{"id":308240,"date":"2025-11-24T12:00:47","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T12:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=308240"},"modified":"2025-11-22T07:05:27","modified_gmt":"2025-11-22T07:05:27","slug":"corporate-media-parrot-dubious-drug-claims-that-try-to-justify-war-on-venezuela","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2025\/11\/corporate-media-parrot-dubious-drug-claims-that-try-to-justify-war-on-venezuela\/","title":{"rendered":"Corporate Media Parrot Dubious Drug Claims That Try to Justify War on Venezuela"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

19 Nov 2025\u00a0<\/em>–\u00a0Since August, the US has been amassing military assets in the Caribbean. Warships, bombers and thousands of troops<\/a> have been joined by the USS Gerald R. Ford<\/i>, the world\u2019s largest aircraft carrier, in the largest<\/a> regional deployment<\/a> in decades. Extrajudicial strikes against small vessels, which UN experts have decried<\/a> as violations of international law, have killed at least 80 civilians (CNN<\/b>, 11\/14\/25<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Many foreign policy analysts believe that regime change in Venezuela is the ultimate goal (Al Jazeera<\/b>, 10\/24\/25<\/a>; Left Chapter<\/b>, 10\/21\/25<\/a>), but the Trump administration instead claims it is fighting \u201cnarcoterrorism,\u201d accusing Caracas of flooding the US with drugs via the Cartel of the Suns and Tren de Aragua, both designated as foreign terrorist organizations.<\/p>\n

Over the years, Western media have endorsed Washington\u2019s Venezuela regime-change efforts at every turn, from cheerleading coup attempts to whitewashing deadly sanctions (FAIR.org<\/b>, 6\/13\/22<\/a>, 6\/4\/21<\/a>, 1\/22\/20<\/a>). Now, with a possible military operation that could have disastrous consequences, corporate outlets are making little effort to hold the US government accountable. Rather, they are unsurprisingly ceding the floor to the warmongers.<\/p>\n

Fabricating \u2018tensions\u2019<\/b><\/h3>\n
\"ABC:<\/p>\n

ABC<\/strong>\u2018s report (11\/18\/25<\/a>) presents at face value Trump\u2019s claimed rationale for a possible attack on Venezuela: \u201cto stop drug traffickers.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Despite Washington ominously amassing naval assets and issuing overt threats against Caracas, Western journalists often talk of \u201ctensions\u201d between the two countries (Fox<\/strong>, 11\/17\/25<\/a>; ABC<\/strong>, 11\/18\/25<\/a>), or even a \u201cshowdown\u201d (Wall Street Journal<\/b>, 10\/9\/25<\/a>; Washington Post<\/b>, 10\/25\/25<\/a>). This is conceptually similar to the framing of Israel\u2019s genocide in Gaza as a \u201cconflict\u201d with Hamas (FAIR.org<\/b>, 12\/8\/23<\/a>), except in this case the media does not have an equivalent of October 7 to rationalize all the atrocities by the US and its allies.<\/p>\n

Though the Trump administration has largely abandoned the traditional US exceptionalist<\/a> discourse of promoting \u201cfreedom\u201d and \u201cdemocracy,\u201d that has not stopped corporate journalists from relentlessly demonizing the Venezuelan government.<\/p>\n

Journalists are quick to label Venezuelan President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro, currently facing hundreds of Tomahawk missiles pointed at his country, an \u201cauthoritarian\u201d (Guardian<\/b>, 11\/14\/25<\/a>; New York Times<\/b>, 10\/15\/25<\/a>;) or an \u201cautocrat\u201d (Wall Street Journal<\/b>, 11\/5\/25<\/a>; Washington Post<\/b>, 10\/24\/25<\/a>). In contrast, the same pieces place no labels on the Trump administration despite its authoritarianism both at home and abroad (Guardian<\/b>, 10\/16\/25<\/a>; CNN<\/b>, 8\/13\/25<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Articles in the Guardian<\/b> (11\/6\/25<\/a>, 10\/22\/25<\/a>) describe US operations in Grenada (1983) and Panama (1989) as success stories, fawning over special operations forces while ignoring the deadly impact. The Panama City neighborhood of El Chorrillo<\/a> became known as \u201cLittle Hiroshima\u201d after civilians were massacred<\/a> there during the US invasion.<\/p>\n

