{"id":250576,"date":"2023-12-18T12:00:49","date_gmt":"2023-12-18T12:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=250576"},"modified":"2023-12-15T06:53:46","modified_gmt":"2023-12-15T06:53:46","slug":"wikipedia-and-propaganda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2023\/12\/wikipedia-and-propaganda\/","title":{"rendered":"Wikipedia and Propaganda"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Is Wikipedia an open encyclopedia or a covert propaganda platform?<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Basics<\/h4>\n

Dec 2023<\/em> – As the seventh most visited website<\/a> in the world and the most popular online encyclopedia, Wikipedia exerts great influence on the knowledge and worldview of many people.<\/p>\n

While Wikipedia is generally thought of as an open, transparent, and mostly reliable community project, upon closer inspection, this turns out not to be the case.<\/p>\n

In fact, the English Wikipedia with its\u00a07 billion<\/a> worldwide pageviews per month is governed by just 500 active administrators<\/a>, whose real identity in many cases remains unknown.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, studies have shown that 80% of all Wikipedia content is written<\/a> by just 1% of all Wikipedia editors, which again amounts to just a few hundred mostly unknown people.<\/p>\n

Corporate influence<\/h4>\n

Obviously, such a non-transparent and hierarchical structure is susceptible to corruption and manipulation, the notorious \u201cpaid editors\u201d<\/a> hired by corporations being just one aspect.<\/p>\n

In 2015, for instance, a German Wikipedia administrator was exposed<\/a> as a project manager at pharma\u00adceu\u00adtical company Merck who was whitewashing Wikipedia articles on Merck\u2019s history and products. Yet despite the exposure, the manager remained a Wikipedia administrator.<\/p>\n

In another case, a German journalist and PR consultant used several pseudonymous Wikipedia accounts to protect<\/a> French pharmaceutical corporation Sanofi-Aventis against negative reports.<\/p>\n

In 2014, a study revealed<\/a> how German airline Lufthansa removed data on aircraft noise from Wikipedia, how vehicle manufacturer MAN deleted information on its tank production during World War II, how car producer Daimler removed information on political lobbying, and how pharma\u00adceutical company Boehringer excised information on its production of \u201cAgent Orange\u201d.<\/p>\n

More recently, employees of Indian commodity trading billionaire Gautam Adani were caught using over 40 fake accounts and paid editors, including an influential Wikipedia reviewer, to manipulate<\/a> Wikipedia articles related to the Adani Group and its founder.<\/p>\n

Some of these actions are detected by Wikipedia editors themselves, others are uncovered by external researchers, and still others remain unnoticed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nevertheless, this murky corporate influence on Wikipedia is just the tip of the iceberg, as the covert and systematic manipulation of Wikipedia reaches much deeper than that.<\/p>\n

Intelligence services<\/h4>\n

Already in 2007, researchers found that one of the most active and influential English Wikipedia administrators, called \u201cSlim Virgin\u201d, was in fact a former British intelligence informer<\/a> who had moved to Canada and lived there under a false identity.<\/p>\n

Encouraged by this discovery, independent researchers using the newly developed WikiScanner<\/a> tool found that CIA and FBI employees were secretly editing<\/a> Wikipedia articles on controversial topics, including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo military prison.<\/p>\n

More recently, another highly prolific Wikipedia editor, going by the name of \u201cPhilip Cross\u201d<\/a>, turned out to be linked to British intelligence and several British establishment journalists<\/a>. Among other things, \u201cPhilip Cross\u201d targeted<\/a> journalists and academics who opposed British military interventions.<\/p>\n

In 2023, investigators found that the government of Saudi Arabia managed to install sixteen agents<\/a> as Wikipedia administrators; the agents not only controlled articles on political topics, but revealed<\/a> the identities of two independent administrators to Saudi authorities \u2013 who put them in jail.<\/p>\n

Even in Switzerland, unidentified government employees were caught whitewashing Wikipedia entries<\/a> about the Swiss secret service just prior to a public referendum about the agency.<\/p>\n

