{"id":313341,"date":"2026-02-23T12:00:16","date_gmt":"2026-02-23T12:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=313341"},"modified":"2026-02-17T06:15:08","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T06:15:08","slug":"israel-just-started-legalizing-its-annexation-of-the-west-bank-heres-what-that-means","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2026\/02\/israel-just-started-legalizing-its-annexation-of-the-west-bank-heres-what-that-means\/","title":{"rendered":"Israel Just Started Legalizing Its Annexation of the West Bank–Here\u2019s What That Means"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

An Israeli flag overlooking an illegal Jewish settlement in the West Bank. Taken from the Israeli Herodian national park in the West Bank.\u00a0 (Photo: Jamie Lynn Ross\/Flickr)<\/p><\/div>\n

The Israeli government recently took radical steps to change the legal status quo in the West Bank. Here\u2019s what these changes mean and how they set the stage for annexation.<\/span><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

11 Feb 2026 –\u00a0<\/em>Israel just erased Palestinian existence from the West Bank by law, and it\u2019s not an overstatement.<\/p>\n

It has so far been commonplace to say that Israel\u2019s annexation of the West Bank exists in all but name, since a state of de facto<\/em> annexation was being established on the ground even though the West Bank was still regarded as legally separate. That changed on Sunday.<\/p>\n

While Israel did not announce a de jure<\/em> annexation of the West Bank, it has laid the legal groundwork for it. The Israeli government\u2019s security cabinet made a series of decisions on Sunday that changed the legal status quo in the West Bank, dramatically shrinking the already limited authority of the self-governing body known as the Palestinian Authority (PA). This signals the practical beginning of a formal annexation of the West Bank \u2014 starting with specific areas.<\/p>\n

\n

The Israeli security cabinet made a series of decisions on Sunday that changed the legal status quo in the West Bank. This signals the practical beginning of an annexation of the West Bank.<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n

The bill conferring these authorities to Israel was approved by the cabinet in its final draft, and is to be voted on by the Israeli Knesset. When it passes, Israel will have the authority to impose Israeli law in areas of the West Bank that had been under PA control, especially laws regulating building permits. The bill, originally introduced in 2023<\/a>\u00a0and known as \u201cthe Antiquities Bill,\u201d concerns dozens\u00a0of Palestinian historical sites in the West Bank. In addition, the Israeli cabinet decided on Sunday to allow Israelis to purchase real estate in those areas, paving the way for future Israeli settlement in Palestinian demographic centers.<\/p>\n

Background<\/strong>: How the West Bank is divided<\/h2>\n

Under the 1993 Oslo Accords, the West Bank was divided into three administrative regions, each under a different regime. About 61 percent of the West Bank, classified as Area C, fell under direct Israeli military and civil control, and the Palestinian communities that live there have been systematically displaced from their homes<\/a> at unprecedented rates in the past two years. It is in Area C where Palestinians are banned from building \u2014 and demolitions happen regularly \u2014 while Israeli settlements have been expanding for decades.<\/p>\n

Area B, making up 22 percent of the West Bank, falls under joint Israeli-PA control, with the PA running civil affairs without the presence of police, and the Israeli army controls security. The remaining 18 percent of the West Bank\u2019s territory falls under Area A, including the urban centers of some 15 cities serving as the power centers of the PA.<\/p>\n

This administrative division of the West Bank has effectively been the status quo since 1993, but Israel is now taking legal steps to erode PA authority in the areas over which it has partial control \u2014 Areas A and B \u2014 and the more it further erodes these authorities, the more Israel effectively collapses the legal distinction between the West Bank and Israel proper.<\/p>\n

\"Israeli
Israeli bulldozers working along Road-60, north of Ramallah.
\n(Photo: Qassam Muaddi\/Mondoweiss)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Major change: Israeli land purchases in the West Bank<\/h2>\n

The first part of Israel\u2019s Sunday cabinet decision is to revoke a Jordanian-era law that banned non-locals from purchasing real estate, except with a special government permit. Now, Israelis are allowed to directly purchase property in areas A and B, which had been previously possible.<\/p>\n

Israeli settlers have long been able to take control of Palestinian land in the West Bank, but often through underhanded means. Since 1967, Israel has funneled land to Israeli settlers by turning Palestinian land into \u201cmilitary zones,\u201d and later turning them into settlements. In addition, Israelis have also sought to purchase land through registered companies with unclear ownership that then transferred property to settlers. Israeli settler organizations have also established the practice<\/a> of searching for Palestinians entitled to property inheritance, living out of the country, and contacting them through companies to make buying offers.<\/p>\n

