{"id":36665,"date":"2013-11-25T12:00:05","date_gmt":"2013-11-25T12:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=36665"},"modified":"2015-05-05T22:21:10","modified_gmt":"2015-05-05T21:21:10","slug":"feeding-the-flame-of-revolt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2013\/11\/feeding-the-flame-of-revolt\/","title":{"rendered":"Feeding the Flame of Revolt"},"content":{"rendered":"

I was in federal court here [NYC] Friday [15 Nov 2013] for the sentencing of Jeremy Hammond<\/a> to 10 years in prison for hacking into the computers of a private security firm that works on behalf of the government, including the Department of Homeland Security, and corporations such as Dow Chemical. In 2011 Hammond, now 28, released to the website WikiLeaks and Rolling Stone and other publications some 3 million emails from the Texas-based company Strategic Forecasting Inc., or Stratfor.<\/p>\n

The sentence was one of the longest in U.S. history for hacking and the maximum the judge could impose under a plea agreement in the case. It was wildly disproportionate to the crime\u2014an act of nonviolent civil disobedience that championed the public good by exposing abuses of power by the government and a security firm. But the excessive sentence was the point. The corporate state, rapidly losing credibility and legitimacy, is lashing out like a wounded animal. It is frightened. It feels the heat from a rising flame of revolt. It is especially afraid of those such as Hammond who have the technical skills to break down electronic walls and expose the corrupt workings of power.<\/p>\n

\u201cPeople have a right to know what governments and corporations are doing behind closed doors,\u201d Hammond told me when we met in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan about a week and a half before his sentencing.<\/p>\n

I did not hope for justice from the court. Judge Loretta A. Preska is a member of the right-wing Federalist Society<\/a>. And the hack into Stratfor gave the email address and disclosed the password of an account used for business by Preska\u2019s husband, Thomas Kavaler, a partner at the law firm Cahill Gordon & Reindel. Some emails of the firm\u2019s corporate clients, including Merrill Lynch, also were exposed. The National Lawyers Guild, because the judge\u2019s husband was a victim of the hack, filed a recusal motion that Preska, as chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, was able to deny. Her refusal to recuse herself allowed her to oversee a trial in which she had a huge conflict of interest.<\/p>\n

The judge, who herself once was employed at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, fulminated from the bench about Hammond\u2019s \u201ctotal lack of respect for the law.\u201d She read a laundry list of his arrests for acts of civil disobedience. She damned what she called his \u201cunrepentant recidivism.\u201d She said: \u201cThese are not the actions of Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela \u2026 or even Daniel Ellsberg; there\u2019s nothing high-minded or public-spirited about causing mayhem\u201d\u2014an odd analogy given that Mandela founded the armed<\/i> wing of the African National Congress, was considered by South Africa\u2019s apartheid government and the United States government to be a terrorist and was vilified, along with King and Ellsberg, by the U.S. government. She said there was a \u201cdesperate need to promote respect for the law\u201d and a \u201cneed for adequate public deterrence.\u201d She read from transcripts of Hammond\u2019s conversations in Anonymous<\/a> chat rooms in which he described the goal of hacking into Stratfor as \u201cdestroying the target, hoping for bankruptcy, collapse\u201d and called for \u201cmaximum mayhem.\u201d She admonished him for releasing the unlisted phone number of a retired Arizona police official who allegedly received threatening phone calls afterward.<\/p>\n

The judge imposed equally harsh measures that will take effect after Hammond\u2019s release from prison. She ordered that he be placed under three years of supervised control, be forbidden to use encryption or aliases online and submit to random searches of his computer equipment, person and home by police and any internal security agency without the necessity of a warrant. The judge said he was legally banned from having any contact with \u201celectronic civil disobedience websites or organizations.\u201d By the time she had finished she had shredded all pretense of the rule of law.<\/p>\n

