{"id":240514,"date":"2023-07-31T12:00:25","date_gmt":"2023-07-31T11:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=240514"},"modified":"2023-07-30T04:47:33","modified_gmt":"2023-07-30T03:47:33","slug":"is-the-multipolar-alliance-controlled-opposition-the-case-of-two-green-paradigms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2023\/07\/is-the-multipolar-alliance-controlled-opposition-the-case-of-two-green-paradigms\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the Multipolar Alliance ‘Controlled Opposition’? The Case of Two Green Paradigms"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

29 Jul 2023<\/em> – On 4 Feb 2022, Presidents Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin unveiled a 5000 word \u2018Joint Declaration on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development<\/a>.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n

The words \u201csustainable development\u201d tied to \u201cinternational relations\u201d have obviously caused more than a few concerned citizens of western nations to gasp in fear that these two Eurasian powers who are apparently in a conflict with the unipolar death cultists managing the NATO cage, are in reality, simply controlled opposition.<\/p>\n

\u201cSustainable development\u201d is, after all the term coined by Maurice Strong and other misanthropic fanatics to promote a policy of depopulation, under the rubric of \u2018de-carbonization\u2019 of industrial civilization.<\/p>\n

For many people who have become conditioned by nominalist habits of thinking, hearing figures like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping using the same words as the leading priests of the liberal rules based order is sufficient evidence to leap to the judgement that they are all working together and that all multipolar resistance to the globalist cult is just an illusion.<\/p>\n

But as I pointed out in my recent article \u2018Communism, Capitalism and Feudalism: How Nominalism Makes us Fools<\/a>\u2019, two people can use the same word with two very different meanings associated with the common word.<\/p>\n

What is more important than associating patterns, and definitions to words labelled onto processes is an understanding that processes themselves are given their value and essence by the intentions, designs and purpose of from the minds of those putting them into motion and not from any set of fixed definitions.<\/p>\n

Fire in the hands of a sociopathic arsonist is a scary weapon while in the hands of a normal human is a great resource.<\/p>\n

In the following essay, we will do what few black pilled analysts ever bother doing\u2026 we will explore at some length WHAT EXACTLY China and her allies are doing in physical reality<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n

We will review the physical economic, scientific, cultural and cognitive factors of the past, present and future trajectories of Eurasia as compared with the western states, and we will look for any evidence to support or reject the thesis that China, Russia, India and their allies are in cahoots with the supranational death cultists managing Davos.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t be surprised if, in the course of this exercise, you discover that there is not one, but two diametrically opposing concepts underlying the term \u201csustainability\u201d and \u201cworld order\u201d currently at play.<\/p>\n

The 2009 Sabotage of a Green World Government<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Before we begin, it should be recalled that China and India were instrumental in sabotaging the December 2009 COP14 agenda in Copenhagen which had promised to establish legally binding emission target cuts to guide the de-carbonization (and de-industrialization) of much of society. Amidst a supposed pandemic and economic meltdown, puppet leaders like Sarkozy, Merkel and Obama championed a new era of green global governance and promised to consolidate a legally binding treaty to enforce decarbonization onto the nations of the globe. But it didn\u2019t happen.<\/p>\n

Why not?<\/p>\n

The\u00a0London Guardian had reported\u00a0in 2009<\/a> that\u00a0\u201cCopenhagen was a disaster. That much is agreed. But the truth about what actually happened is in danger of being lost amid the spin and inevitable mutual recriminations. The truth is this: China wrecked the talks, intentionally humiliated Barack Obama, and insisted on an awful \u2018deal\u2019 so western leaders would walk away carrying the blame.\u201d<\/sup><\/em><\/p>\n

The London Guardian continued:<\/p>\n

\u201cTo those who would blame Obama and rich countries in general, know this: it was China\u2019s representative who insisted that industrialised country targets, previously agreed as an 80% cut by 2050, be taken out of the deal. \u2018Why can\u2019t we even mention our own targets?\u2019 demanded a furious Angela Merkel. Australia\u2019s prime minister, Kevin Rudd, was annoyed enough to bang his microphone\u2026 The Chinese delegate said no, and I watched, aghast, as Merkel threw up her hands in despair and conceded the point\u2026 China, backed at times by India, then proceeded to take out all the numbers that mattered. A 2020 peaking year in global emissions, essential to restrain temperatures to 2C\u00b0, was removed and replaced by woolly language suggesting that emissions should peak \u2018as soon as possible\u2019.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Apparently China and India, along with African governments like Sudan (which had not yet been carved up on the careful watch of Rhodes Scholar Susan Rice<\/a>) did not wish to sacrifice their industry and national sovereignty on the altar of climate change models and technocrats that had only weeks earlier been publicly exposed as frauds by East Anglia University researchers during the\u00a0embarrassing Climategate scandal.<\/a><\/p>\n

