{"id":317733,"date":"2026-06-29T12:00:45","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T11:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=317733"},"modified":"2026-06-27T08:56:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T07:56:11","slug":"datacentres-are-growing-target-of-global-climate-related-legal-cases-report-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2026\/06\/datacentres-are-growing-target-of-global-climate-related-legal-cases-report-finds\/","title":{"rendered":"Datacentres Are Growing Target of Global Climate-Related Legal Cases, Report Finds"},"content":{"rendered":"

LSE analysis highlights litigation linked to energy sources, water consumption and air pollution.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

A Google datacentre in Santiago, Chile, where a project was successfully halted in 2020 on climate grounds.\u00a0 Photograph: Luis Bustamante\/The Guardian<\/p><\/div>\n

25 Jun 2026\u00a0<\/em>–\u00a0The proliferation of datacentres and AI is increasingly at the forefront of environmental litigation around the world, from the US and UK to Chile to Ireland<\/a>, a report has found.<\/p>\n

In an analysis of about 3,600 climate-related lawsuits filed since 2015, the latest annual review of climate litigation<\/a> by the London School of Economics (LSE) found a growing number of cases challenging the energy sources, water consumption and air pollution of datacentres, all of which have related climate implications.<\/p>\n

One of the first cases was filed in 2020<\/a> in Chile\u2019s capital, Santiago, where Google was planning a huge datacentre in the Cerrillos area. A group of residents and the local council challenged permits given to Google, raising concerns about the impact of the development on the city\u2019s already climate-stressed water supply<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit succeeded in halting the Cerrillos project<\/a>, on the grounds that climate impacts had not been properly considered, but not the wider explosion of datacentres, which is draining Chile\u2019s already drought-stricken wetlands<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The LSE report identified Ireland as a hotspot for litigation against datacentres. The Irish government wants the sector to expand<\/a>, even though it is already consuming more than a fifth<\/a> of the nation\u2019s electricity.<\/p>\n

In December, Ireland\u2019s Commission for the Regulation of Utilities (CRU) said<\/a> \u201clarge energy users\u201d such as datacentres would be allowed to operate on fossil fuels for the next six years, after which they must run on at least 80% renewables.<\/p>\n

Friends of the Irish Environment (FIE), Friends of the Earth Ireland and ClientEarth are seeking a judicial review of the decision because they argue it will lock Ireland into high-emitting, expensive fossil gas for years to come.<\/p>\n

FIE has brought several other claims relating to datacentres in Ireland, including one against the Environmental Protection Agency<\/a> over its approval of a project in South Dublin.<\/p>\n

There is also a growing legal backlash against datacentres in the US. In California, the city of Pittsburg must now<\/a> require a datacentre to use renewable energy for power and recycled water to cool its servers. In Georgia<\/a> and Pennsylvania<\/a>, there is ongoing litigation against state regulators for approving new fossil fuel infrastructure linked to datacentres.<\/p>\n

Another case in Mississippi argues that Elon Musk\u2019s xAI<\/a> is breaching the Clean Air Act by running portable methane gas generators without the required permits. The case, brought by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, says these pose serious public health risks to nearby Black and minority communities. The US Department of Justice is trying<\/a> to block the lawsuit<\/a>, claiming the company\u2019s work is essential to the economy.<\/p>\n

In the UK, campaigners took legal action against the government\u2019s decision to force through construction of a \u201chyperscale\u201d datacentre in Buckinghamshire. Foxglove, a tech justice non-profit organisation, and Global Action Plan, an environmental charity, represented by the law firm Leigh Day, said the decision ignored the project\u2019s electricity and water demands and did not properly consider its climate impacts.<\/p>\n

The government has since accepted<\/a> there were flaws in the process and the lawsuit was dropped. The developer now admits<\/a> measures to mitigate environmental impact would need to be made binding through a contract with the council.<\/p>\n

The LSE report said cases in the US and UK showed how litigation \u201ccan drive changes in climate-related decision-making even in the absence of positive judgments\u201d. It could improve transparency, such as in the case of the Buckinghamshire datacentre, where the full scale of environmental impacts \u201cwould not have come to light\u201d.<\/p>\n

The report\u2019s co-author Joana Setzer, an associate professor at the LSE, said these cases were not necessarily about stopping development but about avoiding locking in more dependence on fossil fuels. \u201cIt is an opportunity to get these massively energy-intensive developments powered by renewables at the moment in time where that is possible,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Go to Original – theguardian.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

25 Jun 2026 – LSE analysis highlights litigation linked to energy sources, water consumption and air pollution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":317734,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3078],"tags":[1733,1264,686,4069,519,1014,401,1098,993,391,894,329,1685,1192],"class_list":["post-317733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence-ai","tag-carbon-footprint","tag-climate-change","tag-datacenter","tag-ecology","tag-energy","tag-environment","tag-fossil-fuels","tag-global-warming","tag-nature","tag-pollution","tag-resources","tag-water","tag-water-rights"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317733"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317733\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":317735,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317733\/revisions\/317735"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}