Very few outlets recall more recent US interventions, such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, which according to Brown University\u2019s Costs of War project<\/a> have killed an estimated 4.5\u20134.7 million people over the past two decades. Such \u201caccumulation by waste<\/a>\u201d has seen $8 trillion<\/a> transferred to the military-industrial complex, Wall Street and Silicon Valley.<\/p>\n

Hiding the evidence<\/b><\/h3>\n
\"Drug<\/p>\n

The DEA\u2019s<\/em> 2025 National Drug Threat Assessment<\/a> says that Tren de Aragua\u2019s \u201cdrug trafficking <\/em>activity occurs mainly at the street level.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Washington\u2019s steady escalation in the Caribbean has evoked memories of the buildup to the Iraq War, when Washington also counted on crucial support from the media establishment to manufacture consent for imperialist war (FAIR.org<\/b>, 2\/5\/13<\/a>, 3\/22\/23<\/a>).<\/p>\n

At that time, corporate media parroted White House claims about Iraq\u2019s hidden arsenal, despite evidence that Iraq had destroyed its banned weapons arsenal, in contradiction to the White House\u2019s case for war (FAIR.org<\/b>, 2\/27\/03<\/a>). Fast forward more than 20 years, and once more there is ample information undermining the administration narrative, this time about \u201cnarcoterrorism.\u201d<\/p>\n

Reports<\/a> from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) have consistently found Venezuela\u2019s Eastern Caribbean corridor to be a marginal route for US-bound cocaine trafficking, with former UNODC director Pino Arlacchi estimating that only around 5% of Colombian-sourced drugs flow through Venezuela (L\u2019Antidiplomatico<\/b>, 8\/27\/25<\/a>).<\/p>\n

These findings have been corroborated by the DEA itself. For instance, the agency\u2019s 2024 National Drug Threat Assessment report<\/a> does not even include the word \u201cVenezuela.\u201d The 2025 report<\/a> only has a small section on the gang Tren de Aragua, which dismisses any ties to the Venezuelan government and places its drug trafficking activities \u201cmainly at the street level.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet these glaring flaws in the Trump administration\u2019s casus belli are often overlooked by Western media. Several outlets reporting on potentially imminent US strikes mention the White House\u2019s declared anti-narcotics mission but conveniently omit the fact that, even according to US agencies, fewer drugs flow through this region than many others (Guardian<\/b>, 11\/11\/25<\/a>; Washington Post<\/b>, 11\/14\/25<\/a>; Bloomberg<\/b>, 11\/14\/25<\/a>; New York Times<\/b>, 11\/14\/25<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Former UNODC director Arlacchi pointed out<\/a> that \u201cGuatemala is a drug corridor seven times more important than the Bolivarian \u2018narco-state\u2019 allegedly is.\u201d He accused Washington of hypocritically driving the anti-Venezuela narrative due to interest in its massive oil reserves.<\/p>\n

\u2018Maduro denies\u2019<\/b><\/h3>\n
\"l'AntiDiplimatico:<\/p>\n

The Italian outlet L\u2019Antidiplomatico<\/b> (8\/27\/25<\/a>) calls the \u201cCartel of the Suns \u201can entity as legendary as the Loch Ness monster, but suitable to justify sanctions, embargoes and threats of military intervention against a country that, coincidentally, sits on one of the largest oil reserves on the planet.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

With the \u201cnarcoterrorism\u201d accusations against Maduro and associates, Western journalists absolve US officials of the burden of proof (New York Times<\/b>, 11\/4\/25<\/a>; Financial Times<\/b>, 10\/6\/25<\/a>; Wall Street Journal<\/b>, 11\/5\/25<\/a>). There has never been any public evidence about Maduro, or other high-ranking Venezuelan officials indicted by the US, being involved in drug trafficking via the Cartel of the Suns, while a leaked US intelligence memo<\/a> rejected the notion of government ties to Tren de Aragua.<\/p>\n