\u201cZionist editing of Wikipedia\u201d<\/h4>\n

In addition to some Western countries, Israel is one of the most active and influential state actors on Wikipedia.<\/p>\n

The Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy, founded<\/a> in 2006, has long been known to coordinate<\/a> pro-Israeli activists in various countries who assiduously edit Wikipedia and other online platforms according to Israeli interests. To this end, the Israeli ministry even developed an app, called Act.IL<\/a>, to quickly define and assign various tasks.<\/p>\n

Israeli efforts to shape Wikipedia articles have been supported by some high-profile individuals. For instance, IT entrepreneur, IDF commander and later Israeli Prime Minister, Naftali Bennet, previously organized courses in \u201cZionist editing\u201d<\/a> of Wikipedia.<\/p>\n

In Germany, one of the most aggressive Wikipedia editors was exposed, after a two-year legal battle, as a political operative<\/a> formerly serving in the Israeli army as a foreign volunteer. The operative used the pseudonym \u201cFeliks\u201d \u2013 a reference to Feliks Dzerzhinsky, the architect<\/a> of the early Soviet \u201cRed Terror\u201d campaign \u2013 and manipulated hundreds of articles.<\/p>\n

In 2021, it was revealed<\/a> that the American-Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) had an entire team of nine staff dedicated to editing Wikipedia and working ADL sources into Wikipedia articles. The ADL had previously been caught in several illegal spying operations<\/a> and was exposed<\/a> as an Israeli intelligence front by Mossad whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky.<\/p>\n

Wikipedia itself was founded<\/a> in 2001 by two American-Jewish IT entrepreneurs, Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. While Larry Sanger has since abandoned and criticized the platform (see below), Jimmy Wales remains<\/a> a board member of the Wikimedia Foundation and in 2015 received<\/a> the $1 million Israeli Dan David prize for technological accomplishments.<\/p>\n

Private intelligence firms<\/h4>\n

In addition to state intelligence services, private intelligence firms also manipulate Wikipedia articles as part of covert PR or smear campaigns on behalf of their corporate or government clients.<\/p>\n

In 2022, for instance, the leaked Abu Dhabi Files exposed<\/a> how a Swiss private intelligence firm called Alp Services secretly manipulated Wikipedia articles in several languages on behalf of the rulers of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The purpose of this multi-million dollar operation was to discredit or destroy people and organizations deemed unfriendly by the UAE.<\/p>\n

To this end, Alp Services first planted<\/a> defamatory articles about the targeted people in several media outlets and then \u201crequested the assistance of friendly moderators\u201d to add this negative information to their Wikipedia articles and block any attempted corrections. Finally, Alp Services ensured that the negative information ranked highly in Google internet searches.<\/p>\n

The campaign on behalf of the UAE \u2013 just one of several such operations conducted by Alp Services \u2013 led to the bankruptcy<\/a> of at least one energy trading company and damaged the reputation of a UN human-rights expert, who later described<\/a> Wikipedia as \u201ca monster\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the most dangerous websites on the internet\u201d<\/h4>\n

Many Wikipedia manipulators are editing articles almost all day and every day<\/a>, indicating that they are either highly dedicated individuals, or perhaps operated by a group of people.<\/p>\n

Moreover, articles edited by these personae cannot easily be revised, since the above-mentioned administrators<\/a> can always revert changes or simply block disagreeing users altogether.<\/p>\n

Many of these covert campaigns attempt to promote establishment and industry positions and destroy<\/a> the reputation of critics. Because of its influence, German watchdog group WikiRadar described<\/a> Wikipedia as \u201cone of the most dangerous websites on the internet\u201d.<\/p>\n

Particularly affected by this kind of systematic and covert manipulation are Wikipedia articles about political and geopolitical, commercial, societal, medical and some historical topics as well as biographies of non-compliant academics, journalists, and politicians.<\/p>\n

In some cases, relentless defamation campaigns on Wikipedia drove victims into suicide<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The \u201cSkeptics\u201d movement<\/h4>\n

In addition to PR firms and state actors, several activist groups also play an important role in editing and manipulating Wikipedia articles.<\/p>\n