While China and India should be celebrated for having sabotaged this effort (and the subsequent efforts to impose legally binding treaties in 2021<\/a> or 2022<\/a>), very few people have been able to hold this drama in their memory, and fewer still realize how this fight over sovereignty was tied to 1) the right of all nations to develop without engaging in culling their people, 2) supporting the right of sovereign nations to supersede edicts of globalist institutions and 3) a rejection of the New World Order script outlined by the likes of Bush Sr, Kissinger and Biden in 1992[1]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Imposing Limits to Growth onto Humanity: Derailing Nuclear and Space Economics<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Under the post-industrial logic of the Trilateral Commission agents that took over the reigns of government in the 1970s<\/a>, a full spectrum program was unleashed that shattered the spirit of progress that once animated a vibrant western culture. The creative momentum towards new breakthroughs in nuclear fission and fusion power, space tech and assisting former colonial people in their aspirations for industrial progress was systematically sabotaged as a new logic of scarcity management, population reduction and global governance was made the top priority for all US foreign and domestic policy.<\/p>\n

Funding for advanced breakthroughs in space science was destroyed with the cancellation of the Apollo missions in 1973.<\/p>\n

Where NASA\u2019s \u2018crash science\u2019 methods formerly drove the entire economy towards nonlinear bursts of growth through expanding fields of new discoveries touching on every aspect of life[2]<\/a>, the funding collapsed by design from 4% of GDP\/year in 1965, to less than 1% by 1975 [see graph].<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Just as the limits to growth were imposed onto humankind\u2019s quest to become a space-driven species on the macro scale, breakthroughs in atomic energy were also sabotaged with the cancellation of hundreds of new reactor builds in the late 1970s, while research and development into next generation reactors, nuclear propulsion for deep space exploration, fusion power, and closing the nuclear cycle<\/a> using fast breeder reactors were cancelled under President Carter.<\/p>\n

Fusion funding was cut so deeply<\/a> during this time, that scientists were deprived of the means of building prototypes to test their ideas resulting in a deep demoralization and idiotic \u201ctruism\u201d that commercial fusion power \u201cwould always be 30 years away\u201d.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Heavy industry was outsourced under a new logic of \u201ccheap labor\u201d and the formerly economic independent nations of the west became ever more dependent upon sweat shops, child labor and increasing rates of unpayable debts.<\/p>\n

Henry Kissinger pulled every string<\/a> to ensure that the world would remain addicted to hydrocarbons which became the basis upon which a new era of asymmetric war and economic terrorism under the guise of the petro-dollar would be unleashed.<\/p>\n

The only groups to benefit were those \u2018stakeholders\u2019 prancing about the Bilderberger or Davos who wished to transform once viable economies into speculative, hollowed-out time bombs whose detonation decades later would ensure a traumatic shock to the zeitgeist sufficient to usher in a new post-nation state world order.<\/p>\n

As we saw in part two of this series, this was the trap which Kissinger, Soros and the Trilateral Commission imposed onto Russia and China, during the 1980s and which China began resisting in earnest in 1989<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Resisting Malthus and Defending Open System Economics<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Now let\u2019s begin to see what China and other nations of the Multipolar Alliance are actually doing to reverse this trend towards decay, and artificial scarcity under their own particular re-definition of \u201csustainability\u201d.<\/p>\n

Unlike the post-modern basket cases in the west, Eurasian nations are not resting their entire development strategies on windmills and solar panels (although China has become a leader in the development of these things as well).[3]<\/a><\/p>\n

Instead what we find are competent programs for hydropower, oil, coal, natural gas, hydrogen power and importantly next generation nuclear power (with pioneering work on Molten Salt thorium<\/a> as well as fusion power in the works<\/a>).<\/p>\n

