{"id":313199,"date":"2026-02-16T12:00:52","date_gmt":"2026-02-16T12:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=313199"},"modified":"2026-02-13T19:20:41","modified_gmt":"2026-02-13T19:20:41","slug":"munich-security-conference-the-wests-premier-has-become-a-e20-million-militarist-echo-chamber","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2026\/02\/munich-security-conference-the-wests-premier-has-become-a-e20-million-militarist-echo-chamber\/","title":{"rendered":"Munich ‘Security’ Conference–The West\u2019s Premier Has Become a \u20ac20 Million Militarist Echo Chamber"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

13 Feb 2026 – The MSC\u2019s closed groupthink militarism offers only one prescription \u2014 more weapons \u2014 even as record military expenditures, squeezed from taxpayers in economic crisis, destroy diplomacy and drive escalation and the highest war risks in decades.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n
\n
\n

From Dialogue Forum to Militarised Ritual<\/strong><\/h2>\n

For decades, the Munich Security Conference (MSC)<\/a> – which opened today and runs till Sunday – was one of the few places where adversaries could meet without theatrics. Founded in 1963 as the Wehrkundetagung<\/em>, it served as a discreet Cold War dialogue forum between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even at moments of high tension, Soviet and later Russian representatives were present, and Munich allowed uncomfortable messages to be delivered directly rather than through press releases or military manoeuvres.<\/p>\n

That era has vanished. The MSC has become something entirely different: a \u20ac13\u201320 million annual gathering of a closed Western security elite, a polished meeting of governments, defence industries, major media and aligned think tanks, all wrapped in the language of dialogue but operating as a self\u2011reinforcing militarist echo chamber.<\/p>\n

A \u20ac20\u2011Million Structure That Predetermines Its Outcome<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The MSC\u2019s financing reveals its orientation more clearly than any mission statement. Roughly \u20ac5\u20137 million comes from the German federal government; \u20ac6\u201310 million from corporate sponsors, including major defence and security companies; and \u20ac2\u20133 million from foundations and institutional partners.<\/p>\n

When governments and arms\u2011industry actors are the primary funders, the gravitational pull inevitably shifts toward military\u2011centric definitions of security, technological solutions, alliance cohesion and deterrence doctrines, while peacebuilding, conflict transformation, diplomacy, mediation and non\u2011military approaches \u2014 which lack comparable financial backers \u2014 quietly disappear from the agenda.<\/p>\n

In consequence, the MSC will be devoid of free thinking, alternative non-military security measures and every vision of a better world.<\/p>\n

Speaking <\/strong>About<\/strong><\/em> the World, Not <\/strong>With<\/strong><\/em> It<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The MSC\u2019s agenda is curated by a tight circle of leadership, advisory\u2011council members, government partners, corporate sponsors and security\u2011aligned think tanks. Each layer reinforces the others, producing a remarkably coherent worldview in which the same actors define the problems, propose the solutions and moderate the discussions.<\/p>\n

Panels are dominated by Western officials, military leaders and analysts funded by the same governments and industries that support the MSC; moderators from major Western media outlets reinforce prevailing assumptions rather than interrogating them.<\/p>\n

The result is predictable: panels on Russia without Russians; panels on China with only one Chinese representative (its foreign minister whose different perspectives are hardly ever quoted by Western media); panels on peace without peace researchers; panels on the Global South without Global South voices.<\/p>\n

Thanks to remarkable intellectual inbreeding, the MSC increasingly speaks<\/em> about<\/em> adversaries, about diplomacy, about peace \u2014 but not with the actors<\/em> concerned, nor with those who work professionally on conflict resolution, least of all the UN.<\/p>\n

This is an intentional architecture crafted by the congregation of the NATO Church, and so it is only logical that its former Secretary\u2011General, Jens Stoltenberg, now takes over as its presiding priest.\u2022<\/p>\n

The Only Prescription: More Weapons<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Across the MSC, the policy prescriptions are strikingly uniform: more weapons, stronger deterrence,<\/em> longer\u2011range strike capabilities, higher military spending, deeper alliance integration.<\/p>\n

The logic is circular: insecurity is met with more armament, which produces more insecurity, which justifies more armament. Offensive long\u2011range deterrence is a 100 percent predictable insecurity generator, <\/em>because the opponent sees it as a threat, not reassurance – no matter your argument that you have no bad intentions.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the world has never spent more on weaponry than it does today, yet the objective risk of a major war is rising, not falling. Citizens facing economic crises are told to pay through their noses for \u201csecurity\u201d that demonstrably increases their risk.<\/p>\n

In any rational forum, someone would stand up and say: Something must be wrong: let us stop and think. At Munich, no one does.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Kabuki theatre must continue. Remember, anyone can start a fight in a bar – or a war – but it requires a few capacities to avoid war and create peaceful coexistence.<\/p>\n