One of the most influential but least known activist groups on Wikipedia are the so-called \u201cSkeptics\u201d<\/a>, an obscure and cult-like organization whose members are \u201cskeptical\u201d not of official establishment positions, but of people challenging such positions. Thus, the \u201cSkeptics\u201d essentially serve as \u201ccyber warriors\u201d for political and corporate interests.<\/p>\n

The \u201cSkeptics\u201d originally focused on esoteric topics such as UFOs, homeopathy and parapsychology (hence the name \u201cSkeptics\u201d) but have since expanded their online and offline activities into far more complex political, medical and scientific fields.<\/p>\n

Although most \u201cSkeptics\u201d aren\u2019t professional scientists themselves, they often defend<\/a> an alleged scientific \u201cconsensus\u201d or \u201cauthority\u201d and vilify critics of an official position as \u201ccranks\u201d or \u201cconspiracy theorists\u201d. Typical examples include debates on medical and pharmaceutical questions, global climate change, or intelligence operations.<\/p>\n

One the one hand, \u201cSkeptics\u201d keep real and sometimes dangerous quackery off of Wikipedia, but on the other hand, they also suppress legitimate debates on complex issues.<\/p>\n

In 2010, the \u201cSkeptics\u201d launched<\/a> an initiative called \u201cGuerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia\u201d (GSOW) to train their members in aggressive Wikipedia editing. Their global Wikipedia activities have since been coordinated on a dedicated \u201cProject Skepticism<\/a>\u201d website.<\/p>\n

In a 2019 comment on nutrition studies, a British member of the \u201cSkeptics\u201d confidently declared<\/a> that \u201cthe Skeptics will always run Wikipedia\u201d.<\/p>\n

During the coronavirus pandemic (2020-2022), too, members of the \u201cSkeptics\u201d movement played a\u00a0central role<\/a> on Wikipedia by asserting official but mostly false positions and by defaming dissident researchers, doctors and journalists. Thus, to name but two examples, a lab origin of the virus was dismissed as a \u201cconspiracy theory\u201d and vaccine protection was greatly exaggerated.<\/p>\n

In 2022, an anonymous Wikipedia editor and \u201cSkeptic\u201d was exposed<\/a> as a Texas-based FBI informant specializing<\/a> in \u201conline marketing\u201d and working for the \u201cInfraGard<\/a>\u201d program. This might indicate that some members of the \u201cSkeptics\u201d movement do in fact act on behalf of intelligence services.<\/p>\n

Other activist groups<\/h4>\n

Another activist group that is very active in editing and manipulating various social and political topics on Wikipedia is the so-called \u201cAntifa\u201d movement. Although \u201canti-fascist\u201d, the modern \u201cAntifa\u201d movement is generally supportive of Western military interventions.<\/p>\n

In Germany, a months-long investigation revealed<\/a> that many Wikipedia articles on political and historical topics were written by the same main author: a piano teacher and \u201cAntifa\u201d member who used different usernames and spent several hours per day editing Wikipedia.<\/p>\n

On the complex topic of global climate change, too, various activists try to assert<\/a> the official view and vilify dissenting scientists. Some of this activity is sponsored<\/a> by governments, such as the \u201cproject for improving communication of climate change knowledge through Wikipedia\u201d.<\/p>\n

In 2019, investigators found that German Wikipedia articles on global warming, climate change, climate change denial, science denial, wind energy, solar energy, and Greta Thunberg, all had the same lead author<\/a>: a member of the Green Party and the \u201cSkeptics\u201d organization.<\/p>\n

Wikipedia and the WEF<\/h4>\n

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has repeatedly defended<\/a> the current architecture and operation of Wikipedia. Wales is a friend<\/a> of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair \u2013 in 2012, Wales even married<\/a> Blair\u2019s former diary secretary \u2013 and a \u201cYoung Global Leader\u201d<\/a> of the Davos World Economic Forum.<\/p>\n

