{"id":294622,"date":"2025-05-05T12:00:56","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T11:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=294622"},"modified":"2025-05-05T10:22:59","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T09:22:59","slug":"close-the-us-military-bases-in-asia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2025\/05\/close-the-us-military-bases-in-asia\/","title":{"rendered":"Close the US Military Bases in Asia"},"content":{"rendered":"

The best strategy for the superpowers is to stay out of each other\u2019s lanes.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

21 Apr 2025 –<\/em> President Donald Trump is again loudly complaining that the US military bases in Asia are too costly for the US to bear.\u00a0 As part of the new round of tariff negotiations with Japan and Korea<\/a>, Trump is calling on Japan and Korea to pay for stationing the US troops.\u00a0 Here\u2019s a much better idea: close the bases and return the US servicemen to the US.<\/p>\n

Trump implies that the US is providing a great service to Japan and Korea by stationing 50,000 troops in Japan and nearly 30,000 in Korea.\u00a0 Yet these countries do not need the US to defend themselves.\u00a0 They are wealthy and can certainly provide their own defense.\u00a0 Far more importantly, diplomacy can ensure the peace in northeast Asia far more effectively and far less expensively than US troops.<\/p>\n

The US acts as if Japan needs to be defended against China.\u00a0 Let\u2019s have a look.\u00a0 During the past 1,000 years, during which time China was the region\u2019s dominant power for all but the last 150 years, how many times did China attempt to invade Japan?\u00a0 If you answered zero, you are correct.\u00a0 China did not attempt to invade Japan on a single occasion.<\/p>\n

You might quibble.\u00a0 What about the two attempts in 1274 and 1281, roughly 750 years ago? It\u2019s true that when the Mongols temporarily ruled China between 1271 and 1368, the Mongols twice sent expeditionary fleets to invade Japan, and both times were defeated by a combination of typhoons (known in Japanese lore as the Kamikaze winds) and by Japanese coastal defenses.<\/p>\n

Japan, on the other hand, made several attempts to attack or conquer China.\u00a0 In 1592, the arrogant and erratic Japanese military leader Toyotomi Hideyoshi launched an invasion of Korea with the goal of conquering Ming China.\u00a0 He did not get far, dying in 1598 without even having subdued Korea.\u00a0 In 1894-5, Japan invaded and defeated China in the Sino-Japanese war, taking Taiwan as a Japanese colony.\u00a0 In 1931, Japan invaded northeast China (Manchuria) and created the Japanese colony of Manchukuo.\u00a0 In 1937,\u00a0 Japan invaded China, starting World War II in the Pacific region.
\nNobody thinks that Japan is going to invade China today, and there is no rhyme, reason, or historical precedent to believe that China is going to invade Japan.\u00a0 Japan has no need for the US military bases to protect itself from China.<\/p>\n

The same is true of China and Korea.\u00a0 During the past 1,000 years, China never invaded Korea, except on one occasion: when the US threatened China.\u00a0 China entered the war in late 1950 on the side of North Korea to fight the US troops advancing northward towards the Chinese border.\u00a0 At the time, US General Douglas MacArthur recklessly recommended attacking China with atomic bombs.\u00a0 MacArthur also proposed to support Chinese nationalist forces, then based in Taiwan, to invade the Chinese mainland. President Harry Truman, thank God, rejected MacArthur\u2019s recommendations.
\nSouth Korea needs deterrence against North Korea, to be sure, but that would be achieved far more effectively and credibly through a regional security system including China, Japan, Russia, North Korea, South Korea, than through the presence of the US, which has repeatedly stoked North Korea\u2019s nuclear arsenal and military build-up, not diminished it.<\/p>\n

In fact, the US military bases in East Asia are really for the US projection of power, not for the defense of Japan or Korea.\u00a0 This is even more reason why they should be removed.\u00a0 Though the US claims that its bases in East Asia are defensive, they are understandably viewed by China and North Korea as a direct threat \u2013 for example, by creating the possibility of a decapitation strike, and by dangerously lowering the response times for China and North Korea to a US provocation or some kind of misunderstanding.\u00a0 Russia vociferously opposed NATO in Ukraine for the same justifiable reasons.\u00a0 NATO has frequently intervened in US-backed regime-change operations and has placed missile systems dangerously close to Russia.\u00a0 Indeed, just as Russia feared, NATO has actively participated in the Ukraine War, providing armaments, strategy, intelligence, and even programming and tracking for missile strikes deep inside of Russia.<\/p>\n

Note that Trump is currently obsessed with two small port facilities in Panama owned by a Hong Kong company, claiming that China is threatening US security (!), and wants the facilities sold to an American buyer.\u00a0 The US on the other hand surrounds China not with two tiny port facilities but with major US military bases in Japan, South Korea, Guam, the Philippines, and the Indian Ocean near to China\u2019s international sea lanes.<\/p>\n

The best strategy for the superpowers is to stay out of each other\u2019s lanes.\u00a0 China and Russia should not open military bases in the Western Hemisphere, to put it mildly.\u00a0 The last time that was tried, when the Soviet Union placed nuclear weapons in Cuba in 1962, the world nearly ended in nuclear annihilation.\u00a0 (See Martin Sherwin\u2019s remarkable book, Gambling with Armageddon for the shocking details on how close the world came to nuclear Armageddon).\u00a0 Neither China nor Russia shows the slightest inclination to do so today, despite all of the provocations of facing US bases in their own neighborhoods.<\/p>\n

Trump is looking for ways to save money \u2013 an excellent idea given that the US federal budget is hemorrhaging $2 trillion dollars a year, more than 6% of US GDP.\u00a0 Closing the US overseas military bases would be an excellent place to start.<\/p>\n

Trump even seemed to point that way at the start of his second term, but the Congressional Republicans have called for increases, not decreases, in military spending.\u00a0 Yet with America\u2019s 750 or so overseas military bases in around 80 countries, it\u2019s high time to close these bases, pocket the saving, and return to diplomacy.\u00a0 Getting the host countries to pay for something that doesn\u2019t help them or the US is a huge drain of time, diplomacy, and resources, both for the US and the host countries.<\/p>\n

The US should make a basic deal with China, Russia, and other powers.\u00a0 \u201cYou keep your military bases out of our neighborhood, and we\u2019ll keep our military bases out of yours.\u201d Basic reciprocity among the major powers would save trillions of dollars of military outlays over the coming decade and, more importantly, would push the Doomsday Clock back from\u00a089 seconds to nuclear Armageddon<\/a>.<\/p>\n

______________________________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a> Jeffrey D. Sachs, Professor of Sustainable Development and Professor of Health Policy and Management at Columbia University, is Director of Columbia\u2019s Center for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. He has served as Special Adviser to three UN Secretaries-General [Kofi Annan (2001-7), Ban Ki-moon (2008-16), and currently serves as an SDG Advocate under Secretary-General Ant\u00f3nio Guterres. His books include <\/em>The End of Poverty<\/a>, Common Wealth<\/a>, The Age of Sustainable Development<\/a>, Building the New American Economy<\/a>, and most recently,<\/em> A New Foreign Policy: Beyond American Exceptionalism<\/a>. Sachs was also an advisor to the last leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, as well as to the first president of the Russian Federation, Boris Yeltsin.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The best strategy for the superpowers is to stay out of each other\u2019s lanes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":229079,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[120,504,95,70,126,118],"class_list":["post-294622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-militarism","tag-conflict","tag-international-relations","tag-us-military","tag-usa","tag-violence","tag-war"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=294622"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":294793,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294622\/revisions\/294793"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/229079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=294622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=294622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=294622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}