{"id":261529,"date":"2024-05-06T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2024-05-06T11:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=261529"},"modified":"2024-05-02T07:40:36","modified_gmt":"2024-05-02T06:40:36","slug":"how-israel-violates-international-law-in-gaza-expert-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2024\/05\/how-israel-violates-international-law-in-gaza-expert-report\/","title":{"rendered":"How Israel Violates International Law in Gaza: Expert Report"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

Palestinians search for bodies and survivors among the rubble of a destroyed house following an Israeli airstrike in Nuseirat refugee camp, southern Gaza, 27 Apr 2024.
(Photo: Omar Ashtawy\/APA Images)<\/p><\/div>\n

An independent expert report lays out how Israel systematically violated U.S. and International Law in Gaza, concluding that Israel launched indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks on civilian areas due to “extremely relaxed rules of engagement.” <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

29 Apr 2024 – <\/em>Just days after the Biden administration showered the Israeli military with billions of dollars more in lethal aid, still with no apparent effort to restrict its use on non-military populations and structures, Palestinian solidarity activists were gifted with powerful ammunition to challenge Israel\u2019s genocidal disregard for the International and U.S. laws and norms that protect civilians in war situations.<\/p>\n

In a sober but scathing 76-page report<\/a>, publicly released on April 24, the Independent Task Force on the Application of National Security Memorandum-20 (NSM-20), details \u201cmultiple credible incidents constituting violations of international humanitarian law, military best practices, and [improper] restrictions on humanitarian assistance.\u201d<\/p>\n

The volunteer and unaffiliated task force of prominent experts \u2014 including two recently departed senior State Department officials, legal scholar Noura Erekat, and a former senior \u201cjoint terminal attack controller,\u201d Wes Bryant \u2014 was rapidly formed after President Biden signed NSM-20 on February 8, 2024. The memorandum tasked the Departments of State and Defense to report to Congress by May 8 on the compliance of Israel (and, nominally, other U.S. allies) with International Humanitarian Law and military best practices, as well as on whether it has impeded humanitarian assistance to Gaza.<\/p>\n

Co-chair Noura Erekat said at a briefing that the task force report has two main goals: first, to \u201cinform\u201d State and Defense officials\u2019 review with a selection of well-documented and assessed incidents of misuse of aid, and second, to put pressure on the agencies and the White House to act vigorously to curb the abuses. The pressure will depend on the report\u2019s ability to focus the understanding of the media, the relevant experts, and activists on specific illustrative cases and to clearly explain the legal framework and standards that are supposed to apply.<\/p>\n

The panel reported that its<\/p>\n

\u201caggregate analysis of credible reports involving U.S-provided weapons by Israeli forces indicates a context of systematic disregard for fundamental principles of international law, including recurrent attacks launched despite foreseeably disproportionate harm to civilians and civilian objects, wide area attacks without prior warnings in some of the most densely populated residential neighborhoods in the world, direct attacks on civilians\u2026and attacks against civilian objects, including those indispensable for the survival of the civilian population.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The experts further reported:<\/p>\n

\u201cIsraeli intelligence sources cited by credible media reports indicate that these patterns of unlawful attacks reflect reliance on an unyielding and unconditioned supply of U.S. weapons, relaxed rules of engagement, application of collective punishment, and the use of artificial intelligence technology to generate thousands of targets (including civilian police and civil defense personnel), at maximum speed and with minimal human oversight.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The findings are illustrated by 17 specific, horrific \u201cincidents\u201d and 18 pages of additional incidents. This review of incidents is said to be \u201csupported by both credible media and civil society reporting and statements by Government of Israel officials and IDF uniformed officers.\u201d But the incidents identified are \u201cjust the most easily identifiable among a clear pattern of violations of international law, failures to apply civilian harm mitigation best practices, and restrictions on humanitarian assistance,\u201d by Israel and the IDF, often using U.S.-provided arms.<\/p>\n

Just as important for non-experts is the report\u2019s outline of exactly how the U.S. and international legal systems are supposed to protect civilians from harm \u2014 and how they are flouted. Thus, the experts point to three \u201cfundamental rules [that] govern targeting decisions in armed conflict\u201d:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Distinguish between civilians and combatants, and between civilian objects and military objectives, with a presumption that persons or objects are protected from attack unless the information available at the time indicates that they are military objectives.<\/li>\n
  2. Take all feasible \u201cprecautions\u201d in planning and conducting attacks to avoid or at least minimize incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, and damage to civilian objects.<\/li>\n
  3. Respect \u201cproportionality,\u201d i.e., conduct no attacks that are excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. The greater the foreseeable harm to civilians and civilian objects, the greater the foreseeable military advantage necessary to justify a particular attack. International humanitarian law (IHL) gives special protection to hospitals, clinics, and ambulances, as well as to humanitarian relief operations, and UN premises.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The report outlines the basics of \u201ccivilian harm mitigation practices,\u201d including U.S. Defense Department practices. A key concept is \u201cno-strike entities\u201d (NSEs), which DOD says \u201cmay include, but are not limited to, medical, educational, diplomatic, cultural, religious, and historical sites, or other objects that do not, by their nature, location, purpose, or use, effectively contribute to the enemy\u2019s war-fighting or war-sustaining capability.\u201d The task force charges that Israel has \u201croutinely and repeatedly\u201d targeted six fundamental categories of NSEs, plus a broad array of slightly less protected entities.<\/p>\n

