legion, as we will see in the selection that follows.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_233798\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Assange-free-wikileaks.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-233798\" class=\"wp-image-233798\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Assange-free-wikileaks.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Assange-free-wikileaks.jpg 678w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Assange-free-wikileaks-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-233798\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Henry Nicholls \/ Reuters<\/p><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>1. Journalists Pushing For <em>Less<\/em> Transparency<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Last week, 21-year-old US airman Jack Texeira was arrested <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/world-us-canada-65271302\" >following<\/a>, as BBC News put it:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018[a] leak of highly classified military documents about the Ukraine war and other national security issues.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Former UK diplomat Craig Murray <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.craigmurray.org.uk\/archives\/2023\/04\/snowden-and-texeira-ten-years-of-disaster\" >pointed<\/a> to a disturbing aspect of the case, namely, that Texeira was:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-11973273\/How-investigation-site-Bellingcat-unmasked-Pentagon-leaker-Jack-Texeira.html\"  target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">tracked down<\/a> by UK secret service front Bellingcat in conjunction with the New York Times and in parallel with the Washington Post, not to help him escape or help him publish or tell people his motives, but to help the state arrest him.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Bellingcat has been examined by, among others, Kit Klarenberg of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/thegrayzone.com\/\" >the Grayzone<\/a> who <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/thegrayzone.com\/2021\/10\/09\/bellingcat-intelligence-contractors-extremists-syria\/\" >reported<\/a> that the supposedly \u2018independent, open-source investigations\u2019 website has \u2018accepted enormous sums from Western intelligence contractors\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>As for the New York Times and Washington Post, US journalist Glenn Greenwald <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ggreenwald\/status\/1646682387684655105\" >noted<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018It is indescribably shocking and sickening that the nation\u2019s two largest media outlets were the ones who did the FBI\u2019s work and hunted for the leaker and outed him.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Almost as bad, he said, was that rather than press the government during a Pentagon press conference about the <em>content<\/em> of the leaked documents, journalists actually <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SystemUpdate_\/status\/1646680924883496961\" >pushed<\/a> for greater clampdowns on security leaks.<\/p>\n<p>Murray <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.craigmurray.org.uk\/archives\/2023\/04\/snowden-and-texeira-ten-years-of-disaster\" >added<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018I am not at all surprised by Bellingcat, which is plainly a spook organisation. I hope this enables more people to see through them. But the behaviour of the New York Times and Washington Post is truly shocking. They now see their mission as to serve the security state, not public knowledge.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>He also observed that, over the past week or so, \u2018nothing has been published [from the leaked material] that does not serve US propaganda narratives.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Very little, if anything, has been reliably presented about Texeira\u2019s motives in releasing these state documents. Murray warned readers to be sceptical of attempts to portray him as simply a \u2018rampant Trump supporter\u2019 or \u2018inadequate jock\u2019 trying \u2018to boast to fellow gaming nerds.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Murray concluded:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018We should remain suspicious of attempts to characterise him: I am acutely aware of media portrayals of Julian Assange which are entirely untrue.\u2019<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-8281\"><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>2.\u00a0 Cancelling Julian Assange<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>April 11 marked <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/peoplesdispatch.org\/2023\/04\/11\/assange-completes-four-years-in-uk-jail-struggle-against-us-extradition-continues\/\" >four years<\/a> since Julian Assange, co-founder of WikiLeaks, was forcibly removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London and imprisoned in the high security Belmarsh prison. He and his lawyers have been fighting the prolonged <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.crowdjustice.com\/case\/assangeappeal\/\" >threat of extradition<\/a> to the US, where he would likely spend the rest of his life in a \u2018Supermax\u2019 prison. His \u2018crime\u2019 has been to expose the nefarious activities, including serious war crimes, of the US and its allies.<\/p>\n<p>As Alex Nunns, author and former speechwriter for Jeremy Corbyn, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/alexnunns\/status\/1645902811027341312\" >noted<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018Probably the world\u2019s most significant and famous journalist has been in prison for four years today for his work \u2013 not in Egypt or China or Russia, but in Britain, a country that lectures others on free speech. His imprisonment is entirely political. He should be free.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Media Lens has <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2019\/mirthless-laugh-the-persecution-and-torture-of-julian-assange\/\" >documented<\/a> the grotesque <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2012\/incinerating-assange-the-liberal-media-go-to-work-sp-1707777774\/\" >smears<\/a> and mischaracterisations of Assange over many years, not least by the Guardian, as well as the dearth of coverage of his plight and what that means for real journalism, freedom of speech and democracy.