The severe sentence\u2014Hammond will serve more time than the combined sentences of four men who were convicted<\/a> in Britain for hacking related to the U.S. case\u2014was monumentally stupid for a judge seeking to protect the interest of the ruling class. The judicial lynching of Hammond required her to demonstrate a callous disregard for transparency and our right to privacy. It required her to ignore the disturbing information Hammond released showing that the government and Stratfor attempted to link nonviolent dissident groups, including some within Occupy, to terrorist organizations so peaceful dissidents could be prosecuted as terrorists. It required her to accept the frightening fact that intelligence agencies now work on behalf of corporations as well as the state. She also had to sidestep the fact that Hammond made no financial gain from the leak.<\/p>\n

The sentencing converges with the state\u2019s persecution of Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange and Barrett Brown, along with Glenn Greenwald, Jacob Appelbaum, Laura Poitras and Sarah Harrison, four investigative journalists who are now in self-imposed exile from the United States. And as the numbers of our political prisoners and exiled dissidents mount, there is the unmistakable stench of tyranny.<\/p>\n

This draconian sentence, like the draconian sentences of other whistle-blowers, will fan revolt. History bears this out. It will solidify the growing understanding that we must resort, if we want to effect real change, to unconventional tactics to thwart the mounting abuses by the corporate state. There is no hope, this sentencing shows, for redress from the judicial system, elected officials or the executive branch. Why should we respect a court system, or a governmental system, that shows no respect to us? Why should we abide by laws that serve only to protect criminals such as Wall Street thieves while leaving the rest of us exposed to abuse? Why should we continue to have faith in structures of power that deny us our most basic rights and civil liberties? Why should we be impoverished so the profits of big banks, corporations and hedge funds can swell?<\/p>\n

No one will save us but ourselves. That was the real message sent out by the sentencing of Jeremy Hammond. And just as Hammond was inspired to act by the arrest of Chelsea (then Bradley) Manning, others will be inspired to act by Hammond and the actions taken against him. And we can thank Judge Preska for that.<\/p>\n

Hammond is rooted in the Black Bloc<\/a>. As he was escorted out of the courtroom on the ninth floor of the federal courthouse at 500 Pearl St. on Friday he shouted to roughly 100 people\u2014including a class of prim West Point cadets in their blue uniforms\u2014gathered there: \u201cLong live Anonymous! Hurrah for anarchy!\u201d In a statement he read in court he thanked \u201cFree Anons, the Anonymous Solidarity Network [and] Anarchist Black Cross\u201d for their roles in the fight against oppression.<\/p>\n

Hammond has abandoned faith not only in traditional institutions, such as the courts, but nonviolent mass protest and civil disobedience, a point on which he and I diverge. But his analysis of corporate tyranny is correct. And the longer the state ruthlessly persecutes dissidents, the more the state ensures that those who oppose it will resort to radical responses including violence. \u201cThose who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable,\u201d John F. Kennedy said. And the corporate state is not only making peaceful change impossible but condemning it as terrorism.<\/p>\n

In late October I spent an afternoon with Hammond in New York\u2019s Metropolitan Correctional Center, where he had been held for 20 months. He said during our conversation, parts of which his lawyer requested be published only after his sentencing, that he believed that the sole way the people will now have any power is to rise up physically and seize it. My column last week was about that interview, and now I am including previously withheld parts of the conversation.<\/p>\n

Hammond defines himself as \u201can anarchist communist.\u201d He seeks to destroy capitalism and the centralized power of the corporate state. His revolutionary vision is \u201cleaderless collectives based on free association, consensus, mutual aid, self-sufficiency and harmony with the environment.\u201d He embraces the classic tools of revolt, including mass protests, general strikes and boycotts. And he sees hacking and leaking as part of this resistance, tools not only to reveal the truths about these systems of corporate power but to \u201cdisrupt\/destroy these systems entirely.\u201d<\/p>\n