But the new changes mean that Israeli citizens will no longer have to go through such shady measures to acquire Palestinian land in the West Bank.<\/p>\n

While the cabinet\u2019s legal move doesn\u2019t mean that the Israeli government can now begin building settlements in the heart of Palestinian cities, it does mean that Israelis can directly reach out to Palestinians who own property in those cities and buy them.<\/p>\n

In this way, Israeli individuals or organizations can directly contact Palestinians in Palestine or in the diaspora and pressure them to sell their property titles. This is already the case in Jerusalem, even though the Jerusalemite Palestinian community has remained societally opposed to selling property to Israelis, viewing it as a form of settler colonial confiscation. Still, contentious land sales have occasionally taken place between Israelis with foreign passports and Palestinian Jerusalemites, especially when those property sales were signed by non-Palestinian religious authorities in Jerusalem, such as the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, Theophilus III<\/a>, and Jerusalem\u2019s Armenian Patriarch, Nourhan Manougian<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Since this has now become possible for Palestinian properties in Areas A and B, it paves the way for Israeli settlers to easily establish outposts inside Palestinian cities and towns, bringing with them an Israeli military presence for security. This is already the case in Hebron\u2019s Old City in an area known as H1, where Israel has segregated<\/a> the city\u2019s Palestinian inhabitants from Jewish Israeli settlers and shrunk the physical space available for Palestinian life and movement. Palestinians have also been subjected to strict Israeli military control, house raids, arrests, and surveillance, in addition to daily harassment from violent Israeli settlers.<\/p>\n

\"The
The Armenian Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem in 2014.
\n(Photo: Edmund Gall\/ Wikimedia)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

From land purchases to settlement expansion<\/h2>\n

To establish a settler outpost in a Palestinian city, it likely wouldn\u2019t start with a property purchase. Settlers would impose their presence in those areas under other pretexts. This is where the second part of Sunday\u2019s Israeli cabinet decision comes into play.<\/p>\n

By approving the final draft of the Antiquities Bill, Israel is preparing the grounds for taking administrative control of historic sites in Palestinian cities. Israeli settlers already storm these sites on a regular basis, usually citing religious claims.<\/p>\n

An example is Joseph\u2019s Tomb in Nablus. According to locals, the tomb contains the remains of a local holy man from the nineteenth century named Yousef Dweikat, while Israeli settlers claim it to be the resting place of the biblical figure, Joseph. Since 2021, Israeli forces have regularly raided Nablus with large troops in order to escort Israeli settlers to conduct prayers, injuring and killing Palestinians multiple times in the process. Sunday\u2019s cabinet decision would, legally speaking, allow settlers to establish a permanent foothold at the shrine, creating a situation similar to that in Hebron\u2019s H1.<\/p>\n

In Hebron, the first Israeli settlers moved into the Old City in 1979 with religious claims to be allowed to live near the Ibrahimi Mosque, which houses the tombs of patriarchs that have religious significance for Muslims, Jews, and Christians. Ever since, Palestinians have been constantly pressured by Israeli settlers to sell their property in the Old City, where they already face segregation, settler harassment, and living restrictions.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Palestinians at Ibrahimi Mosque on the anniversary of the birth of the prophet Muhammad, Hebron February 16, 2011. (Photo: Najeh Hashlamoun\/APA Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

According to these new decisions, in places like Hebron, the Israeli Civil Administration will now be responsible for issuing building permits in the Old City, rather than the Palestinian Hebron municipality. This means more restrictions on Palestinians to build or enlarge their homes, and easier issuance of demolition orders for existing ones. The Civil Administration will also create a municipal body for Israeli settlers who have been colonizing the Old City<\/a> since 1979. The decision comes six months after a previous Israeli government decision to transfer administrative authority over the Ibrahimi Mosque<\/a> to Israeli settlers. The previous decision from July of last year had revoked the Islamic endowment\u2019s authority over the holy site.<\/p>\n

Another city that would be directly affected is Bethlehem, where administrative authorities over the religious site of Rachel\u2019s tomb, just hundreds of meters away from the Palestinian city\u2019s center, were transferred over to Israeli settlers. Israel can now control building permits in the area surrounding the site, which Israeli authorities have already expanded by 10 dunams (1 hectare).<\/p>\n

This area is very likely to be used to establish settler housing units, immediately adjacent to Bethlehem\u2019s urban area. The city is already forced to live with an Israeli military tower on one side of a main street as part of the wall that seals off the Rachel\u2019s Tomb area from the city. Given the potential for additional settler presence behind the wall, Israel\u2019s military presence and its raids into the city would also increase.<\/p>\n

