{"id":243489,"date":"2023-09-11T12:00:52","date_gmt":"2023-09-11T11:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=243489"},"modified":"2023-09-04T05:59:24","modified_gmt":"2023-09-04T04:59:24","slug":"what-makes-you-makes-the-universe-nobel-laureate-erwin-schrodinger-on-quantum-physics-vedanta-and-the-ongoing-mystery-of-what-we-are","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2023\/09\/what-makes-you-makes-the-universe-nobel-laureate-erwin-schrodinger-on-quantum-physics-vedanta-and-the-ongoing-mystery-of-what-we-are\/","title":{"rendered":"What Makes You Makes the Universe: Nobel Laureate Erwin Schr\u00f6dinger on Quantum Physics, Vedanta, and the Ongoing Mystery of What We Are"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>To face the question of what makes us who we are with courage, lucidity, and fullness of feeling is to face, with all the restlessness and helplessness this stirs in the meaning-hungry soul, the elemental fact of our choicelessness in the conditions that lead to our existence<\/a>.<\/p>\n

That is what the Nobel-winning founding father of quantum mechanics Erwin Schr\u00f6dinger<\/strong> (August 12, 1887\u2013January 4, 1961) addresses in some exquisite passages from My View of the World<\/em><\/strong><\/a> (public library<\/em><\/a>) \u2014 the slender, daring deathbed book containing two long essays penned on either side of his Nobel Prize, thirty-five years apart yet united by the unbroken thread of his uncommon mind unafraid of its own capacity for feeling, that vital capacity for living fully into the grandest open questions of existence.<\/p>\n

Schr\u00f6dinger opens with one swift, awe-striking defense of what scientists dismiss as metaphysics \u2014 a realm of knowledge that lies beyond the current scientific tools and modes of truth-extraction, which history attests always reveals more about the limitations of the tools than about the limits of nature\u2019s truths. (Lest we forget, even so pure a form of physics as the hummingbird\u2019s flight was long considered a metaphysical phenomenon<\/a> \u2014 that is, a yet-unsolved phenomenon explained as magic \u2014 until science fermented the technology of photography to capture the mechanics of the process.) Echoing Hannah Arendt\u2019s daring indictment that ceasing to ask unanswerable question would mean relinquishing \u201cnot only the ability to produce those thought-things that we call works of art but also the capacity to ask all the answerable questions upon which every civilization is founded,\u201d<\/a> Schr\u00f6dinger writes:<\/p>\n

<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

It is relatively easy to sweep away the whole of metaphysics, as Kant did. The slightest puff in its direction blows it away, and what was needed was not so much a powerful pair of lungs to provide the blast, as a powerful dose of courage to turn it against so timelessly venerable a house of cards.<\/p>\n

But you must not think that what has then been achieved is the actual elimination of metaphysics from the empirical content of human knowledge. In fact, if we cut out all metaphysics it will be found to be vastly more difficult, indeed probably quite impossible, to give any intelligible account of even the most circumscribed area of specialisation within any specialised science you please. Metaphysics includes, amongst other things \u2014 to take just one quite crude example \u2014 the unquestioning acceptance of a more-than-physical \u2014 that is, transcendental \u2014 significance in a large number of thin sheets of wood-pulp covered with black marks such as are now before you\u2026 A real elimination of metaphysics means taking the soul out of both<\/em> art and<\/em> science, turning them into skeletons incapable of any further development.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Even as he made his reality-reconfiguring contributions to science and its search for fundamental truth, Schr\u00f6dinger never relinquished his passionate curiosity about philosophy and the ongoing questions of meaning that kernel every truth in the flesh of consciousness. He was as drawn to Spinoza and Schopenhauer as he was to the ancient Eastern traditions, and especially in their untrammeled common ground of panpsychism \u2014 one of the oldest and most notoriously misunderstood<\/a> theoretical models of consciousness in relation to the universe.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Erwin Schr\u00f6dinger, circa 1920s<\/p><\/div>\n

A century after the pioneering Canadian philosopher, psychiatrist, and nature-explorer Richard Maurice Bucke drew inspiration from Whitman to develop his theory of cosmic consciousness<\/a>, and a century before the emerging science of counterfactuals<\/a> threw its gauntlet at our fundamental assumptions about the nature of the universe, Schr\u00f6dinger takes up the parallels between the discoveries of quantum physics and the core ideas of the Hindu philosophy of Vedanta. In what might best be described as an existentialist prose-poem, he invites you to imagine yourself seated on a mountain bench at sunset, beholding a transcendent display of nature:<\/p>\n

Facing you, soaring up from the depths of the valley, is the mighty, glacier-tipped peak, its smooth snowfields and hard-edged rock-faces touched at this moment with soft rose-colour by the last rays of the departing sun, all marvellously sharp against the clear, pale, transparent blue of the sky.<\/p>\n

According to our usual way of looking at it, everything that you are seeing has, apart from small changes, been there for thousands of years before you. After a while \u2014 not long \u2014 you will no longer exist, and the woods and rocks and sky will continue, unchanged, for thousands of years after you.<\/p>\n

