{"id":313353,"date":"2026-02-23T12:01:36","date_gmt":"2026-02-23T12:01:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=313353"},"modified":"2026-02-21T17:51:55","modified_gmt":"2026-02-21T17:51:55","slug":"no-us-war-on-iran-an-open-letter-to-the-un-security-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2026\/02\/no-us-war-on-iran-an-open-letter-to-the-un-security-council\/","title":{"rendered":"No US War on Iran: An Open Letter to the UN Security Council"},"content":{"rendered":"

16 Feb 2026 – The current threat of an attack by the US did not begin with any failure by Iran to negotiate. On the contrary, it began with the United States\u2019 repudiation of negotiations that had already succeeded.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Distinguished Members of the Security Council,<\/p>\n

The President of the\u00a0United States<\/a>\u00a0is issuing grave threats of force against the Islamic Republic of Iran if it does not accede to US demands. His actions risk a major regional war that would be devastating. Asked if he wanted regime change, he\u00a0responded<\/a>\u00a0that it \u201cseems like that would be the best thing that could happen<\/em>.\u201d When asked why a second US aircraft carrier has been sent to the region, President Trump answered \u201cin case we don\u2019t make a deal, we\u2019ll need it … if we need it, we\u2019ll have it ready<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

These threats are in violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which declares that<\/p>\n

\u201cAll Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the\u00a0United Nations<\/a><\/em>.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

These threats come in the context of Iran\u2019s repeated calls for negotiations. Moreover, on February 7, Iran\u2019s Foreign Minister\u00a0delivered a speech<\/a>\u00a0in Doha proposing comprehensive negotiations for regional peace, following a round of talks in Oman supported by the diplomacy of the Arab states and T\u00fcrkiye. Even as a second round of negotiations has been announced, the US is resorting to escalating threats of force.<\/p>\n

The issue facing the UN Security Council in these perilous days is whether any member state, by force or threat of force, may place itself above the United Nations Charter that governs us all. At stake is the integrity of the UN-based international system.<\/p>\n

One of the crucial roles of the Security Council is to call on member states to settle disputes by peaceful means such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or judicial settlement, without the threat of force or resort to force. Today, the world is in urgent need of a renewed commitment to diplomacy.<\/p>\n

The current threat of an attack by the US did not begin with any failure by Iran to negotiate. On the contrary, it began with the United States\u2019 repudiation of negotiations that had already succeeded.<\/p>\n

On July 14, 2015, after years of extensive diplomacy, Iran and the P5 countries plus Germany concluded the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) to ensure that Iran\u2019s nuclear program would remain exclusively peaceful. In return, economic\u00a0sanctions<\/a>\u00a0on Iran were to be lifted. The JCPOA placed Iran\u2019s nuclear activities under strict and continuous scrutiny by the International Atomic Energy Agency and thereby ended the risk of a nuclear-arms breakout by Iran, a risk that Iran had consistently denied.<\/p>\n

On July 20, 2015, the UNSC unanimously adopted Resolution 2231. That resolution \u201cendorses the JCPOA<\/em>\u201d and calls upon all states to take the steps \u201cnecessary to support the implementation<\/em>.\u201d It terminated previous sanctions resolutions and incorporated the JCPOA into\u00a0international law<\/a>. The Security Council explicitly recognized Iran\u2019s \u201cright to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes<\/em>\u201d under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and established a robust verification regime.<\/p>\n

Yet on May 8, 2018, three years after the successful UNSC Resolution, the United States unilaterally\u00a0withdrew<\/a>\u00a0from the JCPOA. This withdrawal was actively lobbied for by the Israeli government. Since the late 1990s, Israel\u2019s leadership has repeatedly, falsely, and hypocritically claimed that Iran was on the verge of obtaining a nuclear weapon, even as Israel itself had secretly acquired\u00a0nuclear weapons<\/a>\u00a0outside the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and has until today refused to join the treaty and subject itself to its controls.<\/p>\n

When President Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the JCPOA, the US reimposed wide-ranging sanctions in direct contradiction of Resolution 2231 and launched a campaign of economic warfare designed to cripple Iran\u2019s economy that continues to this day.<\/p>\n

The current threats by the US are therefore part of a long-standing pattern of feigning interest in negotiations while in fact pursuing economic warfare and military force. In June 2025, following the renewal of negotiations earlier that year, the United States and Iran entered a sixth round of talks. The US had characterized the negotiations as constructive and positive. The sixth round was set for June 15, 2025. Yet on June 13, 2025, the US supported Israel\u2019s bombing of Iran. A week after that, the US attacked Iran under Operation Midnight Hammer.<\/p>\n

The US assault on the UN Charter has now escalated once again to the brink of war, with US threats of force and acts of economic warfare proceeding daily. The US has been escalating its military presence near Iran and has repeatedly threatened to launch an imminent attack.<\/p>\n

