This month marks the tenth anniversary of the U.S. attack on Iraq, one of the most egregious expressions of naked power and imperial ambition since the Second World War. <\/i><\/p>\n
The attack defied both an outraged world opinion \u2014 expressed by global mass demonstrations\u00a0 \u2014 and the United Nations charter. It also marked a change from the previous veiled decorum of supposed adherence to international law that defined post-war international relations.\u00a0 The Bush administration, armed with the ultimate expression of the arrogance of U.S. exceptionalism \u2013 legislation passed by the U.S. Congress \u2013 unleashed a murderous assault on the people of Iraq dubbed \u201cOperation Shock and Awe.\u201d\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n
Ten years later, the awesome consequences of that criminal assault are clear. More than a trillion dollars spent, almost five thousand American lives lost, more than 32,000 Americans wounded, estimates of a million dead Iraqis and almost five million displaced, an epidemic of Iraqi birth defects from \u201cdepleted\u201d uranium, daily bombings, devastated public services and the dismemberment of the country. Yet, ten years later, no one, not one government official, has been held accountable. The obvious question is: how is it that, in light of one of the most heinous crimes ever committed by a State, there have been no investigations, prosecutions or convictions of the officials responsible for this assault?<\/p>\n
The lack of accountability is even more incomprehensible in light of the fact that it is now widely acknowledged that the real reason for the Western invasion of Iraq had little to do with its concern about weapons of mass destruction and everything to do with its desire to steal Iraq\u2019s oil.<\/p>\n
American officials have long-since broken their silence on the phony excuses proffered to the American people to sucker them into supporting a war of choice against an Iraqi regime softened-up by a decade of crippling sanctions. Antonia Juhasz,\u00a0 in an article<\/a> written for CNN\u2019s website, pointed out that the historical record is now unambiguously replete with evidence that the real motivation to attack Iraq was control of Iraq\u2019s oil and that plans were being made as soon as ten days after the Bush Administration took power to figure out how to accomplish that objective.<\/p>\n But that was not the reason presented to the U.S. and the global public. What was presented was the argument that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and that President Saddam Hussein and his government, therefore, posed a threat to the world (meaning the U.S.).\u00a0 The \u201cthreat argument\u201d was concocted to respond to any questions regarding the justification for waging war against a sovereign nation and was the basis for the ridiculous assertions by the Bush Administration that there was some operational cooperation between the government of Iraq and Ansar al-Islam, at the time loosely identified with the Al-Qaeda network.<\/p>\n Anyone with an even cursory understanding of the relationship between the Iraqi government and Al-Qaeda knew the assertion to be a laughable one, as Saddam Hussein was universally hated by the radical Islamic movement. However, with a compliant U.S. mainstream press and a U.S. public notorious for being one of the most unsophisticated in the world, it was relatively easy to not only make the argument that Iraqi WMDs posed a threat to the U.S. but also that Iraq was somehow connected to the attacks on 9\/11.\u00a0 The government was so successful in planting this notion in American minds that even after an avalanche of evidence to the contrary was revealed, in 2004 over 60 percent of those who voted for the re-election of Pres. George Bush believed that Iraq was somehow connected to 9\/11.<\/p>\n So if it is clear that the concern for WMDs was an elaborate hoax and that the attack on Iraq not only violated international law but even violated U.S. law, where is the investigation by the International Criminal Court?\u00a0 Why don\u2019t we see the likes of Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their boss George Bush in the dock at a Special Tribunal on Iraq?\u00a0 And why has there been no accountability even under U.S. law?<\/p>\n Why the continued impunity, when the facts indicate that a crime of epic proportions was committed?\u00a0 At a very minimum, there is enough evidence to justify an investigation into the attempts to evade, manipulate and distort U.S. law to further the narrow economic interests of powerful interests in the Bush Administration. Don\u2019t \u201cwe, the people\u201d deserve to know the details and role of the National Energy Policy Development Group, chaired by Dick Cheney, that was formed right after the Administration took power?<\/p>\n Who pays the price for impunity? <\/b><\/p>\n The Iraqi Government nationalized its oil sector more than 30 years ago. But Western oil companies are now back. Riding in under the gun of the coalition of the willing, Western companies have now taken over the Iraqi oil sector, with 80 percent of production being exported out of the country while Iraqis struggle to meet basic energy consumption needs. So Western oil is doing fine.<\/p>\n Did the U.S. media learn anything from the Iraqi war? It should have been clear that something had gone horribly wrong with a media culture that could allow itself to be reduced to a mouthpiece and propaganda machine for the U.S. Government.\u00a0 Sadly, it does not appear that any lessons were learned. What this episode has revealed is that by the early 2000s, a corporate media culture had emerged in the U.S. that embraced an ideological orthodoxy that framed its perception of the world in terms that did not diverge substantially from the positions and views of the economic and political elites in the country. The result is a mainstream media culture today that is more than willing to parrot the government\u2019s line on the \u201cbig questions of war,\u201d almost without question.<\/p>\n The latest example if this role is the hysteria being whipped up by the corporate media to push the Obama Administration to attack Syria because of unconfirmed \u201creports\u201d that it\u2019s military has used chemical weapons in the civil war that the U.S. orchestrated in the country. Here again, we see that the media still passes on information from unnamed governmental sources and when it takes editorial positions that find it on the same side as the government,\u00a0 NATO and A-Qaeda in places like Libya or Syria it is seen as just an odd circumstance of history.<\/p>\n So neither government representatives nor associated institutions like the media and corporations pay the price for their role in crimes perpetrated internationally. The lawlessness and impunity of the West is paid for by the people of whichever nation finds itself in the crosshairs of U.S. and Western interests. It is paid for by the families of the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed, the working class families of the troops killed or injured, and the troops who returned home suffering from post-traumatic stress. A price has also been exacted\u00a0 from all us who believe in the possibility of cooperative, global human progress<\/p>\n What the U.S. war on Iraq demonstrated is that in order to maintain their fantasies of continued global dominance, the U.S. and its colonialist allies will resort to naked piracy. But it is not gold trinkets and slaves that are the contemporary booty \u2013 it is whole nations. And while the undermining of the rule of law, the normalization of war to advance national interests and the hollowing out of the human rights idea in order to justify \u201chumanitarian interventions\u201d might seem to be beneficial in the short term,\u00a0 the people of the world who have been\u00a0 slowly liberating themselves from the conceptual myopia of colonization see very clearly the hypocrisy of the West\u2019s supposed commitment to universal human rights, democracy and the rule of law when international crimes like the attack on Iraq go unpunished.<\/p>\n The result is that many are not moved by the West\u2019s expressions of concerns for the people of Syria, when the U.S. and the West continue to support the occupation and dehumanization of the Palestinian people, kill innocents with drone strikes, and train and provide weapons to repressive states and terrorists groups. Many understand that if there was a real commitment to the equal application of international law and accountability, U.S. and British officials would be held to account for the crimes committed in Iraq.\u00a0 But we all know that is not going to happen anytime soon.<\/p>\n ____________________________<\/p>\n Ajamu Baraka<\/i> was the founding Director of the US Human Rights Network until June 2011.\u00a0 He is currently a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, where he is editing a book on human rights entitled <\/i>\u201cThe Fight Must be for Human Rights: Voices from the Frontline.\u201d The book is due to be published in 2013.\u00a0\u00a0<\/i>www.ajamubaraka.com<\/a><\/p>\n