{"id":304770,"date":"2025-10-13T12:00:39","date_gmt":"2025-10-13T11:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=304770"},"modified":"2025-10-11T08:58:52","modified_gmt":"2025-10-11T07:58:52","slug":"africa-will-be-free-when-the-imf-stops-colluding-to-steal-its-wealth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2025\/10\/africa-will-be-free-when-the-imf-stops-colluding-to-steal-its-wealth\/","title":{"rendered":"Africa Will Be Free When the IMF Stops Colluding to Steal Its Wealth"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

In countries like Senegal, the IMF has been complicit with irregular debt practices and fraudulent accounting in order to undermine sovereignty and favour multinational corporations.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

9 Oct 2025\u00a0<\/em>–\u00a0In February 2025, Senegal\u2019s Court of Auditors released<\/a> a report<\/a> that found \u2018anomalies\u2019 in the management of public finances between 2019 and 2024, during the presidency of Macky Sall (2012\u20132024). For instance, the court found that while Sall\u2019s government had suggested that the budget deficit for 2023 was 4.9% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), it was in fact 12.3%. The court went to work on this reconstruction of public finances because of a very significant accusation<\/a> made by Senegal\u2019s new prime minister, Ousmane Sonko, at a press conference in Dakar in September 2024. What the auditors found, and what the International Monetary Fund (IMF) validated<\/a>, was that the actual debt ratio in 2023 was 99.7% of GDP \u2013 not 74.7% \u2013\u00a0and that the deficit had been underestimated by 5.6% of GDP (in August 2025, the debt ratio was revised<\/a> to 111% of GDP).<\/p>\n

The financial situation in Senegal, Prime Minister Sonko said, is \u2018catastrophic\u2019 because of three problems inherited from the decade of Sall\u2019s rule:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. An \u2018unbridled debt policy\u2019 that increased the country\u2019s public debt while erasing the possibility of any growth to pay off that debt.<\/li>\n
  2. An administration that hid this indebtedness and the deep problems in the economy from the Senegalese people (who nonetheless rejected Sall\u2019s chosen successor, Amadou Ba, in the March 2024 presidential elections and chose Bassirou Diomaye Faye instead).<\/li>\n
  3. \u2018Widespread corruption\u2019, including the defrauding<\/a> of the country\u2019s COVID fund by four ministers.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The evidence that Sall\u2019s government knowingly bankrupted their country and stole from its exchequer is slowly being amassed by President Faye and Prime Minister Sonko. Faye (born in 1980) and Sonko (born in 1974) are both former tax officials who went into politics frustrated by the levels of incompetence, fraud, and corruption in Senegal\u2019s politics and bureaucracy. As young men with patriotic ideals, Faye and Sonko studied at the \u00c9cole nationale d\u2019administration (National School of Administration) and then met in the Directorate General of Taxes and Estates (DGID), where Sonko had created the Autonomous Union of Tax and Estate Agents.<\/p>\n

    In 2011, the Canadian company SNC-Lavalin won a $50 million contract to build a mineral sands processing plant in Grande C\u00f4te. However, it was later revealed<\/a> in the Paradise Papers<\/a> that the Senegalese government had signed the contract with an entity known as SNC-Lavalin Mauritius. In other words, the Canadian company had become a Mauritian company (conveniently, there was a tax treaty between Senegal and Mauritius that exempted companies registered in Mauritius from paying taxes in Senegal). Due to this shift in jurisdiction, SNC-Lavalin was able to avoid paying at least $8.9 million in taxes to Senegal (SNC-Lavalin\u2019s annual revenues are about $6 billion \u2013 a third the size of the GDP of Senegal, which has a population of 18 million).<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

    Prime Minister Sonko was a vocal opponent of this project and, in January 2014, formed a political party called African Patriots of Senegal for Work, Ethics, and Fraternity (PASTEF<\/a>) to carry on the fight. In 2017, he won a seat in the National Assembly, where he raised the issue of tax havens and corporate theft. \u2018A tax haven can be a paradise for multinationals that want to avoid paying taxes\u2019, he said<\/a> in 2018. \u2018But for the country, it is hell\u2019. In 2019, Sonko won nearly 16% of the vote in a contentious presidential election. In the 2022 municipal and parliamentary elections, there were major gains for a PASTEF-led coalition called Yewwi Askan Wi (Free the People), with the Socialist Party of Senegal\u2019s candidate Barth\u00e9l\u00e9my Dias elected mayor of Dakar. Then-President Sall was furious with these former tax officials and sought to ban their party and silence Sonko. This led to major demonstrations in 2023\u20132024 that culminated in the electoral victory of Faye and Sonko. It is no surprise that these former tax officials dug into the accountants\u2019 ledgers and uncovered evidence of fraud.<\/p>\n

    But are Sall and his government the only ones guilty of fraud? After all, the entire bureaucracy in Senegal, including the Court of Auditors, did not seem to act on the complaints made by Sonko and others, nor on the revelations from the Paradise Papers.<\/p>\n

