{"id":316418,"date":"2026-05-25T12:00:43","date_gmt":"2026-05-25T11:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=316418"},"modified":"2026-05-20T20:35:17","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T19:35:17","slug":"the-united-states-long-70-year-war-on-cuba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2026\/05\/the-united-states-long-70-year-war-on-cuba\/","title":{"rendered":"The United States\u2019 Long, 70-year War on Cuba"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

People gather during International Workers\u2019 Day celebrations near the US Embassy to protest sanctions and blockades in Havana, Cuba, on 1 May 2026.\u00a0 (Photo by Magdalena Chodownik\/Anadolu via Getty Images)<\/p><\/div>\n

A US invasion would hardly inaugurate a new conflict. It would instead mark the bloodiest phase in a long, bipartisan war against Cuba for the \u201csin\u201d of reclaiming national sovereignty.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

15 May 2026\u00a0<\/em>–\u00a0In recent weeks and months, Washington<\/a> has intensified its long-running campaign of collective punishment<\/a> against the Cuban people. Escalating sanctions<\/a> have further tightened the noose of a punitive US blockade<\/a> that has strangled the island for more than half a century. The resulting \u201cenergy starvation<\/a>\u201d has deepened a manufactured crisis<\/a>, threatening Cubans\u2019 access to food, water<\/a>, healthcare<\/a>, fuel, electricity, and other basic human rights<\/a> and needs, while intensifying the broader assault on the island\u2019s sovereignty and development.<\/p>\n

Since 2017, when the first Trump administration<\/a> began dismantling<\/a> the limited normalization measures introduced under former President Barack Obama<\/a>, Cuba<\/a> has once again been subjected to a regime of \u201cmaximum pressure<\/a>\u201d economic warfare. The consequences have been severe. These policies have degraded material conditions across the island, accelerated the exodus of more than 1 million<\/a> Cubans, and imposed disproportionate suffering on the country\u2019s most vulnerable populations.<\/p>\n

This economic weapon<\/a>, wielded by the ruling elites of the world\u2019s largest financial and military power, has exacted particularly devastating consequences on mothers and children<\/a>. During this period, the infant mortality rate<\/a> rose from 4 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2018 to 9.9 in 2025. Put plainly, an estimated 1,800 Cuban infants died during these years who would have survived absent Washington\u2019s intensified criminal sanctions<\/a>. This is but one stark measure of the blockade\u2019s profound brutality and inhumanity.<\/p>\n

The only \u201ccrime\u201d of these children, like that of countless other Cubans, was being born in a country that continues to insist on its right to determine its own political and economic future outside the structures of hemispheric domination the United States<\/a> has sought to impose across Latin America<\/a>, the Caribbean, and the wider world. The infliction of such suffering has never been incidental to such policies. It has been, and remains, a central feature<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n

It is time to end the madness of US policy toward Cuba and recognize that Cuba is not a failed state, but a state subjected to a criminal siege.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The same has been true since 1959<\/a>, as Washington has pursued a singular, near-fanatical obsession<\/a> with reversing the Cuban Revolution<\/a> and restoring the neocolonial shackles it once imposed on the island. Its aim has been not only to undermine Cuba\u2019s social transformation and internationalist commitments, but to extinguish the example the revolution represented: that an alternative to US hegemony<\/a> and capitalist underdevelopment was possible.<\/p>\n

So despite recent threats to \u201ctake\u201d<\/a> Cuba, such rhetoric cannot be understood in isolation, nor should it obscure a fundamental reality: A US invasion<\/a> would hardly inaugurate a new conflict. It would instead mark the bloodiest phase in a long, bipartisan war against Cuba for the \u201csin\u201d of reclaiming national sovereignty from a Washington-backed lawless order that has sought to punish Cuba for its defiance and refusal to submit meekly to the dictates of empire.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Cuba Under the Shadow of US Empire<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Cuba\u2019s independence has long been imperiled by its proximity to and economic entanglement with the United States. Situated 90 miles off the coast of Florida, the island occupied a central place within the US imperial imagination<\/a>. Throughout the 19th century, Washington elites viewed Cuba<\/a> not as a to-be sovereign nation, but as an inevitable extension of their commercial and geopolitical ambitions, a \u201ccrown jewel\u201d destined to be drawn into Washington\u2019s orbit.<\/p>\n