What is it that has called you so suddenly out of nothingness to enjoy for a brief while a spectacle which remains quite indifferent to you?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In a passage evocative of Whitman\u2019s timeless lines from \u201cCrossing Brooklyn Ferry\u201d<\/a> \u2014 \u201cOthers will enter the gates of the ferry and cross from shore to shore\u2026 Others will see the islands large and small\u2026 A hundred years hence, or ever so many hundred years hence, others will see them\u2026 I am with you, you men and women of a generation, or ever so many generations hence \u2026 Just as you feel when you look on the river and sky, so I felt\u2026 Just as any of you is one of a living crowd, I was one of a crowd\u2026 What is it then between us?\u201d<\/em> \u2014 Schr\u00f6dinger answers:<\/p>\n

The conditions for your existence are almost as old as the rocks. For thousands of years men have striven and suffered and begotten and women have brought forth in pain. A hundred years ago, perhaps, another man sat on this spot; like you he gazed with awe and yearning in his heart at the dying light of the glaciers. Like you he was begotten of man and born of woman. He felt pain and brief joy as you do. Was<\/em> he someone else? Was it not you yourself? What is this Self of yours? What was the necessary condition for making the thing conceived this time into you<\/em>, just you<\/em> and not someone else? What clearly intelligible scientific<\/em> meaning can this \u2018someone else\u2019 really have? If she who is now your mother had cohabited with someone else and had a son by him, and your father had done likewise, would you<\/em> have come to be? Or were you living in them, and in your father\u2019s father\u2026 thousands of years ago? And even if this is so, why are you not your brother, why is your brother not you, why are you not one of your distant cousins? What justifies you in obstinately discovering this difference \u2014 the difference between you and someone else \u2014 when objectively what is there is the same<\/em>?<\/p>\n

[\u2026]<\/p>\n

Inconceivable as it seems to ordinary reason, you \u2014 and all other conscious beings as such \u2014 are all in all. Hence this life of yours which you are living is not merely a piece of the entire existence, but is in a certain sense the whole<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Once we fathom this fundamental reality of interbeing, Schr\u00f6dinger observes, it becomes impossible to wish anything for ourselves that we do not wish for everyone else or to harm anyone else without harming ourselves:<\/p>\n

It is the vision of this truth (of which the individual is seldom conscious in his actions) which underlies all morally valuable activity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A decade later, in a lovely testament to Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019s insistence on the indivisibility of science and art in addressing those grandest unanswered question, Iris Murdoch \u2014 one of the vastest minds and finest literary artists of her time, and of all time \u2014 captured this elemental truth in her case for art as \u201can occasion for unselfing,\u201d<\/a> observing:<\/p>\n

The self, the place where we live, is a place of illusion. Goodness is connected with the attempt to see the unself\u2026 to pierce the veil of selfish consciousness and join the world as it really is.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Complement this fragment of Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019s My View of the World<\/em><\/strong><\/a> \u2014 a superb read in its slim totality \u2014 with the poetic physicist Alan Lightman on selfhood, mortality, and what makes life worth living<\/a>, then revisit Alan Watts \u2014 who introduced the Western mind to Vedanta and its consonance with \u201cthe new physics\u201d of the quantum world \u2014 on the self, the universe, and becoming who we really are<\/a>.<\/p>\n

_______________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a> My name is <\/em>Maria Popova<\/em><\/a> \u2014 a reader, a wonderer, and a lover of reality who makes sense of the world and herself through the essential inner dialogue that is the act of writing. <\/em>The Marginalian<\/em> (which <\/em>bore the unbearable name <\/em>Brain Pickings<\/a> for its first 15 years) is my one-woman labor of love, exploring what it means to live a decent, inspired, substantive life of purpose and gladness. Founded in 2006 as a weekly email to seven friends, eventually brought online and now included in the Library of Congress permanent web archive, it is a record of my own becoming as a person \u2014 intellectually, creatively, spiritually, poetically \u2014 drawn from my extended marginalia on the search for meaning across literature, science, art, philosophy, and the various other tendrils of human thought and feeling. A private inquiry irradiated by the ultimate question, the great quickening of wonderment that binds us all: What is all this? (<\/em>More<\/em><\/a>\u2026) <\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 themarginalian.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

To face the question of what makes us who we are with courage, lucidity, and fullness of feeling is to face, with all the restlessness and helplessness this stirs in the meaning-hungry soul, the elemental fact of our choicelessness in the conditions that lead to our existence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":243491,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[2335,1177,1170,1183,2496,308,2540,2057,938],"class_list":["post-243489","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-inspirational","tag-cosmos","tag-inspirational","tag-life","tag-metaphysics","tag-nobel-prizes","tag-philosophy","tag-spirit-soul","tag-spiritual-science","tag-universe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243489","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243489"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243489\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":243494,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243489\/revisions\/243494"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/243491"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243489"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}