Speaking of Davos, Wikimedia has itself amassed a fortune<\/a> of more than $160 million, donated in large part not by lazy students, but by major US corporations<\/a> and influential foundations, a situation that has given rise to some significant conflicts of interest<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Former Wikimedia CEO Katherine Maher (2016-2021) previously worked at<\/a> the influential US Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as well as at a subgroup of the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a CIA front organization<\/a> specialized in global influence operations and regime changes.<\/p>\n

Katherine Maher is also<\/a> a WEF Young Global Leader, a Senior Fellow at the NATO-linked Atlantic Council, and a member of the US State Department\u2019s Foreign Affairs Policy Board. In 2016, a Tunisian politician suspected<\/a> that Maher may in fact be a US intelligence asset.<\/p>\n

Geopolitical aspects<\/h4>\n

The fact that Wikipedia is influenced by Western and Israeli intelligence services may help explain why articles on geopolitical topics, such as Russia and Iran, are usually aligned with Western geopolitical interests.<\/p>\n

Moreover, many leading authors of the Russian Wikipedia are located<\/a> not in Russia, but in Ukraine, Germany, and the United States. Similarly, many leading authors of the Persian Wikipedia are located<\/a> not in Iran, but in the United States, Canada, France, and Germany.<\/p>\n

In 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Wikimedia and the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs started a collaborative campaign<\/a> \u201cto create and improve articles about the culture and people of Ukraine in as many language editions of Wikipedia as possible.\u201d<\/p>\n

The lack of control over Wikipedia editors may also explain why some non-Western countries decided to block access<\/a> to Wikipedia altogether. Even Nato member Turkey blocked<\/a> access to Wikipedia between 2017 and 2020 to \u201cprotect national security\u201d, after political links to a terrorist group were mentioned on the platform.<\/p>\n

Finally, US search engines and social media platforms increasingly refer to<\/a> Wikipedia to classify or suppress \u201ccontroversial topics\u201d. The revelations discussed above may help explain why.<\/p>\n

\u201cI no longer trust the website I created\u201d<\/h4>\n

In a 2021 interview, Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger revealed<\/a> that he no longer trusted the website he had created. In particular, Sanger noted that any topic or controversy that didn\u2019t appear in the \u201ccenter-left mainstream media\u201d wouldn\u2019t appear on Wikipedia.<\/p>\n

Indeed, Wikipedia accepts almost only establishment media outlets as \u201creliable sources\u201d<\/a>, while independent media outlets, regardless of their quality, remain largely excluded. Even some conservative establishment media outlets have been banned<\/a> as \u201cunreliable sources\u201d.<\/p>\n

In a 2023 interview<\/a> with US journalist Glenn Greenwald, Sanger argued that Wikipedia had become an \u201cinstrument of control\u201d in the hands of the American establishment and intelligence services, adding that \u201cno encyclopedia has ever been as biased as Wikipedia\u201d.<\/p>\n

Sanger emphasized<\/a> that \u201ca great part of intelligence and information warfare is conducted online, on websites like Wikipedia\u201d, and that intelligence services \u201chad learned the Wikipedia game and push what they want to say with their own people\u201d.<\/p>\n

Sanger has since helped launch two alternatives to Wikipedia, Justapedia <\/a>and the Encyclosphere<\/a>, both of which strive for objectivity, neutrality, and civility. Other Wikipedia alternatives include WikiSpooks<\/a> (deep politics), Scholarpedia<\/a> (scientific topics), and Metapedia<\/a> (conservative).<\/p>\n

Conclusion: WikiWho?<\/h4>\n

As detailed in this article, Wikipedia may have started as a community project and open encyclopedia two decades ago, but it has since increasingly become a covert propaganda platform influenced by corporations, state actors, and activist groups.<\/p>\n

To add at least some degree of transparency, German researchers have developed a free web browser extension called WikiWho<\/a> that lets readers color code just who edited what in Wikipedia. In many cases, the result looks as discomforting as one might expect.<\/p>\n

Figure<\/strong>: Editors of the Wikipedia article on the \u201cwar on terror\u201d (WikiWho)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Who edited what? (WikiWho<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Annex<\/h2>\n

Videos<\/h4>\n