The opportunity arrived in 1898<\/a>. Seizing upon Cuba\u2019s nearly victorious war for independence<\/a> from Spain<\/a>, the US intervened not to end empire in the hemisphere, but rather to inherit it. Washington presented its action as a selfless mission<\/a> to secure Cuban liberation. But for many across the region, the contradictions were unmistakable. The US, itself forged in the crucible of empire, with all the violence and exploitation that project entailed, went to Cuba not to secure freedom, but to replace Madrid with Washington<\/a> as the imperial metropole of the Americas.<\/p>\n

As early as 1829, Sim\u00f3n Bol\u00edvar warned that<\/a> \u201cthe United States seemed destined by Providence to plague America with misery in the name of freedom.\u201d Decades later, Cuban revolutionary Jos\u00e9 Mart\u00ed issued a similar denunciation. In his 1891 essay \u201cOur America<\/a>,\u201d he called for \u201ccommon cause\u201d among oppressed peoples and warned against the threat of subordination to the rising power to the north. Mart\u00ed also championed self-sufficiency over integration into an unequal global capitalist system, insisting that Cuba must \u201cmake wine from plantains. It may be sour, but it is our wine!\u201d Having spent years in exile in New York, Mart\u00ed sharpened that critique<\/a> shortly before his death in 1895, writing \u201cI lived in the monster and I know its entrails.\u201d<\/p>\n

History would soon vindicate these words. As the United States extended its \u201cManifest Destiny\u201d to foreign shores, it repeatedly intervened across the hemisphere<\/a>, seeking to transform it into a de facto protectorate<\/a>. In doing so, Washington consistently sided with the interests of capital and local elites over the demands for popular sovereignty. In the decades that followed, the US invaded<\/a> countries throughout the region, overthrowing<\/a> democratic governments, crushing<\/a> revolutionary movements, and backing brutal dictatorships<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In Cuba, this took the form of three lengthy military occupations<\/a> spanning half of the island\u2019s first 24 years of \u201cindependence<\/a>,\u201d from 1898-1902, 1906-1909, and 1917-1922. In each case, the objective was to uphold the neocolonial order established during the first occupation and rooted in US economic interests. Under this restrictive framework<\/a>, the Cuban government was denied control over its foreign relations and domestic economic policy, compelled to cede territory to the US military<\/a>, and forced to accept Washington\u2019s unilateral right of intervention.<\/p>\n

By the 1920s, this relationship had produced a profound dependence on exports, mainly sugar, to the United States while fostering a deeply corrupt<\/a> system incapable of responding to the needs and aspirations of the Cuban people. The island\u2019s land remained concentrated<\/a> in the hands of American corporations and a domestic collaborationist aristocracy, while the state invested more heavily in repression than social development, constructing more barracks than schools<\/a>. With the onset of the Great Depression and the collapse<\/a> of the sugar economy upon which the country had been made dependent, popular discontent only intensified.<\/p>\n

By 1933, the government of Gerardo Machado<\/a>, which promised to transform Cuba into an island of stability for American investment while violently suppressing nationalist and anti-imperialist currents in Cuban society, had become untenable. Amid mounting unrest, Machado was deposed, and a revolutionary coalition<\/a> under Ram\u00f3n Grau San Mart\u00edn<\/a> emerged, seeking to challenge Cuba\u2019s semi-colonial status. But the United States refused to recognize it. The resulting instability created conditions for the rise of one of the more conservative figures within the anti-Machado coalition, army officer Fulgencio Batista<\/a>, who in 1934 deposed the short-lived government and consolidated de facto power in his own hands with the backing of Washington.<\/p>\n

The Roots of the Cuban Revolution<\/h4>\n

Batista would directly or indirectly pull the political strings in Cuba for much of the next quarter century. Though his earlier rule adopted a more populist posture<\/a>, culminating in his election to the presidency from 1940 to 1944, life improved little for Cubans. Corruption<\/a> and dependence on foreign capital remained entrenched. And by 1952, Batista had seized power outright in a military coup<\/a>, inaugurating an authoritarian regime backed by increased state violence.<\/p>\n

It was Batista\u2019s rise, coupled with decades of economic disparities<\/a>, political repression, and social neglect, that created conditions that were ripe for revolution<\/a>. Among those preparing to contest the suspended elections<\/a> that year was a young lawyer named Fidel Castro. Batista\u2019s closure of even the limited avenues for democratic change lent weight to John F. Kennedy\u2019s later observation<\/a> that \u201cthose who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