<\/p>\n<p>In a piece for international media organisation <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/peoplesdispatch.org\/\" >Peoples Dispatch<\/a>, political writer Amish R M <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/peoplesdispatch.org\/2022\/01\/14\/julian-assange-case-4-things-that-the-media-doesnt-tell-you\/\" >summarised<\/a> key facts that state-corporate media have <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2021\/a-remarkable-silence-media-blackout-after-key-witness-against-assange-admits-lying\/\" >buried<\/a> about Assange. These include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The CIA planned to kidnap and assassinate Assange in London.<\/li>\n<li>The US prosecution is based on fabricated testimony from a repeat offender, currently serving a prison sentence for sexual abuse crimes in Iceland, and described as a \u2018sociopath\u2019 by court-ordered psychologists.<\/li>\n<li>The US spied on Assange while he was in the Ecuadorian embassy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Earlier this month, Reporters Without Borders Secretary-General Christophe Deloire and Director of Operations Rebecca Vincent were <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/rsf.org\/en\/uk-rsf-barred-vetted-prison-visit-julian-assange\" >barred access<\/a> to visit Assange in Belmarsh prison, despite receiving confirmation that a visit would be permitted.<\/p>\n<p>In a sane world, with responsible national media outlets, the above facts would be headline news. Both BBC and ITV News at Ten would devote significant coverage to Assange\u2019s plight and there would be extensive follow-up reporting and commentary on the parlous consequences for journalism and society. Instead, there is virtual silence.<\/p>\n<p>But there <em>is<\/em> space to document the plight of Russian journalists who <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/av\/world-europe-62896828\" >contradict the Kremlin\u2019s narratives<\/a>. What about journalists in this country who might try to contradict the narratives of the White House and Downing Street? Have they, in fact, already been \u2018purged\u2019 from so-called \u2018mainstream\u2019 media outlets: the word used by <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/johnpilger\/status\/955490422008242177\" >John Pilger<\/a> to describe his treatment by the Guardian? Where is the outrage about the dumping of dissenting voices in the \u2018free\u2019 western media?<\/p>\n<p>BBC News would rather <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/resources\/idt-4af5a2e0-10d4-4d4f-b3bb-41e2d1fe35dd\" >direct attention<\/a> to: \u2018The talk-show hosts telling Russians what to believe.\u2019 Of course, you would never see a major feature by the famously \u2018impartial\u2019 BBC News on: \u2018The talk-show hosts telling Britons what to believe\u2019 on the war in Ukraine, or anything else for that matter.<\/p>\n<p>Australian writer Caitlin Johnstone describes Assange as \u2018the greatest journalist of all time\u2019. She <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/caitlinjohnstone.com\/2023\/04\/05\/assange-is-the-greatest-journalist-of-all-time-notes-from-the-edge-of-the-narrative-matrix\/\" >wrote<\/a> recently:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018Assange <em>began his journalism career<\/em> by revolutionizing source protection for the digital age, then proceeded to break some of the biggest stories of the century. There\u2019s no one who can hold a candle to him, living or dead.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018And now he\u2019s in a maximum security prison, solely and exclusively because he was better at doing the best kind of journalism than anyone else in the world. <strong><em>That<\/em><\/strong> is the kind of civilization you live in. The kind that imprisons the best journalist of all time for doing journalism.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>3.\u00a0 Nord Stream: \u2018It May Be In No One\u2019s Interest To Reveal More\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>We have previously <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2022\/wicked-leaks-part-1-how-the-media-quarantined-evidence-on-nord-stream-sabotage\/\" >written<\/a> about the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2023\/a-beautiful-outpouring-of-rage-the-observer-the-great-peace-march-and-nord-stream\/\" >blanket of silence<\/a> over attempts to get to the truth of the September 2022 bombing of the Nord Stream pipelines that supplied Russian gas to Germany. US investigative journalist Seymour Hersh\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/seymourhersh.substack.com\/p\/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream\" >report<\/a> pointing to the US as the most likely perpetrator of this terrorist act have been blanked, or summarily dismissed, by state-corporate media.<\/p>\n<p>Following Seymour\u2019s report, US officials released an assessment based on \u2018new intelligence\u2019, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2023\/03\/07\/us\/politics\/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html\" >faithfully relayed<\/a> by the media, that a \u2018pro-Ukrainian group\u2019 carried out the pipeline attack. Der Spiegel then carried a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.spiegel.de\/panorama\/nord-stream-sabotagekommando-die-spur-der-andromeda-a-9186fdf0-9ead-4e78-a237-76837774350f\" >news report<\/a>, echoed in coverage around the world, claiming that divers used a German chartered yacht to sabotage the pipelines. There was a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dumptheguardian.com\/world\/2023\/mar\/10\/divers-used-chartered-yacht-to-sabotage-nord-stream-pipelines-report\" >modicum of scepticism<\/a>; journalists are not <em>totally<\/em> inept or subservient to state narratives.<\/p>\n<p>But media coverage still steered clear of examining the most likely explanation of US involvement; not least given that President Joe Biden had boasted in February 2022 that the US would <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=oSPfXLPUJHM\" >\u2018bring an end to it [Nord Stream]\u2019<\/a> if Russia invaded Ukraine. As Reuters <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/biden-germanys-scholz-stress-unified-front-against-any-russian-aggression-toward-2022-02-07\/\" >reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018\u201dIf Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the \u2026 border of Ukraine again, then there will be \u2026 no longer a Nord Stream 2. We, we will bring an end to it,\u2019 Biden said. Asked how, given the project is in German control, Biden said: \u201cI promise you, we\u2019ll be able to do it.