The Cartel of the Suns\u2019 very existence is far from established, with subject experts contending that, while drug trafficking may be entwined with corruption in Venezuela\u2019s military, there is no evidence of a centralized structure going all the way up to the president (InSight Crime<\/b>, 11\/3\/25<\/a>, 8\/1\/25<\/a>; AFP<\/b>, 8\/29\/25<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Instead of exposing the unfounded accusations and providing data from experts and specialized agencies, Western outlets either let Trump\u2019s case for war go unchallenged, or merely present a dissenting opinion from Maduro, whom they have systematically demonized (New York Times<\/b>, 10\/06\/25<\/a>; DW<\/b>, 11\/14\/25<\/a>; NPR<\/b>, 11\/12\/25<\/a>; CBS<\/b>, 10\/15\/25<\/a>; CNN<\/b>, 11\/14\/25<\/a>).<\/p>\n

This behavior is certainly not new, as Western outlets have consistently pushed the unfounded \u201cnarcoterrorism\u201d narrative, going back to the first Trump administration (FAIR.org<\/b>, 9\/24\/19<\/a>). Similar unfounded accusations of drug trafficking were made against Nicaragua in the 1980s (Extra!<\/b>, 10\u201311\/87<\/a>, 7\u20138\/88<\/a>; FAIR.org<\/b>, 10\/10\/17<\/a>), which served to justify US attempts to overthrow the Sandinista government through the CIA-backed Contras.<\/p>\n

Warmongers to the stage<\/b><\/h3>\n
\"NYT:<\/p>\n

The New York Times<\/b>\u2019 Bret Stephens (11\/17\/25<\/a>) says that the Maduro government\u2019s \u201ccatastrophic misgovernance has generated a mass exodus of refugees\u201d\u2014a paragraph before writing that \u201ceconomic sanctions against the regime in Trump\u2019s first term\u201d succeeded in \u201cimmiserating ordinary people.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

In his typical style, Trump has sent mixed signals over whether he wants to strike targets inside Venezuela, with contradictory on-record and unofficial statements going back and forth. When asked if the White House is seeking regime change in Venezuela, Trump has been noncommittal (Wall Street Journal<\/b>, 11\/4\/25<\/a>). It is worth recalling that in June, Trump similarly sent all sorts of inconsistent<\/a> messages<\/a> before ultimately attacking Iran\u2019s nuclear facilities.<\/p>\n

True to form (FAIR.org<\/b>, 2\/9\/17<\/a>, 4\/13\/18<\/a>, 7\/3\/20<\/a>), many liberal establishment outlets have been more bellicose than the US president they have occasionally chided for murdering scores of civilians in the Caribbean (The Hill<\/b>, 10\/30\/25<\/a>; Foreign Policy<\/b>, 11\/7\/25<\/a>). The New York Times<\/b>\u2019 Bret Stephens (1\/14\/25<\/a>, 10\/10\/25<\/a>, 11\/17\/25<\/a>) has advocated for a regime-changing military intervention for months (FAIR.org<\/b>, 2\/12\/25<\/a>). Quite tellingly, Stephens does not regret supporting the Iraq War (New York Times<\/b>, 3\/21\/23<\/a>).<\/p>\n

The Washington Post<\/b> published an editorial (10\/10\/25<\/a>) after the recent Nobel Peace Prize award to far-right Venezuelan leader Mar\u00eda Corina Machado, arguing that US interests would be \u201cbetter served\u201d by someone like Machado, a firm endorser of US-led regime-change (FAIR.org<\/b>, 10\/23\/25<\/a>). But with the war drums beating louder, the Jeff Bezos\u2013owned paper granted a column (11\/12\/25<\/a>) to John Bolton<\/a>, a former Trump adviser whose main criticism was that the administration is not being efficient enough in overthrowing Maduro.<\/p>\n

