{"id":295696,"date":"2025-05-26T12:00:43","date_gmt":"2025-05-26T11:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=295696"},"modified":"2025-05-21T04:48:29","modified_gmt":"2025-05-21T03:48:29","slug":"rethinking-us-china-relations-after-the-tariffs-shipwreck","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2025\/05\/rethinking-us-china-relations-after-the-tariffs-shipwreck\/","title":{"rendered":"Rethinking US-China Relations after the Tariffs Shipwreck"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

20 May 2025\u00a0–\u00a0When Donald Trump<\/strong> imposed his sweeping tariffs on 2 Apr, he had two main objectives:<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Reduce the trade deficits<\/li>\n
  2. Bring jobs and manufacturing back to the United States<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    These were the stated goals but, as we soon found out, the real aim was to weaken China by preventing them from selling goods to US consumers. The Trump administration also used the tariffs to isolate China by providing incentives to the nations that agreed to reduce their trade with Beijing. In short, the tariffs were the main weapon in a trade war on a peer competitor who has overtaken the US in nearly every area of industrial and technological production<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Fortunately, Trump\u2019s plan failed, and he was forced to ease the tariffs without achieving any of his main objectives. The reason we say \u201cfortunately\u201d is because the tariffs policy never served the interests of the American people. Quite the contrary, Americans are hurt by unilateral policies that ignore the rules of international trade and needlessly disrupt supply chains. All that does is push prices higher, reduce employment and slow growth<\/b>. Besides, manipulating tariffs with the intention of destroying a rival violates a number of widely accepted WTO rules that protect the interests of everyone.<\/span><\/p>\n

    In contrast to the US, China acted in a way that was consistent with their broader social philosophy which is rooted in their unique interpretation of socialism. They took the moral high ground, acted on principle, and refused to give in to Trump\u2019s coercion. They only initiated countermeasures in response to Trump\u2019s tariffs blitz that completely ignored the rules<\/b> articulated in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) <\/b>which stipulates that countries cannot arbitrarily exceed \u201cbound rates\u201d or selectively target one country with 145% tariffs. (which is the equivalent of an embargo.) By acting alone, Trump basically showed his contempt for the international system and for any legal constraints on his own power. This is from the Global Times<\/em>:<\/span><\/p>\n

    The multilateral trading system with the WTO at its core is the cornerstone of international trade and plays an important role in global economic governance<\/b>. All parties should resolve differences and disputes through equal-footed dialogue under the framework of the WTO, jointly uphold multilateralism and free trade, and promote the stability and smooth functioning of global industrial and supply chains. Global Times<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    In other words, Trump\u2019s loss was a victory for the system of international trade. But it was also a victory for China because China \u2018stuck to its guns\u2019 and refused to bow to Washington\u2019s bullying. Here\u2019s more from Bloomberg<\/em>:<\/span><\/p>\n

    Xi Jinping\u2019s decision to stand his ground against Donald Trump could hardly have gone any better for the Chinese leader. <\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    After two days of high-stakes talks in Switzerland, trade negotiators from the world\u2019s biggest economies announced Monday a massive de-escalation in tariffs. In a carefully coordinated joint statement, the US slashed duties on Chinese products to 30% from 145% for a 90-day period, while Beijing dropped its levy on most goods to 10%.<\/span><\/p>\n

    The dramatic reduction exceeded expectations in China, and sent the dollar and stocks soaring \u2014 providing some much-needed market relief for Trump, who is facing pressure as inflation looks set to speed up at home. Chinese equities also surged. The deal ended up meeting nearly all of Beijing\u2019s core demands. The elevated \u201creciprocal\u201d tariff for China, which Trump set at 34% on April 2, has been suspended \u2014 leaving America\u2019s top rival with the same 10% rate that applies to the UK, a longtime ally\u2026.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u201cThis is arguably the best outcome that China could have hoped for \u2014 the US backed down,\u201d <\/b>said Trey McArver, co-founder of research firm Trivium China. \u201cGoing forward, this will make the Chinese side confident that they have leverage over the US in any negotiations.\u201d , Swiss Info<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

    Repeat: This is the best outcome that China could have hoped for \u2014 the US backed down.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    TO CONTINUE READING Go to Original – globalresearch.ca<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    20 May 2025 – When Trump imposed his tariffs on 2 Apr, the real aim was to weaken China by preventing it from selling to US consumers; also to isolate China through incentives to those that reduced trade with Beijing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":295697,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[169],"tags":[240,244,278,3465,339,249,70,1038],"class_list":["post-295696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trade","tag-asia","tag-china","tag-russia","tag-tariffs","tag-trade","tag-trump","tag-usa","tag-xi-jinping"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=295696"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295696\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":295699,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295696\/revisions\/295699"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/295697"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=295696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=295696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=295696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}