The administration has also been candid about its strategy of economic warfare. On January 20,\u00a0in an interview in Davos<\/a>, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described how the US had deliberately engineered the collapse of the Iranian currency, a dollar shortage, and a collapse of imports, all with the goal of fomenting economic suffering and mass unrest. Bessent described the resulting unrest as \u201cmoving in a very positive way here<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

The most striking aspect of the US campaign for regime change in Iran is the repeated US insistence that Iran must negotiate. Iran has negotiated, repeatedly. The JCPOA was negotiated and ratified by the UN Security Council. Even after Iran engaged in renewed negotiations last summer, it faced large\u2011scale air strikes on its territory. Now, the US openly avows the policy of economic collapse and regime change.<\/p>\n

No country is safe if the United States can make brazen threats against Iran and indeed several other states in recent weeks, including\u00a0Cuba<\/a>,\u00a0Denmark<\/a>, and others.<\/p>\n

It is both sad and poignant to recall that the United Nations was the brainchild of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. He envisioned an era of great-power cooperation and multilateralism under international law as the basis of international peace and security. His wife, Eleanor Roosevelt, oversaw the drafting and adoption of the Universal Declaration of\u00a0Human Rights<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The US at that time envisioned an era in which diplomacy would prosper, and a time in which law and justice rather than brute force would prevail, a time when we would honor the words of the Prophet Isaiah inscribed on the wall on First Avenue facing the United Nations: \u201cThey shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation shall not lift up sword against nation. Neither shall they learn war any more<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

To allow the UN Charter to be ruthlessly violated, no less by its host country, is to invite the return to global war, this time in the nuclear age. In other words, it is to invite humanity\u2019s self-destruction. On behalf of\u00a0We the Peoples<\/em>, the UN Security Council carries the authority and heavy responsibility to keep the peace.<\/p>\n

*************************************<\/p>\n

Appendix<\/strong><\/h3>\n

I humbly offer below an illustrative Draft Resolution by which the UNSC could fulfill its duty in the current context:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Security Council,<\/p>\n

Recalling<\/em>\u00a0the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the obligation of all Member States to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, as set forth in Article 2(4) of the Charter,<\/p>\n

Reaffirming<\/em>\u00a0that the maintenance of international peace and security rests upon respect for international law, the authority of the Security Council, and the peaceful settlement of disputes,<\/p>\n

Recalling<\/em>\u00a0its resolution 2231 (2015), adopted unanimously on 20 July 2015, by which the Security Council endorsed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and called upon all Member States to take actions necessary to support its implementation,<\/p>\n

Reaffirming\u00a0<\/em>its commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the need for all States Party to that Treaty to comply fully with their obligations, and recalling the right of States Party, in conformity with Articles I and II of that Treaty, to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination<\/p>\n

Acting<\/em>\u00a0under the Charter of the United Nations,<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Calls upon all<\/em>\u00a0Member States to immediately and unconditionally cease all threats or uses of force and to comply fully with their obligations under Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations;<\/li>\n
  2. Acknowledges that<\/em>\u00a0the JCPOA constituted a valid multilateral negotiation endorsed by the Security Council, and\u00a0recognizes<\/em>\u00a0that the abandonment of the JCPOA resulted from the unilateral withdrawal of the United States;<\/li>\n
  3. Decides that<\/em>, under its authority, the UNSC mandates all States concerned to immediately engage in negotiations to conclude a renewed comprehensive arrangement on the Iranian nuclear issue, building upon the principles of the JCPOA and fully consistent with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;<\/li>\n
  4. Calls upon all<\/em>\u00a0Member States to refrain from actions that undermine diplomatic efforts, escalate tensions, or weaken the authority of the United Nations;<\/li>\n
  5. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    ______________________________________________<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a>Jeffrey D. Sachs, Professor of Sustainable Development and Professor of Health Policy and Management at Columbia University, is Director of Columbia\u2019s Center for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. He has served as Special Adviser to three UN Secretaries-General [Kofi Annan (2001-7), Ban Ki-moon (2008-16), and currently serves as an SDG Advocate under Secretary-General Ant\u00f3nio Guterres. His books include <\/em>The End of Poverty<\/a>, Common Wealth<\/a>, The Age of Sustainable Development<\/a>, Building the New American Economy<\/a>, and most recently,<\/em> A New Foreign Policy: Beyond American Exceptionalism<\/a>. Sachs was also an advisor to the last leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, as well as to the first president of the Russian Federation, Boris Yeltsin.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    16 Feb 2026 – The current threat of an attack by the US did not begin with any failure by Iran to negotiate. On the contrary, it began with the United States\u2019 repudiation of negotiations that had already succeeded.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":229079,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[82],"tags":[2753,1284,742,88,2369,2983,767,124,1888,70,481],"class_list":["post-313353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-united-nations","tag-agent-provocateur","tag-false-flag","tag-iran","tag-israel","tag-jcpoa","tag-jeffrey-sachs","tag-middle-east","tag-united-nations","tag-unsc","tag-usa","tag-warfare"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=313353"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313353\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":313354,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/313353\/revisions\/313354"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/229079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=313353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=313353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=313353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}