\u201d\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Glenn Greenwald <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ggreenwald\/status\/1645071996802269184\" >observed<\/a> recently:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018The NYT \u2014 after feeding the public several bullshit versions about who blew up Nord Stream (an environmentally devastating act of industrial terrorism) \u2014 now announces: \u201cit may be in no one\u2019s interest to reveal more.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Maybe there\u2019s a clue in the article\u2019s last 2 paragraphs?\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here are those last <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2023\/04\/07\/world\/europe\/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-theories.html\" >two paragraphs<\/a> in question:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018And naming a Western nation or operatives could trigger deep mistrust when the West is struggling to maintain a united front [over the war in Ukraine].<\/p>\n<p>\u2018\u201cIs there any interest from the authorities to come out and say who did this? There are strategic reasons for not revealing who did it,\u201d said Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen, a Danish naval commander and military expert at the University of Copenhagen. \u201cAs long as they don\u2019t come out with anything substantial, then we are left in the dark on all this \u2014 as it should be.\u201d\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The NYT even emphasised the point in its <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/nytimes\/status\/1644294009018363906\" >tweet<\/a> highlighting their article:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018Intelligence leaks surrounding who blew up most of the Russian-backed Nord Stream pipelines last September have provided more questions than answers. It may be in no one\u2019s interest to reveal more.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, if you still harbour the illusion that \u2018mainstream\u2019 journalism can be relied upon to report the truth to the public, rather than covering it up, you may have to reconsider what even the \u2018best\u2019 news media, including the NYT, the BBC and the Guardian, do routinely.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>4. Propaganda Operations That Remain Hidden<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>One of the central tenets of western political ideology is that \u2018we\u2019 have free access to information, and that only \u2018the other side\u2019 does propaganda, a dirty word that we are not supposed to discuss; except, when it <em>does<\/em> get mentioned in polite company, it is termed \u2018counter-disinformation\u2019. In other words, it is information that is intended to \u2018counter\u2019 the \u2018misleading\u2019 narratives spun by \u2018official enemies\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>Last month, the UK government <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/bbc-gets-emergency-funding-to-fight-russian-disinformation\" >announced<\/a> \u2018emergency funding\u2019 of \u00a34.1 million \u2018to fight Russian disinformation\u2019. The press release stated that this large sum would help the BBC World Service continue to bring:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018independent, impartial and accurate news to people in Ukraine and Russia in the face of increased propaganda from the Russian state.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course, we are expected to swallow the myth that we in the West already enjoy \u2018independent, impartial and accurate news\u2019 from the BBC.<\/p>\n<p>But, as John McEvoy and Mark Curtis of the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/declassifieduk.org\/\" >Declassified UK<\/a> website recently <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/declassifieduk.org\/how-uk-media-misinforms-on-counter-disinformation-operations\/\" >highlighted<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018Britain\u2019s media routinely takes information from private groups countering Russian and other disinformation without saying these organisations are funded by the UK government and directed by people linked to the UK or US foreign policy establishment.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The same authors <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/declassifieduk.org\/uk-foreign-office-gives-millions-to-counter-disinformation-groups\/\" >reported<\/a> earlier this month that the UK Foreign Office has given over \u00a325 million since January 2018 to organisations targeting \u2018disinformation\u2019. Four of these organisations are directed by former members of the British and US foreign policy establishment and are focused overwhelmingly on \u2018official enemies\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>McEvoy and Curtis observed:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018These organisations tend to focus on Russian war crimes and information operations, particularly in Ukraine, while failing to conduct comparable investigations into Britain, the US or NATO.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Much of these groups\u2019 research is thus unidirectional, presenting malign information operations as the sole domain of enemies identified by the UK government. The impact is likely to be one-sided information entering the public news arena.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Indeed, unsuspecting members of the public will have no idea that analysis from supposedly \u2018independent\u2019 experts commenting on the war in Ukraine often comes from Foreign Office-funded organisations.<\/p>\n<p>In particular, Declassified UK noted of two such organisations:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>25 Guardian and Observer articles referenced the Atlantic Council Digital Forensic Research Lab, none of which mention its funding by the UK and US governments.<\/li>\n<li>The Centre for Information Resilience was referenced 29 times in the UK media, with only one article mentioning its UK government funding.