{"id":297206,"date":"2025-06-23T12:01:21","date_gmt":"2025-06-23T11:01:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=297206"},"modified":"2025-06-22T11:42:28","modified_gmt":"2025-06-22T10:42:28","slug":"fundamental-strategic-importance-of-skin-as-a-metaphor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2025\/06\/fundamental-strategic-importance-of-skin-as-a-metaphor\/","title":{"rendered":"Fundamental Strategic Importance of Skin as a Metaphor"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><em>Comparison of Relevance to Leadership by Distinct Artificial Intelligences<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"intr\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>23 Jun 2025 &#8211; <\/em>The strategic and operational significance of &#8220;skin&#8221; has been clarified at length by <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nassim_Nicholas_Taleb\" >Nassim Nicholas Taleb<\/a> in his discussion of &#8220;skin in the game&#8221; as a metaphor (<em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Skin_in_the_Game_(book)\" title=\"Skin in the Game (book)\" >Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life<\/a><\/em>, 2018). This was a sequel to Taleb&#8217;s other related studies widely recognized as being of strategic relevance (<em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Antifragile_(book)\" title=\"Antifragile (book)\" >Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder<\/a><\/em>, \u00a02012;<em> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Black_Swan:_The_Impact_of_the_Highly_Improbable\" >The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable<\/a><\/em>, 2007). Curiously another metaphor which is fundamental to the strategic responses of leaders to criticism is that of &#8220;thin skin&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The second metaphor has long featured in commentary on Donald Trump as acclaimed leader of the free world (Stephen Collinson, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/edition.cnn.com\/2017\/01\/24\/politics\/trump-legitimacy-voter-fraud-inauguration-crowd\" ><em>President Donald Trump\u2019s thin skin<\/em><\/a>, <em>CNN Politics<\/em>, 25 January 2017;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/world-us-canada-39888641\" ><em> Is Trump&#8217;s thin skin getting in the way of his presidency?<\/em><\/a> <em>BBC<\/em>, 11 May 2017; Jesse Singal, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thecut.com\/2016\/10\/why-is-trumps-skin-so-much-thinner-than-clintons.html\" ><em>The Science of Donald Trump\u2019s Thin, Thin Skin<\/em><\/a>, <em>The Cut<\/em>, 7 October 2016). That thinness of skin has evoked widely cited comment of major global significance (Aimon Marks, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/inews.co.uk\/news\/world\/trumps-thin-skin-us-wider-war-iran-3752359\" ><em>Trump&#8217;s thin skin is dragging the US into wider war with Iran<\/em><\/a>, <em>Reddit<\/em>, 16 June 2025). The other metaphor has also been deemed of relevance (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/atlasgeographica.com\/donald-trump-skin-in-the-game\/\" ><em>Why Skin In The Game Explains Donald Trump\u2019s Popularity,<\/em><\/a> <em>Atlas Geographica<\/em>, 5 November 2020; Mark Goulston, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/mgoulston.medium.com\/trumps-thin-skin-vs-biden-s-need-for-skin-in-the-game-a-call-for-gravitas-f0fd6f18f32b\" ><em>Trump\u2019s Thin Skin vs. Biden\u2019s Need for \u201cSkin in the Game\u201d: A Call for Gravitas<\/em><\/a>, <em>Medium<\/em>, 6 June 2023)<\/p>\n<p>Such insights suggest that more might be derived of strategic relevance from the &#8220;skin&#8221; metaphor. The approach taken here was first to present the two metaphors to the Perplexity AI with the request to identify more such metaphors. As variously entangled, the metaphors frame a space in which the insights of the well known tales of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes\" ><em>The Emperor&#8217;s New Clothes<\/em><\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Boy_Who_Cried_Wolf\" ><em>The Boy Who Cried Wolf<\/em><\/a> are relevant, as previously discussed (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.laetusinpraesens.org\/musings\/memetale.php\" ><em>Entangled Tales of Memetic Disaster: Mutual implication of the Emperor and the Little Bo<\/em><\/a>y, 2009; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.laetusinpraesens.org\/docs00s\/faith.php#fant\" ><em>Complicity of governance in a collective fantasy: Emperor&#8217;s New Clothes<\/em><\/a>, 2009). Those insights invite further exploration (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/laetusinpraesens.org\/docs10s\/wolf.php\" ><em>&#8220;Big Brother&#8221; Crying &#8220;Wolf&#8221;? But them &#8220;wolves&#8221; are a-changin&#8217; &#8212; them&#8217;s becomin&#8217; &#8220;werewolves&#8221;!<\/em><\/a> 2013).<\/p>\n<p>Responding to five questions, the following exercise endeavours to elicit insights from a variety of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Large_language_model\" >large language models<\/a> in common use (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Perplexity_AI\" >Perplexity<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/ChatGPT\" >ChatGPT<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/DeepSeek\" >DeepSeek<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Claude_(language_model)\" >Claude<\/a>). Given the nature of the questions and the answers, there is a peculiar irony to Donald Trump&#8217;s highly publicised recent rejection of the argument that Iran did not have nuclear missile capability (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/news\/2025-06-21\/donald-trump-says-tulsi-gabbard-wrong-on-iran-nuclear-program\/105445142\" ><em>Trump says &#8216;my intelligence community is wrong&#8217; on Iran<\/em><\/a>, <em>ABC<\/em>, 21 June 2025; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/gabbard-trump-intelligence-iran-nuclear-program-51c8d85d536f8628870c110ac05bb518\" ><em>Trump dismisses US spy agencies&#8217; assessment on Iran&#8217;s nuclear weaponry<\/em><\/a>, <em>AP<\/em>, 18 June 2025; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/politics\/americas-spies-say-iran-wasnt-building-a-nuclear-weapon-trump-dismisses-that-assessment\" ><em>America\u2019s spies say Iran wasn\u2019t building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment<\/em><\/a>, <em>PBS<\/em>, 17 June 2025). For many this problematic involvement of the intelligence community recalls only too vividly the assertion of possession of weapons of mass destruction by Iraq (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Senate_Report_on_Iraqi_WMD_Intelligence\" ><em>Senate Report on Iraqi WMD Intelligence<\/em><\/a>, 2004; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/iraq-war-wmds-us-intelligence-f9e21ac59d3a0470d9bfcc83544d706e\" ><em>Iraq WMD failures shadow US intelligence 20 years late<\/em><\/a>r, <em>AP<\/em>, 23 March 2023).<\/p>\n<p>Readers can of course pose the same questions, possibly in amended form &#8212; or in the light of new insights. Curiously the AI responses do not consider the implications of &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/dictionary.reverso.net\/english-definition\/comfortable+in+one%27s+own+skin\" >feeling good in one&#8217;s skin<\/a>&#8221; &#8212; and especially what that might imply for a leader or for a civilization. That phrase can be understood as embodying the outcome of a variety of strategic goals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.laetusinpraesens.org\/musings\/skindeep.php\" >TO CONTINUE READING Go to Original &#8211; laetusinpraesens.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>23 Jun 2025 &#8211; Comparison of Relevance to Leadership by Distinct Artificial Intelligences &#8211; The strategic and operational significance of &#8220;skin&#8221; has been clarified at length by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his discussion of &#8220;skin in the game&#8221; as a metaphor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":132665,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[1733],"class_list":["post-297206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-transcend-members","tag-artificial-intelligence-ai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=297206"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":297207,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297206\/revisions\/297207"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/132665"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=297206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=297206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}