For more than six decades then, Cuba has represented the \u201cthreat\u201d of example: the possibility of building a more just and humane society in which the state serves the people and not the other way around.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Castro\u2019s first revolutionary assault came soon after, with the attack on the Moncada Barracks<\/a> on July 26, 1953. Though the attack failed, Castro\u2019s arrest and trial gave him the opportunity to defend not his innocence, but the legitimacy of and need for revolution, delivering a two-hour speech<\/a> that condemned the island\u2019s entrenched inequalities and the regime that sustained them.<\/p>\n

The state imprisoned<\/a> Castro and his fellow revolutionaries before commuting<\/a> their sentences under popular pressure in 1955, after which they went into exile. From Mexico, joined by Che Guevara<\/a>, they began plotting their return to Cuba and the overthrow of the regime. By late 1956, they had landed in Cuba and launched their insurgency<\/a> from the Sierra Maestra<\/a> mountains. Just two years later, Batista fled the country<\/a> on New Year\u2019s Day 1959, carrying with him as much as $300 million<\/a> in siphoned state funds and ill-gotten gains amassed at the expense of the Cuban people, while leaving behind the ruins of a regime stained with the blood of as many as 20,000 Cubans<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Counterrevolution in the Caribbean<\/h4>\n

In 1959, the new leadership<\/a> inherited a desiccated country picked over by the buzzards of foreign capital and a corrupted local elite. The Cuban revolutionaries set out to overcome these conditions and construct a more just social order, one capable of guaranteeing a basic standard of living long denied to the Cuban population through the misappropriation of the island\u2019s wealth and resources.<\/p>\n

The earliest measures included agrarian reform<\/a>, universal education<\/a>, a national literacy campaign<\/a>, expanded healthcare<\/a>, urban reforms<\/a> that opened pathways to homeownership for working-class Cubans, and anti-discrimination laws aimed at dismantling entrenched racial hierarchies<\/a>. Crucially for the trajectory of US-Cuban relations, the revolution also nationalized<\/a> parasitic foreign-owned and privatized industries.<\/p>\n

The new Cuban government was initially met with a degree of popular appeal<\/a> and favorable media coverage<\/a> in the United States, further amplified by Fidel Castro\u2019s April 1959 visit<\/a> to the country, during which he sought to explain the revolution to American audiences. While in Washington, Castro even met with<\/a> Vice President Richard Nixon<\/a>, but the Eisenhower administration quickly soured on the revolutionary government and soon resolved to see it fail.<\/p>\n

The concern was not Cuba itself, but what the revolution might represent. As State Department official J.C. Hill warned that year<\/a>, \u201cthere are indications that if the Cuban Revolution is successful other countries in Latin America<\/a> and perhaps elsewhere will use it as a model and we should decide whether or not we wish to have the Cuban Revolution succeed.\u201d<\/p>\n

By October 1960, that decision had effectively been made with the imposition of a blockade on the island. The logic underpinning this economic declaration of war was made explicit in a memo by State Department official Lester Mallory. Recognizing that Castro retained widespread popular support, Mallory concluded<\/a> that the most effective means of undermining him was the deliberate immiseration of the Cuban people. The memo called for the denial of \u201cmoney and supplies\u201d to the island in order to produce \u201chunger, desperation, and overthrow of government.\u201d<\/p>\n

In April 1961, Washington escalated its campaign by backing a direct military assault on the island. Yet the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion<\/a> did little to temper the obsession with unseating Castro. In the aftermath, consensus hardened<\/a> across the Kennedy administration that \u201cUS policy toward Cuba should aim at the downfall of Castro.\u201d What followed was an expansive campaign<\/a> of covert warfare involving sabotage, assassination plots, and support for anti-communist exiles.<\/p>\n

Among the proposals considered were plans to manufacture consent for military escalation through false provocations. One suggestion<\/a> was to \u201cdevelop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area\u2026 pointed at Cuban refugees<\/a> seeking haven in the United States\u2026 [which] would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.\u201d Other proposals called for false flag attacks<\/a> on the US navy and the shooting down of a civilian airliner that would then be blamed on the Cuban government.<\/p>\n

This single-minded fixation did little to advance US objectives. Instead, it pushed Cuba further toward the Soviet Union<\/a>, which offered the island an economic and political lifeline in the face of Washington\u2019s blockade and escalating campaign of destabilization. It was within this context that Castro declared the Marxist-Leninist character<\/a> of the Cuban Revolution in 1961. The relentless threats to the island also fostered a profound and understandable sense of siege within the Cuban government itself.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, Washington\u2019s Cuba policy, combined with what Kennedy privately described as the \u201cgoddamned dangerous<\/a>\u201d deployment of US missiles in Turkey<\/a>, helped create the conditions for the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, bringing the world to the brink of a nuclear holocaust and revealing the extent to which the US was willing to risk a senseless<\/a>, largely self-imposed global catastrophe<\/a> in defense of the maintenance of its empire.<\/p>\n