\"Israeli
Israeli soldiers stand guard near the separation wall near Rachel\u2019s Tomb in Bethlehem, December 24, 2009. (Photo: Issam Rimawi\/APA Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The takeover of historic sites also strips Palestinians of important access to their own heritage, further Israelizing the landscape. As an example, Israel had previously decided in November of last year to confiscate 1,800 dunams (180 hectares) in the Palestinian town of Sebastia<\/a>, north of Nablus, that house Canaanite, Roman, Byzantine, and Islamic archaeological sites. Israeli settlers have been increasingly storming Sebastia\u2019s archeological grounds since last year, and Israel has begun to plan for an Israeli archeological park in the area. Sebastia represents a key tourist attraction for Palestinians in the West Bank, and tourism is a main source of income for the town. Israel\u2019s confiscation of the archeological area would end it.<\/p>\n

Sunday\u2019s decision will affect 13 Palestinian historic sites across the West Bank.<\/p>\n

\u2018Most important\u2019 settler decision since 1967<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The move has been called by the Israeli settlements\u2019 council as \u201cthe most important since 1967,\u201d as it takes Israel\u2019s annexation of the West Bank beyond an unrecognized practical reality to something legally entrenched. The decision also turns the PA into little more than a group of municipal bodies connected to a central administration, stripped of any limited state-like powers that it has so far claimed to wield in the sanctuaries of Area A and Area B.<\/p>\n

\n

The move has been called by the Israeli settlements\u2019 council as \u201cthe most important since 1967,\u201d as it takes Israel\u2019s annexation of the West Bank beyond an unrecognized practical reality to something legally entrenched.<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n

This means that Israel has officially removed any collective existence of Palestinians in the West Bank, administrative or political, from its legal framework. Legally speaking, some areas of the West Bank populated by Palestinians can now be considered a part of Israel proper.<\/p>\n

On Monday, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich boasted about having personally drafted the decisions approved by the cabinet. Smotrich stated that Israel is \u201cworking within a clear legal framework to ensure its control over the West Bank and establish a stable reality for years to come,\u201d adding that Israel is \u201cputting an end to the idea of an Arab terror state in the heart of the country.\u201d<\/p>\n

The cabinet decisions are in line with Israel\u2019s stated goal of destroying the idea of a Palestinian state. Israel\u2019s Knesset had already passed a bill in July 2025 allowing the cabinet to annex the West Bank<\/a>, a year after passing a bill rejecting a Palestinian state anywhere in historic Palestine. In 2018, the Knesset passed the \u201cNation-State Law,\u201d stating that the right to self-determination between the river and the sea belongs exclusively to the Jewish people.<\/p>\n

\n

The cabinet decisions are in line with Israel\u2019s stated goal of destroying the idea of a Palestinian state. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said they are \u201cputting an end to the idea of an Arab terror state in the heart of the country.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n

On Monday, eight Arab and Islamic countries condemned the Israeli cabinet\u2019s decisions in a joint statement. The PA condemned the move, calling it \u201cnull and void,\u201d a \u201cviolation of the Oslo Accords,\u201d and \u201ca practical implementation of annexation and expulsion plans,\u201d calling on the international community to intervene to stop these decisions. Jordan\u2019s Foreign Ministry slammed the Israeli cabinet\u2019s decisions, saying that they aim to \u201cimpose illegal settlement authority\u201d on Palestinian land.<\/p>\n

The Israeli organization Peace Now also denounced the move<\/a>, saying that it is part of a broader strategy to entrench Israeli control, sever Palestinian territorial continuity, and undermine any future two-state solution.<\/p>\n

________________________________________________<\/p>\n

Qassam Muaddi is the Palestine Staff Writer for <\/em>Mondoweiss.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original – mondoweiss.net<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

11 Feb 2026 –\u00a0Israel just erased Palestinian existence from the West Bank by law, and it\u2019s not an overstatement.\u00a0Here\u2019s what these changes mean and how they set the stage for annexation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":313342,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[3287,1559,532,405,1854,101,100,1199,865,88,2416,427,3534,2897,880,99,70,965,1025],"class_list":["post-313341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-palestine-israel-gaza-genocide","tag-anti-zionism","tag-collective-punishment","tag-colonialism","tag-colonization","tag-crimes-against-humanity","tag-cultural-violence","tag-direct-violence","tag-ethnic-cleansing","tag-genocide","tag-israel","tag-israeli-occupation","tag-palestine","tag-palestinian-holocaust","tag-sociocide","tag-state-terrorism","tag-structural-violence","tag-usa","tag-war-crimes","tag-west-bank"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313341"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":313345,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313341\/revisions\/313345"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/313342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}