{"id":23799,"date":"2012-12-10T12:00:16","date_gmt":"2012-12-10T12:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=23799"},"modified":"2015-03-13T18:17:47","modified_gmt":"2015-03-13T18:17:47","slug":"facebooks-privacy-vote-what-the-email-actually-means","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2012\/12\/facebooks-privacy-vote-what-the-email-actually-means\/","title":{"rendered":"Facebook&#8217;s Privacy Vote: What the Email Actually Means"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Facebook has sent all its users an email this week about a vote on its proposed changes to Data Use Policy &#8211; the site&#8217;s term for its privacy policy.<\/p>\n<p>The dry, quietly worded email is more significant than it sounds.<\/p>\n<p>Unless 300 million people (a third of Facebook&#8217;s users) vote \u2018against&#8217; by Monday 8pm GMT, the networking giant will no longer allow users to vote on policy changes.<\/p>\n<p>The move has caused concern among privacy groups, who say it&#8217;s &#8220;impossible&#8221; for 300 million to vote in the time period, and that users are worried that their &#8220;voices will no longer be heard&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>So far, the vote stands at less than half a million, but is around six to one against the new Statement of Rights and Data Usage Policy.<\/p>\n<p>The wording of the vote itself is not a simple &#8216;Yes&#8217; or &#8216;No&#8217; \u2013 to vote against, users have to select, \u2018Existing Documents: The current SRR and Data Use Policy,&#8217; as opposed to \u2018Proposed Documents: The proposed SRR and Data Use Policy&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The voting page is <a href=\"http:\/\/us.lrd.yahoo.com\/_ylt=AnMq1KVW0OsKcLiDgC5djl399XQA;_ylu=X3oDMTFqaWd2Ymg3BG1pdANBcnRpY2xlIEJvZHkEcG9zAzIEc2VjA01lZGlhQXJ0aWNsZUJvZHlBc3NlbWJseQ--;_ylg=X3oDMTJubmFrZWNyBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDOGE2Y2E0MTUtY2NiYS0zYzVhLWIyNDQtMmUzYjgzZDFmNjdiBHBzdGNhdAN0ZWNoBHB0A3N0b3J5cGFnZQ--;_ylv=0\/SIG=11sr21km1\/EXP=1356113709\/**http%3A\/www.facebook.com\/fbsitegovernance\"  target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Privacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation&#8217;s Activism Director Rainey Reitman says, &#8220;The voting system currently in place doesn&#8217;t work; it is simply impossible to get 30% of the users (300 million individuals) to vote on anything on Facebook within 30 days.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The overwhelming majority of users participating in the vote right now are voting against removing the voting system.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We believe this shows that Facebook users are concerned that their voices will not be heard, and do not want to lose the ability have a say in site governance. While the vote may never end up binding Facebook, voters are sending a message about a serious concern, and one we hope Facebook respects and responds to.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Facebook claims that the change is to streamline &#8216;voting&#8217; in favour of a system that allows &#8220;meaningful feedback&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Elliot Schrage, Vice-President of Communications said, &#8220;We&#8217;re proposing to end the voting component of the process in favor of a system that leads to more meaningful feedback and engagement.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The site says, &#8220;Voting will end on December 10 at 8:00PM. If more than 30% of all active registered users vote, the results will be binding. If turnout is less than 30%, the vote will be advisory.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/readersupportednews.org\/news-section2\/317-65\/14910-facebooks-privacy-vote-what-the-email-actually-means\" >Go to Original \u2013 readersupportednews.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Facebook has sent all its users an email this week about a vote on its proposed changes to Data Use Policy &#8211; the site&#8217;s term for its privacy policy. The dry, quietly worded email is more significant than it sounds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23799","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-whistleblowing-surveillance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23799","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23799"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23799\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}