The Persistent \u201cThreat\u201d of Example<\/h4>\n

Despite this long war against Cuba, the Cuban government and people have not abandoned their revolutionary project. They have continued to build socialism<\/a> and a new social order toward what Che Guevara described as the construction of \u201cnew [people]<\/a>\u201d: human beings whose motivations, commitments, and social relations are not governed by opportunistic self-interest at the expense of others, but by solidarity<\/a> and a shared sense of collective humanity.<\/p>\n

Cuba has consistently sought to demonstrate this commitment on the world stage. One of Fidel Castro\u2019s earliest acts of foreign policy was the support of those seeking to liberate<\/a> the Dominican Republic<\/a> from the brutal US-backed dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo<\/a>. In the decades that followed, Cuban soldiers and advisers would play major roles in liberation struggles across Africa<\/a>, including in Algeria, the Congo<\/a>, Angola<\/a>, Mozambique, and Guinea-Bissau.<\/p>\n

\n

For those living in the belly of the beast, we bear a clear moral and political responsibility to stand alongside the Cuban people, those on the island, to oppose the violence being carried out in our name.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Cuba\u2019s foreign interventions proved especially consequential in the struggle against South African apartheid<\/a> and white minority rule in Southern Africa<\/a>. It was this material solidarity that led Nelson Mandela<\/a> to declare during his 1991 visit to Havana that \u201cthe Cuban people hold a special place in the hearts of the peoples of Africa,\u201d traveling to Cuba shortly after his release from prison.<\/p>\n

But Cuba\u2019s principal export to the Third World has not been bombs to take lives, as in the case of the United States<\/a>. It has sent doctors<\/a> to provide life. Since 1960, Cuba has dispatched more than 600,000 medical professionals<\/a> to over 160 countries. In doing so, Cuba has advanced not only the principle and practice that healthcare is a human right<\/a>, but a vision of education and foreign policy rooted in both science<\/a> and conscience.<\/p>\n

For more than six decades then, Cuba has represented the \u201cthreat<\/a>\u201d of example: the possibility of building a more just and humane society in which the state serves the people and not the other way around. It is time to end the madness of US policy toward Cuba and recognize that Cuba is not a failed state, but a state subjected to a criminal siege. It is not a sponsor of terrorism, but the victim of sustained US aggression.<\/p>\n

For those living in the belly of the beast<\/a>, we bear a clear moral and political responsibility to stand alongside the Cuban people, those on the island, to oppose the violence being carried out in our name. Cuba, like all those confronting US empire, deserves not the \u201cfreedom\u201d of the grave<\/a> that Washington has so often offered the world<\/a>, but a true freedom rooted in justice, self-determination, and respect for human life and dignity.<\/p>\n

We must therefore demand an end to the blockade on Cuba. We must reject any further military escalation. We must call for Cuba\u2019s removal from the state sponsors of terrorism list. And we must support the restoration of Cuban sovereignty over the occupied territory at Guant\u00e1namo Bay.<\/p>\n

_______________________________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Eric Ross is an organizer, educator, researcher, and PhD Candidate in the History Department at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.\u00a0\u00a0Full Bio ><\/a><\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Go to Original – commdreams.org<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

15 May 2026\u00a0–\u00a0A US invasion would hardly inaugurate a new conflict. It would instead mark the bloodiest phase in a long, bipartisan war against Cuba for the \u201csin\u201d of reclaiming national sovereignty.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":316420,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[3143,2642,1473,417,133,1559,1854,530,3281,2242,1126,1966,1050,1049,950,541,3324,2571,4047,779,880,2200,70],"class_list":["post-316418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-latin-america-and-the-caribbean","tag-anti-hegemony","tag-anti-imperialism","tag-blockade","tag-bullying","tag-cia","tag-collective-punishment","tag-crimes-against-humanity","tag-cuba","tag-evil-empire","tag-famine","tag-hegemony","tag-hunger","tag-imperialism","tag-inhuman-punishment","tag-invasion","tag-latin-america-caribbean","tag-north-america","tag-official-lies-and-narratives","tag-raul-castro","tag-sovereignty","tag-state-terrorism","tag-us-empire","tag-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316418"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":316425,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316418\/revisions\/316425"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316420"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}