The Strategic Role of Nuclear Power<\/strong><\/h3>\n

As of December 2021, China became the first nation<\/a> to complete a fourth-generation high temperature pebble bed gas reactor in Shandong Province with over 93% of the material and all core technology domestically sourced.<\/p>\n

While the United States relies on nuclear power for nearly 20% of its electricity base, ALL of this capacity was built up during the 1960s-1970s. Due to the takeover by a neo-Malthusian technocratic class under Presidents Nixon, Ford and Carter, not a single new construction was permitted<\/a> between 1977 and 2013 as the USA (and Canada) was forced into a nuclear moratorium. The IER graph below showcases the direct effects of the Malthusian takeover and imposition of a system of artificial scarcity onto the formerly pro-industrial growth USA.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

James Schlesinger was an important Trilateral Commission ideologue who would jump from the directorship of the CIA (1973) to the Department of Defense (1973-76) to head the Department of Energy (1977-79) where he oversaw the cancellation of nearly all nuclear projects planed for the 1980s. Why this particular individual was selected to carry his assignment can be seen in his 1960 book \u2018The Political Economy of National Security\u2019<\/a> where he outlined his concept of economics and the necessary future of the world saying:<\/p>\n

\u201cEconomics is the science of choice in a world of limited resources\u2026. We have gone around the world spreading the \u2018gospel of plenty\u2019 raising the level of expectations \u2026 [but] in the nature of things, these rising expectations can never be satisfied\u2026. We must in our strategic policy return to the days before the Industrial Revolution \u2026 [and] prepare to fight limited wars.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Schlesinger\u2019s Canadian Kindred Spirit: Maurice Strong<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In Canada, arch-Malthusian, Rockefeller agent and god-father of the Great Reset Maurice Strong<\/a> had endorsed a nuclear moratorium<\/a> while simultaneously acting as head of Petro Canada from 1976-78.<\/p>\n

In a 1990 interview to West Magazine<\/a>, Strong described a fiction book that he wanted to write. This book would take place amidst the meetings of a global elite where a grouping of enlightened elitists conspired to collapse industrial civilization to save nature. Strong said:<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group\u2019s conclusion is \u2018no\u2019. The rich countries won\u2019t do it. They won\u2019t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn\u2019t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn\u2019t it our responsibility to bring that about?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The 1992 Rio Summit overseen by Maurice Strong had established a new era in the consolidation of NGOs and corporations under the \u201cgreen\u201d agenda. This doctrine was formalized with\u00a0Agenda 21 (later renamed Agenda 2030) and the Earth Charter<\/a>, co-authored by former Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev, and Strong between 1996-2000. The International Earth Charter drafting Committee\u00a0was chaired by none-other<\/a>\u00a0than transhumanist billionaire Steven Rockefeller.<\/p>\n

Mikhail Gorbachev had played his role marvellously for his handlers, and under his liberalizing reforms, armadas of George Soros\u2019 Open Society Foundations, and other CIA front groups had a field day taking control of everything that moved in the former Soviet space.[4]<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/picture><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

After the RIO conference, Strong went on to his next assignment heading Canada\u2019s nuclear power sector as the head of Ontario Hydro from 1992-1995 where the aging Malthusian went to war with the entire Canadian nuclear industry<\/a> using every dirty trick to cancel refurbishments, designs for new constructions and all funding in research and development in favor of \u201csustainable\u201d energy pathways.<\/p>\n

While some of Strong\u2019s damage was undone after his departure, the wounds were deep and Canada still hasn\u2019t healed to this day, having witnessed a consistent decay of its once-vibrant nuclear industry and total destruction of its fusion energy efforts.<\/p>\n

USA vs China Energy Paradigms<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In the USA, overall national energy production has not only stagnated but has actually fallen from 26,545 Terrawatt hours (TWh) in 2000 to 25,825 TWh in 2021 with an increased slide projected into the coming decades by those same forces who 1) sabotaged America\u2019s advanced energy policies over the past decades and 2) wish to induce energy scarcity onto a frightened populous in order to justify a culling of humanity to \u201csustainable levels\u201d.<\/p>\n

In contrast, China has used this same 21 year interval very differently, increasing its annual energy use<\/a> from 12,470 TWh in 2000 to 43,791 TWh in 2021.<\/p>\n