    Perhaps the most striking act of malfeasance is not by the Senegalese government but by the IMF. Since Sonko began to raise this issue in 2017, the IMF has published at least seven staff reports on Senegal, none of which indicated that there was any problem with the reporting arrangements on debt or on finances. The IMF\u2019s 2019 staff report<\/a>, for instance, noted that Senegal\u2019s audit arrangements conformed to the International Financial Reporting Standards<\/a> and that the country had subscribed to the IMF\u2019s own Special Data Dissemination Standard<\/a> in 2017. If the IMF signed off on the data being provided by Senegal, then it is just as liable for fraud as the Sall government and should be held to account.<\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n

    In October 2024, following revelations of budgetary misreporting, the IMF suspended<\/a> Senegal\u2019s lending programme. In March 2025, the IMF\u2019s staff report<\/a> noted the \u2018need for urgent reforms\u2019 in Senegal\u2019s bureaucracy and institutions (but not of the IMF itself). Around the same time, IMF spokesperson Juli Kozack said<\/a> that Senegal might not need to return the fraudulent borrowings of the Sall government because of the good faith with which the Faye-Sonko government conducted an audit to unravel these irregularities. However, this waiver came with strings attached, as it was to be part of the negotiations between the IMF and Senegal.<\/p>\n

    The IMF showed its hand in the August 2025 staff report<\/a> \u2013 it wanted to use the possibility of a waiver to extract concessions from the new government, including structural changes to erode whatever remained of Senegalese sovereignty. The Faye-Sonko government won a popular mandate to strengthen sovereignty. The IMF is using the Faye-Sonko government\u2019s honesty about the previous government\u2019s fraud to undermine it. What the IMF seeks is greater access to \u2018strategic sectors\u2019 (such as energy and agriculture) via multinational corporations, tighter fiscal discipline by the government (i.e., less social spending for the working class and peasantry), and a continuation of Sall\u2019s 2014 Plan Senegal \u00c9mergent<\/a>, which uses technocratic buzzwords to mask the drain of wealth into the hands of foreign multinationals and the Senegalese elite. The waiver will hang over Faye-Sonko\u2019s government to coerce them to exchange their agenda of sovereignty for the IMF\u2019s agenda of subservience.<\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n

    The case of Senegal is not unusual. In the 1980s, US-backed military governments in Latin America conducted off-budget borrowings, which the IMF took seriously in word but not in action. In 2000, the IMF identified<\/a> misreporting by Pakistan\u2019s military government but again did nothing, particularly after Pakistan enthusiastically joined the US War on Terror in 2001. Around the same time, the IMF forgave<\/a> Ukraine for debt misreporting, once again acting under pressure from the US government as it sought to maintain President Leonid Kuchma\u2019s pro-Western orientation. Much the same happened to Congo-Brazzaville<\/a> in 2002 and Gambia<\/a> in 2003. In 2006, the IMF released a paper<\/a> on how to make the misreporting policies \u2018less onerous\u2019 so as not to burden countries with heavy penalties. This attitude informed the IMF\u2019s treatment of Mozambique<\/a> in 2016, when the energy exporter faced challenges from hidden debts.<\/p>\n

    Governments favoured by Washington are slapped on the wrist while governments eager to develop a sovereign policy are punished.<\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n

    In September, the great Senegalese musician Cheikh L\u00f4 (born 1955) released a new album called Maame<\/i> (2025). The album features a reggae track<\/a> called \u2018African Development\u2019 that starts with Cheikh L\u00f4 intoning the names of Cheikh Anta Diop, Thomas Sankara, and Nelson Mandela before he riffs on the words \u2018Free, free, free Africa\u2026 Africa must go be free\u2019. This song is a return to the source, to the hopes and aspirations when Senegal won its independence in 1960 and raised its flag under the leadership of its first president, L\u00e9opold S\u00e9dar Senghor. \u2018Health first\u2019, sings Cheikh L\u00f4, who goes on to list a number of demands:<\/p>\n

    Agriculture, livestock farming, fishing.
    \nEducation: temple of knowledge.
    \nVocational training.
    \nJob creation for youth.
    \nPublic security.
    \nPreserve natural resources.
    \nFight poverty.
    \nFight corruption.
    \nIndependent and fair justice.
    \nDevelop democracy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Freedom for Africa is far from guaranteed by the fifty-four flags that fly in in the fifty-four capitals on the continent. Freedom can only come when the people of Africa assert sovereign control over their own resources and emancipate themselves from the indignities of capitalism and imperialism.<\/p>\n

    _______________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a>Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at<\/em> Globetrotter. He is the director of <\/em>Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research<\/em><\/a> and a senior non-resident fellow at <\/em>Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies<\/em><\/a>, Renmin University of China. He has written more than 20 books, including <\/em>The Darker Nations<\/a> and <\/em>The Poorer Nations<\/a>. His latest book is <\/em>Washington Bullets<\/a>, with an introduction by Evo Morales Ayma.<\/em><\/p>\n

    Go to Original \u2013 thetricontinental.org<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    9 Oct 2025\u00a0–\u00a0In countries like Senegal, the IMF has been complicit with irregular debt practices and fraudulent accounting in order to undermine sovereignty and favour multinational corporations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":186469,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[127],"tags":[237,2642,550,563,3614,1289,551,1826],"class_list":["post-304770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-africa","tag-africa","tag-anti-imperialism","tag-corruption","tag-debt","tag-disaster-capitalism","tag-imf","tag-neocolonialism","tag-senegal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304770"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304770\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":304773,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304770\/revisions\/304773"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/186469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}