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Also buried by state-corporate media is the extent and nature of the UK\u2019s global militarism since 1945. Curtis <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/declassifieduk.org\/the-uks-83-military-interventions-around-the-world-since-1945\/\" >reported<\/a> earlier this year that:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018Britain has deployed its armed forces for combat over 80 times in 47 countries since the end of the Second World War, in episodes ranging from brutal colonial wars and covert operations to efforts to prop up favoured governments or to deter civil unrest.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Faithful consumers of British media over this period, right up to the present day, are meant to believe that successive UK governments have been acting out of benign intent in such foreign \u2018interventions\u2019. To unearth the reality requires digging deeper and further than the tightly-restricted domain overseen by state-corporate media.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Concluding Remarks<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The above sections are but a taste of the systematic blanking, sidelining and even smearing of those who present facts and perspectives that challenge state-corporate policies and pronouncements. In an era of volatile international tensions, threat of nuclear conflict, class warfare against the majority of the population, inhumanity towards refugees, and the overarching spectre of the climate crisis, the propaganda system needs to be exposed and replaced by genuine public-interest media.<\/p>\n<p>Do you think electing establishment stooge Sir Keir Starmer is a solution to any of this? Or do you see that his promotion by establishment media, not least the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dumptheguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2023\/apr\/16\/keir-starmer-polls-tightening-labour-tories\" >Guardian<\/a>, is how the establishment seeks to perpetuate its own interests?<\/p>\n<p>Alex Nunns, mentioned earlier, recently <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.counterfire.org\/article\/the-man-without-principles-starmer-and-the-crisis-of-the-labour-left\/\" >noted<\/a> that when Jeremy Corbyn was elected Labour leader it \u2018gave the Labour right the fright of their lives\u2019. Nunns explained:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018Suddenly the right saw the left as an existential threat. Whatever electoral benefits there were to having the left in the tent were outweighed by the risk of the Labour right permanently losing the party they saw as their property.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Starmer and his supporters in the party are determined to ensure that the prospects of a left-wing Labour leadership are permanently crushed. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/uk-politics-65102128\" >Banning Corbyn<\/a> from standing for Labour in the next General Election is:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>\u2018about sending a message, first to the left, and second to the establishment, that they have nothing to fear from a tamed Labour Party. They want to prove that the insurgent, radical leftism that Corbyn represented will never be repeated.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In this very real sense, the current Labour Party is part of the established interests that are determined to suppress grassroots opposition to endless war, class exploitation and the steps required to avert the worst of the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2023\/end-stage-capitalism-collapsing-britain-and-the-climate-crisis\/\" >onrushing climate catastrophe<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>__________________________________________<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/media-lens-logo.jpeg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-121823\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/media-lens-logo-150x150.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/media-lens-logo-150x150.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/media-lens-logo.jpeg 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a> Media Lens <em>is a UK-based media watchdog group headed by David Edwards and David Cromwell. In 2007,<\/em> Media Lens <em>was awarded the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/gandhifoundation.org\/2007\/12\/02\/2007-peace-award-media-lens\/\" >Gandhi Foundation International Peace Prize<\/a>.\u00a0We have written three co-authored books<\/em>:\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.medialens.org\/index.php\/bookshop\/8-bookshop\/bookshop\/146-guardians-of-power.html\" >Guardians of Power-The Myth of the Liberal Media <\/a><em>(Pluto Press, 2006),<\/em> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.medialens.org\/index.php\/bookshop\/newspeak.html\" >Newspeak-In the 21st Century<\/a> <em>(Pluto Press, 2009), and<\/em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.plutobooks.com\/9780745338118\/propaganda-blitz\/\" > Propaganda Blitz<\/a> <em>(Pluto Press, 2018)<\/em>. <em>Contacts: David Edwards: <a href=\"mailto:editor@medialens.org\">editor@medialens.org<\/a> &#8211; David Cromwell: <a href=\"mailto:editor@medialens.org\">editor@medialens.org<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medialens.org\/2023\/it-may-be-in-no-ones-interest-to-reveal-more-cancelling-facts-that-challenge-establishment-power\/\" >Go to Original \u2013 medialens.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Journalists Pushing For Less Transparency<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":121823,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62],"tags":[2365,2314,1138,1748,2881,1855,234,2571,2880,70,1365],"class_list":["post-233797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-media","tag-cancel-culture","tag-corporate-media","tag-fake-news","tag-fake-report","tag-journalistic-ethics","tag-mainstream-media-msm","tag-media","tag-official-lies-and-narratives","tag-solutions-journalism","tag-usa","tag-war-journalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233797"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233797\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":233799,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233797\/revisions\/233799"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/121823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}