He participated in the Occupy movement in Chicago but found the politics of Occupy too vague and amorphous, a point on which I concur. He said Occupy lacked revolutionary vigor. He told me he did not support what he called the \u201cdogmatic nonviolence doctrine\u201d of many in the Occupy movement, calling it \u201cneedlessly limited and divisive.\u201d He rejects the idea of acts of civil disobedience that protesters know will lead to their arrest. \u201cThe point,\u201d he said, \u201cis to carry out acts of resistance and not get caught.\u201d He condemns \u201cpeace patrols,\u201d units formed within the Occupy movement that sought to prohibit acts of vandalism and violence by other protesters\u2014most often members of the Black Bloc\u2014as \u201ca secondary police force.\u201d And he spurns the calls by many in Occupy not to antagonize the police, calling the police \u201cthe boot boys of the 1 percent, paid to protect the rich and powerful.\u201d He said such a tactic of non-confrontation with the police ignored the long history of repression the police have carried out against popular movements, as well as the \u201cprofiling and imprisonment of our comrades.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBecause we were unprepared, or perhaps unwilling, to defend our occupations, police and mayors launched coordinated attacks, driving us out of our own parks,\u201d he said of the state\u2019s closure of the Occupy encampments.<\/p>\n

\u201cI fully support and have participated in Black Bloc and other forms of militant direct action,\u201d he said. \u201cI do not believe that the ruling powers listen to the people\u2019s peaceful protests. Black Bloc is an effective, fluid and dynamic form of protest. It causes disruption outside of predictable\/controllable mass demonstrations through \u2018unarrests,\u2019 holding streets, barricades and property destruction. Smashing corporate windows is not violence, especially when compared to the everyday economic violence of sweatshops and \u2018free trade.\u2019 Black Bloc seeks to hit them where it hurts, through economic damage. But more than smashing windows they seek to break the spell of \u2018law and order\u2019 and the artificial limitations we impose on ourselves.\u201d<\/p>\n

I disagree with Hammond over tactics, but in the end this disagreement is moot. It will be the ruling elites who finally determine our response. If the corporate elites employ the full force of the security and surveillance state against us, if corporate totalitarian rule is one of naked, escalating and brutal physical repression, then the violence of the state will spawn a counter-violence. Judge Preska\u2019s decision to judicially lynch Hammond has only added to the fury she and the state are trying to stamp out. An astute ruling class, one aware of the rage rippling across the American landscape, would have released Hammond on Friday and begun to address the crimes he exposed. But our ruling class, while adept at theft, looting, propaganda and repression, is blind to the growing discontent caused by the power imbalance and economic inequality that plague ordinary Americans at a time when half of the country lives in poverty or \u201cnear poverty.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe acts of civil disobedience and direct action that I am being sentenced for today are in line with the principles of community and equality that have guided my life,\u201d Hammond told the courtroom. \u201cI hacked into dozens of high-profile corporations and government institutions, understanding very clearly that what I was doing was against the law, and that my actions could land me back in federal prison. But I felt that I had an obligation to use my skills to expose and confront injustice\u2014and to bring the truth to light.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cCould I have achieved the same goals through legal means?\u201d he said. \u201cI have tried everything from voting petitions to peaceful protest and have found that those in power do not want the truth to be exposed. When we speak truth to power we are ignored at best and brutally suppressed at worst. We are confronting a power structure that does not respect its own system of checks and balances, never mind the rights of its own citizens or the international community.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cMy first memories of American politics was when Bush stole the election in 2000,\u201d he told me at a metal table as we met at the prison in a small room reserved for attorney visits, \u201cand then how Bush used the wave of nationalism after 9\/11 to launch unprovoked pre-emptive wars against Afghanistan and Iraq. In high school I was involved in publishing \u2018underground\u2019 newsletters criticizing the Patriot Act, the wars, and other Bush-era policies. I attended many anti-war protests in the city [Chicago] and was introduced to other local struggles and the larger anti-corporate globalization movement. I began identifying as an anarchist, started to travel around the country to various mobilizations and conferences, and began getting arrested for various acts.\u201d<\/p>\n

