For a president that is executing Bush’s “war on terror” against Al-Qaeda and “it’s affiliates,\u201d it seems odd that President Obama has targeted the secular Syrian government for “regime change.\u201d<\/p>\n
Equally odd is that Obama’s strongest military ally on the ground in Syria- the best equipped and effective fighting force against the Syrian Government \u2014 is Jabhat al-Nusra, a group that has affiliated itself with\u00a0 al-Qaeda, and aims to turn Syria into an extremist Islamic state that enforces a fundamentalist version of Sharia law.<\/p>\n
It’s difficult to know exactly how al-Nursa received its guns, but one can make an educated guess.\u00a0For example, The New York Times explained in detail <\/strong><\/a>how the CIA has been in a massive arms trafficking operation that has already funneled thousands of tons of guns from Saudi Arabia and Qatar to Syria:<\/p>\n “The C.I.A. role in facilitating the [weapons] shipments\u2026 gave the United States a degree of influence over the process [of weapon distribution]\u2026American officials have confirmed that senior White House officials were regularly briefed on the [weapons] shipments.”<\/p>\n Where are the guns winding up in this massive arms trafficking operation? An important question to ask is: which rebels in Syria have guns and which ones don’t.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The Guardian reports <\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cThe [secular] Free Syrian Army’s shortage of weapons and other resources compared with [jihadist] Jabhat al-Nusra is a recurrent theme… \u2018If you join al-Nusra, there is always a gun for you but many of the FSA brigades can’t even provide bullets for their fighters,’…3,000 FSA [Free Syrian Army]\u00a0men have joined al-Nusra in the last few months, mainly because of a lack of weapons and ammunition…Al-Nusra fighters rarely withdraw for shortage of ammunition…”<\/p>\n While it’s difficult to know if CIA trafficked guns are going directly or indirectly to al-Nursa, it’s extremely likely that these guns are going directly into the hands of ideological cousins of al-Nursa, since the Syrian rebels are completely dominated by Islamic extremists.<\/p>\n For example, when the Economist magazine was outlining the most important fighting groups in Syria, “Who’s Who in the Syrian Battlefield,\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0 <\/a>they noted with regret that the only important non-Islamist group was in the Kurdish areas, which is virtually an autonomous zone. As far as the secular U.S.-backed fighting group, The Supreme Military Command, the Economist conceded it “has little control on the ground.\u201d Keep in mind that the Economist is very much in favor of a U.S.-NATO military intervention in Syria.<\/p>\n The New York Times also confirmed the complete dominance of extremists <\/strong><\/a>on the rebel side:<\/p>\n “Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of.”<\/p>\n Thus, the minority of secular rebel fighters are not leading the civil war and will not be in power if Assad falls. Instead, honest Syrian revolutionaries will instantly fall victim to the extremists, who will immediately proceed to a mopping-up mission of their former allies.<\/p>\n It’s now clear that Obama’s foreign policy in Syria is actively encouraging terrorism.\u00a0Many rebel-controlled areas in Syria are now new safe havens for terrorists, and there have been hundreds of terrorist bombing attacks against the Syrian government, many of which have targeted civilian areas.<\/p>\n While the U.S. is pouring arms into the jihadist-controlled areas, they have also\u00a0downplayed the atrocities committed by these rebels, which are well documented on Youtube and include a multitude of war crimes that include beheadings, group execution of prisoners, ethnic cleansing <\/strong><\/a>, and the recent episode where a famous rebel commander was videotaped mutilating a dead Syrian solider and eating his heart<\/strong>.\u00a0 <\/a><\/p>\n By minimizing this barbarism the Obama administration ensures that it will continue, since the extremists are empowered by U.S. support and are shielded in the U.S. media and protected from international political pressures.<\/p>\n One question the U.S. media never thinks of asking is: Where did all these Islamic extremists come from and why?\u00a0The Sunni Islamic opposition inside Syria has long been religiously moderate, implying that many of the extremists are foreigners.<\/p>\n The ideological source of this extremism came from Saudi Arabian religious figures and their allies, who use Islam as a political tool to target nations “unfriendly” to Saudi Arabia and the United States.\u00a0The most glaring example of this in regard to Syria was the Fatwa (official interpretation\/statement) issued by 107 Islamic scholars<\/strong> <\/a>that denounced the Syrian government and encouraged Muslims to fight against it. The statement essentially encouraged jihad, though the word wasn’t mentioned explicitly.<\/p>\n The statement includes:<\/p>\n “It is a duty for all Muslims to support the revolutionaries in Syria [against the government] \u201cso that they can successfully complete their revolution and attain their rights and their freedom.