The effects upon quality of life, per capita powers of labor, energy security, food production<\/a> and educational opportunities have increased dramatically. The one child limit (imposed by Kissinger and the Club of Rome 40 years ago) has been abolished and average longevity which was once led by the USA has been overtaken by China which has lifted the average life expectancy from 44 years in 1963 to 77. 5 years today stands in stark contrast to the USA<\/a> whose average life expectance fell to only 76.1 years of age as of September 2022. China\u2019s purchasing power parity has also superseded that of the USA over the past few years [see graph below]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"\"<\/picture>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Graph from worldeconomics.com<\/em><\/p>\n

The dramatic increase of a middle class<\/a> which totalled only 3% of the Chinese population in 2000 to become 54% today are just a few effects of this overall energy policy. One finds that each one of these factors has intentionally been reduced across the Trans Atlantic West over the course of the same period. If we take the 32 period between China\u2019s 1989 expulsion of George Soros to the present, we find a ten-fold increase of incomes and labor productivity on top of a thirteen fold increase of GDP.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"\"<\/picture>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

US-China GDP 1981 to 2022. And forecast for 2023 (based on World Bank\/IMF).<\/em><\/p>\n

Graph made by SL Kanthan for Trends in Geopolitics.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

While nuclear is costly and takes several years to finish an average 1-4 Gigawatts plant, the fact remains that it is the most efficient form of energy that takes up fractions of land (compared to solar or wind farms), and operates at 90% capacity even when there is no wind or sun. On the other hand, solar and wind farms operate at an average of 25-35% respectively on the windiest or sunniest of days. Despite this embarrassing performance, when the wind doesn\u2019t blow, those wind turbines can fall to less than 2% capacity (as they did in the UK recently<\/a>) resulting in exploding energy price and black outs.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"\"<\/picture>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

China on the other hand hasn\u2019t drunk Green New dealing kool aid, and instead thinks of energy in qualitative terms which is why the Chinese government has made nuclear power a top priority for its coming 15-year-energy-strategy.<\/p>\n

On Nov. 2, 2021, Bloomberg reported that<\/a> \u201cChina is planning at least 150 new reactors in the next 15 years. More than the rest of the world has built in the last 35.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

India meanwhile has 23 reactors in operation and will add 12 more by 2024. \u00a0Among those new designs built and operational in India are the fast breeder reactors<\/a> imported from Russia which opens up the door for India\u2019s use of the abundant thorium-233<\/a> found under Indian soil which will be used as part of India\u2019s new three-step nuclear designs. Between 2012-2021, Russia constructed 19 new reactors<\/a>, 15 of which have been built in former colonial nations abroad.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Other nations collaborating with the Multipolar alliance have also seen the birth of a nuclear renaissance. Of those nations now making the leap into nuclear power development, we find the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Egypt and dozens of African nations whose leaders have all signed deals with Russia to construct nuclear power<\/a>.<\/p>\n

While the USA is still ahead of China on per capita energy use with an average of 76,634 kilowatt hours used per person each year (compared to China\u2019s 30,711 kWh), a very different picture emerges<\/a> when we shift our focus to look not upon each nation in a crystalized state, but as a process of change. Here a stark contrast is seen when comparing the two nations.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"\"<\/picture>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

In the case of the USA, per capita energy has fallen below 1971 levels (which were 91,613 kWh per capita according to the Our<\/a> World in Data<\/a>), while China\u2019s 1971 per capita energy use clocked in at a measly 3320 kWh<\/a>. This is nearly a 1000% increase which says a lot considering China\u2019s leadership has committed to tripling those levels by 2030!<\/p>\n

Water Abundance vs Scarcity: China vs the West<\/strong><\/h3>\n

One of the most overlooked components of China\u2019s anti-zero-sum paradigm is a $76 billion megaproject called the \u201cMove South Water North Project<\/a><\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Begun in 2001, the $64 billion water diversion project is the largest such program ever devised in human history. In order to bring much needed water from the flood prone, low-population density headwaters of the Yangtze River of the south to the highly populated industrial zones of drought-prone North, engineers have embarked on a project which aims to bring 44.8 billion cubic meters (1.5 trillion cubic feet) of water per year from the south to the North and Yellow River basin.<\/p>\n

A CGTN overview of the megaproject can be seen here:<\/p>\n

\n