Bolton, an architect of the Iraq War, and of the \u201cmaximum pressure\u201d campaign against Venezuela during Trump\u2019s first term, bemoaned the White House\u2019s \u201cinadequate\u201d explanations about the ongoing lethal boat strikes and international quarrels as damaging the \u201claudable goal\u201d of throwing Venezuela into chaos.<\/p>\n

Bolton went on to urge the administration to create a better \u201cstrategy,\u201d which includes \u201cgreater efforts to strangle Caracas economically.\u201d The Washington Post<\/b> is happy to platform a call for escalating measures that have already caused tens of thousands of deaths (CEPR, 4\/25\/19<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Finally, the former Trump official says that \u201cwe owe it to ourselves and Venezuela\u2019s people\u201d to violently oust the Maduro government, despite opinion polls showing that such a military intervention is widely rejected both in the US<\/a> and in Venezuela<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Bloomberg<\/b> columnist Javier Blas (11\/4\/25<\/a>) went one step further by saying the quiet part out loud: \u201cVenezuelan Regime Change May Open Oil\u2019s Floodgates.\u201d Blas rejoiced at the prospect of a \u201cUS-enforced change of ideology\u201d that would install a \u201cpro-Western and pro-business government,\u201d which would do wonders for energy markets in the long run.<\/p>\n

Unfazed by the human cost of a military intervention, the corporate pundit was only concerned about the possible impact of Venezuela\u2019s current 1 million daily barrels of oil being wiped out. Who cares about millions of Venezuelans when a \u201cbrief military campaign\u201d could drive oil prices down and secure a steady supply in the 2030s?<\/p>\n

Complicity with war<\/b><\/h3>\n
\"NPR:<\/p>\n

Ranking House Intelligence Committee Democrat Jim Himes told NPR<\/strong> (11\/5\/25<\/a>) that \u201cthe administration has finally shared their legal defense for the strikes at sea\u201d\u2014though NPR<\/strong>\u2018s listeners did not get to hear what it is.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The White House\u2019s military build-up and illegal strikes have drawn widespread condemnation and opposition, even from within the US political establishment (NPR<\/b>, 11\/5\/25<\/a>; Intercept<\/b>, 10\/31\/25<\/a>). US politicians have also raised alarm bells about a potential military intervention in Venezuela without congressional approval (New York Times<\/b>, 11\/18\/25<\/a>; Politico<\/b>, 11\/6\/25<\/a>), but these voices feature much less prominently than the administration\u2019s.<\/p>\n

There is hope that a combination of Venezuelan defense deterrence with domestic and international pressure, coupled with Trump\u2019s own unpredictability, might ultimately avoid yet another US regime-change military assault.<\/p>\n

But should the worst come to pass, the media establishment will have once again done nothing to stop yet another deadly US foreign invasion. Over weeks of military buildup and threats, corporate outlets elected to ignore the evidence disproving Trump\u2019s claims and to platform warmongers. They will not wash the Venezuelan people\u2019s blood off their hands.<\/p>\n

_______________________________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ricardo Vaz is a political analyst and editor at <\/em>Venezuelanalysis.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Go to Original – fair.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

19 Nov 2025 – Many foreign policy analysts believe that regime change in Venezuela is the ultimate goal, but the Trump administration instead claims it is fighting \u201cnarcoterrorism,\u201d accusing Caracas of flooding the US with drugs via the Cartel of the Suns and Tren de Aragua, both designated as foreign terrorist organizations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":308241,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62],"tags":[867,2314,393,1138,1126,1113,1050,541,559,3324,2571,1190,2137,249,95,70,557,1365,1892],"class_list":["post-308240","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-media","tag-anglo-america","tag-corporate-media","tag-coup","tag-fake-news","tag-hegemony","tag-hoax","tag-imperialism","tag-latin-america-caribbean","tag-maduro","tag-north-america","tag-official-lies-and-narratives","tag-regime-change","tag-south-america","tag-trump","tag-us-military","tag-usa","tag-venezuela","tag-war-journalism","tag-war-on-drugs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308240","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=308240"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308240\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":308242,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308240\/revisions\/308242"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/308241"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=308240"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=308240"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=308240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}