\u201d<\/p>\n The hypocrisy of such a statement is almost too glaring: the many Saudi figures who signed the document that want “freedom” in Syria are not demanding freedom in Saudi Arabia, by far the country with the least amount of freedoms in the world.<\/p>\n With Saudi Arabia and Qatar providing guns to the Syrian rebels \u2014 with help from the CIA \u2014 the Saudi religious figures attached to the Saudi regime give religious\/political support by misleading devout Muslims to flock to Syria to attack a country of Muslims, thus creating the giant sectarian divisions we now see throughout the Islamic world.<\/p>\n The vast majority of this Islamic sectarian warfare is exported by Saudi Arabia, which funds radical Islamic schools all over the Middle East that attract the downtrodden of these countries by providing basic social services that the host country is too poor \u2014 or unwilling \u2014 to provide.\u00a0 There is an informative chapter on this dynamic in Vijay Prashad’s excellent book, A People’s History of the Third World.<\/p>\n Now the debate among U.S.-NATO countries is whether to give more sophisticated weaponry to the extremist-dominated rebels in Syria.\u00a0The Obama Administration is pressuring the European Union <\/strong><\/a>to drop its arms embargo on Syria so that a new torrent of weapons can flood the country (apparently the CIA operations haven’t yet completely drenched Syria with guns).<\/p>\n In response to the “drop the embargo” discussion, Oxfam intelligently responded <\/strong><\/a>by saying:<\/p>\n “Sending arms to the Syrian opposition won’t create a level playing field. Instead, it risks further fueling an arms free-for-all where the victims are the civilians of Syria. Our experience from other conflict zones tells us that this crisis will only drag on for far longer if more and more arms are poured into the country.”<\/p>\n One EU diplomat gave a scathing rebuke to the Obama Administration’s claim <\/strong><\/a>that it could ensure that new weapons wouldn’t wind up in “the wrong hands” in Syria:<\/p>\n “It would be the first conflict where we pretend we could create peace by delivering arms,” the diplomat said. “If you pretend to know where the weapons will end up, then it would be the first war in history where this is possible. We have seen it in Bosnia, Afghanistan and Iraq. Weapons don’t disappear; they pop up where they are needed.”<\/p>\n In Syria the weapons are needed by those doing the brunt of the fighting. Again, the al-Nursa extremists are widely acknowledged to be the most effective fighting force against the Syrian government, the guns will thus flow to them.<\/p>\n Obama has taken the saying, \u201cthe enemy of my enemy is my friend,\u201d to irrational heights, and in so doing is helping to produce a new generation of Islamic extremists that will help fuel the U.S.-led never-ending “war on terror.\u201d\u00a0 The real intention of the War on Terror is not to stop terrorists, but to target nation states that are opposed to U.S. foreign policy: Iraq and Libya \u2014 like Syria \u2014 were both secular countries at the time of their being invaded; Afghanistan was invaded even though the vast majority of those involved in the 9-11 attacks were from Saudi Arabia.\u00a0There was no terrorist problem in Iraq before the U.S. invaded, just like there was no terrorist problem in Syria before the U.S.-backed rebels came onto the scene.<\/p>\n It’s blatantly obvious to most Americans that Syria and Iran are at the top of Obama’s war list, a much higher priority than any terrorist group.\u00a0This is why Obama is tolerating the terrorist groups inside Syira; they are being used as tools against his real target, Syria and then Iran. NOTES:<\/b><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/03\/25\/world\/middleeast\/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html?hp&_r=1& <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2013\/may\/08\/free-syrian-army-rebels-defect-islamist-group <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.economist.com\/blogs\/graphicdetail\/2013\/05\/daily-chart-12 <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/04\/28\/world\/middleeast\/islamist-rebels-gains-in-syria-create-dilemma-for-us.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2&hp& <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/08\/04\/opinion\/syrias-crumbling-pluralism.html?_r=3& <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.islam21c.com\/fataawa\/2407-fatwa-on-syria-by-107-scholars <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2013\/may\/22\/syria-arms-embargo-rebels <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2013\/may\/22\/syria-arms-embargo-rebels?guni=Network%20front:network-front%20main-3%20Main%20trailblock:Network%20front%20-%20main%20trailblock:Position5 <\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/europe\/divided-europe-imperils-syrian-arms-embargo-8632376.html <\/a><\/p>\n __________________________<\/p>\n Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action ( www.workerscompass.org <\/a>). He can be reached at shamuscooke@gmail.com.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe Syrian people must be left to themselves to decide their future.\u00a0The United States is utterly incapable of “helping” countries by using military means, as the fractured nations of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya painfully prove.\u00a0The global anti-war movement must demand Hands Off Syria!<\/p>\n