He said that his experience of street protest, especially against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, was seminal, for he saw that the state had little interest in heeding the voices of protesters and others in the public. \u201cInstead, we were labeled as traitors, beaten and arrested.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI targeted law enforcement systems because of the racism and inequality with which the criminal law is enforced,\u201d he admitted in court. \u201cI targeted the manufacturers and distributors of military and police equipment who profit from weaponry used to advance U.S. political and economic interests abroad and to repress people at home. I targeted information security firms because they work in secret to protect government and corporate interests at the expense of individual rights, undermining and discrediting activists, journalists and other truth seekers, and spreading disinformation.\u201d<\/p>\n

An FBI informant, Hector Xavier Monsegur, posing as an Anonymous member and using the online name \u201cSabu,\u201d prodded Hammond to break into Stratfor and informed him of technical vulnerabilities in websites of the company.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhy the FBI would introduce us to the hacker who found the initial vulnerability and allow this hack to continue<\/a> remains a mystery,\u201d Hammond said as he faced the judge.<\/p>\n

\u201cAs a result of the Stratfor hack, some of the dangers of the unregulated private intelligence industry are now known,\u201d he said. \u201cIt has been revealed through WikiLeaks and other journalists around the world that Stratfor maintained a worldwide network of informants that they used to engage in intrusive and possibly illegal surveillance activities on behalf of large multinational corporations.\u201d<\/p>\n

At Sabu\u2019s urging, Hammond broke into other websites, too. Hammond, at Sabu\u2019s request, provided information to hackers enabling them to break into and deface official foreign government websites, including some of Turkey, Iran and Brazil. The names of these three countries are technically under a protective court order but have been reported widely in the press.<\/p>\n

\u201cI broke into numerous sites and handed over passwords and backdoors that enabled Sabu\u2014and by extension his FBI handlers\u2014to control these targets,\u201d Hammond said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t know how other information I provided to him may have been used, but I think the government\u2019s collection and use of this data needs to be investigated,\u201d he went on. \u201cThe government celebrates my conviction and imprisonment, hoping that it will close the door on the full story. I took responsibility for my actions, by pleading guilty, but when will the government be made to answer for its crimes?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe hypocrisy of \u2018law and order\u2019 and the injustices caused by capitalism cannot be cured by institutional reform but through civil disobedience and direct action,\u201d Hammond told the court. \u201cYes, I broke the law, but I believe that sometimes laws must be broken in order to make room for change.\u201d<\/p>\n

__________________________<\/p>\n

Chris Hedges spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas Morning News and The New York Times, for which he was a foreign correspondent for 15 years. Hedges was part of the team of reporters at The New York Times awarded a Pulitzer Prize in 2002 for the paper\u2019s coverage of global terrorism. He also received the Amnesty International Global Award for Human Rights Journalism in 2002. The Los Angeles Press Club honored Hedges\u2019 original columns in Truthdig by naming the author the Online Journalist of the Year in 2009 and again in 2011. The LAPC also granted him the Best Online Column award in 2010 for his Truthdig essay \u201cOne Day We\u2019ll All Be Terrorists<\/a>.\u201d Hedges is a senior fellow at The Nation Institute in New York City and has taught at Columbia University, New York University and Princeton University. He currently teaches inmates at a correctional facility in New Jersey.<\/i><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 truthdig.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I was in federal court in NYC on 15 Nov 2013 for the sentencing of Jeremy Hammond to 10 years in prison.\u201cThe hypocrisy of \u2018law and order\u2019 and the injustices caused by capitalism cannot be cured by institutional reform but through civil disobedience and direct action,\u201d Hammond told the court. \u201cYes, I broke the law, but I believe that sometimes laws must be broken in order to make room for change.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-activism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36665\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}