From Dialogue to Narrative Consolidation<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Since the Obama-orchestrated Maidan regime-change in Kiev on 22 February 2014 and Russia\u2019s Crimea annexation of 18 March 2014, the MSC has steadily closed the door on dialogue with Russia \u2014 a far cry from 2007 when Putin gave his now historic low-key speech in which he asked what had happened to the promises given to Gorbachev about not expanding NATO one inch.<\/p>\n

The MSC has aligned itself fully with the strategic posture of NATO and the EU. Dialogue with adversaries has been replaced by discussions about<\/em> adversaries; panels on Russia or China are framed entirely through Western threat lenses; and the conference has become a stage where governments, industries, media and aligned academics reinforce a single worldview that defines security almost exclusively in military terms and is unable to see the larger world and its opportunities.<\/em><\/p>\n

The tragedy is not that the MSC has a perspective; the tragedy is that it has only one. And it is anything but trust, confidence, conflict-resolution and peace.<\/p>\n

The Missing Counterpart: A Global Peace Conference<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The MSC\u2019s official prominence and media attention highlights a deeper structural absence: there is no equivalent high\u2011level forum for peace. <\/em>No annual gathering where peace researchers, mediators, peace workers, conflict\u2011resolution practitioners, civil society, Global South voices, non\u2011aligned states and humanitarian actors and people of culture meet to explore non\u2011military approaches to security.<\/em><\/p>\n

The most unrealistic and debunked assumption<\/em> is that security is about arms and more arms lead to more stability, security and peace – the mantra of the NATO Church, no matter what the alliance does, including violating it own treaty 24\/7 since bombing Yugoslavia in 1999.<\/p>\n

There is no \u20ac20\u2011million (or cheaper) platform for diplomacy, prevention, reconciliation or structural peacebuilding; no global stage where peace is treated with the same seriousness, resources and media attention as deterrence, rearmament and unlimited militarist thinking.<\/p>\n

The imbalance is not accidental; it reflects political priorities and the MIMAC\u2011shaped worldview that now dominates Western security thinking.<\/p>\n

It is dead dangerous for you and me – in substance and because of its own self-affirming blindness.<\/p>\n

Understanding Munich for What It Has Become<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The Munich Security Conference no longer functions as a platform for dialogue between adversaries or as a space for exploring diverse approaches to security. Instead, it has become a high\u2011profile meeting point for a closed security groupthink \u2014 a place where elite interests converge, narratives are synchronised and the boundaries of acceptable discourse are tightly managed.<\/p>\n

It is time understand it honestly. It is time for free media (if they still exist) to have a critical perspective. Will they, or have they been co-opted completely?<\/p>\n

Until someone invests in a serious, well\u2011funded, global peace conference \u2014 something with the scale, visibility and ambition of Munich \u2014 the imbalance will remain. And so will the risks of warfare.<\/p>\n

Perhaps it is time for BRICS, the Belt & Road Initiative, a coalition of peace-willing in cooperation with the United Nations and non-Western regions and actors – governments and citizens – to arrange a conference for true peace and human security<\/em> where the military dimension has its proper – minimal – place.<\/p>\n

We must never accept that violence becomes the first resort. It should always be the last resort after everything else has been tried and found in vain.<\/p>\n

***************<\/p>\n

P.S.<\/strong> A conference that invites Mar\u00eda Corina Machado to speak about Venezuela, Lindsey Graham to speak about Russia, Tony Blair to speak about peace, and uses only conservative Western media as moderators, documents not global security thinking but the intellectual and ethical disarmament of a declining West and – who knows? – a disintegrating EU and NATO.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

__________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Prof. Jan Oberg, Ph.D. is director of the independent <\/em>Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research-TF<\/a>F<\/a> in Sweden and a member of the <\/em>TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment<\/a>. CV: <\/em>https:\/\/transnational.live\/jan-oberg<\/em><\/a>
\n<\/em>https:\/\/transnational.live<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Go to Original – thetransnational.substack.com<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

PAPER OF THE WEEK STAYS POSTED FOR 2 WEEKS BEFORE BEING ARCHIVED<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

13 Feb 2026\u00a0–\u00a0The MSC\u2019s closed groupthink militarism offers only one prescription \u2014 more weapons \u2014 even as record military expenditures, squeezed from taxpayers in economic crisis, destroy diplomacy and drive escalation and the highest war risks in decades.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":313202,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[241],"tags":[1817,2914,3010,1161,1188,1104,1268,739,3888,172],"class_list":["post-313199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-paper-of-the-week","tag-anti-militarism","tag-anti-nato","tag-armageddon","tag-arms-industry","tag-arms-race","tag-arms-trade","tag-european-union","tag-germany","tag-munich-security-report-2026","tag-west"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313199"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313199\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":313204,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313199\/revisions\/313204"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/313202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}