One country refused to bail out its derelict banks and slash social spending amid the financial crisis. And guess what? Unlike the eurozone and the United States, it\u2019s making a sturdy comeback.<\/p>\n
Iceland\u2019s stock market plunged 90 percent in 2008. Inflation reached 18 percent, unemployment shot up ninefold and its biggest banks failed. This was no recession. It was a full-blown depression.<\/p>\n
Since then, the country has steadily improved. By September of this year, it repaid its IMF rescue loans ahead of schedule. Unemployment dropped by half and its economy will have grown by roughly 2.5 percent by the beginning of 2013.<\/p>\n
So what\u2019s Iceland\u2019s secret? According<\/a> to the editors at Bloomberg News, it\u2019s a refusal to do what virtually every other nation that was pummeled by the crisis did: adopt policies of economic austerity.<\/p>\n Iceland\u2019s approach was the polar opposite of the U.S. and Europe, which rescued their banks and did little to aid indebted homeowners. Although lessons drawn from Iceland, with just 320,000 people and an economy based on fishing, aluminum production and tourism, might not be readily transferable to bigger countries, its rebound suggests there\u2019s more than one way to recover from a financial meltdown.<\/p>\n Nothing distinguishes Iceland as much as its aid to consumers. To homeowners with negative equity, the country offered write-offs that would wipe out debt above 110 percent of the property value. The government also provided means-tested subsidies to reduce mortgage-interest expenses: Those with lower earnings, less home equity and children were granted the most generous support.<\/p>\n The International Monetary Fund\u2019s mission chief to Iceland has sung the nation\u2019s praises too. \u201cIceland has made significant achievements since the crisis,\u201d Daria V. Zakharova told<\/a> Bloomberg in August. \u201cWe have a very positive outlook on growth, especially for this year and next year because it appears to us that the growth is broad based.\u201d<\/p>\n Letting the losses fall on bondholders rather than taxpayers, maintaining the country\u2019s welfare system and imposing temporary controls on investments protected Iceland from collapse and pushed it toward recovery, she said.<\/p>\n American leaders are threatening to do the opposite at the end of this year when a potential failure to reach a deficit reduction deal will trigger a total of $54.7 billion in spending cuts from government offices and social programs, Medicare among them, per year.<\/p>\n Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman agrees<\/a> that cuts to the social safety net are not the way. Ideology should not trump empirically based economics, he says. But right now, in the United States, it is. Krugman writes:<\/p>\n The doctrine in question amounts to the assertion that, in the aftermath of a financial crisis, banks must be bailed out but the general public must pay the price. So a crisis brought on by deregulation becomes a reason to move even further to the right; a time of mass unemployment, instead of spurring public efforts to create jobs, becomes an era of austerity, in which government spending and social programs are slashed.<\/p>\n Even in the face of evidence, including a recent return to recession for the eurozone economy, elected officials on the right and left are pushing what serious economists recognize as failed policies. And it appears they will continue to do so for the indefinite future. In the meantime, we honor the reality-based leaders in Iceland as our Truthdiggers of the Week.<\/p>\n \u2014Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n