    Proportionality \u2018rendered meaningless\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    A common excuse the Israelis advance for the death and wounding of civilians is that they are being used by Hamas as \u201chuman shields.\u201d The report notes that \u201ctaking advantage of the presence of civilians or other protected persons with intent to shield a military objective from attack constitutes a war crime.\u201d However, U.S. military rules \u201caffirm that an attacker shares responsibility for civilian harm with its enemies if it fails to take feasible precautions\u201d to avoid killing shields.<\/p>\n

    NSM-20 itself spells out that its allies must \u201cfacilitate and not arbitrarily deny, restrict, or otherwise impede . . . the transport or delivery of [U.S.] humanitarian assistance and U.S. Government-supported international\u2026humanitarian assistance.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Outlining the \u201ccontext\u201d of Israel\u2019s \u201csystematic disregard for IHL,\u201d the report cites \u201crecurrent attacks launched despite foreseeably disproportionate harm to civilians and civilian objects, wide-area attacks without prior warnings in some of the most densely populated residential neighborhoods in the world, direct attacks on civilians or otherwise protected persons\u2026and attacks against civilians objects, including those indispensable for the survival of the civilian population.\u201d A high-ranking former IDF officer is quoted as condemning Israel\u2019s \u201creckless conduct,\u201d which he says \u201creflects an absolute assumption that the U.S. will continue to arm and finance it.\u201d<\/p>\n

    \u201cExtremely relaxed rules of engagement\u201d inconsistent with IHL also explain much of the harm done to civilians. Thus, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Air Force, Omar Tishler, has stated that neighborhoods have been attacked \u201con a large scale and not in a surgical manner.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Such attacks are facilitated by an expansion of the concept of \u201cmilitary advantage\u201d in its proportionality<\/em> assessments to weigh civilian harms against the advantages of \u201can operation as a whole,\u201d rather than against each individual attack. That move \u201crenders the proportionality rule meaningless,\u201d the report says, as it\u2019s impossible to compare the harms of a single specific attack with all the military advantages allegedly achieved or sought by the whole Gaza operation, which has lasted more than six months.<\/p>\n

    Similarly, former U.S. Air Force drone controller Bryant noted how Israel blurs the requirement of taking precautions<\/em> to protect civilians \u201cby employing precautions it knows are ineffective,\u201d such as texting populations whose phones are not functional.<\/p>\n

    Also \u201crelaxed\u201d is Israel\u2019s use of the term terrorist. Thus, a reserve officer told Ha\u2019aretz, \u201cIn practice, a terrorist is anyone the IDF has killed in the areas in which its forces operate.\u201d The extensive, open-ended imposition of \u201ckill zones\u201d is another way to disguise genocide, an Israeli intelligence officer has explained. With a \u201ckill zone\u201d lasting a month or two, \u201cyou could stick with an order that anyone approaching should be shot\u2026But we\u2019ve been there for six months, and people have to start coming out; they are trying to survive, and that leads to very serious incidents.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Lastly, Israel asserts it can block humanitarian aid, if it has \u201cserious reasons for fearing\u201d that relief consignments \u201cwill be diverted from their civilian destination or otherwise provide a definite advantage to the enemy\u2019s military efforts\u201d \u2014 a position the task force says relies on a \u201cdefective rule\u201d from 1949 that was modified in 1977 and superseded by a rule of customary international law. Recent UN Security Council and General Assembly resolutions confirm that Israel \u201cmust allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded humanitarian relief and may not deny such relief based on fears that a small portion of aid may be seized by armed groups.\u201d<\/p>\n

    In conclusion, the report warns that \u201cthe Task Force\u2019s findings raise grave concerns regarding the Administration\u2019s compliance with both U.S. and international law, particularly with respect to security assistance and arms transfers.\u201d It then identifies the laws in question, as well as citing \u201cobligations under customary international law to ensure respect for international humanitarian law and to cooperate to bring serious violations of peremptory norms of general international law to an end through lawful means.\u201d<\/p>\n

    __________________________________________________<\/p>\n

    Steve France is a retired journalist and lawyer in the DC area. An activist for Palestinian rights, he is affiliated with the Episcopal Peace Fellowship Palestine-Israel Network and other Christian Palestinian-solidarity groups.<\/em><\/p>\n

    Go to Original – mondoweiss.net<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    29 Apr 2024 – An independent expert report lays out how Israel systematically violated U.S. and International Law in Gaza, concluding that Israel launched indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks on civilian areas due to “extremely relaxed rules of engagement.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":261530,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[532,1854,87,865,88,715,427,965,1025],"class_list":["post-261529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-palestine-israel-gaza-genocide","tag-colonialism","tag-crimes-against-humanity","tag-gaza","tag-genocide","tag-israel","tag-massacre","tag-palestine","tag-war-crimes","tag-west-bank"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261529"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261529\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":261531,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261529\/revisions\/261531"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261530"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}